
TRENDS exposes dangers of Muslim Brotherhood at House of Lords
18 Mar 2025 02:45
By: Mohammed Al-Ali*Think tanks work hand in hand with governments and their various institutions to achieve a vital goal that is directly tied to security and stability at the national, regional, and global levels: the fight against extremism and terrorism. Within this effort, think tanks serve as the intellectual core that analyses data, draws evidence-based conclusions, devises present-day scenarios, and anticipates future developments. They do so by drawing on a deep understanding of both recent and distant past experiences, especially as they connect theoretical and practical approaches to uncover the roots of the phenomena. In addition, think tanks gather academic and scientific insights to support counter-extremism initiatives and raise public awareness about the dangers of extremist groups. This is particularly vital when certain tactics, which may not initially appear extremist, are in fact rooted in violent ideologies. Behind such tactics lie groups and organisations that exploit existing conditions to recruit more extremists and terrorists, viewing societies merely as pools from which to draw the tools needed to implement their destructive plans.TRENDS Research & Advisory has consistently shared insights with academics and policymakers worldwide on a range of international issues, especially in the fight against extremism and terrorism. Its most recent initiative took place in the UK, right in the historic House of Lords, where TRENDS organised a symposium titled "Strengthening the Middle East-UK Partnership in Countering Extremism and Promoting Prosperity". The event brought together several members of the House of Lords and leading UK counterterrorism experts to outline the best strategies for tackling extremism and fostering tolerance across different cultures and religions globally. The discussions centred on the Muslim Brotherhood, given the serious threat it poses as the parent organisation for many of the world's terrorist groups. Participants highlighted the dangers the Muslim Brotherhood represents in any society where it operates and underscored the importance of designating the group as a terrorist organisation in the UK.Extremist groups and organisations, including most notably the Muslim Brotherhood, have long sought to cultivate an alternative identity for their followers. Under this framework, individuals develop a sense of emotional isolation that distances them from their societies, making them more inclined to reject societal values and threaten public security and stability. Some European countries have increased surveillance of extremist groups, but the efforts are fragmented rather than a coordinated initiative. Moreover, the ideology underpinning these extremist groups has not been subjected to the depth of study or comprehensive analysis it requires.At TRENDS Research & Advisory, we have taken on the responsibility of deconstructing the rhetoric employed by extremist outlets to expose the ideology driving these movements. We accomplish this through in-depth research as well as through engagement, interaction, and knowledge sharing by hosting broad intellectual dialogues aimed at understanding the roots of extremism that lead to violence. Our goal is to find ways to shield societies from destructive extremist ideas and groups. Given that the Muslim Brotherhood serves as the primary ideological umbrella, and indeed the foundational root, for many other extremist organisations, TRENDS refutes its ideology and arguments through a variety of research publications, most notably the Muslim Brotherhood Encyclopedia.We furthered our efforts by engaging with lawmakers in key parliaments to expose the true nature of the Muslim Brotherhood and to raise policymakers' awareness of the group's risks, particularly in a country like the UK, where it remains active. This led to the recent symposium, which featured highly constructive discussions. The remarks from British lawmakers and counter-terrorism experts demonstrated a genuine understanding of the breadth and danger posed by the Muslim Brotherhood's agenda in the UK and the West as a whole.By examining and understanding the Muslim Brotherhood's methods and operations, it becomes evident that it is highly dangerous to allow the group to continue its activities and develop complex networks across Europe without fully assessing the influence of its discourse. Islamist extremism cannot be understood without a deep dive into the Muslim Brotherhood's intellectual foundations and the ideological links later adopted by other terrorist organisations, such as Al Qaeda and ISIS. This reality calls for redefining terrorism to encompass not only those who commit violence but also those who theorise it and justify its use.In our view, Islamism is rooted in a foundational violence that deems society to be in a state of ignorance and views Muslims who hold differing views as infidels, before it even does the same to non-Muslims. As such, it is a takfiri ideology that underpins terrorist thought. To counter this threat, we must continue to trace its ideological development using practical approaches and foster dialogue between Western and Arab think-tanks. It is also crucial to investigate the sources of funding for these groups and for governments to adopt more robust measures to curb both theoretical and actual violence, given its grave impact on societies and states. One such measure is designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organisation, in line with decisions already taken by certain European and Arab countries. Such a designation would effectively limit the group's activities and prevent it from benefiting from public funding or operating under the guise of a European charitable organisation.
*The writer is the CEO of TRENDS Research & Advisory
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arabian Business
2 hours ago
- Arabian Business
UAE defence firm signs $2.45bn missile boat deal with Kuwait
UAE defence major EDGE has announced the signing of a AED9bn ($2.45bn) contract with the Kuwait Ministry of Defence for the supply of FALAJ3 62m missile boats. This contract marks the largest naval shipbuilding export in the region and ranks among the highest-value naval export deals globally. As the prime contractor, EDGE will lead the programme which includes the design, construction, trials, and delivery of the vessels, in addition to Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) and In-Service Support (ISS). UAE and Kuwait missile boat deal EDGE will also provide the ammunition for the vessels, further demonstrating its end-to-end capability offering. Abu Dhabi Ship Building (ADSB), EDGE Group's naval arm and the UAE's leading shipbuilder, has been selected as the build subcontractor for the programme. Hamad Al Marar, Managing Director and CEO, EDGE, said: 'This agreement with Kuwait is hugely significant both in scale and strategic importance. It deepens long-term defence ties between our nations, brings a proven class of advanced vessels into regional service, and reinforces EDGE's position as a trusted international partner. 'It also reflects the pace of industrial and engineering progress we've achieved in just a few years, and our ability to design, build, and deliver complex naval platforms at scale. 'As we enter a new phase of export-led growth, this programme marks a clear signal of global confidence in what EDGE can deliver.' The FALAJ 3-class missile boat has also been selected by the UAE Navy, with the first vessel, ALTAF, formally commissioned into service in February 2025. This operational deployment reflects the vessel's proven capability and performance in regional waters. With the latest agreement, these advanced 62m vessels are tailored to meet Kuwait's operational requirements, offering high performance, advanced combat systems, and enhanced capabilities for littoral defence operations. This latest contract reinforces EDGE's position as a trusted partner for customers seeking turnkey defence solutions and integrated long-term support, while driving the UAE's strategic objectives for defence exports and industrial collaboration.


The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Evangelical interfaith advocate who advises Trump named head of Gaza Humanitarian Foundation
Johnnie Moore, an evangelical leader and businessman, has been appointed head of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), the organisation said in a statement on Tuesday. Mr Moore, an adviser to President Donald Trump on interfaith issues, replaces Jake Wood, who left the top position at the foundation last week. Mr Wood said in a statement that he felt compelled to leave after determining the organisation could not fulfil its mission. 'GHF believes that serving the people of Gaza with dignity and compassion must be the top priority," he said in a statement. He is the founder and chief executive of the boutique communications consultancy Kairos Company and president of the Congress of Christian Leaders. He has been active in interfaith dialogue, and was involved in the drafting of the 2017 Bahrain Declaration on Religious Freedom and Peaceful Coexistence in the Middle East. According to his biography on the Kairos website, Mr Moore is a "noted evangelical friend" of Israel and has met Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as well as various Palestinian government and civil society leaders. He also played "a significant role" in the development of the Abraham Accords, the biography says. John Acree, the acting director of the GHF, said Mr Moore has "a proven record of principled leadership and hands-on humanitarian work". Mr Moore has praised the GHF on social media since its foundation, most recently lauding it for the development of a "women only" lane at aid distribution sites. He also posted on X that he had "several really encouraging meetings" with the International Committee of the Red Cross, though they don't "always see eye to eye". In another post, he called reports of violence at GHF-run aid distribution sites a lie "spread by terrorists". There have been several reports of violence at distribution sites in the days since the GHF began operations. On Tuesday, 27 people were killed and 90 wounded when Israeli troops opened fire in the area, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. The Israeli military said on social media it had fired shots near an aid distribution complex after "identifying a number of suspects moving towards forces". Both Israel and the US have denied or played down reports of violence. 'We welcome others to join us and urge extreme caution against sharing unverified information from sources that have repeatedly issued demonstrably false reports,' Mr Moore said in the statement. On social media, Mr Moore has drawn a connection between the so-called false reports and anti-Semitic violence in the US, particularly an attack on a Jewish group gathered in a park in Colorado. The National has contacted Mr Moore for comment. The GHF has faced criticism from the UN and humanitarian groups that have traditionally operated in the enclave. The news comes after a leading US consulting firm reportedly pulled out of the GHF last week. The Washington Post said that Boston Consulting Group had been hired last autumn to help design the programme and run its business operations, but that it withdrew its team operating in Tel Aviv on Friday. A representative for the firm said the company had terminated its contract with the GHF and placed a senior partner on the project on leave, pending an internal review. The representative added that all the firm's work with the foundation was "pro bono". Boston Consulting Group set the prices for paying and equipping contractors associated with the foundation working to distribute aid in southern Gaza, the Post said.


The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Meeting of Palestinian factions in Lebanon postponed amid dispute over disarmament
A meeting of Palestinian factions from the 12 official refugee camps in Lebanon will be held next week, a member of the Fatah faction told The National on Tuesday, amid criticism from rival groups that they had been excluded from consultations over the decision for all factions to surrender their weapons to Lebanese authorities. 'There was supposed to be a meeting today or tomorrow with the Joint Palestinian Action Committee, which includes all factions – Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the Islamist forces – but most of the leadership in the Hamas-PIJ coalition is currently travelling outside Lebanon,' said Abu Iyad Al Shaalan, a member of Fatah's leadership in Lebanon. 'So, the meeting has been rescheduled for immediately after Eid.' Despite the absence of Hamas and PIJ from the decision-making process, a delegation led by deputy head of the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) Azzam Al Ahmad is in Beirut to discuss the next steps towards implementing a multiphase plan to disarm Lebanon's 12 Palestinian refugee camps in the coming weeks. The plan seeks the surrender of medium to heavy weaponry but will allow Palestinian security forces to keep light arms. Hamas's leadership in Lebanon voiced dissatisfaction with what it suggested was a unilateral decision by PA President Mahmoud Abbas, but has made no further public comment. 'Right now, there's no fixed appointment for after Eid,' a Hamas source told The National. 'We haven't been informed of the disarmament plan in any official capacity.' The source said 'bypassing' factions outside the Fatah-dominated PLO, such as Hamas and the PIJ, has 'upset many of the factions'. 'No one knows the factional structure of the camps except the Palestinians of Lebanon. Everyone who is speaking on behalf of the Palestinians in Lebanon is coming from Ramallah, and they don't know how to administer the camps or maintain the balance,' the source said, referring to the Palestinian city in the occupied West Bank where the PA has its headquarters. Mr Al Shaalan said the disarming the refugee camps would begin in mid-June as planned, despite 'a few voices of disagreement here and there, but they don't affect Fatah or the PLO's decision'. 'Everyone is comfortable with the plan that is being discussed and with the proposals being made,' he said, referring to a series of meetings between the PLO delegation and Lebanese officials. The issue of disarming Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon, which fall outside Lebanese state control, has long been a contentious one. Armed groups such as Hamas and PIJ – aligned with Hezbollah and committed to armed resistance against Israel – have previously used Lebanon as a launch pad for attacks across the border. They also have popular support in many of the camps. Disarming the camps comes under a broader initiative by Lebanese leaders to limit and disarm non-state actors. But the memory of Lebanon's 1975–1990 civil war – during which Palestinian militias were among the main participants, alongside a series of Lebanese factions and international proxies – still lingers for many Palestinians, who view weapons as essential for self-defence. Weaponry also holds deep symbolic value for Palestinians in Lebanon, many of whom were expelled from their land in 1948 during the Nakba, which marked the creation of what is now Israel. For them, arms represent not only protection but a continuing struggle to return to their homeland. The PA is internationally recognised as the governing body of parts of the Palestinian territories, but its legitimacy is contested by many Palestinians. In Lebanon, Palestinian refugee camps are not governed by the PA, but by inter-factional committees – some of whom do not pledge loyalty to the PA. Under a long-standing arrangement, the Lebanese army does not enter the Palestinian camps, leaving security to be handled by the factions themselves. That arrangement may be coming to an end with the moves towards disarming the camps.