Court ruling favours Australia's Bega Cheese in dairy giant Fonterra's trademark dispute
(Reuters) - Australia's Bega Cheese said on Monday that the Supreme Court of New South Wales has dismissed a case filed by Fonterra over trademark licensing agreements and the New Zealand dairy firm's divestment plan.
Last November, Fonterra's Australian units initiated proceedings against Bega Cheese, seeking a ruling that Fonterra's divestment proposal would not impact the existing trademark license agreements with the Australian cheese producer, with room for changing certain control clauses within them.
Bega Cheese and Fonterra are linked through trademark license agreements, allowing Fonterra to use Bega's trademarks on specific dairy products like cheese and butter.
In February, Fonterra said it will engage with potential buyers for its global consumer business and integrated businesses, which could include a sale and initial public offering.
The ruling may potentially delay Fonterra's proposed divestiture, including the sale of its Oceania unit, as it could complicate the potential changes to the licence deal between the two firms."We hope to work constructively with Fonterra Group on the sale of its Oceania businesses of which Bega Group is a natural acquirer and remains very interested in," Barry Irvin, executive chairman of Bega Group, said.
Shares of Bega Cheese gained as much as 1.9%, the highest in a month.
(Reporting by Kumar Tanishk in Bengaluru; Editing by Sonia Cheema)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Casino giant slapped down in latest poker machine bid
Australia's largest casino group will not be permitted to run pokies as fallout continues from a damning report into a major poker machine regulator. NSW Premier Chris Minns on Friday ruled out moving legislation to allow Crown's Sydney casino to install poker machines. It followed reports the gaming giant was lobbying MPs to overcome the legal obstacle as their licence does not permit pokies. "This is a legislative imposition that's been put in place in the state for over a decade," the premier said. "It would require a bill, presumably, from the government, to knock over that restriction, and I'm not going to do it." The government did not indicate its position if a non-government MP tried to move legislation supporting Crown's position. But there is no suggestion any MP would make that move. Independent Sydney MP Alex Greenwich said allowing pokies in Crown's waterfront casino at Barangaroo would betray the community's agreement to give away public land for a restricted gaming facility without poker machines. Gaming tables at the towering complex opened a year late in 2022 after an inquiry found Crown was not fit to operate a casino, forcing it into three years of remediation. "With gambling harm on the rise, we need less venues with large poker machine floors, not new ones right on the harbour," Mr Greenwich said. He referenced a NSW auditor-general report released on Thursday that found regulators were failing in harm-minimisation efforts. The report also found licence conditions were not being pro-actively reviewed and little was done to force pokie venues to take meaningful actions when problem gambling was noticed. Poker machine numbers have increased under the state Labor government, with NSW having half of all Australian pokies in 2022/23. Profits from the machines hit all-time highs of $8.4 billion in the 2023/24 financial year. That delivered $2.3 billion in tax revenue, a figure tipped to hit $2.9 billion by 2027/28. Gambling reform advocates found the report unsurprising and lamented government inaction in the reform space. An independent panel in 2024 recommended mandatory cashless gaming be introduced state-wide, but the government has not followed through. "This inaction privileges the special pleading of a harmful and predatory industry over and above the health and wellbeing of the people of NSW," Wesley Mission chief executive Reverend Stu Cameron said. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-Trend hedge funds struggle as more nimble macro funds embrace whipsawing markets
By Nell Mackenzie LONDON (Reuters) -Hedge fund returns so far this year show a stark divide between those that have been able to navigate U.S. President Donald Trump's erratic decision making and switch tactics quickly and those hemmed in by algorithmic strategies. Systematic hedge funds, whose algorithms ride market trends until they peter out, are down over 11% so far this year to end-May, according to a Societe Generale client note seen by Reuters this week. Global funds such as Systematica, Transtrend and Aspect Capital - between them managing almost $30 billion - run strategies that are down around 18.5%, 16.3% and 15% respectively, according to Transtrend's website and two sources close to the matter. The funds declined to comment. In contrast, hedge funds that use their discretion on the timing of trades and the asset classes they choose were up almost 7% by the end of May, data from hedge fund research firm PivotalPath shows. "Trend funds have been whipsawed and haven't been able to latch on to any consistent trend," said PivotalPath's head of manager relations, Gwyn Roberts. "Every time trend funds have begun to latch on to a market move this year, it has changed." The broadest index of European stocks gained around 10% from the start of the year to February 28 before falling by 20% over two weeks from March 25, a period that included Trump's April 2 Liberation Day tariff announcement. U.S. stocks trod a similar rocky path. The "worst" positions causing negative returns for trend funds included U.S. Treasuries, the Australian dollar, Japanese government bonds and in May, coffee, SocGen's report said. However, the dispersion between the two types of hedge funds has narrowed since April as markets swung back again. MACRO UP Discretionary macro hedge funds have achieved broadly positive returns over the first five months of the year. Rokos Capital Management, with $22 billion in assets, had returned 9.5%, according one source, with EDL Capital up 24%, according to a second. Brevan Howard's Alpha Strategies was up 4.32%, although its flagship fund is down 2.12%, said a third source. Macro traders in general have averaged an 8.5% annual return while managed futures traders, which include trend funds, have averaged a 7.2% annual return since PivotalPath began collecting data in 1998, with discretionary macro traders increasing that to an average of 9.6% since 2001. "Managed futures tend to be used in investor portfolios as a defensive allocation, which performs well when other strategies struggle," said PivotalPath's Roberts. Some large hedge funds have both macro and trend funds, which buffer each other. Man Group's systematic AHL Alpha Programme is down 10.6% for the year but its multi-strategy fund is up around 5.4%, according to the hedge fund's website. AQR Capital Management, which oversees $135 billion, posted a 10.6% return in its multi-strategy Apex fund to end-May. Bucking the trend, its Helix alternative trend strategy was also up, by 7%, although flat last month as it contended with reversals across interest rate swaps and yield curves. An almost 9% return in Graham Capital Management's Multi-Alpha Opportunity fund this year offset an 8.7% fall in its Tactical Trend fund, according to SocGen. Graham declined to comment on the results, but the founder of the $20 billion hedge fund, Ken Tropin, told Reuters that when trends "reverse violently", it "generally hasn't paid to overreact and deviate from trading models that have historically performed well in a variety of market cycles". In a note to clients, Adam Singleton, CIO of Solutions at Man Group, said May was a mixed month for discretionary macro strategies, adding that positions betting on a rise in stocks, the euro and the yen boosted performance while certain relative fixed income trades had hurt some. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-Trend hedge funds struggle as more nimble macro funds embrace whipsawing markets
By Nell Mackenzie LONDON (Reuters) -Hedge fund returns so far this year show a stark divide between those that have been able to navigate U.S. President Donald Trump's erratic decision making and switch tactics quickly and those hemmed in by algorithmic strategies. Systematic hedge funds, whose algorithms ride market trends until they peter out, are down over 11% so far this year to end-May, according to a Societe Generale client note seen by Reuters this week. Global funds such as Systematica, Transtrend and Aspect Capital - between them managing almost $30 billion - run strategies that are down around 18.5%, 16.3% and 15% respectively, according to Transtrend's website and two sources close to the matter. The funds declined to comment. In contrast, hedge funds that use their discretion on the timing of trades and the asset classes they choose were up almost 7% by the end of May, data from hedge fund research firm PivotalPath shows. "Trend funds have been whipsawed and haven't been able to latch on to any consistent trend," said PivotalPath's head of manager relations, Gwyn Roberts. "Every time trend funds have begun to latch on to a market move this year, it has changed." The broadest index of European stocks gained around 10% from the start of the year to February 28 before falling by 20% over two weeks from March 25, a period that included Trump's April 2 Liberation Day tariff announcement. U.S. stocks trod a similar rocky path. The "worst" positions causing negative returns for trend funds included U.S. Treasuries, the Australian dollar, Japanese government bonds and in May, coffee, SocGen's report said. However, the dispersion between the two types of hedge funds has narrowed since April as markets swung back again. MACRO UP Discretionary macro hedge funds have achieved broadly positive returns over the first five months of the year. Rokos Capital Management, with $22 billion in assets, had returned 9.5%, according one source, with EDL Capital up 24%, according to a second. Brevan Howard's Alpha Strategies was up 4.32%, although its flagship fund is down 2.12%, said a third source. Macro traders in general have averaged an 8.5% annual return while managed futures traders, which include trend funds, have averaged a 7.2% annual return since PivotalPath began collecting data in 1998, with discretionary macro traders increasing that to an average of 9.6% since 2001. "Managed futures tend to be used in investor portfolios as a defensive allocation, which performs well when other strategies struggle," said PivotalPath's Roberts. Some large hedge funds have both macro and trend funds, which buffer each other. Man Group's systematic AHL Alpha Programme is down 10.6% for the year but its multi-strategy fund is up around 5.4%, according to the hedge fund's website. AQR Capital Management, which oversees $135 billion, posted a 10.6% return in its multi-strategy Apex fund to end-May. Bucking the trend, its Helix alternative trend strategy was also up, by 7%, although flat last month as it contended with reversals across interest rate swaps and yield curves. An almost 9% return in Graham Capital Management's Multi-Alpha Opportunity fund this year offset an 8.7% fall in its Tactical Trend fund, according to SocGen. Graham declined to comment on the results, but the founder of the $20 billion hedge fund, Ken Tropin, told Reuters that when trends "reverse violently", it "generally hasn't paid to overreact and deviate from trading models that have historically performed well in a variety of market cycles". In a note to clients, Adam Singleton, CIO of Solutions at Man Group, said May was a mixed month for discretionary macro strategies, adding that positions betting on a rise in stocks, the euro and the yen boosted performance while certain relative fixed income trades had hurt some. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
