Employers told they should give women time off work for screening
Employers told they should give women time off work for screening
A third of women have put off cervical screening because of work commitments
Nearly a third of women admitted to having booked annual leave for their screenings
Companies are being urged to allow women time off to attend potentially life-saving screening appointments. The Lady Garden Foundation is calling on employers to grant all those eligible time off. The plea comes following research ahead of the start of Cervical Screening Awareness Week (19 – 24 June), where it was revealed that over a third of women said they've put off attending their cervical screenings due to work commitments.
The research, conducted by gynaecological cancer charity, the Lady Garden Foundation, also found that half of the women polled said they had felt pressured to prioritise work over personal health appointments, including cervical screenings.
Nearly a third of women admitted to having booked annual leave for their screenings, whilst 16% said their boss or workplace had insisted they book time off to attend their appointments. Nearly a third also claimed that their boss or workplace would not see their cervical screening as a good reason to be off work.
48% say companies should give paid time off to attend screenings, whilst more than three-quarters believe women should have a legal right. Despite more than 16 million British women over the age of 16 in employment, more than half of those surveyed said they were unaware of any policies or programmes in their workplace to support women to take time off to attend their cervical screening.
Jenny Halpern Prince MBE, Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder of the Lady Garden Foundation, said, 'NHS England estimates that five million women currently aren't up to date with their cervical screenings[3]. Whilst it is so important for us to educate and empower women to attend these potentially life-saving screenings, employers have a huge role to play in enabling women to have the time off they need, whilst also normalising the conversation in the workplace. This is evident in the fact that our research told us 60% of women believed more open workplace conversations would encourage them to attend. Our Public Cervix Announcement is about recognising the vital role employers play and encouraging them to get to work on supporting the health of women in their business'.
Article continues below
Cervical cancer is most commonly diagnosed in women between 30-34 years old, however, it can occur at any age, with early detection being key. In 2023-24, 5.12 million women in England aged between 25-64 were due a cervical cancer screening, only 3.25 million women were tested – 99.8% of cases are preventable if women regularly attend their screenings and are HPV vaccinated.
The Lady Garden Foundation has created two 'Public Cervix Announcement' guides, one for employers and one for employees.The guides can be downloaded from the Lady Garden Foundation website.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Is drinking tap water bad for you? Wellness influencers say yes, but here's what the experts think
Concerns about the safety and purity of UK tap water are no longer confined to the comment sections of influencers with conspiratorial or fringe ideas. An increasing number of British consumers are now filtering their water, worried that it might be unsafe to drink. Investigations by The Guardian, Watershed Investigations, and the Drinking Water Inspectorate (DWI) have revealed the presence of potentially harmful substances – specifically PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, also known as 'forever chemicals ') – in drinking water sources used by 17 out of 18 English water companies. The findings have raised significant questions about long-term exposure to such contaminants and prompted renewed scrutiny of the UK's water infrastructure. From countertop filtration systems and under-sink reverse osmosis units to purifying showerheads and portable bottles, there are now several ways to filter your tap water at home. Some of these solutions are expensive – costing more than £2000 – but they claim to transform potentially harmful water into safe, drinkable, even health-boosting H2O. But is the concern around our tap water justified, and do these domestic filtration products offer any meaningful protection? I grew up in an old house, with my mum telling me never to drink from the hot tap in case there was a dead pigeon in the tank in the loft, or in case the hot water dislodged some slime in the Victorian pipes. We had a filter installed, and I assumed all people had these concerns around tap water – I was met with blank stares when I warned the room about the pigeon risk at a sleepover when I was 14. I love to drink water, but I've always been sensitive to its flavour – the mineral content, the provenance; as a health writer, these things interest me. For years, I used a Brita filter, but after reading a study about microplastics found in UK tap water – despite claims that treatment facilities are able to remove more than 99 per cent – I switched to some heavier-duty technology: the Skuma countertop water filter. The Skuma uses three-stage reverse osmosis to remove microplastics, chemicals, and heavy metals, and then infuses the water with the helpful, health-giving minerals it stripped out. I'm not so obsessive that I would start arguing with my dentist if handed a cup of tap water to rinse with, like I have seen some American wellness influencers do on Instagram. I wouldn't turn down a drink if it had been made with tap water, but I am more mindful about what I'm drinking when I can help it. Though the UK maintains some of the highest regulatory standards for drinking water globally, a growing body of research points to the presence of emerging contaminants – including microplastics, industrial chemicals, heavy metals, and pharmaceutical residues – in our water supply. Many of these substances are still not yet regulated under UK or EU law, despite growing evidence of potential links to hormonal disruption, developmental issues, liver toxicity, and certain cancers. 'I was really focused on microplastics, PFAS, and other substances that weren't being widely reported on,' says Charles Robinson, founder of water filtration company Water2. 'I remember asking scientists at UCL whether, if they were in charge, they would allow this – and the answer was a clear 'no'.' Robinson funded independent research through labs in Italy and the UK to develop a filtration system capable of removing contaminants at the sub-micron level. His first-generation filter launched in 2023 and was subsequently backed by survivalist and TV personality Bear Grylls. 'A standard filter jug may filter particles down to around 200 microns,' Robinson explains. 'A human hair is about 70 microns for comparison. Our filters work down to 0.1 microns, capturing most microplastics, which typically range from 1 to 10 microns.' A team of research scientists behind The Water Professor – an organisation offering laboratory water testing kits for home use – explain: 'Smaller particle size may be important for the blood-brain defences against microplastics. In the study on the cognitive decline of mice contaminated with microplastics, the particle sizes were between 0.1 and 2 microns. 'The current understanding of toxicity associated with microplastics suggests that size does matter; smaller microplastics will find it easier to pass through tissue layers and could be absorbed through the stomach and lungs, entering deep into the body.' They also point to early studies suggesting that particles below 25 microns can pass through biological barriers and accumulate in organs, causing adverse effects. Larger particle sizes are less likely to have toxic effects since they are unable to pass through biological membranes. Logic then follows that high-tech filters able to sift out smaller microplastics will be better for you than something like a filter jug. The Water Professor's research also suggests that bottled water, on average, contains a higher concentration of smaller microplastics and could be worse for humans than previously thought, which is why opting for glass or metal bottles might also be the healthier choice. However, filtration is not without trade-offs. It might sound like a perfect solution, but some high-powered systems, such as reverse osmosis units, can also strip water of essential minerals like magnesium and calcium. These nutrients are linked to bone health, cardiovascular function, and even skin health, so their presence in water is important. 'It would be easy to assume that pure H2O is the gold standard,' says Robinson. 'But distilled or over-filtered water can actually be less beneficial if it lacks mineral content. The challenge is reducing harmful contaminants while preserving key elements.' Many people choose to add electrolytes to filtered water to ensure at least one glass contains a recommended daily allowance of vitamins and minerals. It's a smart workaround – and one that I personally employ every morning. However, there are concerns around these kinds of products too. Nutritionists frequently warn of the dangers of taking too many supplements and overloading the body, so be mindful of whether you actually need electrolytes and how much of a product you're using. Public health authorities continue to assert that UK mains water is safe to drink. But as Robinson and The Water Professor point out, 'safe' does not necessarily mean optimal, particularly given the pace at which chemical pollutants, synthetic compounds, and microplastics are entering the global water cycle. The Water Professor researchers explain that the most common plastic materials contributing to micro- and nanoplastics in water are polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polystyrene (PS) and polyethylene (PE), along with toxic chemicals such as per-and poly fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS ) and BPA. PFAS are commonly associated with non-stick cookware, as well as cosmetics, food packaging and outdoor clothing. These chemicals are also known as 'forever chemicals' because they don't break down easily and can build up in the environment, leading to potential risks for both wildlife and humans. Last year, researchers at Birmingham University found that the combined effects of PFAS with microplastics led to greater harm. After studying their effects on water fleas, they noted delays in sexual maturity and stunted growth. Their study paves the way for future research on how these chemicals might affect gene function, providing crucial insights into long-term biological impacts not only on aquatic species but on humans too. Menstrual health brand Asan recently reported that 2.4 million tampons are flushed down UK toilets each day, some of which end up in wastewater systems. Trace fibres and fragments from hygiene products, pharmaceuticals, and plastics are increasingly being detected in tap water, and while the long-term health impacts of these exposures are still under investigation, their ubiquity is raising alarm among environmental scientists and public health researchers. Stephanie Metzger, policy advisor at the Royal Society of Chemistry, has said: 'Here in the UK, we monitor for a long list of PFAS, but we're lagging far behind the US and the EU when it comes to the amount allowed in our drinking water and what is considered healthy. 'We know that PFAS can be filtered from drinking water – the technology exists – so increasing the level of filtration is just a matter of expense and political will. 'In [the regulator] Drinking Water Inspectorate's own words, levels above 10 nanograms per litre pose a medium or high risk to public health. We're seeing more and more studies that link PFAS to a range of very serious medical conditions, and so we urgently need a new approach for the sake of public health.' A 2024 study of London boroughs showed that in Harrow, a water sample had a PFOS (a type of PFAS) level of 14 nanograms per litre (ng/l) – 1.4 times the maximum limit for its presence in tap water under proposals put forward by the RSC. The answer as to whether you should be filtering your water largely depends on the level of risk you are willing to accept. For many, the regulated standard of UK tap water is sufficient. But for those concerned about cumulative exposure to emerging contaminants – or managing specific health conditions – additional filtration may be worth considering. 'It's about making informed choices,' says Robinson. 'Not everyone can afford an expensive system, but a well-made filter that costs under £100 a year can reduce your exposure significantly.' That said, experts caution against assuming that all filters are created equal. Filtering technologies vary significantly in their efficacy. While standard pitcher filters can improve taste and remove some chlorine, only high-performance filters operating below one micron are likely to capture smaller contaminants such as microplastics and certain PFAS. Consumers should look for independently verified performance data, consider the filter's lifespan and replacement costs, and weigh potential losses in mineral content against reductions in harmful substances. Of course, some people resort to filtration to soften hard water, which contains elevated levels of calcium and magnesium. These minerals not only cause the build-up of limescale on appliances and surfaces, but may also affect skin and hair. According to Karlee Oz, founder of Hello Klean, showering in unfiltered water may 'leave residue, contribute to dryness, and exacerbate conditions like eczema,' she explains. 'In addition, hot showers can vaporise chlorine and other disinfectant byproducts, increasing the risk of respiratory exposure and irritation.' Hello Klean's shower filters use KDF (Kinetic Degradation Fluxion) technology to convert chlorine into gentler compounds. Oz emphasises the importance of using filters that are clinically tested and certified for efficacy. 'Filtering reduces the burden on the skin and hair barrier and may improve tolerance over time.' Of course, not all areas in the UK have a hard water problem – and in some cases, softer water may be better for skin and hair – but a filter can still remove heavy metals like lead and cadmium and traces of harmful bacteria like E. coli. For the consumer, it can be complicated. UK tap water meets legal safety standards: it undergoes multiple filtration rounds and was ranked joint first for drinking water quality and sanitation in Yale University's 2022 Environmental Performance Index, along with Finland, Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, and the Netherlands. However, that doesn't mean there is no room for improvement. Research suggests that trace levels of PFAS, microplastics, and other contaminants are present in some supplies. Filtration can reduce exposure to these substances, but must be balanced against the potential loss of essential minerals. Research is still ongoing, but personally, I'll always reach for filtered water, glass bottles, and avoid ice if I can. A filter in my shower has made a noticeable difference too. It's a personal choice – but with microplastics now found in human blood, remote Antarctica, tea bags, and at the bottom of the ocean, I'll do what I can to avoid them in my morning glass of H2O.
Scotsman
4 hours ago
- Scotsman
Inclusive tech gives ‘time back to patients' amid surge in cases, says Scottish GP
A Scottish GP with dyslexia has hailed the benefits of a British-developed voice recognition tool in helping his practice cope with a rise in administrative demands and growing clinical complexity. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Dr Mark Taylor, a family doctor of 28 years, says digital dictation software from UK medtech company Lexacom is significantly easing the admin burden on him and his colleagues at a time when GPs are under more pressure than ever. According to the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (SPICe), NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde recorded a 1,000% increase in adult ADHD referrals between 2020 and 2023. In central Fife, referrals have risen by 500% over the past decade. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'We've seen a huge increase in referrals, and the wait times for specialist assessments are long,' said Dr Taylor from Kingsmills Medical Practice in Inverness, which serves around 10,000 patients and has a team of 12 clinicians. 'Using this tech has helped us focus on what matters most – time with our patients.' Lexacom Echo is helping GPs give time back to patients. 'Patient demand has changed since COVID', Dr Taylor adds. 'There are more complex cases, more paperwork, and fewer specialists to refer to. Tools like this help us to manage the work better and stay focused on care.' The software, Lexacom Echo, allows GPs to dictate directly into patient records and automatically converts medical notes into plain English, making health information easier to understand for patients. Crucially for Dr Taylor, who has dyslexia, the tool has significantly reduced the frustration of manual notetaking, improving both accuracy and continuity of care. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He explains: 'My typing skills are poor, and making my notes clear was always a challenge. Echo helps me get my thoughts down quickly and accurately. I can't imagine a GP who wouldn't find it useful.' The use of inclusive digital tools comes as primary care practices across Scotland – and the wider UK – experience an unprecedented rise in demand for autism and ADHD assessments. National NHS data shows that more than 224,000 people were waiting for autism assessments in December 2024 – a 23% rise on the previous year and a 75% increase since 2022. These rising figures translate to a growing administrative burden on GPs, many of whom are already managing heavy caseloads and staffing shortages. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Lexacom, the only platform offering workflow management, ambient AI, speech recognition, and digital dictation is used by more than 60% of GP practices in the UK. These tools are designed to streamline documentation, simplify patient communication, and reduce admin burden, allowing clinicians to spend more time on direct patient care. 'By reducing the time we spend writing and re-writing notes, we can increase the time spent listening to patients,' added Dr Taylor. 'In that sense, it's not just about helping the doctor – it's about giving time back to the patient.'
Scotsman
5 hours ago
- Scotsman
Inclusive tech gives ‘time back to patients' amid surge in cases, says Scottish GP
A Scottish GP with dyslexia has hailed the benefits of a British-developed voice recognition tool in helping his practice cope with a rise in administrative demands and growing clinical complexity. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Dr Mark Taylor, a family doctor of 28 years, says digital dictation software from UK medtech company Lexacom is significantly easing the admin burden on him and his colleagues at a time when GPs are under more pressure than ever. According to the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (SPICe), NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde recorded a 1,000% increase in adult ADHD referrals between 2020 and 2023. In central Fife, referrals have risen by 500% over the past decade. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'We've seen a huge increase in referrals, and the wait times for specialist assessments are long,' said Dr Taylor from Kingsmills Medical Practice, which serves around 10,000 patients and has a team of 12 clinicians. 'Using this tech has helped us focus on what matters most – time with our patients.' Lexacom Echo is helping GPs give time back to patients. 'Patient demand has changed since COVID', Dr Taylor adds. 'There are more complex cases, more paperwork, and fewer specialists to refer to. Tools like this help us to manage the work better and stay focused on care.' The software, Lexacom Echo, allows GPs to dictate directly into patient records and automatically converts medical notes into plain English, making health information easier to understand for patients. Crucially for Dr Taylor, who has dyslexia, the tool has significantly reduced the frustration of manual notetaking, improving both accuracy and continuity of care. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He explains: 'My typing skills are poor, and making my notes clear was always a challenge. Echo helps me get my thoughts down quickly and accurately. I can't imagine a GP who wouldn't find it useful.' The use of inclusive digital tools comes as primary care practices across Scotland – and the wider UK – experience an unprecedented rise in demand for autism and ADHD assessments. National NHS data shows that more than 224,000 people were waiting for autism assessments in December 2024 – a 23% rise on the previous year and a 75% increase since 2022. These rising figures translate to a growing administrative burden on GPs, many of whom are already managing heavy caseloads and staffing shortages. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Lexacom, the only platform offering workflow management, ambient AI, speech recognition, and digital dictation is used by more than 60% of GP practices in the UK. These tools are designed to streamline documentation, simplify patient communication, and reduce admin burden, allowing clinicians to spend more time on direct patient care.
