Piers Morgan slams popular trad wife as ‘despicable' over shock act
A trad wife has confessed to regularly using a racial slur — a year after the use of that same word got her fired.
Lilly Gaddis, 24, is a social media star and 'trad wife', a term which refers to women who embrace 'traditional gender roles' within marriage.
Now Ms Gaddis has found herself in hot water again after recently appearing on Piers Morgan Uncensored, to discuss Shiloh Hendrix, a woman who has been accused of calling a black child a slur.
When asked why she would 'want to support a white racist', her response was that she wanted to support free speech.
'That's fine, you can support free speech but you also have to be accountable for what you say. I mean, would you use the N-word,' Morgan asked her.
Ms Gaddis confirmed she would use the racial slur, and had done so repeatedly and 'frequently'.
The British host demanded to know why she'd use the term, calling her a 'despicable racist'.
'Some would say I am. According to the ADL, I'm a white supremacist. I'm a neo-Nazi,' she said.
She said she would 'embrace' being called a racist if that meant 'helping white people achieve real freedom of speech'.
When asked if she uses it when with black people, she said she did when it was 'appropriate'.
When asked to clarify that she said: 'Any time I feel like it'.
Ms Gaddis tried to bring the discussion back to Ms Hendrix, but Morgan said she had 'moved on' the conversation to her own racism.
'It explains why you've supported her in public and why you've got all these views. You see no problem with a woman shrieking the N-word repeatedly is because you yourself are a despicable racist,' Morgan said.
'And you've just proudly admitted that with a smug grin on your face — which is pretty horrifying.'
The video prompted a huge response from audiences, with many stunned to agree with the controversial British media personality.
'I did not have 'Agreeing with Piers Morgan' on my 2025 Bingo Card,' one social media user said.
Another added: 'You know she's bad when Piers Morgan seems left wing.'
'When Piers Morgan is against you, you know it's bad,' another social media user said.
One person commented: 'This woman is a pathetic human being!'
'She does have freedom of speech. She can say it. Anyone can, but they can't wrap their heads around the fact THEY'RE NOT FREE FROM THE CONSEQUENCE,' another added.
One social media user said: 'Yet Piers Morgan is ALLOWING that kind of person to have a platform.'
'It is never appropriate to be racist, ever. America be better, do better,' one commented.
One said: 'My eyebrows just kept going higher and higher and higher.'
'Freedom of speech should just be called, freedom of hate speech, at this point, because that's the only time we even hear about it,' another added.
It's not the first time Ms Gaddis has openly used the racial slur and faced consequences for her actions. Last year, she was filming herself in the kitchen and said the N-word — and also referenced 'dumb wh***s,' 'immigrants fresh off the boat looking for a green card' and 'gold diggers'.
She then posted an 'apology' following backlash, where she said she 'couldn't find a care'.
Ms Gaddis worked as a marketing and sales manager at Rophe of the Carolinas, a home healthcare company for the elderly and disabled in Wilmington, North Carolina.
Although Rophe of the Carolinas did not name Ms Gaddis, it emphasised in a statement that the 'newly hired' employee was axed over 'inflammatory remarks on social media that do not align with the values and beliefs of our company'.
'Oh no I just got fired! #mob,' Ms Gaddis tweeted following the announcement.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Who took the photo of 'Napalm Girl' ?
11h ago 11 hours ago Sat 7 Jun 2025 at 9:30pm Space to play or pause, M to mute, left and right arrows to seek, up and down arrows for volume. Play Duration: 20 minutes 50 seconds 20 m

News.com.au
8 hours ago
- News.com.au
Prince Harry's wild palace comeback plan for Archie, Lili
There is a brilliant British expression: The marmalade dropper. That one is standing in one's kitchen at breakfast time, looking out over trellised delphiniums and Marks and Spencer garden furniture, and you hear some news so startling a jar of the Waitrose's finest Oxford pip-free slips through your fingers out of deep shock. So I'm warning you now. Put down all condiments, sauces, dressings or hot drinks. Get this: Prince Harry, The Duke of Sussex reportedly sees a future where his children could return to the UK and become official working members of the royal family. Yes, him. The world's only royal refugee, a man who chucked in palace-dom and the possibility of ever being proudly tasked to open the Perthshire Agricultural Show, who painted the Windsors as emotionally constipated, self-serving egoists, who told us at exhausting length about the commercial-grade suffering that he endured as a paid up representative of the Crown. Him. He, reportedly, thinks that – despite having earned tens of millions of dollars rubbing his family and laying bare the inequities and humiliations of monarchy and despite his kids having been to the UK once in the last five years – his kids could one day become paid up, front row members of Crown Inc. I'm not sure we've had a piece of news this bizarre and defying all logic, reason and good sense since, Prince Edward (remember him? Thin, suited, bears an increasingly haunting resemblance to Prince Philip if he had ever joined a book club?) got the idea to do a royal version of 80s game show It's A Knockout. On Thursday The Guardian, which normally stays well clear of breaking any news about Crown Inc aside from pointing out the tens of millions they squeeze out farm land they acquired during a joust in 1484, took a break from extolling the virtues of wind farms and tahini to get into the royal reporting game. (Personally, I love both.) The Guardian ran a piece reporting that Archie and Lili were forced to wait six months for new passports after the late Queen died and that Harry and his wife Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex feared the delay was because 'UK officials were dragging their feet because the passport applications included the titles HRH (His/Her Royal Highness) for both children.' A source close to the Sussexes said that 'the king hadn't wanted Archie and Lili to carry the titles, most of all the HRH, and the British passports, once created, would be the first and perhaps the only legal proof of their names'. However, the Duke of Sussex wanted 'to keep the HRH titles for his children so that when they grow older they can decide for themselves whether they want to become working royals, or stay out of public life'. Marmalade, meet floor. Of all the things that you can imagine the duke noodling about in Montecito as he did the composting or was assuming the lotus position, his children having or wanting a future that would see Buckingham Palace merrily tasking them with a few lighthouse-related outings or some mid-tier midlands military patronages is madness. It would be like a committed vegan considering whether their adored offspring might one day get into farm to table butchery. The members working royal family, the fundamental indignity of the pathological hierarchy of it, the monarchy, the mandatory involvement of his most nemesis the British media duly recording every pat pleasantry during an away day to Sheffield – isn't this everything Harry has been pushing back against? Has repeatedly criticised from the global bully pulpit of Netflix and from the pages of a Guinness World Record setting book and interview after interview? Even aside from this, what makes the duke think his kids would be allowed to rejoin the merry old house of Windsor? Archie has not lived in the UK since he was about six months old; Lili has only been there once. She is not believed to have ever met William or Kate, The Princess of Wales or anyone with any sort of main character energy here. Why would they want to sacrifice their independence and freedom for a country and institution they have no connection with? Nor, you would have to imagine, would the British people be that jazzed about two people with thick Californian accents turning up to host garden parties who don't know what Hobnobs are. That the palace or the British people would accept the young Sussexes as representatives of the Crown is nigh-on impossible to swallow. Even then, even if these obstacles were somehow surmounted, there is the biggest of them all – would William let them? By the time Archie and Lilli are firmly in their 20s he is likely to be running the show and King. As a friend of his told The Daily Beast last year, he 'absolutely f**king hates' Harry. Does that sound like a welcome-with-open-arms situation to you? Even today, royal cousins are essentially barred from being allowed to be working members of the royal family. Since 2012, when Charles put his plan in action, four deeply regrettable words have echoed up and down the Buckingham Palace halls – 'slimmed down royal family'. At another time Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie as HRHs and 'blood princesses' would have been shoe-ins to never have to work real jobs and to live lives where they spent the hours of 10am until 2ish on any given Wednesday cutting ribbons at Women's Institute meetings and visiting donkey rescues on behalf of the palace. Instead you can find Beatrice York on LinkedIn, a regular London gal in her 30s with a very good career in the software biz. Beatrice and Eugenie have not been allowed out onto the palace balcony to exercise their waving muscles since 2019. Who knows. Maybe by 2045 the royal family will be desperate for fresh faces and Prince George, as he preps for the throne himself, will be dead keen on his American cousins being called up to bolster the flagging royal ranks. Maybe Archie and Lili will be keen to embrace their British heritage and want to devote their lives to dutiful public service. For the time being though, you can safely pick up the marmalade again but be warned. There is one thing we can say about Harry – the duke never fails to surprise us. Or the palace. And maybe the same goes for the next generation, in Montecito and London.

News.com.au
14 hours ago
- News.com.au
Meghan speaks out after posting viral ‘cringe' video of birthing suite dance
Meghan appears to have brushed off criticism of her 'cringe' pregnant dance video, declaring that she's 'so excited' about the future in a new post. The Duchess of Sussex used the official Instagram page of her brand, As Ever, to share a new picture of herself on the beach in a white sleeveless dress, writing: 'So excited for all the good to come! Running into the weekend like [wave emoji].' It came just days after Meghan divided followers with the release of a throwback video in honour of her and Prince Harry's daughter's fourth birthday, which featured the pair of them taking part in a viral TikTok dance challenge in the birthing suite on the day she was born. 'Four years ago today, this also happened. Both of our children were a week past their due dates … so when spicy food, all that walking, and acupuncture didn't work – there was only one thing left to do!' she captioned the video of the couple dancing to the 'Baby Mama Dance Song'. While it appeared to be designed as a relatable moment, it didn't quite land with a lot of her followers, who branded it 'peak cringe'. 'I feel nauseous,' one person tweeted in reaction to the clip. 'Oh my,' added another. 'That's … really … awful.' 'They are cringe to the max!' a third remarked. Some, however, offered their support: 'This is everything! Harry on beat and Meghan dropping it like it's hot. They look like they have so much fun together.' 'Bet Lili came quickly after those dance moves. It helps,' added one user. 'I love this so much. Who knew that Prince Harry & Meghan Markle were hot steppers?' said another. Meghan also shared a video showing how her family celebrated Lili's fourth birthday, with she and Harry taking their two kids to Disneyland for 'two days of pure joy'. Despite all four of them featuring in the footage, Meghan continued her policy of covering the children's faces, using emojis to obscure their appearances.