Vermont Governor Pauses EV Rules Citing Concerns Over Insufficient Charging Infrastructure
Vermont Gov. Phil Scott signed an executive order on May 13 putting the state's electric vehicle (EV) sales requirements for passenger cars and medium- and heavy-duty trucks on hold amid concerns over the feasibility of zero-emission vehicle rules and the lack of adequate charging infrastructure.
Vermont
The measure aimed to accelerate the state's transition to zero-emission medium- and heavy-duty vehicles by requiring manufacturers to produce vehicles certified to increasingly more stringent emission categories.
Specifically, it directed manufacturers to gradually increase deliveries of new zero-emission vehicles (ZEV) for sale in Vermont to 100 percent by 2035, starting with model year 2026 vehicles.
Vermont is among a dozen states—including New York, Maryland, and Massachusetts—that have adopted California's zero-emission vehicle rules or similar regulations.
Despite agreeing to the new standards, Scott said on Tuesday that it was clear the state lacks sufficient charging infrastructure and technological advances in heavy-duty vehicles to be able to meet its current EV sales goals.
Related Stories
5/13/2025
4/30/2025
The Republican signed an
His order instructs the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation to use its enforcement discretion to ease compliance with the plan, including by not taking action against manufacturers that do not meet their sales obligations and targets, and declining to pursue penalties against those with ZEV delivery shortfalls.
According to the order, such actions will not be taken against manufacturers provided they do not impose ZEV sales ratios on dealerships and continue to supply internal combustion engine cars to dealerships seeking those vehicles.
Scott's order will remain in full force until Dec. 31, 2026, or until the governor, in consultation with the Secretary of the ANR, determines whether to amend or rescind it.
'I continue to believe we should be incentivizing Vermonters to transition to cleaner energy options like electric vehicles. However, we have to be realistic about a pace that's achievable,' Scott said in a
'We have much more work to do, in order make it more convenient, faster, and more affordable to buy, maintain and charge EV's. When we do, it's more likely everyday Vermonters will make the switch.'
Scott 'Committed to Addressing Climate Change'
Though the ZEV rule has been put on hold, Scott's office said he remains 'committed to addressing climate change,' including advocating for more charging infrastructure across the state, which it said is essential in helping make EVs viable and reducing transportation emissions.
It added that mandates are 'not going to be the total answer' when it comes to transitioning to a low-carbon future.
'Using common sense and incentivizing technological advancements is necessary to overall success and this compliance flexibility is intended to reflect this reality,' his office said.
Scott's announcement was welcomed by Jack Castellaneta, president of the Vermont Vehicle and Automotive Distributors Association (VADA), who
'We need to be realistic about what's achievable and focus on building more practical solutions for our transportation sector,' Castellaneta said in a statement.
Maryland Gov. Wes Moore last month issued a similar
Moore's order cited concerns among manufacturers that the ZEV requirements would be too difficult to meet in the state, as well as 'indications' that the policies of the Trump administration, including its tariff plans, would 'greatly impact' compliance.
In May, the House of Representatives also voted to ban California's plans to require an increasing number of zero-emission heavy-duty trucks, as well as its 2035 EV plan, a move that would repeal the legal approval for the rules granted by the Environmental Protection Agency under former President Joe Biden.
California contends Congress cannot reverse the Biden administration's decision under fast-track rules.
The Senate has yet to take up the measures.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate Republicans revise ban on state AI regulations in bid to preserve controversial provision
WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Republicans have made changes to their party's sweeping tax bill in hopes of preserving a new policy that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade. In legislative text unveiled Thursday night, Senate Republicans proposed denying states federal funding for broadband projects if they regulate AI. That's a change from a provision in the House-passed version of the tax overhaul that simply banned any current or future AI regulations by the states for 10 years. 'These provisions fulfill the mandate given to President Trump and Congressional Republicans by the voters: to unleash America's full economic potential and keep her safe from enemies,' Sen. Ted Cruz, chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, said in a statement announcing the changes. The proposed ban has angered state lawmakers in Democratic and Republican-led states and alarmed some digital safety advocates concerned about how AI will develop as the technology rapidly advances. But leading AI executives, including OpenAI's Sam Altman, have made the case to senators that a 'patchwork' of state AI regulations would cripple innovation. Some House Republicans are also uneasy with the provision. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., came out against the AI regulatory moratorium in the House bill after voting for it. She said she had not read that section of the bill. 'We should be reducing federal power and preserving state power. Not the other way around,' Greene wrote on social media. Senate Republicans made their change in an attempt to follow the special process being used to pass the tax bill with a simple majority vote. To comply with those rules, any provision needs to deal primarily with the federal budget and not government policy. Republican leaders argue, essentially, that by setting conditions for states to receive certain federal appropriations — in this instance, funding for broadband internet infrastructure — they would meet the Senate's standard for using a majority vote. Cruz told reporters Thursday that he will make his case next week to Senate parliamentarian on why the revised ban satisfies the rules. The parliamentarian is the chamber's advisor on its proper rules and procedures. While the parliamentarian's ruling are not binding, senators of both parties have adhered to their findings in the past. Senators generally argue that Congress should take the lead on regulating AI but so far the two parties have been unable to broker a deal that is acceptable to Republicans' and Democrats' divergent concerns. The GOP legislation also includes significant changes to how the federal government auctions commercial spectrum ranges. Those new provisions expand the range of spectrum available for commercial use, an issue that has divided lawmakers over how to balance questions of national security alongside providing telecommunications firms access to more frequencies for commercial wireless use. Senators are aiming to pass the tax package, which extends the 2017 rate cuts and other breaks from President Donald Trump's first term along with new tax breaks and steep cuts to social programs, later this month. Matt Brown, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Associated Press
13 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Senate Republicans revise ban on state AI regulations in bid to preserve controversial provision
WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Republicans have made changes to their party's sweeping tax bill in hopes of preserving a new policy that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade. In legislative text unveiled Thursday night, Senate Republicans proposed denying states federal funding for broadband projects if they regulate AI. That's a change from a provision in the House-passed version of the tax overhaul that simply banned any current or future AI regulations by the states for 10 years. 'These provisions fulfill the mandate given to President Trump and Congressional Republicans by the voters: to unleash America's full economic potential and keep her safe from enemies,' Sen. Ted Cruz, chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, said in a statement announcing the changes. The proposed ban has angered state lawmakers in Democratic and Republican-led states and alarmed some digital safety advocates concerned about how AI will develop as the technology rapidly advances. But leading AI executives, including OpenAI's Sam Altman, have made the case to senators that a 'patchwork' of state AI regulations would cripple innovation. Some House Republicans are also uneasy with the provision. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., came out against the AI regulatory moratorium in the House bill after voting for it. She said she had not read that section of the bill. 'We should be reducing federal power and preserving state power. Not the other way around,' Greene wrote on social media. Senate Republicans made their change in an attempt to follow the special process being used to pass the tax bill with a simple majority vote. To comply with those rules, any provision needs to deal primarily with the federal budget and not government policy. Republican leaders argue, essentially, that by setting conditions for states to receive certain federal appropriations — in this instance, funding for broadband internet infrastructure — they would meet the Senate's standard for using a majority vote. Cruz told reporters Thursday that he will make his case next week to Senate parliamentarian on why the revised ban satisfies the rules. The parliamentarian is the chamber's advisor on its proper rules and procedures. While the parliamentarian's ruling are not binding, senators of both parties have adhered to their findings in the past. Senators generally argue that Congress should take the lead on regulating AI but so far the two parties have been unable to broker a deal that is acceptable to Republicans' and Democrats' divergent concerns. The GOP legislation also includes significant changes to how the federal government auctions commercial spectrum ranges. Those new provisions expand the range of spectrum available for commercial use, an issue that has divided lawmakers over how to balance questions of national security alongside providing telecommunications firms access to more frequencies for commercial wireless use. Senators are aiming to pass the tax package, which extends the 2017 rate cuts and other breaks from President Donald Trump's first term along with new tax breaks and steep cuts to social programs, later this month.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump to sell Tesla amid bitter row with Musk
Donald Trump is planning to sell the White House Tesla amid a bitter row with Elon Musk. Mr Trump purchased a red Model S Tesla in March when Mr Musk brought a range of his fleet to the White House for the president to peruse. The purchase was a show of support for Mr Musk's business at a time when his shares were tumbling, with Mr Trump declaring the car a 'great product' and 'as good as it gets'. However, a senior administration official told NewsNation that Mr Trump now plans to sell or give away the car, which is currently parked at the White House and used by staff. Mr Musk spent hundreds of millions of dollars on the president's re-election campaign before assuming a senior role in his government but the two men have bitterly fallen-out, primarily because of disagreements over Mr Trump's tax-and-spend bill. On Thursday, Mr Trump suggested the Tesla billionaire had developed 'Trump derangement syndrome' while Mr Musk suggested he should be impeached and will cause the US to go into recession. The president continued the war of words on Friday when he claimed Mr Musk had 'lost his mind', despite officials claiming he was 'over' their public spat. Thanks for following our live coverage. This blog is now closed. Marjorie Taylor Greene, the firebrand Republican congresswoman, has hit out at Elon Musk for 'lashing out on the internet'. The intervention is significant from the Georgia representative, who as chair of the House of Representatives' Doge subcommittee would in theory be one of Mr Musk's closest allies in Congress. Referring to Mr Musk spending close to $300 million on Mr Trump's re-election campaign, she said: 'Every single one of those votes, no matter how much money they have, matter... whether it was $1 or 100 donated, or hundreds of millions of dollars donated, I think they're all the same. 'And I think each voice really matters. 'And I don't think lashing out on the internet is the way to handle any kind of disagreement, especially when you have each other's cell phones.' Donald Trump has said Elon Musk has 'lost his mind' in an escalation of his public war of words with the tech billionaire. Asked about reports of a scheduled call with Mr Musk later today, Mr Trump told ABC News: 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' The US president added that he was 'not particularly' interested in speaking with Mr Musk, with whom he has clashed over his tax and spend bill. The comments came after White House sources told The Telegraph that Mr Trump was 'over it' and wanted to move on from the public spat, which ended with Mr Musk calling for the president's impeachment. A Trump official said: 'I don't think the president is interested in speaking to Elon right now. But he's also over it and wants to stay focused on passing the bill. 'That was his mindset when he left last night, and that's his mindset moving forward.' Other than Mr Trump's comments earlier today - calling Mr Musk 'crazy' - there is no sign of the feud continuing on social least for now. The US president's last post on his Truth Social was about the economy. 'GREAT JOB NUMBERS, STOCK MARKET UP BIG! AT THE SAME TIME, BILLIONS POURING IN FROM TARIFFS!!!' he posted. Mr Musk, meanwhile, congratulated Tesla's Berlin team after it produced its eight millionth vehicle in the German capital. If you're just catching up on the latest between Donald Trump and Elon Musk, here's where things stand... Mr Trump and Mr Musk's relationship descended into chaos last night days after the Tesla billionaire launched his scathing criticism of the US president's tax and spending bill Mr Trump said he was 'very disappointed' by Mr Musk's criticism and said he did not know if their relationship would survive Mr Musk quickly hit back on Twitter, suggesting a new political party should be formed and accused Mr Trump of being on the Epstein list There was talk of a phone call between the two in order to settle their differences... But Mr Trump said he had 'no interest' in speaking to Mr Musk, who he said had gone 'crazy' Mr Musk is yet to tweet about the president today Americans should continue to put their trust in Donald Trump, who 'continues to beat expectations', the White House has said. Karoline Leavitt, Mr Trump's press secretary, posted figures on X showing that the US economy added 139,000 jobs in May, which was more than expected. 'President Trump's American First Economic Agenda has created a BOOMING economy - jobs are up, unemployment is down, wages are increasing, and inflation is dead. 'More than 139,000 good jobs were added to the private sector in May, all accounted for by American-born workers. Americans should continue to Trust in President Trump, who continues to beat expectations.' The row between the President and Elon Musk could also hit the tech billionaire's Starlink internet service. An offshoot of Mr Musk's SpaceX company, Starlink, uses satellites to deliver broadband services to areas which would otherwise be off-grid. The contracts with the Federal government are worth millions of dollars to Mr Musk. They include a $70 million deal to provide satellite communications to 54 stations used by the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard. Starlink is also used by the Federal Communications Commission to provide rural broadband to 642,000 company is currently negotiating new contracts with the US Geological Survey, the Army, and the Navy. Not long ago, Elon Musk was a darling of American progressives. A visionary bringing electric cars to the people, and voting Democrat for more than two decades. He then became their self-appointed nemesis, clearing the US government of a 'viper's nest of radical-Left Marxists who hate America'. So, how did Musk make the political voyage from Left to Right in record time? Mike Johnson, speaker of the US House of Representatives, expressed confusion over Elon Musk's criticism of the GOP tax and spending bill and Donald Trump. Mr Johnson has reportedly been contacting Mr Musk through calls and messages to persuade him to reconsider his stance. Speaking to reporters, Mr Johnson said he wasn't sure 'what has motivated this disturbance to begin, but obviously it's not helpful'. He added that he would prefer 'that policy disputes are not personal'. 'I've tried very hard to speak with Elon over and over, you know, and talk with him about what I believe are misconceptions he has about this bill and what it is,' Mr Johnson said. An online poll has shown that Americans are largely siding with President Trump over Elon Musk, although the vast majority preferred to stay out of the dispute. When asked by YouGov who they supported - Mr Trump, Mr Musk, or neither - 28 per cent chose Mr Trump, 8 per cent backed Mr Musk, and 52 per cent sided with neither. Amongst Republicans, support for Mr Trump was overwhelming at 71 per cent, compared to just 6 per cent for Mr Musk, with 12 per cent choosing neither. Democrats mostly favoured neither, but amongst those who picked a side, 11 per cent supported Mr Musk versus 4 per cent for Mr Trump. Senior Russian officials have made digs at both Donald Trump and Elon Musk, joking about hosting peace talks, while another said Mr Musk should bring his businesses to Russia. 'Elon, don't be upset!' nationalist senator Dmitry Rogozin, who once ran Russia's space programme, wrote on Mr Musk's X social media site. 'If you encounter insurmountable problems in the US, come to us. Here you will find reliable comrades and complete freedom of technical creativity.' Dmitry Medvedev, a senior security official and former Russian president, posted: 'We are ready to facilitate the conclusion of a peace deal between D and E for a reasonable fee and to accept Starlink shares as payment. Don't fight, guys!' Margarita Simonyan, one of Russia's most powerful state media executives, mocked it as an example of 'modern US political culture'. 'Sort of like the English Industrial Revolution. Only in reverse,' she added. Donald Trump has said that Elon Musk has 'a problem' in his latest comments on the feud between them. 'I'm not even thinking about Elon... He's got a problem,' he reportedly told ABC News. 'The poor guy's got a problem.' Mr Trump added: 'I won't be speaking to him for a while, I guess, but I wish him well.' Vice President JD Vance said Donald Trump's dismissal of his former ally Elon Musk from the MAGA circle was neither rash nor ill-planned. 'There are many lies the corporate media tells about President Trump. One of the most glaring is that he's impulsive or short-tempered,' Mr Vance wrote on X 'Anyone who has seen him operate under pressure knows that's ridiculous,' he said. 'It's (maybe) the single biggest disconnect between fake media perception and reality.' Late on Thursday, Mr Vance made his loyalty to Mr Trump clear, saying he was 'proud to stand beside him'. Donald Trump is reportedly considering selling or giving away the red Tesla car he purchased earlier this year, according to a senior White House official. Mr Trump bought the car during a White House photo-op intended to promote Elon Musk's business. As of Thursday evening, the vehicle remained parked outside the West Wing. A planned meeting between US and Chinese officials on trade is expected to take place within seven days, White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said on Friday, a day after President Donald Trump and his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping spoke. Readers of The Telegraph have had their say on the public spat between Elon Musk and Donald Trump. You can add your own thoughts at the bottom of this page. Yesterday evening, there were signs that Elon Musk and Donald Trump could reconcile after their argument played out across social media. Mr Trump projected an air of nonchalance as he spoke about the spat in a phone call last night. 'Oh it's okay,' Mr Trump told Politico when asked about the argument. 'It's going very well, never done better.' Mr Musk also appeared agreeable to a truce last night when hedge fund manager Bill Ackman moved to ease tension.'I support @realDonaldTrump and @elonmusk and they should make peace for the benefit of our great country,' Mr Ackman wrote on X.'You're not wrong,' Mr Musk responded. Those hopes were dashed when White House sources denied any possibility of a phone call between the pair today. The Trump-Musk alliance was always on shaky ground - and now, with a spectacular bang, it has crashed. But from Mr Trump's relentless need to dominate the spotlight to his history of turning on allies, many say this explosive split was almost inevitable. Here, The Telegraph's Michael Lind breaks down why their public fallout came as no surprise. A bust in honour of Elon Musk was vandalised in Brownsville, Texas, as the feud escalates. Quotes from sources close to the White House reveal a tense and uneasy view of the fallout between Donald Trump and Elon Musk. One insider described Mr Trump as concerned about Mr Musk's mental state, telling POLITICO: 'The president is worried Elon is not well… and is just kind of freaking out.' But even taking this into consideration, the source said Mr Trump's combative nature remains: 'He'll punch at whoever punches him if he thinks he needs it.' Another senior official hinted that the administration is unsurprised that their relationship has suddenly soured. 'Everyone knew this was gonna end badly. We're dealing with someone who is unstable… we saw it coming,' they said. While the comments offer insight into the workings of their relationship, perhaps more importantly, they could present Mr Musk with an opportunity to back-pedal by attributing his actions to going through a 'difficult time'. The breakdown of Donald Trump's relationship with Elon Musk yesterday resulted in a combined loss of about $21 billion for both men. Both Mr Trump and Mr Musk oversee vast business empires, and each had a key public company affected by the fallout. As their social media feud escalated into personal attacks, investors reacted sharply. Tesla shares plunged 14.3 per cent, wiping nearly $20 billion off Mr Musk's net worth. Meanwhile, Trump Media & Technology Group's stock fell 8 per cent, costing Mr Trump around $202 million. The most significant blow to Mr Trump came from the roughly 10 per cent drop in his Official Trump meme coin, which could have cost him nearly $900 million. Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, has called Elon Musk's behaviour 'an unfortunate episode', adding the Tesla boss is 'unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted'. In a post on X, Ms Leavitt wrote that Donald Trump's 'number one focus' is ensuring that the legislation passes smoothly. 'This is a transformative piece of legislation that delivers on the Make America Great Agenda by delivering the largest tax cuts and border security investments in HISTORY,' she added. Sweeping cuts introduced by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) will have a lasting impact on foreign aid, global health, and development programmes. The end of dozens of USAID projects has limited the resources it will spend on disaster relief, food security, and refugee support, worsening crises in vulnerable regions. Cuts to funding for initiatives like the Global Fund or pandemic preparedness set back efforts to combat infectious diseases, including malaria, tuberculosis, and Covid-19. The US is also said to be proposing cuts to its flagship anti-HIV programme by almost 40 per cent next year. The long-running programme is estimated to have saved more than 20 million lives in the past two decades, and is often cited as one of the world's most successful public health schemes. Experts worry reduced US aid could open the door for rival powers - including China and Russia - to increase their influence through their own investments and aid, reshaping global alliances. Elon Musk's legal 130-day term as a 'special government employee' is set to expire today after a controversial stint that will have a lasting impact both in the US and across the world. Mr Musk's stated goal as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) was to slash spending across the board, saving American taxpayers money by ending 'waste, fraud, and abuse'. He claimed he could cut $1 trillion from the federal budget before September 30, but the reported toll is far off that figure. As of May 26, DOGE's online 'wall of receipts' claims estimated savings of $175 billion since the start of Mr Trump's term, averaging $1,086.96 saved per taxpayer. But analysis by the New York Times has spotted gaping holes in those claims. This includes counting government contracts not yet awarded, contracts that ended years ago, triple-counting the same savings, and confusing 'million' with 'billion'. DOGE has since corrected some of those errors, but many remain, leaving Mr Musk's governmental legacy in murky waters. Republicans with close ties to Donald Trump might not be as willing to forget Elon Musk's series of sensationalist social media posts against the US president. Leading figures have pitched in their thoughts in the hours since the spat began. 'The president treated him almost like a son,' Steve Bannon, a long-time antagonist of Mr Musk, told Playbook yesterday. 'He invited his family to Christmas dinner. He let him sleep over. He let him walk in and out of meetings. The president went to the max informality to welcome this guy.' Bannon added: 'You're going to tell me we should allow some fucking punk to sit there and say he should be impeached and JD (Vance) should step in? F--- you, dude. We're going to go to f------ war, and I'm going to rip your f------ face off.' In one of his controversial posts on X, Elon Musk hit out at Donald Trump's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Ever since Epstein's crimes first came to light, the internet has been filled with conspiracy theories about Mr Trump's relationship with the convicted paedophile. Mr Trump and Epstein's friendship stretched back decades: In 1997, the US smiled as he posed for a photograph with his old friend in Palm Beach. At the time, the pair, who moved in the same wealthy social circles and bonded over their love of beautiful women, had been friends for years. But when did their friendship begin and what are the finer details? Read the full story here. The Kremlin has said it would not get involved in Donald Trump's row with Elon Musk, but was confident that Mr Trump would deal with the situation. The quarrel between the two was an internal US matter, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said this morning. Elon Musk's high-profile support of Donald Trump during his election campaign undoubtedly gave him a boost. Early on, Mr Musk offered his support for Mr Trump's policies on business deregulation, space exploration, and economic growth. He generated high-profile endorsements, leveraging his influence in tech and media circles. Public comments and interviews saw Mr Musk praise aspects of Mr Trump's agenda, lending credibility to the campaign among voters interested in innovation, space, and technology. The once-strong alliance between President Trump and Mr Musk is unravelling, with insiders suggesting a breakup is imminent. Mr Musk's explosive rift with the White House stems from longstanding tensions about his libertarian policies and his unpredictable behaviour, according to sources close to the president. Interviews with a string of insiders reveal months of concern at Mr Musk's grandstanding behaviour and philosophical differences with people at the heart of the Trump administration. Our Chief US Correspondent, Rob Crilley, has the full story here. Mr Trump's new bill marks a major legislative move by the US president. Named the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act', it encompasses significant tax reforms, spending cuts, and defence allocations. The bill is the root of the tensions between Mr Musk and Mr Trump, with the Tesla boss claiming it will undo all of the cost-cutting he has initiated during his tenure at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Key provisions include: Tax reforms: The bill proposes extending the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act provisions, which benefit upper-income earners. It would also increase the state and local tax deduction cap from $10,000 to $40,000. Spending cuts: It aims to reduce non-military government spending, cutting funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Medicaid through stricter eligibility requirements. Defence spending: The legislation allocates an extra $150 billion for defence expenditures. Energy policy: It would scale back many clean-energy tax credits from the Inflation Reduction Act, including the $7,500 federal tax credit for electric vehicles. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said today that he had 'absolutely no doubt' that Mr Trump would keep the United States within the Nato military alliance. 'I have absolutely no doubt that the American government is sticking with Nato,' Mr Merz said in a speech at an entrepreneurs' event just hours after returning from his inaugural trip to Washington. Tesla shares have risen after news that White House aides had scheduled a call with CEO Elon Musk in an effort to ease tensions. The stock climbed about 5 per cent in Frankfurt, rebounding after a sharp 14.3 per cent drop in New York on Thursday that wiped out roughly $150 billion in market value. 'It's unlikely that Trump will end subsidies and contracts with Tesla. Those are obviously threats that are unlikely to come into fruition,' Fiona Cincotta, senior market analyst at City Index, told Reuters. 'I don't expect this to blow out into anything more serious than a war of words for a couple of days.' Welcome to today's live coverage of the spat between Elon Musk and Donald Trump. For those of you who are just joining us, the argument began yesterday when Mr Musk publicly criticised the US president's new spending bill. The Tesla boss labelled the legislation a 'disgusting abomination' before accusing Mr Trump of being named in documents relating to the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Mr Musk added that Mr Trump would have lost the election without him and called for him to be impeached. Mr Trump responded that his former ally was lashing out at his legislation because he did not 'get his own way'. Read the full story here. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
