logo
Britain to ask Kosovo to take UK's small boat migrants as it lines up talks over 'return hubs' in the Balkans after ditching Rwanda plan

Britain to ask Kosovo to take UK's small boat migrants as it lines up talks over 'return hubs' in the Balkans after ditching Rwanda plan

Daily Mail​26-05-2025

Britain wants Kosovo to take migrants who arrive in Britain in small boats under a return hub' deal.
The tiny country of 1.6million people, which only declared independence from Serbia 17 years ago, heads a shortlist of nine countries that ministers want to take failed asylum seekers.
Sir Keir Starmer is currently looking for allies who might take those who cross the Channel as he seeks a way to reduce the numbers making the perilous journey.
He is under mounting pressure after the total number of arrivals by small boats in 2025 hit 13,573, 37 per cent higher than at the same point last year.
One of the PM's first acts after taking power was to ditch the Tories' Rwanda migrant deportation scheme.
Serbia, North Macedonia and Bosnia-Herzegovina are also on the list, the Times reported, with ministers wanting to make progress by the time the UK hosts a Balkan conference in the autumn.
But Kosovo is at the top after its president, Vjosa Osmani, said earlier this month she was 'open' to talks on the subject, although she had not yet been approached by UK ministers.
More than 3,000 migrants entered the EU through the Western Balkans in the four months of 2025, according to border agency Frontex.
Official figures showed net long-term inflows into the UK were 431,000 in the year to December, compared with 860,000 across 2023.
Numbers had dropped to 739,000 in the year to last June - just before the election - with the peak remaining 906,000 in the 12 months to June 2023.
The Tories said the ONS data demonstrated their curbs were already having an impact - although the level in 2024 was still roughly equivalent to the population of Leeds.
Separate figures from the Home Office showed 32,245 asylum seekers were housed in hotels as of the end of March this year - despite Keir Starmer 's vow to shut them down.
The PM unveiled a crackdown on legal immigration last week, warning that failure to control the system risked turning Britain into an 'island of strangers'.
Downing Street was forced to deny angry comparisons from MPs that it was an echo of Enoch Powell's 'Rivers of Blood' speech.
Director of population statistics at the ONS Mary Gregory said: 'Our provisional estimates show net migration has almost halved compared with the previous year, driven by falling numbers of people coming to work and study, particularly student dependants.
'This follows policy changes brought in restricting visa applications.
'There has also been an increase in emigration over the 12 months to December 2024, especially people leaving who originally came on study visas once pandemic travel restrictions to the UK were eased.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Western democracies have a duty to resist growing Russian aggression
Western democracies have a duty to resist growing Russian aggression

Telegraph

time16 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Western democracies have a duty to resist growing Russian aggression

SIR – Beyond the finances not adding up, which appears to be a feature of all Labour policy, the other thing that struck me about the Strategic Defence Review (report, June 4) was its leisurely response to what it acknowledged to be a present and growing threat. Surely the best answer to Russian aggression towards Europe is to increase support to Ukraine now, giving it everything we can without restrictions on use, while properly ramping up full sanctions and other deterrent actions against Russia. Russia is now weaker than it has been for some time, thanks to the extraordinary efforts of Ukraine. We in Western Europe have a moral obligation to defend Ukraine and other nations from repeated Russian aggression. Hopefully, at the same time, we may ultimately help Russia towards a better future, and deter China from resorting to conflict. Colonel Ronnie Bradford (retd) Vienna, Austria SIR – Your Leading Article (June 4) draws attention to the fact that the Prime Minister declined to set a firm date for when the defence budget would increase to 3 per cent of GDP. This gives rise to two concerns. Will 3 per cent be enough, when Nato is poised to set a new target for members to spend 5 per cent? And, given the obvious urgency of the matter, why will this happen only in the next parliament? Brigadier Rod Brummitt (retd) Bournemouth, Dorset SIR – I read your Leading Article (June 4) with incredulity. You write that 'Sir Keir dismissed calls to set specific spending targets as 'performative fantasy politics' '. When I served during the Cold War period, we mustered four armoured divisions – each of three brigades – in Germany, as well as substantial UK Land Forces and a Territorial Army of several thousand. Now, as Lewis Page has written (Comment, June 1), the Army's sole war-fighting division, which is supposed to have three brigades, is actually a two-brigade force with enough equipment for just one. As you say, 'If the deployments needed for the next two or three decades are to be met, then commitments have to be made now.' As it is, what threat does the Government believe we can deter? Lt Col Jeremy Moger (retd) Hazelbury Bryan, Dorset SIR – John Healey, the Defence Secretary, talks about a 10-year plan to get Britain ready for war (report, June 2), in the face of 'growing Russian aggression'. Does he really think that Vladimir Putin is going to wait that long? He added that the Strategic Defence Review would send a 'message to Moscow'. Mr Healey publicises his plans, while Putin hides his. It isn't hard to see who is likely to be the winner. Mick Ferrie Mawnan Smith, Cornwall

Major change to free school meal rules unveiled - saving parents up to £500
Major change to free school meal rules unveiled - saving parents up to £500

Daily Mirror

time23 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Major change to free school meal rules unveiled - saving parents up to £500

Keir Starmer unveiled plans to extend free school meals to all kids in families who get Universal Credit, in a move that could save parents up to £500 a year - in a victory for the Mirror More than half a million children will become eligible for free school meals from next year in a game-changing boost for families. Keir Starmer unveiled plans to extend the lifeline benefit to all kids in families who get Universal Credit in England, in a move that could save parents up to £500 a year. ‌ It marks a victory for the Mirror's long-running campaign to widen provision to stop children being too hungry to learn. ‌ The Prime Minister praised our campaign, and told Mirror readers: "My government will leave no stone unturned in our pursuit to give every child the best start in life." Teachers, doctors, and child poverty campaigners have long called for an overhaul of strict eligibility rules, which mean around 900,000 children living in poverty don't qualify. Currently, all children in England can get free school meals until the end of Year 2 but after that they only qualify if their family gets certain benefits. Youngsters whose families claim Universal Credit only qualify if their household earns less than £7,400-a-year after benefits. ‌ But from September 2026, all children in UC households will be able to get a free, nutritious hot meal. More than 500,000 kids are expected to benefit from the change, and the Government said it would lift 100,000 children out of poverty. Writing in the Mirror, the Prime Minister said: "I want every child to have every opportunity and the best support to aim high, achieve good grades, and get the best education possible. ‌ "That starts with the basics - it's common sense that children can't do well at school if they're hungry." He added: "It will put £500 in parents' pockets, help children achieve at school, and ease cost-of-living pressures. "The Mirror has long campaigned on free school meals, so I'm delighted that we're able to make this announcement today." ‌ Expanding free school meal provision can not only save parents money on packed lunches but also improve children's health, drive up school attendance and improve behaviour and concentration. Research by School Food Matters last year found 38% of teachers reported that pupils in their classes were regularly too hungry to learn. ‌ Some 24% of heads said their school was operating a foodbank. Some 2.1 million pupils - almost one in four (24.6%) - in England were eligible for free school meals in January 2024. The numbers have soared since the start of the Covid pandemic - when 1.44 million children were eligible - in a sign of the pressures on household budgets. ‌ The decision comes as pressure mounts on the Government to do more to address rising levels of child poverty. Former PM Gordon Brown said last month that Labour must act now to help "austerity's children" as 4.8 million kids could be living in hardship by 2029. Ministers have delayed publication of a long-promised plan to the autumn amid calls from Labour MPs to scrap the Tory-era two-child benefit limit, which has been blamed for pushing families into hardship. ‌ Campaigners hailed the decision to widen free school meal provision as a "game changer" for families struggling with cost of living pressures. Nick Harrison, chief executive of the Sutton Trust social mobility charity, said: "This is a significant step towards taking hunger out of the classroom. "Children can't learn effectively when hungry, so this announcement not only helps to tackle the effects of child poverty, but will also likely help improve education outcomes for disadvantaged young people. ‌ Kate Anstey, head of education policy at Child Poverty Action Group said: "This is fantastic news and a game-changer for children and families. "At last more kids will get the food they need to learn and thrive and millions of parents struggling to make ends meet will get a bit of breathing space." ‌ Daniel Kebede, General Secretary of the National Education Union, which campaigned alongside the Mirror, said: 'The National Education Union is proud to stand shoulder to shoulder with our campaign partner the Mirror in celebrating this historic win. "After years of joint campaigning, knowing tens of thousands more children will benefit from a hot, healthy school meal is the good news NEU members have been waiting for. "But we won't stop there. The cost of living still impacts too many children, so we continue to call for Free School Meals for all. ‌ "Let's make sure there is no child left behind.' Liberal Democrat Education Spokesperson, Munira Wilson said: " Liberal Democrats have been pushing hard for this crucial change for years. It's a victory for thousands of passionate campaigners that the Government has finally listened." She urged the Government to look at auto-enrolling eligible kids so parents aren't put off by paperwork and to consider scrapping the two-child benefit limit.

Reeves forced to back down in net zero row with Miliband
Reeves forced to back down in net zero row with Miliband

Telegraph

time31 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Reeves forced to back down in net zero row with Miliband

Ed Miliband has defeated an attempt by Rachel Reeves to raid one of his key net zero programs in next week's spending review, The Telegraph understands. The Treasury has for months been considering cuts to the £13.2 billion warm homes plan, which aims to insulate properties and make them more energy efficient. But Mr Miliband, the Energy Security Secretary, and Ms Reeves, the Chancellor, are understood to have reached an agreement in the past few days after fraught negotiations and the scheme will remain largely unaffected. The agreement is a boost for net zero supporters in government, chief among them Mr Miliband, who have warned against scaling back green plans. It will also likely be regarded as a sign of the Chancellor's waning influence as Downing Street seeks to placate backbenchers unhappy over spending cuts. The decision is expected to please the Left wing of the party, which is threatening to rebel against Sir Keir Starmer's plans to make cuts to welfare and has been emboldened by a memo sent to Ms Reeves by Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, demanding tax rises. However, it could complicate attempts, spearheaded by Number 10, to counter Reform, which is surging in support on a net zero sceptic platform and could outperform Labour in a Scottish by-election seat on Thursday. Spokesmen for the Treasury, the Energy Security Department and Number 10 all declined to comment, with announcements being unveiled at the spending review on Wednesday. Mr Miliband's victory can be disclosed hours after Ms Reeves warned that she would be tough with some Cabinet colleagues. Delivering a speech in Rochdale on Wednesday morning, the Chancellor said that 'not every department will get everything that they want next week' as she has had to 'say no' to things that she would support in an ideal world. Following a major about-turn by Sir Keir to appease backbenchers, millions of pensioners will be handed back their annual winter fuel payments of up to £300 next week, when the details of a reversal in last year's cut are announced. Some wealthy pensioners will still not receive the payment – meaning confusion continues on what the new policy will become – and it is unclear how the reversal will be funded. Meanwhile, the Government has announced that there will be £1 billion for an extra 500,000 free school meals over the next three years, lifting an estimated 100,000 children out of deprivation. Cabinet ministers have been locked in negotiations with the Treasury for months over the spending review, which will set out day-to-day departmental budgets for the next three years. Mr Miliband, the former Labour leader who heads up the net zero brief in government, was one of the few remaining Cabinet ministers still battling the Treasury this week. Sources last week were forced to deny reports he 'stormed out' of a meeting with Darren Jones, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, amid a row over cuts. Ms Rayner is also said to have clashed with the Chancellor over the spending review, with sources previously claiming she had complained 'forcibly' about proposed cuts to housing. But The Telegraph understands Mr Miliband has now reached agreement with Ms Reeves and has seen off an attempt to raid a major net zero scheme. The warm homes plan is an initiative to lift more than 1 million households out of fuel poverty by 2030, reducing energy bills as well as making houses more energy-efficient. It includes investment to insulate homes – thereby making them more energy-efficient – and grants for heat pumps. Labour promised an extra £6.6 billion for the plan in its general election manifesto last summer, taking the total to be spent on the program to £13.2 billion. A hint that Ms Reeves had given ground came on Wednesday morning when she said publicly that manifesto promises would be kept to in the spending review. The negotiations with ministers have been fraught because, despite a £300 billion boost to spending this parliament, some departments still face real-terms cuts in the years ahead. It has prompted protests from a string of departments and public officials, with police chiefs warning the Prime Minister that cuts would force them to decide which crimes to investigate. The politics of the Government have been shifting over its legal commitment to make the UK a 'net zero' carbon emitter, complicating Labour's approach. Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, has withdrawn her support for the target, making one of her first policy commitments of office the insistence that achieving the ambition by 2050 is 'impossible'. The repositioning, which comes despite it being the Conservatives under Theresa May who brought in the legal target, moves the Tories closer to Reform's position on net zero. Nigel Farage's party wants to scrap the policy entirely. Opinion polls show that while the public support hitting net zero, that drops markedly when voters are asked if they are willing to take a financial hit to achieve it. Mr Miliband has been the driving force behind the Government's net zero stance. Others in the Labour movement, including leading trade unions, oppose the new North Sea oil licence ban. The Energy Secretary's win comes after he lost battles over the expansion of Heathrow Airport and clashed with Sir Tony Blair when the former prime minister raised doubts over whether net zero was feasible.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store