As Kentucky kids lose more learning to weather, lawmakers ponder relief
Avian Perez looks into his family's flooded trailer for the first time since about 8 feet of water filled it. The Perez family lives at Ramsey Mobile Home Park in Pikeville, one of the Kentucky places hardest hit by weekend rainfall. (Photo by)
FRANKFORT — Snow, ice, sickness and now floods have kept Kentucky students out of classrooms this winter.
Amid the 'extraordinary circumstances,' state lawmakers are looking for ways to make up for missed instruction and relieve schools.
The severe flooding that hit Kentucky over the weekend is forcing some schools to close or use NTI — non-traditional instruction — days, when students participate in virtual learning at home. Districts are typically allowed no more than 10 NTI days in a school year.
Some schools are running out or have already run out of NTI days after bad winter weather or sickness in recent weeks. Kentucky law requires school districts to provide 170 student attendance days and offer a minimum of 1,062 instructional hours.
A House committee this week advanced a bill that would allow schools to meet or have those requirements waived and make up missed days in a few different ways.
One option under House Bill 241 would allow districts to lengthen the school day but not to longer than seven hours of instruction. Local school boards could revise their calendars and submit plans to the Kentucky Department of Education for approval, under the bill, and if a district cannot make up days by June 4, the state education commissioner could waive up to five student attendance days.
The primary sponsor, Rep. Timmy Truett, presented the bill to the House Primary and Secondary Education Committee Tuesday. Truett, a McKee Republican and elementary school principal, introduced the bill the first week of February.
The committee amended the bill in response to the recent flooding by adding a provision also allowing Education Commissioner Robbie Fletcher to grant up to five 'disaster relief student attendance days' when schools could provide instruction without having students in the classroom, Truett said. The bill makes no mention of NTI which Truett acknowledged has become unpopular.
Some school districts began using NTI days as a pilot program to make up for lost classroom time because of school closures for weather or sickness. During the coronavirus pandemic, all Kentucky school districts became eligible for NTI days in March 2020.
Truett told his fellow lawmakers that most educators know that 'the term NTI days is not a very popular word' and virtual learning is 'not as good as in-seat instruction.'
'I'm telling you firsthand — it is not,' Truett said. 'It's not, but it does beat the alternative. When you're off school for two weeks because of weather or not going to see your kids for a month because of flooding, a virtual instruction day is so much more valuable than not seeing your kids at all.'
Truett also acknowledged that the legislature would not approve a bill that would outright increase the number of NTI days.
'This is just a fix for this year,' Truett said. 'Hopefully, we never have to see a bill like this ever again. But this is the only flexibility that we can give our districts at this point.'
Rep. Felica Rabourn, R-Turners Station, was the lone no vote on the bill. She said while questioning Truett that she strongly opposes more NTI days. 'If it were up to me, we would have zero,' she said.
As of Monday afternoon, 154 of Kentucky's 171 school districts had used an NTI day during the 2024-25 school year, according to the Kentucky Department of Education. Of those districts, 37 had used 10 NTI days and one school district had used 13 NTI days.
In most cases, school districts are allowed a total of 10 NTI days for a school year. The education commissioner retroactively approves the use of NTI days in late spring. Under the current law, NTI days exceeding 10 would have to be made up at the end of the school year.
While most uses of NTI days have been for weather or health issues, some Eastern Kentucky districts used NTI days or closed amid a manhunt for a shooting suspect in September.
Republican President Robert Stivers, of Manchester, told reporters Tuesday afternoon that lawmakers understand school districts are dealing with extraordinary circumstances. 'But the bottom line in these discussions with Tim (Truett) … and talking to the commissioner and talking to superintendents is, how do we most effectively get those students to maximize their learning capabilities and experiences?'
Stivers said that whatever solution is agreed upon will likely appear in Truett's bill by the end of the legislative session. Stivers added that 'we're trying to be methodical about what we do' and there should be some discussions with superintendents about changing school calendars and those should happen 'pretty soon.'
The processes proposed in the bill would not be available until it passes the General Assembly and is signed into law by the governor, Truett said. He estimated the solution was 'two weeks at the best away.'
'This is just an option, if needed, if you have some emergency days, some flooding, some bad ice storms, tornadoes,' Truett said. 'In Kentucky, who knows? Who knows what we're going to experience?'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kilmar Abrego Garcia pleads not guilty to human smuggling charges in Tennessee federal court
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Kilmar Abrego Garcia, whose mistaken deportation has become a flashpoint in President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown, pleaded not guilty on Friday to human smuggling charges in a federal court in Tennessee. The plea was the first chance the Maryland construction worker has had in a U.S. courtroom to answer the Trump administration's allegations against him since he was mistakenly deported in March to a notorious prison in El Salvador. The Republican administration returned Abrego Garcia to the U.S. last week to face criminal charges related to what it said was a human smuggling operation that transported immigrants across the country. The charges stem from a 2022 traffic stop in Tennessee during which Abrego Garcia was driving a vehicle with nine passengers. His lawyers have called the allegations 'preposterous.' Friday's hearing will also focus on whether Abrego Garcia should be released from jail while awaiting trial on the smuggling charges. A federal judge will hear arguments from Abrego Garcia's lawyers and attorneys for the U.S. government. Before the hearing began in Nashville, Abrego Garcia's wife told a crowd outside a church that Thursday marked three months since the Trump administration 'abducted and disappeared my husband and separated him from our family.' Her voice choked with emotion, Jennifer Vasquez Sura said she saw her husband for the first time on Thursday. She said, 'Kilmar wants you to have faith,' and asked the people supporting him and his family ''to continue fighting, and I will be victorious because God is with us.'' Abrego Garcia is a citizen of El Salvador who had been living in the United States for more than a decade before he was wrongfully deported by the Trump administration. The expulsion violated a 2019 U.S. immigration judge's order that shielded him from deportation to his native country because he likely faced gang persecution there. While the Trump administration described the mistaken removal as 'an administrative error,' officials have continued to justify it by insisting Abrego Garcia was a member of the MS-13 gang. His wife and attorneys have denied the allegations, saying he's simply a construction worker and family man. U.S. attorneys have asked U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes to keep Abrego Garcia in jail, describing him as a danger to the community and a flight risk. Abrego Garcia's attorneys disagree, pointing out he was already wrongly detained in a notorious Salvadoran prison thanks to government error and arguing due process and 'basic fairness' require him to be set free. The charges against Abrego Garcia are human smuggling. But in their request to keep Abrego Garcia in jail, U.S. attorneys also accuse him of trafficking drugs and firearms and of abusing the women he transported, among other claims, although he is not charged with such crimes. The U.S. attorneys also accuse Abrego Garcia of taking part in a murder in El Salvador. However, none of those allegations is part of the charges against him, and at his initial appearance June 6, the judge warned prosecutors she cannot detain someone based solely on allegations. One of Abrego Garcia's attorneys last week characterized the claims as a desperate attempt by the Trump administration to justify the mistaken deportation three months after the fact. 'There's no way a jury is going to see the evidence and agree that this sheet metal worker is the leader of an international MS-13 smuggling conspiracy,' private attorney Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg said. In a Wednesday court filing, Abrego Garcia's public defenders argued the government is not even entitled to a detention hearing — much less detention — because the charges against him aren't serious enough. Although the maximum sentence for smuggling one person is 10 years, and Abrego Garcia is accused of transporting hundreds of people over nearly a decade, his defense attorneys point out there's no minimum sentence. The average sentence for human smuggling in 2024 was just 15 months, according to court filings. The decision to charge Abrego Garcia criminally prompted the resignation of Ben Schrader, who was chief of the criminal division at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Tennessee. He posted about his departure on social media on the day of the indictment, writing, 'It has been an incredible privilege to serve as a prosecutor with the Department of Justice, where the only job description I've ever known is to do the right thing, in the right way, for the right reasons.' He did not directly address the indictment and declined to comment when reached by The Associated Press. However, a person familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a personnel matter confirmed the connection. Although Abrego Garcia lives in Maryland, he's being charged in Tennessee based on a May 2022 traffic stop for speeding in the state. The Tennessee Highway Patrol body camera video of the encounter that was released to the public last month shows a calm exchange between officers and Abrego Garcia. It also shows the officers discussing among themselves their suspicions of human smuggling before sending him on his way. One of the officers says, 'He's hauling these people for money.' Another says Abrego Garcia had $1,400 in an envelope. Abrego Garcia was not charged with any offense at the traffic stop. Sandoval-Moshenberg, the private attorney, said in a statement after the video's release that he saw no evidence of a crime in the footage. Meanwhile, the lawsuit over Abrego Garcia's mistaken deportation isn't over. Abrego Garcia's attorneys have asked a federal judge in Maryland to impose fines against the Trump administration for contempt, arguing that it flagrantly ignored court orders forseveral weeks to return him. The Trump administration said it will ask the judge to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that it followed the judge's order to return him to the U.S. ___ This story has been corrected to show the Trump administration said that the human smuggling operation transported immigrants across the country, not that it brought immigrants into the country illegally. ___ Finley reported from Norfolk, Va.


Hamilton Spectator
34 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Charles Rangel's funeral mass draws big names who celebrated the late congressman's life
NEW YORK (AP) — Former President Bill Clinton, Gov. Kathy Hochul and House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries remembered former U.S. Rep. Charles Rangel's sharp wit, relentless advocacy for Harlem and extraordinary life of public service during a funeral mass for the late congressman in Manhattan on Friday. Rangel, a pioneering congressman and veteran of the Korean War, died on May 26 the age of 94. The mass, held at the historic St. Patrick's Cathedral, came a day after Rangel's body lay in state at New York City Hall , an honor bestowed to only a handful of political figures, including U.S. presidents Abraham Lincoln and Ulysses S. Grant. Clinton, who called Rangel one of the most effective members to ever serve in Congress, recalled the congressman's insistence on steering a critical economic program to his Harlem district when Clinton was president, helping to lower unemployment there. 'I don't think I ever knew a happier warrior than Charlie Rangel,' Clinton said. Rangel served in Congress for nearly five decades, becoming a dean of the New York congressional delegation and a founding member of the Congressional Black Caucus, as well as being the first first African American to chair the powerful Ways and Means Committee. Before his time on Capitol Hill, he earned a Purple Heart and a Bronze Star for his military service in the Korean War. Jeffries, the House Democratic Leader, told the crowd at the mass that 'America is better off today because of his service' and said, as a young congressman, that the legendary Rangel would simply call him Jeff. 'Now, Charlie Rangel would often call me Jeff. I believe it was short for Jeffries. But I never confirmed that. 'Cause this was Charlie Rangel, and so you go with the flow,' Jeffries said, smiling. Hochul called Rangel 'a giant in American life' and said she would move to rename a street in Harlem after the late congressman, who was sometimes called 'Lion of Lenox Avenue.' She thanked the attendees who came to the mass 'not to mourn Charlie, but to celebrate an extraordinary life.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Judge blocks Trump's election executive order, siding with Democrats who called it overreach
ATLANTA (AP) — A federal judge on Friday blocked President Donald Trump's attempt to overhaul elections in the U.S., siding with a group of Democratic state attorneys general who challenged the effort as unconstitutional. The Republican president's March 25 executive order sought to compel officials to require documentary proof of citizenship for everyone registering to vote for federal elections, accept only mailed ballots received by Election Day and condition federal election grant funding on states adhering to the new ballot deadline. The attorneys general said the directive 'usurps the States' constitutional power and seeks to amend election law by fiat.' The White House defended the order as 'standing up for free, fair and honest elections' and called proof of citizenship a 'commonsense' requirement. Judge Denise J. Casper of the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts said in Friday's order that the states had a likelihood of success as to their legal challenges. 'The Constitution does not grant the President any specific powers over elections,' Casper wrote. Casper also noted that, when it comes to citizenship, 'there is no dispute (nor could there be) that U.S. citizenship is required to vote in federal elections and the federal voter registration forms require attestation of citizenship.' Casper cited arguments made by the states that the requirements would 'burden the States with significant efforts and substantial costs' to update procedures. Messages seeking a response from the White House and Department of Justice were not immediately returned. The ruling is the second legal setback for Trump's election order. A federal judge in Washington, D.C., previously blocked parts of the directive, including the proof-of-citizenship requirement for the federal voter registration form. The order is the culmination of Trump's longstanding complaints about elections. After his first win in 2016, Trump falsely claimed his popular vote total would have been much higher if not for 'millions of people who voted illegally.' Since 2020, Trump has made false claims of widespread voter fraud and manipulation of voting machines to explain his loss to Democrat Joe Biden. He has said his executive order secures elections against illegal voting by noncitizens, though multiple studies and investigations in the states have shown that it's rare and typically a mistake. Casting a ballot as a noncitizen is already against the law and can result in fines and deportation if convicted. Also blocked in Friday's ruling was part of the order that sought to require states to exclude any mail-in or absentee ballots received after Election Day. Currently, 18 states and Puerto Rico accept mailed ballots received after Election Day as long they are postmarked on or before that date, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Oregon and Washington, which conduct their elections almost entirely by mail, filed a separate lawsuit over the ballot deadline, saying the executive order could disenfranchise voters in their states. When the lawsuit was filed, Washington Secretary of State Steve Hobbs noted that more than 300,000 ballots in the state arrived after Election Day in 2024. Trump's order has received praise from the top election officials in some Republican states who say it could inhibit instances of voter fraud and will give them access to federal data to better maintain their voter rolls. But many legal experts say the order exceeds Trump's power because the Constitution gives states the authority to set the 'times, places and manner' of elections, with Congress allowed to set rules for elections to federal office. As Friday's ruling states, the Constitution makes no provision for presidents to set the rules for elections. During a hearing earlier this month on the states' request for a preliminary injunction, lawyers for the states and lawyers for the administration argued over the implications of Trump's order, whether the changes could be made in time for next year's midterm elections and how much it would cost the states. Justice Department lawyer Bridget O'Hickey said during the hearing that the order seeks to provide a single set of rules for certain aspects of election operations rather than having a patchwork of state laws and that any harm to the states is speculation. O'Hickey also claimed that mailed ballots received after Election Day might somehow be manipulated, suggesting people could retrieve their ballots and alter their votes based on what they see in early results. But all ballots received after Election Day require a postmark showing they were sent on or before that date, and that any ballot with a postmark after Election Day would not count. Christina A. Cassidy, The Associated Press