
'Hairdresser saved my life with advice on hidden scalp mole that was cancer'
'Hairdresser saved my life with advice on hidden scalp mole that was cancer'
Michaela Peacock, 35, first noticed the 10p-sized growth on her scalp when absent-mindedly rubbing her head while watching TV
Michaela Peacock, 35, claims her hairdresser 'saved her life'
(Image: Kennedy News and Media )
A pale mum claims her hairdresser 'saved her life' after discovering a hidden cancerous mole on her scalp - caused by 'burning' for a tan as a youngster. Michaela Peacock, 35, first noticed the 10p-sized growth on her scalp when absent-mindedly rubbing her head while watching TV. Unsure whether she'd always had it, she checked with her mum and then her hairdresser who said the mole was larger and darker than her last appointment, urging her to get it checked. After a trip to her GP and nearby hospital, the aesthetics clinic owner was diagnosed with stage 1a melanoma - something doctors believe was caused by sunburn while tanning as a youngster. The fair-skinned mum of two, who also works as a cancer nurse, says she now feels 'paranoid' about going out in daylight - making her 'feel she wants to become a vampire'. Now facing an anxious wait about whether her other moles are cancerous, Michaela is urging people to slap on the SPF to avoid the same thing happening to them.
Michaela Peacock's scalp after the mole was removed
(Image: Kennedy News and Media )
Michaela, from Market Deeping, Lincolnshire, said: "I found a mole on my scalp, on the left side just above my ear. It was the size of a 10p piece, so quite big. I think that's why it was quite alarming because if you'd have had that anywhere else on your body you would have been like 'oh my God' but you're not looking at your scalp. "One night we were just sat watching the telly, I rubbed the side of my head underneath my hair with my fingers, it wasn't itchy, and I felt the tiniest lump. I said to my husband Oliver 'what's that on my head?' and moved my hair. He said 'you've got a mole on your head'. "I messaged my mum because I thought 'if she says that's been there ever since I was a child I won't worry too much about it'. But Mum said she didn't remember me having a mole. A friend said 'why don't you message your hairdresser? She looks at your scalp every eight to 12 weeks'. "I sent her a picture of it and she said that it looked bigger and darker than when she last saw it, that's what made me go and get it checked. The fact my hairdresser could say 'that looks bigger' meant it was changing, so she helped save my life."
After spotting the mole on December 1st, Michaela used a mole-mapping app on December 2 and was told by a dermatologist to 'err on the side of caution' and get it checked by her GP.
Michaela Peacock, 35, in hospital getting the mole on her scalp removed
(Image: Kennedy News and Media )
Article continues below
On January 2 she had a doctor's appointment and was given an urgent referral to North West Anglia hospital in Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, on January 8. There, the mole was removed, biopsied and six weeks later identified as melanoma. Michaela said: "The mole was brown around the edges but really dark in the middle - it was the pigment in it that made the doctors worry. I was shocked when they said it was melanoma. My first thought was 'is this going to end up as a death sentence?' Melanoma caught early is very treatable and curable, but when you hear the word 'cancer' you think of death. "I've never used sunbeds in my life, but when I was a teenager and young adult I never used to wear sun cream because I didn't like the feel of it. I'm very fair skinned and would never tan, so to get any hint of a tan I'd have to burn first and unfortunately in the past I've had some awful sunburn. "The consultant said it only takes one time to have a blistering sunburn and melanoma can present itself 20 years later, so I think it's from years of not looking after my skin." Now waiting on biopsy results from other moles on her stomach and inside her lip, Michaela is sharing her story to 'scare' people into being responsible in the sun. Michaela said: "I wear SPF all the time now anyway and on sunny days I wear factor 50, a hat and sunglasses. When you get a diagnosis of melanoma it almost terrifies you to go out, you kind of feel you want to become a vampire. I went to pick the kids up from school and even just walking across the playground to get to the shady bit I could feel the sun on my arms, it makes you so paranoid. "I just don't think people think of skin cancer as anything that serious. I've even had people say 'it's only skin cancer'. What a stupid thing to say. Melanoma is deadly, it kills people. I can bang onto people all the time, 'wear your SPF', don't lay out in the sun'. How do you hit home to people not to do it? I don't know how to do that unless you scare people, which is what my tactic is."
NHS guidance on melanoma
Melanoma is a type of skin cancer that can spread to other areas of the body, the NHS website says. The main cause of melanoma is ultraviolet light, which comes from the sun and is used in sunbeds. Things that increase your chances of getting melanoma include your age and having pale skin, a large number of moles and a family history of skin cancer. It's often possible to prevent skin cancer by being careful in the sun - for example, by using sunscreen and reapplying it regularly.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
2 days ago
- The Independent
How to choose the right sunscreen for your skin type, plus tried and tested favourites
Sunscreen is not only a summer staple. When it comes to daily skincare, we all know that facial SPF is non-negotiable, and the sun's UV rays cause damage all year round. However, the UV index tends to be much higher in summer, so sun cream is more important than ever during the warmer season. Wearing a daily SPF with a minimum of SPF30 is the best way to protect our skin, but it can be tricky to know where to start, particularly with so many formulas on the market. Just like moisturisers, serums and face washes, one size doesn't fit all. It's important to find an SPF that's tailored to your skin type or specific concerns. Whether you have acne-prone, sensitive or oily skin, the latest formulas are made using innovative ingredients that don't clog the pores or leave a white cast over darker skin tones. From Murad and La Roche Posay to Ultrasun and Garnier, we've rounded up the best tried and tested SPFs for various skin types below, as recommended by our team of beauty editors and experts. How we tested This is a collection of tests from several articles, but all of these products were tested on these different skin types for days at a time. We assessed how easy it was to apply each product, if it caused make-up to pill, and ultimately, whether or not it worked well with its given skin type. Best sunscreen for your skin type


The Independent
2 days ago
- The Independent
Expert reveals exact amount of SPF to use, and it's more than you'd think
Summer is the perfect time to stock up on SPFs. UK temperatures are set to soar into the twenties this July, so we're all going to need a good sun cream. But an SPF isn't just for sunny days. In Britain, we're used to near-constant cloud cover, so you'd be forgiven for thinking that the overcast sky will protect your face, arms and everything else. In reality, harmful UVA and UVB rays, which can cause skin cancer, are still present when the sun is behind cloud cover. So, though it might feel odd to wear sun cream on cloudy days, it's crucial to protect your skin with sun cream, whatever the weather. But it's not always obvious how much to use. It seems logical that you only need a tiny amount of SPF50 compared to SPF15, but how much SPF should we actually apply every day? You'd think it'd be less on an overcast day than the blazing heat of summer, but it isn't always clear from sun cream marketing. Meet the experts Dr Marko Lens is a consultant plastic and reconstructive surgeon and a Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons. He also owns an antioxidant-focused skincare brand, Zelens. How much SPF should you apply daily? Dr Lens revealed that we should 'use one teaspoon over the face and neck'. For context, one teaspoon's worth of SPF is around 5ml. But it doesn't stop there. Dr Lens adds that 'it should be reapplied every two hours if we are exposed to the sun'. As for the cloud cover, he clarified that the reason for wearing SPF in these less exposed circumstances is down to the fact that 'you don't know what the UV [index measurement] is. The days when it's grey, the UV light is still there. You should be protected.' Again, for context, a high UV is considered eight or over, with a UV from three to seven being in the range where it's recommended to limit exposure to the sun. 'There are so many foundations nowadays with SPF, but [this type of SPF] isn't going to last. The best protection would be to not expose ourselves to the sun – but of course, we need to live a life.' So, a teaspoon a day it is, with reapplication every other hour. Sun exposure is any day on which we can see the sun through the clouds, like a typical autumn/winter day. As for your summer beach holiday? 'For one day at the beach, a man my height and weight should probably use one bottle [of sunscreen ] a day,' says Dr Lens. If you need a good sun cream, our tests of the best sunscreens for your face found a clear winner. This SPF50 came out on top in our ranking of the best sun creams. Recommended by many dermatologists, our tester found that it 'absorbs quickly and easily without leaving the skin feeling greasy.' It holds up well, lasting throughout several workouts.


Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
Distraught co-founder of Aussie sunscreen brand labelled as having the WORST SPF50+ rating by CHOICE breaks her silence with stunningly personal message: 'My own children'
The co-founder of embattled Australian sunscreen brand Ultra Violette has broken her silence after one of the brand's products failed to meet its SPF50+ claim in CHOICE's bombshell investigation. In an emotional eight-minute video posted to Instagram on Friday, Ava Chandler-Matthews addressed the backlash following the consumer watchdog's damning one of the brand's most popular sunscreens. The consumer advocacy group's results shockingly claimed Ultra Violette's cult-favourite Lean Screen SPF50+ Mattifying Zinc Skinscreen was one of the worst performing sunscreens on Aussie shelves - delivering an extremely low SPF rating of just 4. CHOICE experts said they were 'so perturbed' by the results of its extraordinary first experiment that it conducted a second test at an independent lab in Germany where the results came back with a reported SPF of 5. The condemning sunscreen report, which tested 20 popular products, found 16 failed to live up to their SPF claims, with Ultra Violette's mineral-based formula copping the biggest blow, and sending concerned customers into meltdown. However, Ava has hit back, saying the bombshell report was 'absolutely shocking,' and why she felt the need to speak up and dispute the damning claims. What might come as more surprising to consumers though is the fact that they've known about the report since March. 'We obviously freaked out, [and] took it very seriously immediately,' she said in the clip. 'We have now done three tests on this product,' she said in the clip. 'Two to ISO Australian standards [International Organisation for Standardisation] and one to FDA standards.' The results, she said visibly emotional, 'were all consistent SPF rating of over 60 [and] we stand behind the tests we've done.' Fighting back tears, the beauty entrepreneur said she was devastated not just for the brand but for the growing sense of mistrust this might cause with Aussie consumers. 'My concern with this whole thing is that people will now no longer trust any sunscreen,' she admitted. 'This isn't just about us. I put Lean Screen on my own children - and I still would tomorrow.' Addressing her followers directly, Ava pleaded that they have in-house regulators and have followed all the correct rigorous testing procedures. Because they knew where CHOICE had purchased the product from, they'd sent the brand a receipt, Ava and her team were able to know what batch number their test was from. 'We checked that the SPF, [and] the zinc levels in the product were as we have put on the packaging, which was 22.75% zinc'. 'That is almost a quarter of the entire formulation is zinc, and they were within spec, so there was no issue from a manufacturing point of view,' she continued. The next thing they did, within the same hour, was organize an urgent SPF test of a 10 panel study at an independent third party lab. She said those new tests, done on 10 real people as required by the TGA, returned SPF scores of 64 and 61.7. By contrast, CHOICE allegedly ran two small-scale tests - one with five people (with only three results counted), and one with a batch that had been decanted into another container, which Ava says could have compromised the zinc-based formula. 'You can never, especially a zinc… never decant the product.' 'We know that CHOICE decanted our product because they told us they decanted it into a different packaging.' According to Ava, all sunscreens have to go through a long stability process for six months depending on the country. 'We had our lean screen sitting in stability testing for six months in the exact same tube that we sell it in for six months and the same material for six months before we were launching it.' Australian consumer group CHOICE claimed in a bombshell report that Ultra Violette's Lean Screen SPF50+ Mattifying Zinc Skinscreen, which retails for $52, returned an SPF of just 4 during its first round of rigorous testing Ava said that CHOICE however sent it in an unlabelled container that was not the packaging that it had been stability tested in Ava said that CHOICE however sent it in an unlabelled container that was not the packaging that it had been stability tested in. In a moment of calm defiance, Ava reminded viewers that CHOICE is not the authority on SPF in Australia. 'They are not the TGA. They are not the ACCC. They're not a regulator. They are not the ones who approve sunscreens.' The TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration) requires all listed sunscreens to meet strict testing protocols before being sold to Australians - protocols Ultra Violette insists they've followed to the letter. 'We live and die by what we put in the market.' We as founders, Beck [Jefferd] (Ultra Violette's other co-founder) and I, are so across the formulating, the testing, the regulatory rigor, the process behind what how we bring a sunscreen to market.' CHOICE's report has already sent shockwaves through the beauty industry, with social media erupting in anger and confusion. Many consumers have flooded Ultra Violette's Instagram page with demands for refunds and answers but Ava's video may begin to turn the tide. 'We now have 3 SPF tests done on 30 people that show where they've got a consistent result,' she continued. 'We are as baffled as you are.' The brand is continuing its own internal investigation and says it will fully cooperate with the TGA if required. Meanwhile, Ava is calling for calm and for consumers to seek clarity rather than panic. For now, Ultra Violette is standing firm behind its sunscreen and its science. 'We have the data to support the testing results. It is on our website.' The surprising results of the 20 popular sunscreens tested Australian consumer watchdog CHOICE has tested 20 popular sunscreens, with 16 failing to meet the SPF50 protection claims on their labels. Of the 20 sunscreens tested, only four passed the SPF test: Cancer Council Kids Sunscreen SPF 50+ passed with a reported SPF of 52 La Roche-Posay Anthelios Wet Skin Sunscreen 50+ passed with a reported SPF of 72 Mecca Cosmetica To Save Body SPF 50+ Hydrating Sunscreen passed with a reported SPF of 51 Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Body Lotion SPF 50 passed with a reported SPF of 56 Sunscreens that failed the SPF test: SPF results in the 10s Ultra Violette Lean Screen SPF 50+ Mattifying Zinc Skinscreen - tested at 4 SPF results in the 20s Aldi Ombra 50+ ¿ tested at 26 Banana Boat Baby Zinc Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ - tested at 28 Bondi Sands SPF 50+ Zinc Mineral Body Lotion - tested at 26 Cancer Council Everyday Value Sunscreen 50 - tested at 27 Cancer Council Ultra Sunscreen 50+ - tested at 24 Neutrogena Sheer Zinc Dry-Touch Lotion SPF 50 - tested at 24 Woolworths Sunscreen Everyday Tube SPF 50+ - tested at 27 SPF results in the 30s Banana Boat Sport Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ - tested at 35 Bondi Sands SPF 50+ Fragrance Free Sunscreen - tested at 32 Cancer Council Kids Clear Zinc 50+ - tested at 33 Invisible Zinc Face + Body Mineral Sunscreen SPF 50 - tested at 38 SPF results in the 40s Coles SPF 50+ Sunscreen Ultra Tube ¿ tested at 43 Nivea Sun Kids Ultra Protect and Play Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ - tested at 41 Nivea Sun Protect and Moisture Lock SPF 50+ Sunscreen - tested at 40 Sun Bum Premium Moisturising Sunscreen Lotion 50+ - tested at 40