Five years of change: How the Blue Book Programme has grown
The Blue Book Traineeship programme welcomed 9,562 trainees between 2020 and 2025.
Over the past five years, the European Commission hired more female trainees than male trainees across the European Union.
That's according to data shared by the Secretariat General of the European Commission via a Freedom of Information (FOI) request.
The Blue Book Traineeship programme is a five-month paid internship offered by the Commission, occurring twice a year - in March and October.
It provides graduates with the opportunity to gain experience in EU policymaking and administration.
There were only six instances in which the number of male trainees outnumbered female trainees.
Malta was the EU country where this situation happened three times - in March 2020 and 2023, and in October 2023.
The Netherlands had two occurrences in October 2024 and March 2025, and Denmark had one instance in March 2020.
The only country where the number of female and male trainees was equal was Luxembourg in October 2021.
Between 2020 and 2025, the programme admitted only 168 non-binary individuals.
Italy is the country with the highest number of candidates, exceeding 25,000.
France follows with over 11,000 candidates, and Spain has slightly over 10,000.
By contrast, Estonia recorded the fewest candidates at just 199, followed by Malta with 240 and Latvia with 257.
The UK's last participation in this traineeship was in 2020, with 29 trainees in March and 24 in October.
The year 2021 saw the highest number of candidates overall, accounting for more than 19,000 applications.
However, in 2024, the highest number of trainees was accepted, exceeding 1,900 participants.
"Russia wants to see the US and Europe divided. Let's not give them that," the EU's foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas has told Euronews.
Speaking live on Euronews' Europe Today on Wednesday, Kallas said that there is "no wedge" between Brussels and Trump's administration, and urged both sides to remain united in the face of Russia's aggression in Ukraine.
Kallas also said that the current talks are "shuttle diplomacy" and that Europe will have a seat on the table when formal negotiations on a peace settlement start.
"There is no table where Russia and Ukraine are sitting right now. It's a shuttle diplomacy," she said, a day after a call between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in which both presidents agreed to a temporary 30-day halt on strikes on Ukraine's energy infrastructure.
"Of course for any deal to work you need Europeans around the table to agree to the deal. Because the implementation of the deal needs to be in the hands of Europe."
Asked about her response to the Putin-Trump call, Kallas said: "It's really good to see how these things are going. Trump was clear that aid to Ukraine was not discussed. Putin said it was discussed. I'd rather trust Trump on this than President Putin."
According to reports, Putin demanded that the West halt its deliveries of military aid to Ukraine as a precondition for the limited 30-day ceasefire. Trump later claimed in an interview with Fox news that military aid was "not discussed."
Trump also hailed that call as "productive", but the limited ceasefire agreed falls short of the comprehensive halt to fighting on land, sea and air that the US President had hoped to secure.
Kallas also cast doubt over Putin's good will and the feasibility of the limited, 30-day ceasefire he agreed with Trump.
"In order for the ceasefire to work there has to be deterrence. And if all guards are down, I mean Putin has shown this before, hes not keeping to the ceasefires." she said.
"And if he wants the guards to be down on the Ukrainian side, then he actually achieves what he wants, and I am absolutely certain he will continue."
Kallas has tabled a proposal to release a staggering €40 billion in fresh military support for Ukraine which, if approved, could ramp up deliveries of artillery ammunition, air defence systems, missiles, drones and fighter jets.
The draft proposal, recently seen by Euronews, would see "participating countries" pitch in with pledges, meaning it would not require the unanimous approval of all 27 EU member states.
It's also open to like-minded non-EU participating countries, such as the United Kingdom and Norway, suggesting a shift to a "coalition of the willing."
Kallas' initiative will be up for debate when EU leaders gather in Brussels for a summit on Thursday. Questions remain over whether the €18 billion loan, backed by the seized windfall profits from Russian assets frozen in the EU, will be part of that plan.
The EU executive is also expected to unveil a paper later on Wednesday with concrete proposals on how to ramp up Europe's defences.
"The stronger we are the less likely war is," Kallas said. "We need to do more for our defence. We also need to do more for Ukraine so that the stronger they are on the battlefield, the stronger they are on the negotiation table."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
13 minutes ago
- Euronews
‘We'll convince Hungary' on EU accession
Ukraine is confident that it will eventually be able to overcome Hungarian resistance to its path to EU accession, the head of the country's Mission to the EU told Euronews' morning show Europe Today on Thursday. Chentsov Vselovod came into the studio in Brussels for an exclusive interview as EU leaders gather in Brussels for another critical summit, with Ukrainian EU accession one of the agenda items. 'We're fighting to stop this war first of all and we're fighting for our European future. Ukraine is a candidate state and we're ready to start accession talks as soon as there is consensus,' Vselovod said. Pressed by Euronews' Meabh McMahon on Hungary's resistance to Ukraine's EU accession process, he said: 'You mentioned that Hungary is blocking. I would concentrate on who is supporting, so we have 26 member states supporting, and I'm sure we'll be able to convince Hungary to get on board.' Elsewhere in the interview, Vselovod said he was confident that US President Donald Trump would 'stick to his word' on a commitment given during Wednesday's NATO summit in The Hague to supply the war-torn state with Patriot missiles. Trump told a press conference on Wednesday that Patriots were 'very hard to get' but that 'we are going to see if we can make some of them available' after a 50-minute meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on the sidelines of the NATO summit. The ambassador also responded to Trump's touting the possibility that Russia's Vladimir Putin may invade other countries following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine during a press conference at the NATO summit in The Hague. Trump was asked whether he considered Putin an enemy and if he believed the Russian leader had territorial ambitions beyond Ukraine. "It's possible", Trump replied. 'Its' good there is an understanding that Russia is a threat and we kept telling [people] about this imminent threat if Ukraine is not defended, if Ukraine is left alone,' said Vselovod. 'To avoid this continuation, this broadening of this conflict, Europe and the US has to help Ukraine to stop this war,' the ambassador concluded.
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Trump's rejection of US intel on Iran strikes reflects long history of discrediting spy agencies
An early US intelligence assessment said Iran's nuclear program has been set back only a few months after American strikes on three sites last weekend. US President Donald Trump has rejected the report and pronounced the program 'completely and fully obliterated'. Following the initial assessment, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Director John Ratcliffe on Wednesday said a body of credible intelligence indicated that Iran 's nuclear program was severely damaged by the strikes, and that it would take years to be rebuilt. 'This includes new intelligence from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years,' Ratcliffe said in a statement. The dispute is unlikely to fade anytime soon. Top administration officials are pressing Trump's case, with a news conference set for Thursday at the Pentagon. Briefings also are scheduled for lawmakers on Capitol Hill, though the White House plans to limit the sharing of classified information after the initial intelligence assessment leaked this week. 'Intelligence people strive to live in a world as it is, describe the world as it is, where politicians are all about describing the world as they want it to be,' said Larry Pfeiffer, a 32-year intelligence veteran who held positions including CIA chief of staff and senior director of the White House Situation Room. Though it's hardly unheard of for presidents to bristle at what they perceive as bad news from the intelligence community, it's rare for the conflict to spill into public view as it did this week. 'I don't think we've seen another president push back as strong as this guy has,' Pfeiffer said. Trump's anti-intelligence track record Trump's suspicion of the intelligence community, particularly when its assessments do not align with his worldview, dates back to even before his first term. His 2016 campaign was shadowed by an investigation into whether his team had coordinated with Russia to sway the outcome of the election. He was so infuriated by the scrutiny over a dossier of unverified and salacious claims connecting him to Russia that, one week before he was sworn in, he tweeted: 'Intelligence agencies should never have allowed this fake news to 'leak' into the public. One last shot at me. Are we living in Nazi Germany?' Trump disputed the assessment that Russia had interfered in the election on his behalf, decrying as a 'hoax' and a 'witch hunt' an investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller, which ultimately concluded the Trump campaign had welcomed Moscow's help but did not find sufficient evidence of a criminal conspiracy. Trump also openly challenged the judgment of his intelligence agencies alongside Russian President Vladimir Putin at a Helsinki summit in 2018. 'I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today,' Trump said. 'He just said it's not Russia. I will say this: I don't see any reason why it would be.' Such public protestation takes its toll on an intelligence community that historically has endeavored to produce data-driven and apolitical judgments, said Frank Montoya Jr., a former FBI supervisor who served as director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center. 'It's really demoralising because nobody is looking at this stuff from a political perspective. They're looking at the data and they're analysing the data,' he said. 'When you get this kind of unfounded criticism, especially from the policymaker in chief, it just destroys morale.' Second term Trump tapped loyalists to lead America's intelligence services in his second term – Tulsi Gabbard as director of national intelligence and John Ratcliffe as CIA director. They promised to end what they said was the weaponisation of intelligence and root out disloyal officers. But there have already been conflicts. Last month, the National Intelligence Council declassified a memo in response to an open records request that said American spy agencies found no coordination between the Venezuelan government and the Tren de Aragua gang, contradicting statements the Trump administration used to justify invoking the Alien Enemies Act and deporting Venezuelan immigrants. Gabbard later fired the two veteran intelligence officers who led the council because of their perceived opposition to Trump. More trouble came after the war between Israel and Iran began nearly two weeks ago. Trump dismissed Gabbard's testimony to Congress in March that US spy agencies did not believe Iran was actively pursuing a nuclear weapon. Trump insisted Iran was very close. 'I don't care what she said,' he told reporters last week. Gabbard later accused the news media of mischaracterising her testimony, noting that she had mentioned Iran's large stockpile of enriched uranium that goes beyond levels needed for civilian uses. Iran maintains that its nuclear program was peaceful, though the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency has repeatedly warned that Tehran has enough highly enriched uranium to make several nuclear bombs if it chooses. Impact of US strikes on Iran A preliminary report from the Defense Intelligence Agency that emerged this week said that while the US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities did significant damage, the facilities were not totally destroyed and the program was only set back by a few months. The White House called the assessment 'flat-out wrong'. The DIA said the initial findings will be refined as new information becomes available. Given Trump's sceptical view of intelligence officials, Pfeiffer said, 'his initial instinct is to assume that if the intelligence community is telling him something different than he would like it to be, that it's because they're trying to undermine him'. Gabbard and Ratcliffe have sought to brush off any perceived conflict between their agencies and Trump. Ratcliffe said Wednesday that new intelligence from a 'historically reliable and accurate' source reveals that US strikes 'destroyed' several of Iran's nuclear facilities that would require years to be rebuilt. 'CIA continues to collect additional reliably sourced information to keep appropriate decision-makers and oversight bodies fully informed,' Ratcliffe said in a statement. 'When possible, we will also provide updates and information to the American public, given the national importance of this matter and in every attempt to provide transparency.' Gabbard noted the DIA assessment was of 'low confidence', an acknowledgment by its authors that their conclusions could be mistaken. 'The propaganda media has deployed their usual tactic: selectively release portions of illegally leaked classified intelligence assessments,' she wrote on X. Trump narrated his own intelligence assessment while attending the NATO summit in the Netherlands. He mentioned satellite images showing the area around nuclear facilities 'burned black' and said the underground tunnels had 'all collapsed'. He also suggested Israel had sources on the ground in Iran: 'They have guys that go in there after the hit' to evaluate the damage. The White House pointed to an Israel Atomic Energy Commission assessment that the US and Israeli strikes have 'set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years'. Intelligence officers routinely craft assessments about global threats and specific incidents – information vital to the decision-making of national security officials and lawmakers. Assessments are regularly updated as new intelligence is produced from sources including field agents, informants, open source material and secret surveillance. The work is secretive to protect the methods and sources of intelligence agencies and to avoid becoming a political football. Former intelligence officials said it's likely to take days, weeks, or even months to form a full picture of the impact of the US strikes on Iran's nuclear capabilities. 'I would call for patience,' said John Negroponte, a former ambassador who served as the first director of national intelligence under President George W. Bush. 'Avoid the temptation to rush to judgment.'
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
CIA chief reports 'severe damage' to Iran's nuclear Sites
The head of the CIA has said that US strikes caused "severe damage" to Iran's nuclear facilities after a leaked report and contradictory statements from US President Donald Trump cast doubt on the extent of the damage. John Ratcliffe, head of the CIA, said key sites had been destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the "course of years". He stopped short of declaring that Iran's nuclear programme had been outright eliminated. The new intelligence assessment comes a day after a leaked early assessment from the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) concluded that key components of Iran's nuclear programme could be restarted in months. It also mentioned that much of Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium had been moved by Iran before the US struck the sites over the weekend — a claim the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog said on Thursday was a possibility. Trump initially said that the use of US bunker-buster bombs on the Furdow and Natanz uranium enrichment sites was a "spectacular military success" that "obliterated" the key locations. He denied media reports about the assessment from the DIA, posting on social media on Wednesday that the "fake news" media had "lied and totally misrepresented the facts". On Wednesday, Trump and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth then appeared to cast doubt over the scale of the damage inflicted on the sites. During a NATO summit in The Hague, Trump told journalists that the "intelligence was very inconclusive". "The intelligence says we don't know. It could've been very severe. That's what the intelligence suggests," he said, later reversing his claim by saying that the Iranian programme had been set back "decades". On Wednesday, Hegseth described the damage to the facilities as "moderate to severe", although he rejected the DIA report, calling it false. US officials have also pointed to conclusions made by the Israelis. On Wednesday, the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that the US strike on the Furdow facility "rendered it inoperable" and that the combined effort of Israeli and US strikes had "set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years". Experts say that drawing reliable conclusions about the impact of the US strikes is difficult only days after they have taken place. Jeffrey Lewis, a professor of nonproliferation at the Middlebury Institute, told AP that, "either it's too early to know, or you know" about the damage to the sites. A spokesperson for the Iranian foreign ministry said the facilities have suffered significant damage, although declined to elaborate in detail which facilities had sustained the most damage and to what extent. Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN's nuclear body, said on Tuesday that the sites had seen "extensive damage" as a result of the conflict. The IAEA assessed that access roads close to the underground facility and an entrance at the Furdow site were hit. At the Natanz site, the IAEA said in its initial assessment that two impact holes from US strikes were found above the underground halls that had been used for enrichment and storage. As the row over the extent of the damage to Tehran's nuclear sites continues, diplomatic efforts to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear programme are also gaining traction. Trump said that US and Iranian officials would meet soon to resume a dialogue that was interrupted by nearly two weeks of open conflict between Israel and Iran. "I don't care if I have an agreement or not," Trump said, because Iran was too badly damaged to even consider rebuilding its programme. "They're not going to be doing it anyway. They've had it." The IAEA has rejected an "hourglass approach" involving different assessments of how many months or years it would take Iran to rebuild its programme, saying that such efforts distracted from finding a long-term solution. Iran still had the "technical knowledge" and "industrial capacity" to rebuild its programme, Grossi said, adding that his priority was allowing IAEA inspectors back to the sites in order to conduct a thorough assessment.
