
Labrador Indigenous leaders react to Premier Andrew Furey's resignation
Some say he strengthened ties with Indigenous groups, while others feel the provincial government overlooked their communities. His effort toward reconciliation was met with both gratitude and frustration.
But Premier Andrew Furey's resignation took them all by surprise.
While Furey finds his way back to the surgery room, Labrador Indigenous leaders are reflecting on his time in office — his accomplishments, his shortcomings, and what they hope to see from the next leader.
'Set back any progress'
Nunatsiavut government President Johannes Lampe reflected on his relationship with Furey, calling it "for the most part very positive."
"He was approachable, easy to communicate with and willing to listen," Lampe said.
"We met over the years when he was premier. And I do believe that he was committed to building a strong relationship with the Nunatsiavut government and to reconciliation."
But Lampe was critical of Furey's stance on the NunatuKavut Community Council (NCC), which represents 6,000 self-identifying Inuit in south and central Labrador.
Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami — the national organization representing Inuit across Canada, including Inuit in northern Labrador — does not recognize NCC as an Indigenous group, and neither does Nunatsiavut or the Innu Nation, who say NCC is a settler organization engaging in Inuit identity theft.
"Premier Furey was well aware of our concerns, yet he continued to support having a member of the NCC serve as the minister responsible for Indigenous affairs," Lampe said, referring to Cartwright-L'Anse au Clair MHA Lisa Dempster. "And he also continued to engage with the NCC as if it were an Indigenous collective, which it isn't."
Lampe says Furey's approach to the NCC "set back any progress that had been made in recent years toward reconciliation."
Despite these disagreements, Lampe describes Furey as "genuine" and someone who "truly wanted to make a difference."
He pointed to Furey's visits to Nunatsiavut communities, particularly his presence during the apology to residential school survivors, as moments of sincerity.
"I truly appreciate having him come and see the situations of Labrador Inuit in our Nunatsiavut communities," Lampe said. "But having done that, you know, I would have liked to see some action taken after the apologies were made to Labrador Inuit in Nunatsiavut communities."
'An exceptional human being and an exceptional premier'
That apology tour began in southern Labrador, in an area claimed by NunatuKavut. The group's president, Todd Russell, said he was shocked by Furey's decision to step down.
Russell described Furey's relationship with NCC as "respectful, open, inclusive" and said he made efforts to understand their history.
"He treated us with respect and equity around the table. He really fought to understand where we were coming from, who we are, our history, and that was a quality about Premier Furey that I so appreciated," Russell said.
Furey made an official apology to residential school survivors in Cartwright, a moment that Russell said was "indicative of the type of person he is and the leadership."
"That was somewhat controversial for some others, but he stuck to his promises and his commitments and he saw it through with integrity," he said.
'We feel like we were forgotten'
In Hopedale, AngajukKâk Marjorie Flowers was also surprised by the resignation, but was less positive about Furey's tenure, saying people in her community often felt neglected.
"I don't mean to sound negative, but sometimes we here on the north coast feel like we were forgotten," Flowers said.
"We will remember that he did come and make the apology for the residential schools. And that's actually the only time that we've ever seen the premier here in our community."
Despite her criticisms, Flowers said Furey came across as "a very pleasant man" and his visit for the residential school apology was meaningful to some people there. However, she said a visit alone was not enough to address the deeper concerns of people in her community.
Flowers criticized Furey's government for consulting communities only after the government had made decisions.
"That to me is not a good relation," she said.
'One of the best premiers we've had in Newfoundland and Labrador'
Former Labrador MP and Innu Nation land claims advisor Peter Penashue, who has worked closely with Innu leadership, calls Furey "one of the best premiers we've had in Newfoundland and Labrador."
Penashue praised Furey for his willingness to engage with Indigenous leaders and listen to concerns.
"On a human level, he's a very fine gentleman," he said. "You can sense he cares about the people, he cares about what's happening in Newfoundland and Labrador, and he cares about what happens in the future of this province."
One moment that stands out, Penashue says, was a meeting in Natuashish where Furey committed to resolving long-standing concerns related to Muskrat Falls rate mitigation. Penashue said the provincial government had previously altered the agreement, reducing revenue for the Innu.
The Innu Nation sued over the deal, and eventually reached a tentative deal with the province outside of court.
"[Furey] just said, 'We're going to resolve this issue' — and he did. That changed things for us. He's a premier that looks for reconciliation, looks for resolution," Penashue said. "And that's a fine quality to have in a premier."
Penashue also highlighted Furey's role in pushing forward Indigenous participation in resource development, including discussions on Churchill River projects and economic agreements.
He said Furey understood the importance of land rights and ensured Innu representation at key decision-making tables — something that hasn't always been the case with past premiers.
Still, Penashue acknowledged concerns about the next government.
"We may have a premier that'll absolutely say, 'Look, I don't want to deal with the Innu people. I don't want to deal with these issues,'" he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Canada Standard
an hour ago
- Canada Standard
The quiet killing of the Canadian giantess forests and urgent reminder to push the climate change agenda
On Friday, almost the entire country is under an Environment Canada air quality warning as wildfires continue to rage across the Prairies. As world leaders prepare to gather in Alberta in Kananaskis for the G7 summit next week, some activist groups across Canada say they are planning protests. The Group of G7 is consisting of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States. But as of Saturday afternoon, there were 59 fires burning in the province, with 23 of them classified as out of control. Since mid-May more than 580,000 hectares have burned in Alberta so far. A wildfire burning in northern Alberta is not only threatening the homes of hundreds of residents in various communities, but also major oil and gas companies with operations in the area. Security officials at the G7 leaders summit in Kananaskis say plans are in place, including the possibility of evacuations, if wildfires become a serious threat. Kananaskis, located at the foothills and front ranges of the Rocky Mountains. Its western edge borders Banff National Park and the Alberta-B.C. boundary. More than 30,000 people in the prairies have been forced to leave their homes due to the numerous fires that have broken out in recent days. According to government data, the fires are caused by campfires of humans. But, several environmental groups are denouncing the oil companies' practices of extracting tar sands. In fact, Alberta's oil companies have been draining the prairies for decades. Despite promises from industry and government to reduce water use in oil sands operations and restore wetlands that have been mined to a depth of more than 200 meters, the delta's ecosystem of the Athabasca River declined. It will become irreversible if oil companies actually triple their production in Alberta, as they have announced, by 2030. Extracting oil from the tar sands requires enormous quantities of water. For every barrel of oil produced, at least 2.6 barrels of water must be extracted from the Athabasca River or local groundwater. For so-called "in situ" operations, which use steam to separate the oil from the sand underground and then pump the bitumen to the surface, freshwater consumption is less, but still significant. The Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) forecasts that production of crude bitumen-the thick, sticky oil found in Alberta's oil sands region-will reach four million barrels per day in 2033, up from 3.4 million barrels per day last year. If we do the math, that's more or less 10 million barrels of freshwater water per day being pumped to produce the petrolium. The quiet killing of the Canadian giantess forests and its various animal species is the urgent reminder for the Canadian population to push the climate change agenda. During the G7 summit, environmentalists, anti-imperialist coalitions and Indigenous advocates, among many other groups most raise their voices. They must demand that Mark Carney, the Canadian Prime minister, legislate quickly to stop the devastation of the canadian forest even at the risk of displeasing some governments in Western Canada. ( Pressenza, Montreal ) Source: Pressenza


CTV News
13 hours ago
- CTV News
AFN to hold emergency meeting on major projects bill
Watch National Chief of the Assembly of First Nations Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak on the upcoming emergency meeting to discuss Bill C-5.


Toronto Star
19 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Doug Ford won't be the only one feeling the heat this summer
Ontario's long, hot summer of 2025 just got hotter. And longer. Not just for Doug Ford. The premier's political rivals will also be facing the heat, each in their own way. MPPs headed home this week with a surprise: Ford's Tories told them to stay away until Oct. 20. That's a sweet summer break lasting nearly 20 weeks for provincial politicians who sat in their legislative seats for only six weeks this year. Another seven weeks of work awaits them upon their return, after which they're back home for the Christmas break. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Total time at work in the legislature: 13 weeks out of 52 for the whole year. The ready excuse? Ford's Tories argue they've produced so much 'ambitious' legislation to date that they need more time to recharge. The real explanation? The premier has provoked so much antagonism to his controversial plan for 'special economic zones' — a new law to dilute old laws — that he's better off lying low. Ford's mishandling of the issue sparked warnings from Indigenous leaders that protests will flare over the summer. Away from the daily question period in the legislature, Ford can talk about standing up to Donald Trump instead of taking questions about trampling on rights of First Nations. All that said, if tensions rise, it could complicate Ford's plans to host his fellow premiers in Muskoka at their annual summit meeting in mid-July. Instead of the usual banter, there could be blockades pitting protesters against politicians — and cottagers. Ford won't be the only one on the firing line. Any highway blockades would also put Ontario's opposition leaders on the spot, forcing them to pick a lane — or, more precisely, restate their stance when the stakes are high. New Democratic Party Leader Marit Stiles and Liberal Leader Bonnie Crombie, choosing their words carefully, have said they won't side with civil disobedience on the highways. Not when motorists are fuming under the baking sun. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW As Ontario's populist premier has noted, blockades rarely win public support. Either way, Ford will spend much of the summer watching his rivals face the heat while he cools off at his cottage. With or without the drumbeat of First Nations protests, both Stiles and Crombie will be facing the music in leadership reviews mandated by their parties after every election. New Democrats will meet on Sept. 20 in Niagara Falls — Canada's honeymoon capital — to vote on the post-honeymoon future of Stiles after the Feb. 27 loss to Ford. Despite losing seats and stature in the election — her party stumbled and tumbled in the popular vote — Stiles seems sure to prevail. Most activists understand their party was predestined to decline in an election called early by Ford to capitalize on anti-American animus. Provincially as federally, New Democrats suffered from a political squeeze play as polarized voters opted for a binary choice between Tories and Liberals to cope with economic uncertainty. In the aftermath, the NDP fell from a competitive 23.7 per cent of the popular vote in the 2022 election to a dismal 18.6 per cent this time. The only saving grace was the final seat count. While New Democrats dropped to 27 seats from 31, the Liberals came third with only 14 seats — despite winning a far higher 30 per cent of the popular vote (up from 23.9 per cent in 2022). For Crombie, the failure to win her own riding — or any seats — in her home base of Mississauga, where she once served as mayor, proved an embarrassment. In truth, Stiles was dragged down by the declining fortunes of the federal NDP under former leader Jagmeet Singh. So too, Crombie was lifted up by the remarkable popularity of Carney's federal Liberals. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW While federal-provincial crossover is a constant in Ontario politics, Crombie's Mississauga shutout leaves her with a lot of explaining to do. Now, she too faces a party leadership review in September — and a long, hot summer of reaching out to provincial Liberals who are wondering who does what next. Yet her future depends less on past performance than on future prospects. The problem for both Stiles and Crombie is that if another election were held now, Ford would do even better. A key difference is that Crombie's Liberals are positioned to fare better than the New Democrats under Stiles. The latest Leger poll shows Ford's Tories preferred by 45 per cent of respondents (up from 43 per cent in the February vote). That compares to 32 per cent for the Liberals (up from 30 per cent), versus 15 per cent for the NDP (down from 18.6 per cent in the election). You can do the math. Crombie's Liberals are more than twice as popular as the New Democrats, and Ford's Tories are precisely three times more popular. Which explains why Ford will be sitting pretty this summer while Stiles and Crombie will be stuck in their respective hot seats, looking over their shoulders. Politics Headlines Newsletter Get the latest news and unmatched insights in your inbox every evening Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. Please enter a valid email address. Sign Up Yes, I'd also like to receive customized content suggestions and promotional messages from the Star. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Politics Headlines Newsletter You're signed up! You'll start getting Politics Headlines in your inbox soon. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page.