Newly released polls: Most in NC oppose repealing permit requirement for carrying concealed handguns
A 7-year-old boy picks up a handgun during the 2022 National Rifle Association annual convention in Houston. The number of firearm deaths among children and teens in the United States have jumped 50% since 2019. ()
A significant majority of North Carolina residents oppose laws that would allow people to carry concealed handguns without a permit, according to polls released in recent days by Elon University and the advocacy group Everytown for Gun Safety.
Though it was conducted several months ago, the Everytown for Gun Safety survey, released Wednesday, found that a large majority of likely North Carolina voters (77%) were against removing permit requirements from concealed carry laws.
Global Strategy Group conducted a survey of 800 likely voters in North Carolina between September 4 and September 9, 2024 for Everytown for Gun Safety. The poll had a margin of error of +/- 3.5%.
The Elon University poll, released last Thursday, found that 54% of respondents opposed dropping the concealed carry permit while only 34% support such a change.
The Elon poll was conducted March 3 through 11, 2025, with a sample of 800 North Carolina adults and a margin of error of +/- 4.04%.
Poll director Prof. Jason Husser told NC Newsline he found it particularly noteworthy that a large percentage of Republicans had concerns about permitless carry and that less than half (48%) favor removing the requirement. While he noted that the survey did not explore the question in depth, Husser opined that 'many of the Republicans who have these permits feel like it was not that invasive or intrusive to have the process — they already went through it, and don't really see a need to change it.'
The analyses come as state legislators are debating Senate Bill 50 and House Bill 5, two measures aiming to enact what supporters call 'constitutional carry' — the idea that individuals should be able to carry concealed weapons without permits due to their Second Amendment rights.
Current North Carolina law requires individuals to obtain a permit from their local sheriff's office and undergo an eight-hour training course in order to carry a concealed firearm.
In addition to the bulk of North Carolinians opposing permitless carry, the Everytown polling found that 66% of gun owners did as well.
85% of women are against permitless carry, as are 66% of men, the Everytown survey found.
There was a similar trend when considering political party. 96% of Democrats, 77% of independents, and 60% of Republicans oppose permitless carry, according to the Everytown poll.
In each category surveyed across partisan, gender, racial, and education groups, more people were against permitless carry than in support.
'The data couldn't be clearer — North Carolinians don't want to live in a state where untrained, potentially dangerous individuals can carry hidden guns in our communities. This isn't just a policy issue; it's a matter of public safety,' said Wendy Brooks, a volunteer with the North Carolina chapter of Moms Demand Action, Everytown Survivor Fellow, and gun owner.
At the North Carolina state legislature, Senate Bill 50 passed the Senate on March 20 and is now in the House, while House Bill 5 awaits approval from another committee in the lower chamber.
On Tuesday, the House Judiciary 2 Committee approved House Bill 193, a measure that would allow handguns in private schools.
'If North Carolina lawmakers truly want to represent their constituents, including gun owners and Republicans, they should reject this reckless attempt to dismantle the concealed carry permitting system and instead focus on real solutions that will keep communities safe,' said Angela Ferrell-Zabala, executive director of Moms Demand Action.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House Narrowly Passes DOGE Cuts After Flipping Two Holdout Republicans
House Republicans secured a 214-212 vote to advance the 'DOGE cuts' package that includes $9.3 billion in cuts to foreign aid and public media. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tensions rising in GOP over Trump border plan as Rand Paul squares off with Stephen Miller
A bitter feud is escalating between Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Donald Trump's top border official, injecting uncertainty into Congress's attempt to pass the administration's signature policy bill this month. Key Trump adviser Stephen Miller came to Capitol Hill to meet with Senate Republicans on Thursday to resolve a major issue over the bill's border security provisions – which Paul opposes. Paul and Miller have been locked in a dispute for days over the border funding. The White House is seeking $150 billion in funds for border security and deportation. But Paul – who has repeatedly lashed out against the price tag of Trump's bill – wants to dramatically cut down that funding. Now, that tension between the two key GOP figures is spilling into the open. Paul is taking swipes at Miller to reporters on Capitol Hill, attacking Miller for his recent comments about the administration looking at suspending habeas corpus and then suggesting on Wednesday that Miller himself was the reason he was uninvited from a White House picnic. Trump has since personally asked him and his family to attend the Thursday event, the senator said. Miller, meanwhile, has been firing off social media posts at the Kentucky senator, accusing him of, for instance, trying to cut funding for border security amid the Los Angeles riots. 'They want to quiet me down, and it hasn't worked, and so they're going to try to attack me. They're going to try to destroy me in other ways, and then do petty little things like social occasions or whatever. But you know, it probably will not work. It probably will not make me cow down or bend over,' Paul told CNN on Wednesday, after saying he was disinvited from the White House picnic. Asked if he was talking about Miller, Paul nodded. Paul's strong push to limit Trump's border security cash puts him mostly on an island among Hill Republicans, according to one person familiar with the talks, though other GOP senators pressed Miller about specific funding accounts in a meeting earlier Thursday. And the back-and-forth has frustrated some of their fellow GOP senators. Oklahoma Sen. Markwayne Mullin said Miller 'did a good job' answering GOP senators' questions on Thursday about border wall money, but he added some Republicans 'were upset' or 'just didn't want to hear it.' 'I mean, Rand Paul's solution is cut everything in half and call it good. Yeah, that's not real budgeting,' Mullin added. Paul, however, has defended his stance, insisting that the White House needs to justify its funding request, especially since it was made before Trump came into office. And he specifically called out a certain GOP senator whom he accused of being a fiscal hawk only when 'convenient.' 'Senator Graham wants to make sure the president gets exactly what he wants. He's a rubber stamp, and I am a believer that we are acting fiscally responsible at every level of government, across government, and that you can't just sort of be fiscally conservative when it's convenient, when it comes to the border,' Paul told reporters Thursday. Paul did not attend Miller's visit to Senate Republicans on Thursday, citing a conflicting committee meeting. Even so, the meeting at times grew contentious over the president's plans to spend billions on the border. Florida Sen. Rick Scott, offering a defense of his GOP colleagues, said those Republicans were interested in more specifics about how the border money would be spent. 'I think what everybody was pushing back is we want more detail. I know exactly how the money is going to be spent. It's not, has nothing to do with whether we support him,' Scott said. One of those probing Miller on the border funding was GOP Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, another fiscal hawk who has been working to make sure Trump's pricey tax breaks don't add to the deficit. 'The numbers didn't quite add up,' Johnson later told reporters of his questions to Miller. 'He did a really good job of explaining why it is going to be more expensive, but then just how difficult it is going to be to create the beds and the expense of that.' 'There was just some basic numbers that we weren't aware of. We didn't have the math. We didn't have their calculation. I think he was a little blindsided from that standpoint.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Republicans, including Sen. Lee, push to rein in D.C. sanctuary policies as anti-ICE protests heat up
WASHINGTON — A local law preventing D.C. police from cooperating with Immigration and Customs Enforcement on deportations could be overturned as congressional Republicans seek to rein in sanctuary city policies nationwide. The House passed the District of Columbia Federal Immigration Compliance Act on Thursday, seeking to end sanctuary policies that block D.C. police from assisting ICE with arrests and bans. The bill would also overturn local laws prohibiting city officials from releasing detained individuals to ICE or allowing ICE to interview a suspect in D.C. custody without a judicial order. 'My bill requires the District of Columbia to comply with federal immigration law. What's wrong with that?' Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., who led the bill, said in a floor speech on Wednesday. 'We shouldn't have to bring this to the floor. We shouldn't have to explain these things. But we are going to ... require that our nation's capital comply with our nation's federal law.' The bill was introduced in early March, but its passage comes as immigration law enforcement and sanctuary city policies have become a political flashpoint in recent days. Protests and riots broke out in Los Angeles last weekend after ICE agents carried out raids in several locations across the city, prompting outrage from city residents. Although protests began peacefully, several turned violent after local law enforcement was called in to help quell the crowds. The protests have since spread across the country, and Republicans have renewed their calls to crack down on sanctuary city policies by urging stricter enforcement of immigration policies. 'It's sad that Gov. Newsom and Mayor Bass decided it was more important to refuse cooperation with ICE and posture against President Trump than make LA safe,' Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, told the Deseret News in a statement. 'I hope other blue states and cities avoid this mess by complying with federal immigration law and not tolerating any rioting or violence.' Lee has been at the forefront of reining in the D.C. government, hoping to reassert congressional authority over the nation's capital. Lee has consistently introduced legislation that would end the city's autonomy and has also promoted the BOWSER Act — ironically named after the city's mayor — to reclaim authority over the city's public safety. 'I'm glad that the House of Representatives is considering the District of Columbia Federal Immigration Compliance Act, so that our nation's capital can set a better example,' Lee said. 'The D.C. Council has proven itself incapable of keeping the city safe, and my BOWSER Act handing the reins back to Congress is our best bet to restore dignity and order to Washington.' Republicans have pushed for years to claw back D.C.'s autonomy by overturning the Home Rule Act. Despite not being a state, Washington is permitted to operate as an independent city government under the D.C. Home Rule Act. However, local laws are still subject to congressional approval before they can take effect, occasionally setting up showdowns between Congress and local lawmakers. Rep. Andrew Clyde, R-Ga., has been a leading voice on that issue in the House, successfully passing a bill in 2022 that would repeal the amended criminal code for the district that he argued was too soft on crime. That bill passed both chambers of Congress despite Democratic control of the Senate and was eventually signed by former President Joe Biden. President Donald Trump has expressed support for reining in D.C.'s local control, paving the way for Republicans to use their GOP trifecta in Washington to do so. 'I remain committed to reforming the unconstitutional and failed experiment of D.C. Home Rule,' Clyde told the Deseret News in a statement. 'Our nation's capital city is still in dire need of strong leadership and commonsense policies. Congress must continue using its constitutional authority over Washington's affairs to ensure America's capital city is a safe and prosperous place for years to come.' The bill now heads to the Senate, where it will require at least seven Democrats to buck party lines to support the measure. However, Democrats have supported bills to rein in the D.C. government before — and 11 Democrats in the House voted in favor of the bill on Thursday.
