Electric cars became a major headache for Israel amid its conflict with Iran
A general view shows the city of Haifa and its port. (AFP)
Notify me
The Israel-Iran conflict has caused significant destruction on both sides. With hundreds of missiles and drones flying from both sides and attacking each other, it has become a major conflict zone and headache for the rest of the world as well. The Israeli authorities are very much concerned about electric cars parked at the country's ports and other infrastructure.
The Maritime Executive has reported that Israeli officials urged companies to prepare to move out electric vehicles from the ports. Authorities are reportedly afraid of a massive EV fire, which could be sparked by an Iranian missile attack. The officials reportedly asked the companies to relocate the vehicles to open lots, away from the country's critical infrastructure.
The report has stated that in order to prepare for further escalation of the conflict with Iran, Israel's Administration of Shipping and Ports has ordered car importers in the country to prepare to evacuate all electric vehicles from the country's seaports. The report further added that authorities want electric vehicles out of key ports such as Haifa and Ashdod. The Port of Haifa is the busiest port in Israel. Nearly 20 million tons of cargo pass through the port every year, which makes it an attractive target for Iran. Why Israel wants EVs out of ports?
Electric vehicle fires have been known as notoriously hard to extinguish due to the intensity of the fire. Over the last one decade, several EV fire incidents across the world have been reported, which have involved major injuries as well as death. While electric vehicles catching fire is not common, and the EV battery is less vulnerable to thermal incidents compared to fossil fuels like petrol and diesel, once an electric vehicle catches fire, it is nearly impossible to extinguish. The EV batteries emit immense heat during a thermal incident, which increases the intensity of the fire significantly.
With hundreds of electric vehicles parked at the ports, a missile strike could result in a devastating fire incident. This concern has prompted the Israeli authorities to order the car importers in the country to move the EVs out of the ports.
Get insights into Upcoming Cars In India, Electric Vehicles, Upcoming Bikes in India and cutting-edge technology transforming the automotive landscape.
First Published Date: 24 Jun 2025, 09:14 AM IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
24 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Mark Zuckerberg is writing to top AI talent, offering ₹860 crore pay packages: report
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has spent the last few months personally reaching out to the smartest AI minds and offering them as much as $100 million or ₹ 860 crore, in an attempt to catch up in the artificial intelligence race, a report by the Wall Street Journal said. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is personally reaching out to hundreds of researchers, scientists, engineers and entrepreneurs.(AFP) The tech leader is personally reaching out to hundreds of researchers, scientists, engineers and entrepreneurs to convince them to join his new Superintelligence lab. Zuckerberg is willing to shell out hundreds of millions of dollars to onboard these people, making them some of the most expensive hires in the industry. Apart from offering $100 million packages to some people, he has also spent $14 billion for a stake in AI startup Scale and its CEO Alexandr Wang, who is slated to run his new AI team. The 28-year-old is now one of the most lucrative hires in history of the tech industry. The report claimed that Zuckerberg has also connected with Aravind Srinivas, a co-founder of Indian origin, and offered to buy Perplexity, an AI search startup. The Meta CEO has also reached out to OpenAI employees, including co-founder Ilya Sutskever, but Sam Altman claims that none of his best people have decided to go with him. Zuckerberg's hands on approach The messages directly from Zuckerberg have surprised people, some of whom did not believe it was really the Meta CEO reaching out to them and ended up not responding to the emails they considered hoaxes. Those who have turned him down have claimed his vague concept of a "superintelligence" achieving a team of 50 lacks a specific enough execution plan. However, Zuckerberg has taken a hands-on approach to recruiting top AI researchers, believing it's where he can have the greatest impact at Meta. After convincing candidates that the outreach is genuinely from him, he often hosts them at his homes in Palo Alto or Lake Tahoe. He stays involved throughout the hiring process, even planning where they'll sit.
Mint
31 minutes ago
- Mint
Expert view: Nifty may deliver single-digit returns in CY25; positive on pharma, private banks, says SAMCO MF CIO
Expert view on markets: Umeshkumar Mehta, CIO of SAMCO Mutual Fund, expects no significant positive surprises on the earnings front, which may keep market momentum in check. Talking to Mint, Mehta shared his views on the Indian stock market, key challenges and the sector he is positive about. Here are the edited excerpts of the interview: We expect benchmark indices to deliver single-digit growth for the year. The modest performance of the Nifty 50 in the first half was largely driven by a slowdown in corporate earnings. Looking ahead to the second half, we do not foresee any significant positive surprises on the earnings front, which may keep market momentum in check. Adding to the subdued outlook is the overhang of geopolitical uncertainty, particularly the Iran-Israel conflict. The duration of this conflict remains unpredictable, but its prolonged continuation could have broader implications. Iran, being one of the world's largest producers and suppliers of oil and gas, plays a critical role in the global energy ecosystem. Any sustained disruption in this region could lead to volatility in crude oil prices, with potential ripple effects across the global economy. Currently, the Indian stock market is navigating several obstacles: Geopolitical instability, particularly the escalating tensions in the Middle East involving Iran and Israel, continues to weigh on investor sentiment. Additionally, the deadline for the three-month extension of the tariffs is approaching fast, adding to global trade-related uncertainty, which could have ripple effects. Domestically, there are segments within the small and mid-cap segments where valuations are a matter of concern. Despite headwinds, India stands out for its macroeconomic resilience. This is characterised by resilient domestic demand, stable inflation and a policy environment. Investors with a long-term horizon should use corrections as an opportunity to accumulate rather than waiting for complete clarity, which may never fully arrive. The pharmaceutical sector continues to present compelling opportunities for investors, supported by a mix of strong domestic fundamentals and favourable global dynamics. In the current geopolitical climate, the China+1 strategy has gained further momentum as global companies look to diversify their supply chains away from China. This shift places India in a strategic position, given its established leadership in generic drug manufacturing, robust R&D capabilities, and cost-effective production processes. With a reputation for producing high-quality medicines at globally competitive prices, India's pharma industry is well-positioned to play an even more critical role in global healthcare. Domestically, rising healthcare awareness, increased government spending, and growing demand for affordable medicines are additional tailwinds that strengthen the sector's long-term growth prospects. Private sector banks have witnessed a rally in recent weeks, yet they continue to offer valuation comfort relative to other segments of the market. Their strong fundamentals, healthy balance sheets, and improving credit growth outlook position them well for sustained performance. The recent RBI rate cut further enhances their prospects by reducing funding costs and potentially boosting loan demand, making the sector an attractive option for investors seeking both stability and growth. On the consumption front, while overall demand has been somewhat subdued, early signs of recovery are visible, particularly in rural areas. The tax cuts announced in the February Union Budget are gradually starting to benefit middle-class households and small businesses, translating into higher disposable income. As spending picks up, sectors such as FMCG, travel, apparel, and restaurants are likely to see increased traction, offering strong long-term potential for investors riding India's consumption wave. In India, after implementing a front-loaded 100 basis point cut in the repo rate, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is expected to hold off on further action for now, allowing time to gauge the effects of the easing. Additional rate cuts could be on the table if economic growth weakens further or if disinflation gains momentum, with any potential moves most likely to be considered in the December or February policy meetings. The interest rate trajectory in the US this year is likely to remain cautious and data-dependent, which reflects the Federal Reserve's wait-and-watch stance given the economic uncertainty due to tariffs. Inflationary pressures continue to persist due to tariff-related risks and geopolitical developments. The Fed appears hesitant to pursue aggressive monetary easing. While some policy easing later in the year cannot be ruled out, particularly if growth softens, the overall stance suggests that any such moves would be limited. However, the outlook could shift if economic data around consumer sentiment and GDP growth weaken. A sharper-than-expected economic downturn could compel the Fed to reconsider its position and adopt a more accommodative approach. For Indian equities, the trajectory of US interest rates remains a key external factor. The Fed's stable or accommodative policy stance tends to favour emerging markets by improving liquidity conditions and boosting investor confidence. This could be beneficial for Indian equity. However, continued global uncertainty, particularly from US trade policies and inflation dynamics, could further increase volatility in the markets. Read all market-related news here Read more stories by Nishant Kumar Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, not Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions, as market conditions can change rapidly, and circumstances may vary.
Indian Express
32 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Oil price slips after Iran targets US base in Qatar instead of blocking Strait of Hormuz: Here's why
As Iran launched missiles at a US military base in Qatar in retaliation to American airstrikes at its nuclear facilities, oil prices tumbled. With West Asia on edge amid the Israel-Iran conflagration and the US joining in, the fact that oil prices slipped after Iran fired missiles at Qatar could seem counterintuitive at first, given that it would appear that the conflict was escalating further. Oil traders, however, saw it differently. To them, Iran's Monday evening strikes accompanied by a de-escalatory tone were signals that Tehran was not going to target oil shipments or attempt a blockade of the critical chokepoint—the Strait of Hormuz—and would limit its response to seemingly symbolic strikes. The traders, it now appears, were right in their assessment. Overnight, US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Although the two countries have not officially acknowledged that an understanding has been reached, there are clear indications that military action is likely to be suspended, at least for the time being. Iran's foreign minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi said that there was no agreement on any ceasefire, but if Israel stopped attacking Iran, then the latter had no intention to continue with its attacks. Oil prices started slipping after Iran's volley of missiles at the US base in Qatar, giving up all the gains of the past couple of weeks. Trump's announcement of an Israel-Iran 'ceasefire' further exacerbated the fall. Brent is currently hovering around $68 per barrel. Over the course of the nearly two-week conflict between Israel and Iran, oil prices were volatile, with Brent rising from around $69 per barrel to $81, given the presence of threat to West Asian oil export infrastructure and flows from the region. War risk premiums on shipping surged over fears that oil tankers could become targets, or even collateral damage. But oil prices still did not really shoot through the roof, despite Tehran's warnings that it could shut the Strait of Hormuz. In fact, the Iranian parliament on Sunday recommended the closure of the strait, which is critical for global energy flows, but the oil prices did not really shoot up when markets opened the next day. It was clear that energy markets, while concerned and watchful, were not really buying into Iran's threats of blocking the Strait of Hormuz. For energy industry insiders and analysts, it was always improbable, a highly distant possibility at best. The Strait of Hormuz is a critical and narrow waterway between Iran and Oman, and connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) calls it the 'world's most important oil transit chokepoint', with around one-fifth of global liquid petroleum fuel consumption and global liquefied natural gas (LNG) trade transiting the strait. The strait is critical for India's energy security as well. According to tanker data, over 45 per cent of crude oil imported by Indian refiners in May was likely to have been transported from various oil producing countries in West Asia via the Strait of Hormuz. The importance of the chokepoint for India's energy supply and security cannot be understated as the country is the world's third-largest consumer of crude oil and depends on imports to meet over 88 per cent of its requirement. The strait's blockade, if it actually did happen, would have sent energy prices soaring, with predictions of oil prices in triple-digits, up to $130 per barrel, being widely talked about. Such price levels would have hurt the global economy, with additional pain points for energy import-dependent countries like India. Given the fragile peace now in place in the region, that fear has abated to a great extent, at least for the time being. Iran has in the past threatened to close the strait on multiple occasions, but has never actually done it, even during some of its worst wars. A large number of energy sector experts and analysts, while viewing Iran's repeated threats of the strait's closure with concern, maintained that the possibility was extremely low, primarily because such a move would impose a heavy cost on Iran, which would outweigh any benefit the country may get. 'First foremost, such a blockade would disproportionately harm China, which sources 47 per cent of its seaborne crude from the Middle East Gulf, including Iranian volumes. Iran's ability to maintain its sole major oil customer would be directly jeopardised. Additionally, Tehran has made deliberate efforts over the past two years to rebuild ties with key regional actors, including Saudi Arabia and the UAE, both of which rely heavily on the Strait for exports and have publicly condemned Israel's actions. Sabotaging their flows would risk unraveling those diplomatic gains,' commodity market analytics firm Kpler had said on Thursday (June 19). In fact, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in an interview with Fox News that China should prevent Iran from attempting the strait's closure, as China is the key buyer of Iranian oil and seen as having a close relationship with Iran. He added that while the US retained options to deal with the strait's closure, 'other countries should be looking at that as well'. He also termed the strait's closure as 'economic suicide' for Tehran. Iran remains structurally reliant on the Strait of Hormuz. While it has an oil export terminal located outside the Persian Gulf, its effective capacity is only a fraction of Iran's oil export volumes that cannot bypass the strait. Additionally, Iran would have certainly faced international military retaliation if it went ahead to close the Strait of Hormuz or targeted the transiting oil shipments. 'Any Iranian naval build-up would be detectable in advance, likely triggering a preemptive US and allied response. At most, isolated sabotage efforts could disrupt flows for 24–48 hours, the estimated time required for US forces to neutralise Iran's conventional naval assets… while the rhetoric may generate headlines, the fundamentals argue strongly against action,' Kpler's June 19 note said. Also, the strait's closure would have infringed upon Oman's territorial waters, souring Iran's relationship with its neighbor, which would have been counterproductive for a country that doesn't exactly have a lot of friends and allies in its neighbourhood, analysts pointed out. Iran depends on Oman for back-channel diplomacy with the US, and alienating Muscat could have significantly constrained Iran's diplomatic options. Sukalp Sharma is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express and writes on a host of subjects and sectors, notably energy and aviation. He has over 13 years of experience in journalism with a body of work spanning areas like politics, development, equity markets, corporates, trade, and economic policy. He considers himself an above-average photographer, which goes well with his love for travel. ... Read More
