Chatham Islands runway vandalism disrupts community, causes $75k damage
One business experienced delays exporting 500kg of crayfish, while a second was forced to wait months for replacement parts for a fridge.
Exasperated locals described the group's actions as 'senseless vandalism' that significantly affected their community.
The court heard the impact was also compounded because the cargo ship which also serviced the island was out for maintenance at the time, putting more demands on the air service already under pressure.
And it had the potential to threaten the island's medical evacuation service.
'Had there been a medical emergency, thankfully there wasn't, it would have been a pretty awful thing to discover that the plane wasn't operable,' Judge Hastings said.
Judge: Dutch courage and peer pressure
The night's events began when the group were drinking at a house on the island in February last year.
At some point, they climbed into two cars and drove to Te Whanga lagoon, where one of the vehicles got stuck. Undeterred, they climbed into the second vehicle, a Hilux ute, and headed to the airport.
The court heard William Tuuta Memorial Airport has a perimeter fence with clear signage telling unauthorised personnel not to enter. The group drove up to a gate and waited while two of the group attempted to enter a code into the gate's keypad.
When that failed, they drove the ute through the gate, forcing it off the rails and on to the ground. They drove up and down the runway, reaching speeds of 80km/h – the ute's top speed – breaking several runway lights in the process.
They then crossed the airport's apron towards a freight plane, breaking more runway lights. The group got out and five climbed on to the aircraft wing, filming and photographing themselves as they did so.
The plane's wing was also damaged when the group tried to drive the ute underneath it, leaving it unable to fly.
The group left by another entrance, but not before propping up the damaged gate against the perimeter fence.
They caused $21,000 of damage to the airport and $55,000 in damage to the plane, which was insured. But $4167 was sought from each defendant to cover the $25,000 insurance excess.
Four men admitted charges of endangering transport and trespass, while two others were dealt with in another jurisdiction.
Earlier, Jacob Reihana Parkinson, who lives on Pitt Island, was sentenced to 300 hours of community work.
Today, Poliko Talaelei Tapu and Te Hinota Kururangi were sentenced, while a fourth man, who had since died, was convicted and discharged, with his name permanently suppressed.
In sentencing the pair, Judge Hastings noted the aggravating factors of the case, including the significant and costly damage and the potential harm if the aircraft had been flown without someone realising the extent of its damage.
This was a case of Dutch courage and peer pressure, the judge said while sentencing Tapu.
Tapu, who appeared by video link from Auckland, hadn't climbed on the aircraft's wing and only participated that night because he didn't want to be left behind at the house.
He told the court he wanted to pay reparation, but couldn't because he was unemployed.
Taking into account Tapu's guilty plea, remorse, willingness to pay reparation, and the 15 months he'd already spent on curfew, Judge Hastings sentenced the now 29-year-old to four months' community detention, six months' supervision, and ordered him to do 150 hours community work, as well as pay reparation of $4167. He was also ordered to undertake an alcohol and drug assessment and any counselling as appropriate.
The court heard Kururangi had visited the Air Chathams office the day after the incident and apologised to staff.
'That was a brave, but necessary thing to do,' the judge said.
The 23-year-old also paid his share of the reparation.
Taking into account Kururangi's youth, guilty plea, remorse, reparation payment, lack of convictions, and young age, Judge Hastings sentenced him to 280 hours of community work.
Judge Hastings concluded his sentencing by thanking Crown prosecutor Sebastian Hartley and Kururangi's lawyer, Shane Robinson, saying it was good to be able to draw a line under the case.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
05-06-2025
- RNZ News
Warning to illegal rubbish dumpers: new rules could lead to crack-down
Clearing up the worst dumping spots costs Heretaunga-Hastings ratepayers more than $100,000 a year, councillor Wendy Schollum says, and she wants councils to have better enforcement options (file photo). Photo: Supplied/ Hastings District Council Fly-tippers illegally dumping rubbish could be in for a shock if new laws are passed making it easier for councils to prosecute them, and to crack down on them using clues such as old car registration plates or names on letters or mail. The government has proposed revisions to the Waste Minimisation Act 2008 (WMA) and the Litter Act 1979 (the Litter Act), including giving authorities more flexibility to help them crack down on illegal dumping. Hastings District Councillor Wendy Schollum told Checkpoint that illegal rubbish dumping was an ongoing issue in the community, but the council was currently limited in its ability to do much about the fly-tippers. Annually, picking up litter in Heretaunga-Hastings cost well over $100,000, council staff had told her - "and that was only in hot-spot areas, so that wasn't even across the whole district," she said. Wendy Schollum Photo: Supplied via LDR "We estimated that if we were to try and clear every space of litter, it would cost in excess of over $1 million." The types of rubbish being dumped in the area varied from everday litter, to households worth of rubbish, including whiteware and mattresses. "It's actually quite outrageous some of the stuff that gets left," Schollum said. Hastings District Council was not alone in the problem, but critics say it is difficult to hold offenders to account under laws written in the 70s, with offenders basically needing to be caught in the act. "When I first was elected onto council back in 2017, right from then until now, littering and dumping has been the number one issue with ratepayers in our area," Schollum said. But at the moment, even with overwhelming evidence, the council often could not do much in response, she said: "Unless someone was literally standing there watching the person do it at the time, under the current law, there is so little we can do." A consultation document on the law changes also noted the problem: The current Waste Minimisation Act "provides limited CME [compliance, monitoring and enforcement] powers. Prosecution is the main means to address non-compliance, with maximum fines of $100,00 for all main offences at a central government level, [and] $20,000 for a breach of bylaws." But in effect that meant: "For ... offences [other than non-payment of the levy] prosecution through the courts is the only enforcement option, which is limiting because prosecution can be a disproportionate regulatory response to non-compliance, [and] if non-compliance falls below the prosecution threshold, no consequences can arise from breach of the WMA." Schollum said the current loophole leaves ratepayers footing the bill for fly-tippers. "In an area like Heretaunga, where they've been hit by Cyclone Gabrielle and we're reeling from recovery costs, our ratepayers don't need to be paying for what is frankly laziness." She believes the problem was caused by bad attitudes, rather than issues affording dump fees. "Often people contact me and say, 'well, if you reduce the dump fees, people wouldn't litter'. The reality is that if that were the case, we would see in areas where it's cheaper or free to dispose of rubbish that there would be no illegal dumping at all and that's just not the case. "The evidence overwhelmingly points to the fact it's about attitudes." Under the proposed changes, evidence like addressed mail left in dumped rubbish could be used to identify dumpers and fine them. (file photo) Photo: Supplied/Gisborne District Council The consultation document also suggests a new tiered compliance system, with different penalties for different levels of offence. This could range from small infringements where a warning might be suitable, for example for "illegal plastic bag use" or minor littering, through to mid-range offences where the most severe consequences were not suitable, up to the most severe consequences, for behaviour like "high-harm illegal dumping". Schollum said tiered enforcement options would be helpful to the council: "If someone threw their takeaway container out their car window, they're not going to be met with the same sort of penalty as someone who dumps a whole house ... worth of rubbish [in] the community area. "This is about councils finally being able to pursue repeat offenders and stop communities having to pay for the cost of laziness, but only with reasonable evidence." The revisions could also distinguish between individuals and larger entities committing offences, and define offences and maximum fees, penalties and prosecution. Schollum said despite enthusiasm from the community to help in clearing the litter, other frustrating barriers have stood in the way. "Some of the worst hit areas are actually NZTA managed lands, and at the moment, because of health and safety rules with NZTA we can't even arrange community clean ups on their land." Even though these set backs have limited community clean ups, Schollum said it should not be the community's job in the first place. "We shouldn't be having to look at the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff solution, which is the community spending their money and time trying to clean up other people's mess. We need to stop the dumping and the littering in the first place." Other changes in the proposal include adjusting how local councils are allocated funds to dispose of waste, widening what councils can use the funds for and clarifying who is responsible for what. Consultation for the potential law changes closed on 1 June, the Ministry for the Environment website said. Next, the submissions will be considered, and from there Cabinet could decide to create an amendment bill, which could be introduced to Parliament to pursue changing the existing law. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
05-06-2025
- RNZ News
Addressed mail, bills could be used to catch illegal dumpers
Car rego plates and letters or bills with peoples names on them could be used to track down and fine offenders illegally dumping rubbish. So called fly tippers can cost councils hundreds of thousands of dollars a year in clean up costs. At the moment critics say it is difficult to hold them to account under laws written in the 70s,.with offenders basically needing to be caught in the act. But under proposed changes to legislation, evidence like addressed mail left in dumped rubbish could be used to identify dumpers, and fine them for the costs of clean-up. Hasting's District Councillor Wendy Schollum spoke to Lisa Owen.
RNZ News
29-05-2025
- RNZ News
Ahere Gillies and Isaiah Buchanan guilty of manslaughter of Javon Aranui in Hastings
By Ric Stevens, Open Justice reporter of Isaiah Buchanan, (left), and Ahere Gillies have been on trial in the High Court at Napier, charged with the murder of Javon Aranui, inset. Photo: Supplied / Ric Stevens / NZME Homicide victim Javon Aranui suffered 16 different head injuries when he was beaten up on a Hastings street early one morning in December 2023. A jury has now decided that the assault - described by a 111 caller as a "bloody beating" - was not a case of murder. Instead, Ahere Gillies and Isaiah Buchanan, the two men who faced a murder charge in the case, have each been found guilty of the lesser count of manslaughter. Today, the jury returned the verdicts after almost three days of deliberation. The assault in Jellicoe Street at around 3am on December 20, 2023, went on for some time. Exactly how long was a point of contention at the trial, which has occupied the High Court at Napier before Justice Peter Churchman for almost two weeks. Prosecutor Megan Mitchell, when she opened for the Crown, said the assault could have lasted as long as 15 minutes. But as evidence piled up during the trial, it became clear that the assault was probably a lot shorter. "This is a trial about how many times and how hard you can kick or punch someone in the head before you know you are risking their life," Mitchell told the jury. If the violence inflicted was difficult to visualise, Mitchell invited the jury to stare at a clock for just 10 seconds in silence. Imagine someone getting kicked in the head for 10 seconds, she said, and then imagine it going on for longer. Minutes longer. There was never any question that both Gillies and Buchanan had been involved in the altercation. Gillies, 20, accepted that he was responsible for the manslaughter of the 24-year-old Hastings man, who was sometimes known by his tag-name of Snake, but he denied murdering him. Buchanan also pleaded not guilty to murder, and did not accept that he could be found guilty of manslaughter either. He said that the two accused never intended to seriously hurt Aranui, and that he had left the altercation at one point to secure his two dogs, which had got involved. Buchanan said Aranui - who was 30kg heavier than him - threw the first punch, and that he responded with kicks to the torso, but not a punch, in self-defence. He said he tended to Aranui when he was knocked unconscious at the end of the fight, had placed his head on his duffle-bag "like a pillow", and had helped the beaten man get up when he came to again. He said the altercation ended in a handshake when Gillies returned to the scene, and the two men gave Aranui a bottle of water. Pathologist Dr Katherine White had earlier described carrying out the post-mortem on Aranui and the multiple injuries on both sides of his head, including a "dangerous volume" of bleeding inside the skull. There were also injuries - although mainly not visible on the surface - to Aranui's torso, and his legs. The cause of death was blunt force trauma to the head. Despite the extent of his injuries, Aranui was able to get up after the altercation, which happened outside a known gang house. Buchanan said he had a lifelong association with the Mongrel Mob. Aranui even climbed back on the bicycle and rode a short distance. He was seen riding the bike by the police officers responding to the 111 call, and who arrived in Jellicoe St at about 3.20am. Aranui fell off the bike in Collinge Road, just around the corner, but was still talking and walking unaided, although stumbling, when ambulance officers arrived to help him. He also spoke to the police and ambulance staff, who noted his visible head injuries and his split lip. They did not know at that time that Aranui was already beginning to succumb to his fatal injuries when he had the conversation. He said he felt hot. He got out of the ambulance to urinate on the side of the road. He vomited. He told the first responders things that were not true about where he had been and how he got his injuries. He appeared to be intoxicated, although the pathologist would later find he had no alcohol in his system at all. Aranui was reluctant to be taken in the ambulance. He was worried about what might happen to his bike if it were left on the side of the street. Obligingly, the police officers put the bicycle in the back of their car and said they would take it to Aranui's home if the injured man agreed to go to hospital. He went, but then things went downhill. The ambulance stopped twice on the way to Hastings Hospital, 5.5km away, as the crew tried to stabilise Aranui's rapidly deteriorating condition. By the time they got to the hospital Emergency Department, about an hour after the beating, Aranui was on a breathing tube. He was transferred to Wellington Hospital, where he died the following day. Such was Aranui's condition when he arrived at ED that hospital staff got back in touch with police, who quickly returned to Jellicoe St and the house where blood spots had been found on the pavement. As the morning progressed, they cordoned off the property and asked the occupants - 17 people who lived in the house and associated sleepouts and a housebus - to come outside. They knocked at the door of a cabin on the front of the property. When they got no response, they threatened to break the door down. Inside were Buchanan, who was 18 at the time, and Gillies. Although a year or so older than Buchanan, Gillies is his nephew. Police noticed Gillies was nervous and shaking slightly. Both young men were questioned and DNA samples were taken, but they were not arrested immediately. Both were to leave Hastings in the days after Aranui died, and police later found a social media post of Gillies in a rural location with his face covered and accompanied by the clip of a rap song entitled Murder Was the Case . They also intercepted phone calls between the two in which they discussed a relative talking to officers, the DNA evidence, and the possibility of going to police to present Aranui's death as manslaughter. Gillies' lawyer, Eric Forster, did not call his client to the witness stand or call evidence in his defence. His position was that Gillies accepted that in the altercation with Aranui, he was involved in unlawful actions that caused death and so, he committed manslaughter. But he said what separated manslaughter from murder in this case, was what was in Gillies' mind at the time. "It never crossed Ahere Gillies' mind that his actions would cause Javon Aranui's death," Forster said. Buchanan was called to the stand by his counsel, Adam Holland, and said that the fight started after he and Gillies laughed at Aranui when they saw him cycling down the road being chased by a neighbourhood dog named Honey. They had been chased by the same dog before, he said. He said Aranui came up to them and asked what they were laughing at before hitting Buchanan without warning. From there, it was all on. "We never intended for him to die - it was an accident," Buchanan said. "We never intended to hurt him or seriously injure him. All we wanted was for him not to attack us." The jury deliberated over their verdicts for almost three days after being sent out on Monday afternoon, and returning on Thursday afternoon. By that time, they had been reduced to 11 members - eight women and three men. Gillies and Buchanan will be sentenced in August. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .
