Alphabet to keep hiring engineers while AI advances
[SAN FRANCISCO] Alphabet's chief executive officer Sundar Pichai said his company will keep expanding its engineering ranks at least into 2026, stressing human talent remains key even as Google's parent ramps up AI investments.
Speaking at the Bloomberg Tech conference in San Francisco, Pichai said he will continue to invest in engineering in the near future.
US tech leaders like Microsoft have trimmed more staff this year, reflecting in part the enormous investments needed to ensure leadership in AI. The firings have stoked fears about the technology replacing certain job functions. Google itself has conducted rounds of layoffs in recent years to free up resources.
'I expect we will grow from our current engineering base even into next year, because it allows us to do more with the opportunity space,' Pichai said in conversation with Bloomberg's Emily Chang. 'I just view this as making engineers dramatically more productive, getting a lot of the mundane aspects out of what they do.'
Still, Pichai presented a vision of AI that was at once optimistic about the technology's possibilities and sober-minded about some of its present limitations. While AI excels in areas like coding, the models continue to make basic mistakes, Pichai said.
'So are we currently on an absolute path to AGI? I don't think anyone can say for sure,' Pichai said. He was referring to artificial general intelligence: the dream of building AI that can perform on par with humans.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
As Google incorporates more AI into its search engine, publishers have sounded the alarm about how the company's AI-generated answers deprive them of traffic. Pichai stressed that the company remains committed to sending traffic to the web.
'Compared to most companies in the world, we take care to design an experience which is going to showcase links,' Pichai said. 'We took a long time testing AI Overviews and prioritised approaches which resulted in high quality traffic out. I'm confident that many years from now that's how Google will work.'
Pichai has led Google since 2015, when he took the reins from Google co-founder Larry Page pledging to focus even more on AI.
Asked about a CEO when the company celebrates its 50th birthday, Pichai quipped: 'Whoever is running it will have an extraordinary AI companion.'
At the same conference on Wednesday (Jun 4), Meta Platforms chief technology officer Andrew Bosworth said that there's been a cultural shift in the Silicon Valley and it is now more palatable for the tech industry to support the US military's efforts.
The company announced a partnership with defence contractor Anduril Industries last week to develop products for the US military, including an artificial intelligence-powered helmet with virtual and augmented reality features. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nylon
18 hours ago
- Nylon
Google and Gentle Monster set to launch AI smart eyewear collaboration with Android XR
At the recent Google I/O 2025, the tech giant and South Korean global eyewear brand Gentle Monster announced that they will be teaming up to launch their first-ever AI smart eyewear collaboration with Android XR. Image courtesy of Google. During the announcement, General Manager and Vice President of Google XR, Shahram Izadi, shared that creativity and sophistication are essential design features for technology to integrate into everyday life and with Gentle Monster onboard as the first partner highlights a pivotal step in the evolution of AI smart eyewear into essential, lifestyle fashion items. Although no launch date for the collaboration has been set yet, Google foresees that the new partnership is looking to seamlessly integrate extended reality into everyday life by showcasing cutting-edge smart technology alongside the refined aesthetics of Gentle Monster.
CNA
18 hours ago
- CNA
Lawyers face sanctions for citing fake cases with AI, warns UK judge
LONDON :Lawyers who use artificial intelligence to cite non-existent cases can be held in contempt of court or even face criminal charges, London's High Court warned on Friday, in the latest example of generative AI leading lawyers astray. A senior judge lambasted lawyers in two cases who apparently used AI tools when preparing written arguments, which referred to fake case law, and called on regulators and industry leaders to ensure lawyers know their ethical obligations. "There are serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence in the justice system if artificial intelligence is misused," Judge Victoria Sharp said in a written ruling. "In those circumstances, practical and effective measures must now be taken by those within the legal profession with individual leadership responsibilities ... and by those with the responsibility for regulating the provision of legal services." The ruling comes after lawyers around the world have been forced to explain themselves for relying on false authorities, since ChatGPT and other generative AI tools became widely available more than two years ago. Sharp warned in her ruling that lawyers who refer to non-existent cases will be in breach of their duty to not mislead the court, which could also amount to contempt of court. She added that "in the most egregious cases, deliberately placing false material before the court with the intention of interfering with the administration of justice amounts to the common law criminal offence of perverting the course of justice". Sharp noted that legal regulators and the judiciary had issued guidance about the use of AI by lawyers, but said that "guidance on its own is insufficient to address the misuse of artificial intelligence".
Business Times
21 hours ago
- Business Times
We need a new deal for the Web
GIVEN that Google attracts more than 136 billion visits a month – as many as the next 12 most popular websites combined – it is easy to see how a US federal judge concluded last year that the company ran a monopoly in online search and had abused its market dominance. Last week, Judge Amit Mehta heard the final arguments about what remedies to impose. His conclusions are expected in August. The US justice department, which launched the antitrust lawsuit, is demanding that Google be broken up. It wants to force the company to sell its Chrome browser, ban the massive payments it makes to Apple, Samsung and Mozilla to be their default search engine, and share data with competitors. That would surely be a triumph for free-market competition, motherhood and apple pie. Yet, as ever with regulatory interventions, the skill lies in ensuring that any corrective action anticipates tomorrow's challenges rather than just trying to fix today's problems. That's especially tough right now. As the judge acknowledged, the digital economy is evolving fast thanks to the light-speed diffusion of artificial intelligence. Some suggest that AI might even undermine the financial viability of the open, human, ad-supported Web on which Google has gorged. However much it may (or may not) abuse its market dominance, Google remains the strongest champion of the existing Web and many users would miss it if it were gone. Since being invented 36 years ago, the Web has emerged as one of humanity's most precious resources, giving any online user anywhere access to almost all of the world's knowledge. It has also become the foundation on which many thousands of digital businesses have been built. But it has its darker deformities and there is a risk that AI might further degrade it in two insidious ways. First, the big AI companies are in effect strip-mining all websites for content to train their models and paying back almost nothing in return to sustain the ecosystem. At present, Google accounts for about 90 per cent of the global search market and directs a torrent of traffic – and advertising – to content sites. Even though they may (understandably) complain about the terms, some content creators fear the trade itself may be in jeopardy because far fewer users would visit their sites. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up AI models aggregate and summarise the Web's content rather than encouraging users to visit the original content source. That may destroy the financial incentives for creating new content. 'I think that is a risk,' Laura Chambers, chief executive of the technology company Mozilla, tells me. 'How can we ensure that the Internet remains healthy?' The obvious survival mechanism for creators is to build walled gardens by erecting more paywalls around their content, or to move to closed channels off the open Web. For many companies, it may make sense to deepen direct-to-consumer business models via social media or their own apps. But both trends would further devalue the richness, utility and universality of the Web. The second threat is that AI models are increasingly flooding the Web with machine-generated slop. For the first time in a decade, bots have overtaken humans on the Web, accounting for an estimated 51 per cent of total traffic, according to the data and US cybersecurity group Imperva. The ability of generative AI to create plausible content at minimal cost means this trend is only likely to accelerate. An AI-mediated Web could move it further towards a 'dark forest', an increasingly hostile space populated by predatory bots that seize on any living thing. We may not like our current surveillance capitalism, in which users are tracked and targeted with ads. Subordination capitalism would be still worse. Yet, there are more positive visions of the Web's future, as recently sketched out by Kevin Scott, chief technology officer of Microsoft, which runs Bing, a very distant second in search. The increasing interaction of bots means that new open protocols are being developed to enable interoperability on this agentic Web. That creates the possibility for a different Web architecture and a 'new deal', in which 'everybody's incentives are aligned, where the creators and consumers have their interests balanced and there aren't a bunch of weird intermediaries constraining how utility and value gets exchanged', Scott told The Verge. No one yet knows exactly how to build such a glorious future. But whatever Judge Mehta can do to help nudge us in that direction would be appreciated. FINANCIAL TIMES
