Cops pledge 'it won't happen again' after Nazi gender storm
Police chiefs have been accused of 'pandering' to 'fringe activists' after backtracking on comments comparing gender-critical campaigners to Nazis.
Top brass insisted the internal document drawing the 'Nazi' analogy was 'immediately withdrawn' and measures had been put in place to 'ensure it does not happen again'.
The Mail revealed last month that officers were told ' gender binary' – the belief that there are only two genders – was a 'key feature' of the Nazis' ideology.
It is understood the document was written by a police officer or member of civilian staff with responsibility for liaising with gay and transgender employees.
Last night, Scottish Tory equalities spokesman Tess White said: 'It's disgusting such outrageous language made it into an official Police Scotland document.
'Claiming additional governance has been put in place now is no comfort to those who were smeared for standing up for basic common sense.
'SNP ministers need to get a grip and stop public bodies pandering to fringe gender activists who keep pushing self-ID.' Ms White wrote to Police Scotland demanding an explanation after the Mail disclosed the 'Nazi' document.
In his reply, Assistant Chief Constable Mark Sutherland said: 'I can confirm this document was immediately withdrawn from circulation and does not represent the views of Police Scotland.
'Police Scotland drives continual cultural improvement through engagement with diverse communities to ensure we tackle discriminatory behaviours.
'Additional governance has been put in place prior to the circulation and internal publication of documents. When required, this also includes consultation with the Police Scotland equality and diversity unit.
'I trust this provides you with reassurance that this matter was quickly addressed and measures put in place to ensure that it does not happen again.'
The document at the centre of the row – which mirrors material from controversial LGBT group Stonewall – focused on last month's 'Trans+ History Week'.
It states: 'This week was founded in recognition of the anniversary of the Nazi raid on the world's first ever trans clinic in 1933.
'Books were burned as part of the Nazis' targeting of queer communities. Gender binary was a key feature of the Nazi racist policies.
'Right now, the gender critical movement has a strong voice. Is this movement an echo of past hostilities and does it mean we have failed to understand the lessons from history?'
Last month former Police Scotland superintendent Martin Gallagher said: 'This is what happens when the police get involved in contested political issues.
'Police neutrality existed for a reason – the sooner it returns the better.'
Dr Stuart Waiton, a sociologist at Abertay University in Dundee, said: 'Transgender activists are inclined to use hyperbolic statements.
'This one that attempts to associate today's gender critics with Nazi Germany is a particularly embarrassing example.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
35 minutes ago
- The Independent
Martin Lewis shares important council tax payment update on live TV
Martin Lewis announced that the government is launching a consultation into council tax payments, which will affect over three million people. The Money Saving Expert founder criticised the current council tax debt collection process as "so rapid and aggressive it would make banks blush". Mr Lewis said that forcing individuals to pay for a year when they cannot afford a month is "destroying lives". The consultation will consider slowing down the debt collection process to allow people more time to pay before further action is taken. Watch the video in full above.
Sky News
36 minutes ago
- Sky News
Eight men arrested near Iranian embassy in London after 'altercation at protest'
Eight men have been arrested near the Iranian embassy in London after a protest turned violent, police have said. Seven men were detained on suspicion of grievous bodily harm just before 10am on Friday. Separately, a man has been arrested on suspicion of breaching an order imposed by police to prevent serious disorder. "Two men were treated for injuries at the scene and have been taken to hospital for further treatment by the London Ambulance Service," said the Metropolitan Police. The Met Police also confirmed their injuries are not believed to be life-threatening. In a statement, police added: "Conditions have since been put in place to prevent serious disorder. This stops protestors from gathering in the area until 13:00pm on Sunday 22 June. "One man has been taken into police custody after he was arrested on suspicion of breaching the above conditions. "Seven other men remain in police custody after being arrested on suspicion of grievous bodily harm." The Met Police, who were called to the incident at 09.53am, confirmed the altercation took place on Prince's Gate, which is where the embassy is located. No further details have been released about the injured men, although the London Ambulance Service (LAS) said they were treated at the scene before one was taken to a major trauma centre and the other to hospital. An LAS spokesperson said: "We sent a number of resources to the scene including ambulance crews, paramedics in fast response cars and our Tactical Response Unit." It is not clear how the violence developed or what the demonstration was about, but initial reports suggested it centred around a protest against the Iranian leadership. The Iranian embassy has previously been the target of protests which have turned violent. In September 2022, demonstrators and police clashed outside the building in Knightsbridge. The protest was focused against the Iranian regime after the death of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini in police custody. The Met Police said five officers were seriously injured and 12 people were arrested in those scuffles. A year later, in September 2023, another rally was held in the same area to mark the first anniversary of Ms Amini's death. A number of national embassies are located on or near Prince's Gate, including those for the UAE, Afghanistan, Ethiopia and Tunisia. Separately, the UK said on Friday it was temporarily withdrawing UK staff from its embassy in Iran due to the ongoing security situation there.
Telegraph
39 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Jenrick: Grooming gang members must face automatic life sentences
Child sexual groomers must face automatic life sentences and should be barred from big discounts on their sentences if they plead guilty, Robert Jenrick has said. Setting out his party's policy in the wake of the Baroness Casey review, the shadow justice secretary said it should be 'the norm' for anyone convicted of a rape or sexual offence involving child grooming to face a life sentence. He said they should also serve consecutive terms where there are multiple victims, instead of the common current practice where the sentences run concurrently. This would mean that a man handed three separate terms of 10 years for rape would have to serve 30 years. Mr Jenrick also proposed that child sexual groomers should be barred from eligibility for a third off their sentence if they plead guilty at their first court hearing, as is currently the case under the discount scheme. The decades-old system is designed to encourage early guilty pleas, which can spare victims the trauma of appearing before a court and also speed up justice. The Tories are also proposing to review overall discounts where a guilty plea earns a quarter off the sentence if entered after the first hearing but before the trial starts. Offenders can also get a tenth off if they plead guilty when the trial begins. Mr Jenrick said: 'There should be no guilty plea discounts for organised sexual exploitation. The privilege should stay only for low-level, non-violent crime where victims genuinely avoid court.' As part of the proposed policy, he said dual nationals convicted of child exploitation should be stripped of their British citizenship and foreign nationals should be deported the 'moment their sentence ends'. Loophole exploited The Home Office has taken such action against two of the ringleaders of the Rochdale grooming gang scandal, Qari Abdul Rauf, a 55-year-old father of five, and Adil Khan, 54, who were jailed in 2012 for their part in raping or sexually assaulting 47 girls, including some as young as 12. But the pair have exploited a loophole by also renouncing their Pakistani citizenship, which has led to a stalemate, with Pakistan refusing to take them back as it no longer recognises them as citizens. Tory sources said they would investigate whether they could close the loophole and would also review the lower tariff discounts to sentences for serious offenders such as child sex groomers. The moves follow low sentences issued to groomers such as Sohail Zaffer, 41, who was jailed for just three years and six months for raping a child, and Manzon Akhtar, imprisoned for four and a half years, also for raping a child. Mr Jenrick said: 'These men have been sentenced but not punished. They are already back out walking the same streets as their victims. 'These were some of the few who were convicted. The Telford inquiry found that more than 1,000 girls were raped and abused, yet just 10 men have been convicted for their crimes.' He said that even when they were prosecuted, serious flaws in the criminal justice system meant that they did not get the longer sentences merited by their crimes. 'Tactical giveaway' 'First, many rape gang trials happened more than 20 years after the abuse. Under Article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights, judges are forbidden from imposing a harsher penalty than was available at the time of the crime,' he added. 'In the 1990s, indecent assault on a child carried a 10-year cap, not life – so the court's hands were tied, even when the same act today would attract a life tariff. 'Second are discounts. A rapist who pleads guilty at the first hearing is automatically given up to a third off their sentence. The rule was meant to spare victims from cross-examination. In grooming gang cases, it's become a tactical giveaway – the damage is done, victims still relive the abuse in court statements and the perpetrator bags a shorter stretch. 'For group child rape that trade off simply isn't defensible, not least for victims who have waited decades for justice. 'Third is the totality rule: when an offender faces many counts, judges, as bound by the Sentencing Council, must make the overall term 'just and proportionate'. They therefore run most sentences concurrently. 'Mohammed Din was convicted of 11 rapes, each worth well into double digits, but received 14 years in total because the terms all overlap. That's barely a year per rape. 'The result? Derisory jail terms that insult survivors, embolden predators and shred public confidence in justice.'
