Lafayette Parish home listings asked for less money in December - see the current median price here
The median home in Lafayette Parish listed for $298,250 in December, down 0.6% from the previous month's $299,999, an analysis of data from Realtor.com shows.
Compared to December 2023, the median home list price increased 2.9% from $289,999.
The statistics in this article only pertain to houses listed for sale in Lafayette Parish, not houses that were sold. Information on your local housing market, along with other useful community data, is available at data.theadvertiser.com.
Lafayette Parish's median home was 1,843 square feet, listed at $165 per square foot. The price per square foot of homes for sale is up 0.3% from December 2023.
Listings in Lafayette Parish moved slowly, at a median 86 days listed compared to the December national median of 70 days on the market. In the previous month, homes had a median of 80 days on the market. Around 254 homes were newly listed on the market in December, a 2.4% increase from 248 new listings in December 2023.
The median home prices issued by Realtor.com may exclude many, or even most, of a market's homes. The price and volume represent only single-family homes, condominiums or townhomes. They include existing homes, but exclude most new construction as well as pending and contingent sales.
Across the Lafayette metro area, median home prices fell to $263,000, slightly lower than a month earlier. The median home had 1,839 square feet, at a list price of $147 per square foot.
In Louisiana, median home prices were $274,950, a slight decrease from November. The median Louisiana home listed for sale had 1,828 square feet, with a price of $152 per square foot.
Throughout the United States, the median home price was $402,502, a slight decrease from the month prior. The median American home for sale was listed at 1,800 square feet, with a price of $222 per square foot.
The median home list price used in this report represents the midway point of all the houses or units listed over the given period of time. Experts say the median offers a more accurate view of what's happening in a market than the average list price, which would mean taking the sum of all listing prices then dividing by the number of homes sold. The average can be skewed by one particularly low or high price.
The USA TODAY Network is publishing localized versions of this story on its news sites across the country, generated with data from Realtor.com. Please leave any feedback or corrections for this story here. This story was written by Ozge Terzioglu.
This article originally appeared on Lafayette Daily Advertiser: Lafayette Parish home listings asked for less money in December - see the current median price here
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
11 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Oil Tanker Titans Stay Calm But Cautious After Mideast Warnings
Several of the world's largest ocean-tanker operators said they remained calm but cautious after risk warnings from naval forces for vessels operating in and around the Persian Gulf, the world's largest oil-producing region. The risk notices were issued around the same time as US ordered some staff to leave its embassy in Baghdad on Wednesday, and followed threats by Tehran to strike American assets in the region in the event Iran is attacked over its nuclear program.
Forbes
16 minutes ago
- Forbes
The Unofficial #1 On Forbes' 2025 World's Most Influential CMOs List
Wondering if and when the other shoes will drop getty The Unofficial #1 designation is given to a person, force, or condition with outsized influence over CMOs and their ability to influence growth. — Stepping back 125 years to early 20th-century New York City, and you find the origins of an almost apt metaphor for the current state of global affairs and global marketing alike. Returning to your tenement apartment after a day in the factory, you'd sit on your bed and begin getting out of your work clothes. As you took off your first shoe and it dropped to the floor, your downstairs neighbor couldn't help but hear its thud through the tenement's thin ceiling. Then they'd wait for the thud of your other shoe dropping. While these are certainly 'other shoe' times, the metaphor is only almost apt because then, there was a certainty the other shoe would ultimately drop. Today however, nothing is certain, little is inevitable or predictable, most everyone is on edge, and seemingly any crazy thing could happen (or not) in any given moment. In fact, in April and across 142 countries, The International Monetary Fund's World Uncertainty Index, recorded the single highest level of global uncertainty—higher than during the Pandemic or the 2008 economic crisis—since tracking began 17 years ago. While much is uncertain, regardless of your politics or nationality, what's not is that no one and nothing has greater influence over the ripple effects of what happens next from shoes that do or don't fall than the current American president. And so—and not because by any objective measure he is a marketing savant—for his outsized influence on global uncertainty, its near and long-term consequences, and thus on what CMOs and the brands and companies they help steward do and don't next, I've named Donald Trump The Unofficial #1 on the 2025 Forbes World's Most Influential CMOs list. No one and nothing thrive on uncertainty, and the discomfort, wariness, volatility and the should-we-or-shouldn't-we vacillation it creates is good for neither one's best laid marketing plans nor buying behavior. Whether by design or disposition, from Wall Street to Main Streets, China to Chicago, the chaos and radical uncertainty sown by the President's words and deeds finds consumer and corporate sentiment jumpier than Elon at a Trump rally before their break-up. Any semblance of predictability around tariffs, interest rates, taxes, retaliatory taxes, prices, jobs, inflation, recession, geo-political alliances, trade wars and military ones, is confounding capital markets, forecasts, budgets, supply chains, human brains and emotions in real-time. Willingness to spend by consumers and companies alike whose expectations are tossed-about by contradictory signals and volatile moods is throttled. So, corporate guidance and forecasts are being cut, as costs and prices remain in limbo. No small part of why Global GDP is expected to grow at its slowest rate in almost 20 years, and why The World Bank anticipates this being the weakest decade of economic growth in almost 60. Admonishing anyone getty As quick to publicly admonish and/or punish stalwarts of the global economy from Apple to Walmart to Los Angeles as he is to threaten Presidents Zelensky, Ramaphosa and Xi, Greenland and NATO, his all-caps proclamations can have as much near-term impact on global markets—and thus marketing—as any actual policy that may or may not follow. CEOs and CFOs want growth without risk and savings without sales impacts, as if that were a thing. Legal wants safety. Boards want clarity. And no one wants to be wrong. All of which delays corporate actions and decisions, and equally, makes the creative and bold-ideas so essential to value creation and capture feel riskier than they'd otherwise be. While self-help books are replete with counsel about not obsessing over that which you can't control, that's not advice CMOs can heed (at least professionally) at a time when distracted audiences are harder to predict, reach and influence; when longer-term strategies seem disposable, and most everyone is doomscrolling their feeds on the regular to see what was or wasn't said and how this might affect what they do or don't next. Over the past five years, CMOs have learned that this year's plan could become this week's fire drill or act of triage in any given moment. But, thanks to the President, this has never been more so. And so, chief marketers are pushed to 'do more with less,' (not unreasonable in and of itself) and to just 'wait and see.' Yet so it goes during this second Trump presidency, and so it goes for CMOs wondering when another all-caps tweet will drop. Or not. As Tom Petty sang, 'the waiting is the hardest part,' which is why this year, for his outsized influence on markets, marketers and marketing (to say nothing of humanity), Donald Trump is The Unofficial #1 on the 2025 Forbes World's Most Influential CMOs list. Thank you for your attention to this matter. ... Note. I'd finished writing this when reminded that Mr. Trump was also named Time's Person of the Year, in December. Reminded, I considered going in another direction but, despite the redundancy, decided no one/nothing is a more appropriate choice. Under no illusion about the difference in attention the two designations get; I also hope to offer a reminder to the CEOs, CFOs and Board Directors reading this that anyone or anything influencing global conversations and sentiment influences what CMOs do and don't in turn. ... For those interested, in 2022, I named 'Anyone' the Unofficial #1 because 'Anyone' with a keyboard can change the trajectory of a brand and business in an instant. In 2023, Sam Altman was recognized as proxy for the then (and still) TBD implications of GAI on marketing. Last year, 'The CEO' was the Unofficial #1 for their oft unwitting and unintentionally but ultimately marketing-ignorant influence over the expertise and actions of CMOs.
Boston Globe
35 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Women are poised to inherit trillions in the coming decades. Will it give them more power, too?
Write to us at . To subscribe, . TODAY'S STARTING POINT The largest wealth transfer in history is happening in slow motion. About $124 trillion worth of earnings, property, and other financial assets will change hands in the US over the next 23 years, financial experts estimate, as older Americans die off. And as men bequeath money to their spouses and divvy up their wealth among their children, most of the beneficiaries will be women. The so-called great wealth transfer seems poised to change the American economy's relationship with gender. 'Wealth and personal finance especially has for generations or centuries been squarely the domain of men,' said Josie Cox, a financial journalist who wrote ' Money, valuable on its own, can also buy status. Yet it remains uncertain whether greater wealth will also give women greater power in American society. Here's how the great wealth transfer will happen and what it may mean. Advertisement Share the wealth Understanding the great wealth transfer means getting a little morbid. Here's how it will work: Through 2048, many of the remaining members of the baby boom generation (defined as Americans born between 1946 and 1964) will die. Women tend to live longer, so most men will leave their assets to female spouses. Advertisement 'Something like 95 percent of the spousal inheritance goes to women,' said Kay Hope, a research analyst at Bank of America who has Shifting cultural mores also help explain women's outsized share of the proceeds. Parents today are more likely to divide their assets relatively evenly between their male and female children than in the past, when inheritances flowed primarily to sons, Hope said. That will mean another $47 trillion going to younger women. An economy transformed? Greater wealth for women is poised to reshape the US economy. Some companies are already recognizing the shift, and Hope expects more to follow. That could mean more financial advisers catering to women, travel companies marketing overseas vacations to older single women, or a medical industry that focuses on osteoporosis and other conditions that disproportionately affect women into old age. 'Men today control about two thirds of global wealth,' Hope said. 'When those numbers are more 50-50, how hard is it to ignore?' The great wealth transfer could, in turn, grow the economy as a whole. Gender gaps in wages and labor force participation have narrowed in the US. If greater wealth helps more women enter or stay in the workforce, it could add trillions in value. 'It's not about pushing anyone aside,' Hope said, but 'about growing the whole pie.' Still, the shift may not be seamless. 'There is still a real cultural narrative that implies that the world of money and the world of investment is a world that is geared towards men,' said Cox, the financial journalist. Experiences in her own life have proven as much, from waiters bringing her husband the check to a financial adviser who refused to talk until her husband got on the phone. (According to some estimates, 70 percent of widows fire their financial advisers.) Advertisement The transfer may also reinforce inequality because it won't benefit those whose spouses or parents have little or nothing to pass on. The wealthiest 1 percent of Americans hold Does money equal power? The transfer also may not radically reshape women's position in American society, at least not by itself. Women's wealth grew during the 20th century as more entered the workforce, went to college, and held political office. Those advances are real. But Cox doubts that money alone will enable enough women to climb the corporate ladder to reach gender parity, for example, because women still feel more pressure than men to leave the workforce to raise children. Changing that, she argues, would take policies like universal childcare, which the US doesn't have. Changes in gender relations can also invite backlash. Despite the broad benefits of women's economic participation, men often believe that gains by women mean losses for them. It happened after World War II, Cox said, when women who entered the workforce found themselves relegated back to homemaking when their husbands returned from overseas. A similar backlash may be brewing today. Polls show that the share of boys who think women should have the same job opportunities as men Advertisement Cox is hopeful that progress on gender equality will continue and that the great wealth transfer will be part of it. But it won't be enough, she said. 'I think this is more like a small step rather than a giant leap.' 🧩 1 Down: 86° POINTS OF INTEREST The Charles River under hazy skies due to Canadian wildfires in 2023. Craig F. Walker/Globe Staff Boston Mayoral race: A super PAC aligned with Michelle Wu launched its first TV ad 'Joyful protest': Amid a broader backlash to LGBTQ+ rights, the organizers of Saturday's Boston Pride parade say they expect Help from his friends: Here's how Bill Chisholm's Crawling along: Green Line trains Massachusetts and New England Karen Read retrial: A crash reconstructionist testified for the defense that John O'Keefe's injuries weren't consistent with a vehicle strike, Market Basket: Workers Fuming: Wildfires are burning 7 million acres of Canadian forest, sending toxic smoke Trump administration Khalil case: The administration can't deport or continue to detain Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University activist ICE arrested after he organized pro-Palestinian protests, a judge ruled. ( Jaundiced eye: Health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. named eight new members to a CDC vaccine advisory panel he fired this week, including a Covid vaccine critic. ( Inflation: President Trump's tariffs haven't significantly driven up prices yet; inflation rose less than expected last month. ( Marcelo Gomes da Silva: The Milford High student from Brazil Withdrawals: The US evacuated Americans from parts of the Middle East ahead of a possible Israeli attack on Iran. ( Fort Bragg speech: The Army screened the uniformed soldiers who cheered Trump's political attacks this week for their political allegiance and appearance. 'No fat soldiers,' one message read. ( En masse: The Fulbright scholarship's board resigned, accusing the administration of political interference it called 'impermissible under the law.' ( China trade 'deal': Trump says it's done, but details are vague. Trump's commerce secretary said US tariffs on China wouldn't change again. ( Trump-Musk feud: Elon Musk spoke to Trump before writing on X yesterday that some of his posts about the president 'went too far.' ( Mixed reviews: Audience members booed and cursed Trump at a Kennedy Center performance of 'Les Miserables,' a musical The Nation Ousted: The Democratic National Committee removed David Hogg, 25, as vice chair after he backed primary challenges to incumbent Democrats. ( Brian Wilson: The former band leader of the Beach Boys, who helped pen some of its most beloved hits, died at age 82. BESIDE THE POINT By Teresa Hanafin 🍋 Summer recipes: Lemon is synonymous with summer, so here are recipes for mousse, cake, spaghetti, and fish soup that all 💙 We've got the blues: After 30 years, Blue Man Group is ending its Boston run on July 6. The production has already closed in Chicago and NYC, but will continue in Las Vegas and Orlando, as well as internationally. ( 🎙️ Talk show success: Sports media writer Chad Finn takes a 🌈 Pride events: In addition to the 💦 A good bet: There's now a reason to take your kids to a casino: A Great Wolf Lodge indoor water park Advertisement 🍷 Miss Conduct archives: This couple is very busy all summer. Can they give themselves a break by 📱 No more Muzak: If you hate waiting on hold, iPhone is introducing a feature that will stay on the line in your place, then alert you when a human finally picks up. ( Thanks for reading Starting Point. This newsletter was edited and produced by ❓ Have a question for the team? Email us at ✍🏼 If someone sent you this newsletter, you can 📬 Delivered Monday through Friday. Ian Prasad Philbrick can be reached at
