Trump halts entry of foreign students enrolled at Harvard
Listen to article
US President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced an immediate ban on visas for foreign students enrolled to begin studies at Harvard University, intensifying a long-standing clash with academic institutions.
In a proclamation released late in the day, Trump said the measure targets those seeking entry to the United States "solely or principally" to attend courses or exchange programmes run by Harvard.
The decision applies to all new entrants via the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) and places current visa-holders under review.
"The entry of such aliens presents an unacceptable risk to our Nation's security," Trump said in the statement.
The White House accused Harvard of repeatedly withholding information on criminal activity involving foreign students and resisting federal oversight of its programmes.
Harvard, a frequent target of Trump's rhetoric, has openly defied the administration's efforts to impose stricter controls on academic operations, including recruitment and research.
Trump's order also warned that existing international students could face revocation of their visas if concerns arise during the review process.
The move is likely to strain further relations between the government and US universities, many of which depend on international enrollment.
Harvard officials have yet to respond publicly to the directive.
Trump also accused Harvard and its affiliated campus groups of limiting opportunities for American citizens, claiming the university continued to deny "hardworking Americans" fair access.
The proclamation stated it was not in the country's interest to "exacerbate" what it described as Harvard's discriminatory practices against certain races, nationalities, or religious backgrounds by allowing large numbers of international students.
The Trump administration has taken a hard line on foreign students, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently pledging to step up efforts to revoke visas for Chinese nationals.
Just last week, as students marked graduation ceremonies, a federal judge extended a temporary injunction blocking Trump's attempt to halt international student enrollment at Harvard.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
25 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Iran urges Europe not to back IAEA resolution on nuclear compliance
'Mark my words as Europe ponders another major strategic mistake: Iran will react strongly against any violation of its rights,' says Abbas. PHOTO: AFP Listen to article Iran warned European powers on Friday against backing a draft resolution at the International Atomic Energy Agency next week accusing Tehran of non-compliance, calling it a 'strategic mistake'. 'Instead of engaging in good faith, the E3 is opting for malign action against Iran at the IAEA Board of Governors,' Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on X, referring to Britain, France and Germany. 'Mark my words as Europe ponders another major strategic mistake: Iran will react strongly against any violation of its rights.' The warning from Iran's top diplomat comes as the three European governments prepare to join Washington in backing a censure resolution at next week's board meeting, a diplomatic source told AFP. The resolution would accuse Iran of failing to meet its nuclear obligations and carries the threat of referral to the UN Security Council if Tehran 'does not show goodwill', the source added. Araghchi said Tehran had demonstrated 'years of good cooperation with the IAEA - resulting in a resolution which shut down malign claims of a 'possible military dimension' (PMD) to Iran's peaceful nuclear programme'. 'My country is once again accused of 'non-compliance,'' he added, blaming 'shoddy and politicised reporting'. UN nuclear chief urges 'more transparency' from Iran After years of good cooperation with the IAEA—resulting in a resolution which shut down malign claims of a "possible military dimension" (PMD) to Iran's peaceful nuclear program—my country is once again accused of "non-compliance". Instead of engaging in good faith, the E3 is… — Seyed Abbas Araghchi (@araghchi) June 6, 2025 The criticism follows a quarterly report from the IAEA last week which cited a 'general lack of cooperation' from Iran and raised concerns over undeclared nuclear material. Tehran rejected the report as politically motivated and based on 'forged documents' it said had been provided by its arch foe Israel. The pressure on Iran comes amid indirect talks with the United States, mediated by Oman since April 12, to forge a new nuclear agreement between the longtime foes. The two sides have been publicly at odds over uranium enrichment, the process that produces fuel for nuclear reactors or, in highly extended form, the material for a nuclear warhead. Iran insists it has the right to enrich uranium under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and the issue is 'non-negotiable'. But in a post on his Truth Social network on Monday, President Donald Trump said the United States 'WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM' by Iran. Tehran and Washington are seeking a new agreement to replace a 2015 deal with major powers which Trump unilaterally abandoned during his first term in 2018. The agreement quickly unravelled as Trump reimposed sweeping sanctions and Tehran began walking back its own commitments a year later. Iran currently enriches uranium to 60 percent, well above the 3.67 percent cap set by the 2015 deal but below the 90 percent threshold required for a nuclear warhead. Britain, France and Germany, which were all party to the 2015 deal, are considering whether to trigger a 'snapback' of UN sanctions under its dispute resolution mechanism – an option that expires on the deal's 10th anniversary in October.
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Trump is not interested in talking to Musk as they feud over tax-cut bill
WASHINGTON: U.S. President Donald Trump is not interested in talking with his former ally Elon Musk, amid a bitter feud over the president's sweeping tax-cut bill, a White House official said on Friday, adding that no phone call between the two men is planned for the day. A separate White House official had said earlier that Trump and Musk were going to talk to each other on Friday. Trump, the world's most powerful leader, and Musk, the world's richest man, launched an extraordinary day of hostilities on Thursday - largely over social media - marking a stark end to a close alliance. In pre-market trading on Friday, shares in Musk's Tesla rose as much as 5% after the early news that the two men were scheduled to speak. Tesla had closed down 14% on Thursday, losing about $150 billion in market value in the largest single-day decline in value in the electric vehicle maker's history. Trump, Musk feud explodes with threats of cutting contracts, backing impeachment Musk bankrolled a large part of Trump's presidential campaign and was then brought to the White House to head up a controversial effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending. The falling-out had begun brewing days ago when Musk, who left his role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency a week ago, denounced Trump's tax-cut and spending bill. The feud is complicating efforts to pass the bill, which is the president's main demand of the Republican-controlled Congress. Musk has denounced the package, which contains most of Trump's domestic priorities, as a 'disgusting abomination' that would add too much to the nation's $36.2 trillion in debt. The package narrowly passed the House of Representatives last month and is now before the Senate, where Republicans say they will make further changes. Nonpartisan analysts say it would add $2.4 trillion in debt over 10 years. House Speaker Mike Johnson said he has been in touch with Musk. 'I don't argue with him about how to build rockets and I wish he wouldn't argue with me about how to craft legislation and pass it,' he said on CNBC. Trump says 'very disappointed' by Musk criticism 'Very disappointed' Trump initially stayed quiet while Musk campaigned to torpedo the bill, but broke his silence on Thursday, telling reporters he was 'very disappointed' in Musk. 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' he said. The pair then traded barbs on their social media platforms: Trump's Truth Social and Musk's X. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' wrote Musk, who spent nearly $300 million backing Trump and other Republicans in last year's election. Musk also asserted that Trump's signature import tariffs would push the U.S. into a recession and responded 'Yes' to a post on X saying Trump should be impeached. That would be highly unlikely given Trump's Republicans hold majorities in both chambers of Congress. Trump, for his part, suggested he would terminate government contracts with Musk's businesses, which include rocket company SpaceX and its satellite unit Starlink. Musk, whose space business plays a critical role in the U.S. government's space program, responded that he would begin decommissioning SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, which is the only U.S. spacecraft capable of sending astronauts to the International Space Station. He backed off the threat later in the day. In a sign of a possible detente, Musk subsequently wrote: 'You're not wrong' in response to billionaire investor Bill Ackman saying Trump and Musk should make peace. A prolonged feud between the pair could make it harder for Republicans to keep control of Congress in next year's midtermelections if Musk withholds financial support or other major Silicon Valley business leaders distance themselves from Trump. Musk had already said he planned to curtail his political spending, and on Tuesday he called for firing 'all politicians who betrayed the American people' next year. His involvement with the Trump administration has provoked widespread protests at Tesla sites, driving down sales while investors fretted that Musk's attention was too divided.
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan, India bring heavy-hitters to persuade US after conflict
WASHINGTON: Weeks after a military crisis, India and Pakistan have dispatched top lawmakers to press their cases in the United States, where President Donald Trump has shown eagerness for diplomacy between them. After crisscrossing the world, the delegations descended this week at the same time on Washington, which played a key mediatory role in a ceasefire after four days of fighting between the nuclear-armed adversaries in May. In strikingly similar strategies, the rival delegations are both led by veteran politicians who have been critical of their countries' governments and are known for their ease in speaking to Western audiences. Pakistan has embraced an active role for the Trump administration while India, which has close relations with Washington, has been more circumspect and has long refused outside mediation on the flashpoint Himalayan territory of Kashmir. 'Just like the United States and President Trump played a role in encouraging us to achieve this ceasefire, I believe they should play their part in encouraging both sides to engage in a comprehensive dialogue,' said Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, the scion of a political dynasty whose Pakistan People's Party says it belongs neither to the governing coalition nor opposition. India laying ground of first nuclear war over water: Bilawal 'I don't quite understand the Indian government's hesitance,' he told AFP. 'I'm the first to criticize the United States for so many reasons, but where they do the right thing, where they do the difficult task of actually achieving a ceasefire, they deserve appreciation.' India's delegation is led by one of its most prominent opposition politicians, Shashi Tharoor, a former senior UN official and writer. He said he was putting the national interest first, despite disagreements domestically with Hindu nationalist Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Tharoor said he heard 'total support and solidarity for India' during his meetings with US lawmakers and a 'complete understanding of India's right to defend itself against terrorism.' 'No equivalence' Gunmen on April 22 massacred 26 tourists on the Indian-administered part of Kashmir, most singled out as Hindus, in the deadliest attack on civilians in decades in the scenic region that has seen a long-running insurgency. Only ceasefire between Pakistan, India represents true victory, says Bilawal India accused Pakistan of backing the assailants and launched strikes on Pakistani territory. More than 70 people were killed in missile, drone and artillery fire on both sides. 'There can be no equivalence between a country sending terrorists and a country having its civilians killed – holiday-makers, tourists, men shot down in front of their wives and children after being asked their religion,' Tharoor told a news conference. He said he was 'puzzled' by those who believe denials of responsibility by Pakistan, pointing to how US forces found Osama bin Laden in the country. Tharoor also noted that former Pakistani president Asif Ali Zardari – Bilawal's father – had advocated peace with India but was in power during the siege of Mumbai on November 26, 2008. 'If they can't control what they're doing to us, why bother to talk to them?' said Tharoor, who pointed to the outsized role of the military in Pakistan. 'A new normal' Trump has repeatedly credited his administration with averting nuclear war and said the United States had negotiated an agreement to hold talks between the two sides at a neutral site, an assertion that met India's silence. Pakistan had cool relations with Trump's predecessor Joe Biden, whose aides bitterly resented Islamabad's role in the Afghanistan war, but Pakistan has quickly worked to woo Trump including with the arrest of a suspect in a deadly 2021 attack that killed more than 170 people, including 13 US troops, during the withdrawal from Kabul. Bilawal – recalling how his mother, former prime minister Benazir Bhutto, was killed in an attack – said Pakistan was ready to discuss terrorism with India but that Kashmir as a 'root cause' also needed to be on the table. He said that India was establishing a dangerous new precedent in South Asia where whenever there is a terrorist attack in any country, 'you go straight to war.' 'I think that the fate of 1.7 billion people and our two great nations should not left in the hands of these nameless, faceless, non-state actors and this new normal that India is trying to impose on the region,' he said. The two delegations have no plans to meet in Washington.
