On World Music Day, Adnan Sami says 'whenever I display my love for India, it ignites the other side'
Though he started living in India in 2000, he continued to stay and work in Mumbai on a Pakistani passport, until he became an Indian citizen in December 2015. A 'proud Indian', composer-singer Adnan Sami doesn't mince his words when it comes to expressing his love for India, from posting a Tricolour in-ear after Operation Sindoor to taking trolls head-on when his allegiance for India is questioned. On World Music Day, he talks about being fearless, why he chose to make India his home, and more. Adnan Sami during the World Music Day interview
Whenever I display my passion and love for India, it ignites the other side. They can't take that. It's like, 'Say anything, but don't say that'. They don't seem to understand that when they talk about the love for their flag, their country, nobody will turn around and say that they are doing so to prove something. But when I do that for my India, they say, 'He's trying to show off and prove his loyalty'. Every countryman shows their love and allegiance for their country, what's the big deal in that? At least I am showing it for my country, in Pakistan, they show it for the Army. It's the only country in the world where the Army has got a country in it and not vice versa.
When you're born into a family of a certain faith or social status, it's not your choice, you inherit it. But when you convert and take to another religion, you do so because you study the philosophy of that belief and understand what it stands for. So, it's an informed decision. Making India my home didn't come on a platter. I could have become a German, British, Canadian or US citizen. I chose India because of conviction. And that's something Pakistan cannot stand. I too grew up amid the same propaganda in Pakistan, until I came and witnessed it myself. Now I know exactly how India is and how Pakistan is. If someone says I moved to India for money, I want to tell them that I left assets worth crores when I moved to India. When I stand at the airport in India and look at the flag, I tell myself: 'My kids better remember what their father went through to get that flag, because it's something that didn't come on a platter'. I live with those emotions. I have every right to love my country, my India. Not sparing trolls
Growing up, we were told that we should never blow our own trumpet and be humble. But now we are living in a time when everyone is marketing themselves: 'Maine yeh kar liya, maine woh kar liya'. Earlier, if I felt sharing my opinion on something would be slightly controversial, I would just stay quiet, because main jhooth nahin bol sakta. But log khamoshi ko meri kamzori samajhne lagey, unhe lagne laga, 'yeh to backfoot pe hai'. Hence, I started speaking the language people understand, because the trolls needed to be told off. India, the land of music
I went all over the world, but I never felt more at home with my existence and music than India. If I was a swimmer, India was my swimming pool. I wanted a place that could help my passion for music grow and you cannot deny that jitni mohabbat aur izzat music ko India mein di jaati hai, it's unparalleled. Wasn't it a miracle that as a public figure with a Pakistani passport, I could live here peaceful from 2000 to 2016, until I got my citizenship? Being fearless
People evolve. I realised a few years ago that the good old cliche that the truth will set you free is so apt that you don't have to worry about anything else. Hum poori zindagi darr ke rehne mein guzaar dete hain. But when you realise ki zindagi ka sabse bada khauf sirf maut hai, aapko aur kisi baat ka khauf nahin hona chahiye kyunki woh waqt upar waale ne tay kiya hua hai. Your destiny is written by the Almighty so why have the fear of anyone else? I have seen so much in life, so I don't care about the consequences. Moving to India - personal or work decision?
Personal. A lot of people separate their personal life from their profession. Music, to me, is my passion and has always been my personal space. It's never been a profession for me. I never look at the watch when it comes to music, the longest so far being 48 hours. I was like that back in my teenage and I am still the same. It's so beautiful that you make your livelihood out of something that's so much fun. I went all over the world, but I never felt more at home with my existence and music than India. If I was a swimmer, India was my swimming pool. I wanted a place that could help my passion for music grow and you cannot deny that joh mohabbat aur izzat music ko India mein di jaati hai, it's unparalleled. Wasn't it a miracle that as a public figure with a Pakistani passport, I could live here peacefull from 2000 to 2016, until I got my citizenship? When you started out, there was a section in the music fraternity that was not okay with 'outsiders'. Did you ever experience that outsider to insider transition?
Pakistani musicians such as Mehdi Haasan Khan, Farida Khanum, Ghulam Ali, Nushrat Fateh Ali Khan etc were working in India for many decades. But when I and some other Pakistani musicians (such as Atif Aslam, Rahat Fateh Ali Khan and Ali Zafar) came in the scene, there was a difference between them and me. I was living in India and working here, while they would come, work and leave. So this section that had an issue comprised artistes who were frustrated themselves and were barely working. They should have realised that India is such a big market for music, that people from across the world would want to try their hand here, and they should have been welcoming. But the reasons for not allowing Pakistani artistes to work in India now is absolutely valid. Art has been used in the past for the purpose of political indoctrination. There's nothing like art has no boundaries. No matter who you are, you belong somewhere. Otherwise artistes wouldn't have been issued passports! Is your daughter Medina also into music?
Yes, very much. She is 8 and plays the piano. I don't teach her. She has a teacher who comes in, as learning music needs a certain kind of discipline. She's also passionate about singing and writing poetry. How do you keep her guarded from all the negativity?
I always wanted to send her to a school where she could just be a herself, and was not seen as a celeb child. I want her to have a normal childhood. I try to keep her away from all the filmi things, because this is not the time for it. When I enter the house, I am just baba who makes her a sandwich. That's my way of keeping her guarded. Baaki sab upar waale ke haath mein hai. What's Asha Bhosle to you?
Asha ji is like a mother to me. My relationship with her is how a normal mother-son bond is. We love each other and we fight too. My respect for her as a human being and artiste is infinite. There's no one as brilliant and versatile as Asha ji. She's 91 and is still so magical. Lata Mangeshkar once said, 'Jo gaane main gaa sakti hoon, woh Asha gaa sakti hai. Par jo gaane Asha gaati hai, woh main nahin ga sakti'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
28 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Pakistan nominates Trump for Nobel Peace Prize, cites ‘pivotal' role during conflict with India
Pakistan announced on Saturday that it has nominated United States President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize 'in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership' during the recent conflict with India. 'The Government of Pakistan also acknowledges and greatly admires President Trump's sincere offers to help resolve the longstanding dispute of Jammu and Kashmir between India and Pakistan – an issue that lies at the heart of regional instability,' Islamabad stated in a social media post. It also described Trump as a 'genuine peacemaker'. The winner of the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize is expected to be announced in October 2026. Pakistan to recommend US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize 2026: Pakistan statement — Sidhant Sibal (@sidhant) June 21, 2025 Pakistan's announcement came days after Trump claimed that he deserved the Nobel Peace Prize for multiple global peace efforts, The Hindu reported. 'I should have gotten it four or five times,' the US president was quoted as saying by AP. 'They won't give me a Nobel Peace Prize because they only give it to liberals.' In a social media post on Saturday, Trump reiterated that he would never receive a Nobel Peace Prize, 'no matter what I do'. He also repeated his claim that he had helped 'stop the war' between India and Pakistan. New Delhi has rejected Trump's assertions. On Wednesday, New Delhi stated that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had told the US president that India will never accept mediation to resolve tensions with Pakistan. Trump was also told that New Delhi had agreed to the ceasefire only on Islamabad's request, said India's Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri. Hours after the statement, Trump hosted Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff, Field Marshal Asim Munir, at the White House. Speaking afterwards, Trump thanked both Munir and Modi for their roles in 'ending the war', and noted ongoing trade discussions with both countries, The Hindu reported. The tensions between New Delhi and Islamabad escalated on May 7 when the Indian military carried out strikes – codenamed Operation Sindoor – on what it claimed were terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The strikes were in response to the terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam, which killed 26 persons on April 22. The Pakistan Army retaliated to Indian strikes by repeatedly shelling Indian villages along the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir. At least 22 Indian civilians and eight defence personnel were killed. On May 10, India and Pakistan reached an 'understanding' to halt firing following a four-day conflict. New Delhi's announcement on the decision to stop military action had come minutes after Trump claimed on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to the ceasefire. However, India has said that the decision to stop firing was taken bilaterally and that there was no intervention by the US. The winner of the Nobel Peace Prize is selected by the Norwegian Nobel Committee. The five-member panel is appointed by the Norwegian Parliament. According to the Nobel Prize website, a nomination for the Peace Prize is valid if submitted by qualified individuals such as government officials, judges, professors, former laureates or members of recognised peace organisations. This includes 'members of national Assemblies and national governments of sovereign states as well as current heads of state'. Self-nominations are not accepted.
Indian Express
31 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Gave Amitabh Bachchan a Hollywood film's CD instead of a script when I went to sign him, recalls producer: ‘He asked what do I do with it?'
In the early 2000s, Amitabh Bachchan was successfully mounting a comeback in Bollywood after enduring a tough period in the 1990s. During this time, filmmakers in India had no qualms about remaking Hollywood films, even without buying any rights as the laws regarding these matters weren't strictly in place at the time. Keeping up with the trend, Big B was also offered the remake of a Hollywood film, but interestingly, without a script. The actor, who is often regarded as the greatest actor in the Indian film industry, was directly handed the CD of a Hollywood film and was told that they will Indianise it if he came on board, which, obviously, left the actor shell shocked. While appearing on Friday Talkies' YouTube channel, producer Bunty Walia spoke about the making of Ek Ajnabee, which was directed by Apoorva Lakhia, and also starred Arjun Rampal, and said that Lakhia decided to make this film after watching Denzel Washington-starrer Man on Fire. The duo thought that if they wanted to remake it, Amitabh would be the best man for the job. Right before this, Lakhia had made his Bollywood debut with Abhishek Bachchan-starrer Mumbai Se Aaya Mera Dost. Bunty recalled, 'I talked to Amitabh sir's secretary, Sheetal ji, and we fixed up a meeting with him. When I met with him, he asked me for the script, and I told him that we didn't have any script, and I handed him the CD of Man on Fire. I told him we were going to 'Indianise' it and then make a film.' Walia added that Amitabh was confused with what they were trying to do and asked him, 'What do I do with it?' His secretary was definitely not impressed by their level of readiness. 'I remember Sheetal ji looking at me like I was a fool. We didn't have a script or schedule for the film, and we were trying to sign him for the film. He gave us dates for many months later and told us straight that now it was our job to convince Amitabh sir to do the film.' ALSO READ: Bollywood's biggest hairstylist died penniless, family was left with 'nothing to eat' despite counting Bachchans, Kapoors as friends After borrowing money from his father and talking to the actor, Walia was able to sign him for the film, but even though the veteran actor had said yes to the project, he still had his reservations about playing an action hero. Walia talked about shooting in Bangkok and shared how Amitabh was curious to know why they signed him. 'We had some time on our hands, and Amitabh sir asked me, 'Why did you guys sign me? I am an old man.' I smirked and said, 'If you think you are old, then so many people from the industry should just retire'.' Amitabh's time shooting Ek Ajnabee was certainly eventful, as previously shared by Apoorva Lakhia during his appearance on Friday Talkies. The director shared that while roaming around Bangkok after shooting one day, Big B ended up going to a strip club called Exotic p****. 'I told him, 'Sir, this is Patpong; there are live shows here. If I take you, there will be riots. He said, 'No, we will go.' So, I said, Let's go.' Big B would make new plans every day after filming was over, and according to Lakhia, he would reach the set right on time, even if he had been clubbing the night before. Apart from Amitabh, the cast of the film also included Arjun Rampal, Rucha Vaidya, Perizad Zorabian, and Akhilendra Mishra. The movie it took inspiration from, Man on Fire, was directed by Tony Scott.
Mint
32 minutes ago
- Mint
Memes are changing how we talk IRL
It started as a joke. Rishabh Malik, 21, a college student from Rajasthan, mimicked a trending meme at a party. 'Only one friend got it—we ended up laughing, but the rest looked lost," he says. 'That's when I realised not everyone lives online like we do. Sometimes," he adds, 'meme references completely derail a conversation, leaving it fragmented or flat." Visha Agrawal, 23, a graphic designer from Ahmedabad, has experienced similar moments. 'I quoted a reel and then had to explain the entire backstory. It killed the moment," she says. For her, the problem runs deeper. 'People escalate everything into a debate, even trivial stuff like AI memes. No one knows when to stop." Manan Sharma, 22, who works in advertising in Mumbai, has observed digital language infiltrating professional spaces. 'I've had coworkers say things like 'LMAO' or 'XD' out loud in meetings. It feels robotic. Like we're performing the internet version of ourselves." As our online lives bleed into the real world, social media's logic—fast, curated, and often performative—is subtly reshaping how we speak, share and show up offline. Real-world communication is beginning to mirror social media: fast-paced, reaction-driven and curated for attention. Mumbai-based Rutu Mody Kamdar, founder of Jigsaw Brand Consultants, specialising in consumer research, behavioural insights and cultural strategy, explains how digital validation has altered behaviour beyond screens. 'While validation has always been part of human nature, what's changed in the social media age is the pace, scale, and structure of how it plays out," she says. Earlier, validation was shaped by real-time cues in a room—today, it's shaped by the logic of virality. 'People now narrate stories not just to connect, but to resonate, to land, to be remembered—often unconsciously mirroring the rhythm of a post." Kamdar notes a 'performative edge" creeping into everyday offline moments. 'People talk at dinner like they're writing a caption. The ability to sit with nuance is diminishing." Conversations are either hyper-verbal or awkwardly thin—emotions skimmed, not felt. This shift is particularly visible in Gen Z and younger millennials, who have grown up with their online and offline selves deeply enmeshed. According to Instagram's 2024 Trend Talk report, Indian Gen Z users increasingly seek day-in-the-life content and advice from creators, blurring the boundary between what's authentic and what's aspirational. In turn, their real lives begin to echo the curated tones of their digital personas. Empathy eroded Mumbai-based clinical psychologist and trauma therapist Rupa Chaubal observes this closely in her practice. 'Gen Z's worldview is largely shaped by what they consume online. Many turn to Google or social media before speaking to their parents," she says. 'They believe they already know enough, which reduces trust in human experience." This trust deficit doesn't just affect families—it impacts peer groups, workplaces, and romantic relationships. 'Empathy is eroding. I see clients reacting impulsively or resorting to harsh criticism in conflicts," Chaubal explains. 'An increasing sense of entitlement becomes a barrier while handling real-life disagreements." Even in therapy, online habits seep in. 'Some clients bring memes to explain how they feel rather than using their own words," she says. Others cite social media counterpoints as if trying to 'dethrone" the therapist. 'It becomes a battle of sources." Preeti D'Mello, founder of The Fulfillment Institute, a leadership coaching and organisational development institute, and an organisational psychologist based in Princeton, New Jersey, links this to an overdependence on digital validation. 'When affirmation comes from likes and shares, people start needing constant feedback. They struggle with patience, active listening, and empathy." She sees the result in both personal and professional settings. 'People are more reactive and less able to sit with opposing views. Civil discourse is declining." Is debate mode the default? Malik says that at his engineering college, juniors often approach conversations like Twitter threads. 'You say something and they come back with 'Um, actually…'—as if every interaction is a thread to win, not a discussion." This debate-mode mindset, driven by online norms like quote-tweeting and clapbacks, often leaves real-life interactions tense or exhausting. 'People forget they're not on a comment section," Sharma says. 'You can't just mute or block someone in person." Chaubal adds, 'Younger clients seem more interested in the 'intent' of communication than the content itself. They're restless, they lose interest if a conversation isn't stimulating—and they often struggle with eye contact or pauses." This inability to read or respond to non-verbal cues—especially among those raised during the peak of screen use during covid—further frays connection. 'It can lead to relationships that feel hollow or unstable." The offline resistance Yet, even in a hyper-connected world, people are beginning to carve out intentional spaces for offline connection—often without making a big show of it. A recent trend, especially among young urban dwellers, involves turning apartments into temporary cafés. Friends are invited over for coffee shop-style hangouts—no phones, no agendas, just in-person time. Others are organising monthly themed dinners, cooking together, or doing small group activities like zine-making or handmade balm workshops. The goal is to shift attention from passive scrolling to active, tactile engagement. The trend is catching on because it offers something digital life can't: slowness, unpredictability, and the intimacy of shared silence. As Kamdar puts it, 'We're not going back to a pre-internet world. The answer isn't retreat—it's integration." She encourages a return to values that shaped real-world connection: deep listening, genuine curiosity, presence without performance. While the idea of a digital detox is often floated, experts agree that simply going offline isn't enough. 'What's needed is conscious choice-making," says Chaubal. 'A digital habit that overrides impulse control can have psychological side effects—social withdrawal, irritability, anxiety." Her advice: choose fewer platforms, set realistic time limits, and engage in real conversations—even if they're awkward or slow. 'It's about re-learning how to be human, without the filter of a screen," she says. D'Mello agrees: 'True social intelligence is built sitting around a dinner table, navigating pauses, and learning to read a room's unspoken needs." The internet has given us incredible tools—community, expression, visibility–but it's worth asking what we might be losing in the process. A long walk with a friend. A screen-free dinner. A quiet moment that isn't uploaded. Maybe the most radical thing we can do is simply show up, fully. Anoushka Madan is a Mumbai-based freelance lifestyle writer. She posts @noushontheinternet.
