Ex-prez Kovind lauds Dattatreya, calls him ‘universally admired'
Hyderabad: Former President Ram Nath Kovind lauded Haryana Governor Bandaru Dattatreya as a truly multidimensional figure, remarking on the rare quality of being universally admired. These sentiments were shared at a well-attended event at Silpakala Vedika, where Mr Kovind formally launched the Telugu edition of Governor Dattatreya's autobiography, titled 'Prajala Kathe Naa Atmakatha' (The Story of the People of Telangana is My Autobiography).
The significant gathering included former Vice President M Venkaiah Naidu, alongside Governors Indrasena Reddy of Tripura, Kambampati Haribabu of Odisha, and Syed Abdul Nazeer of Andhra Pradesh. Kovind recounted Dattatreya's life journey, highlighting his consistent efforts to connect with and uplift individuals from disadvantaged and underprivileged backgrounds. He particularly noted Dattatreya's resilience during challenging periods, including the Emergency, where he reportedly boosted the morale of fellow detainees. The former President also underscored Dattatreya's impactful tenure as Union Minister for Labour and Employment, where his reforms concerning minimum wages, pensions, and welfare programmes benefited thousands. Kovind observed that the sheer number of well-wishers present at the autobiography launch felt more like a birthday celebration for the Governor.
Former Vice President Venkaiah Naidu spoke of the extraordinary sight of such esteemed personalities assembled on one stage to honour a genuinely good man with a 'golden heart.' He stressed that Dattatreya's unwavering dedication to public service and his ability to maintain a grounded life serve as a powerful inspiration for future generations. Naidu likened Dattatreya's conduct to a water droplet on a lotus leaf, signifying his consistent integrity regardless of his position.
Expressing concern over politicians frequently changing parties, he commended Dattatreya's steadfast commitment to his ideology and his focus on purposeful politics, always prioritising nationalism and the well-being of society.
The Governors of Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, Tripura, and Telangana all acknowledged Dattatreya's approachable nature, simplicity, and friendly demeanour, qualities that have endeared him to many.
People affectionately refer to him as 'Dattanna' (brother), a testament to the strong bonds he has forged while addressing their concerns. They highlighted his dedication to empowering rural communities and fostering social harmony and national unity. The Governors of Tripura and Odisha shared personal anecdotes of their interactions with Mr Dattatreya, emphasising that his life story remains a source of inspiration for younger generations.
Former Supreme Court Chief Justice N V Ramana underscored Dattatreya's emphasis on human relationships. Union Ministers G Kishan Reddy, Bhupathi Raju Srinivasa Varma, Andhra Pradesh Health Minister Satyakumar Yadav, Telangana Road and Buildings Minister Komati Reddy Venkat Reddy, and BJP MP Dr K Laxman also reflected on their associations with Dattatreya. They recalled his impactful work as an RSS Pracharak during the Divineema Cyclone disaster response, his role in establishing the Deen Dayal Housing Colony for those displaced, and the sanctioning of a 300-bed ESI hospital in Visakhapatnam. His initiatives, such as the Valmiki Ambedkar Awas Yojana houses in Musheerabad and Visakhapatnam, further exemplify his profound commitment to serving the poor and needy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
22 minutes ago
- India Today
Siddaramaiah slams PM Modi's 11 years at Centre: Unfulfilled promises, zero marks
Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah delivered a sharp critique of the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led government, marking its 11 years in power with a strong rebuke of what he described as 'unfulfilled promises' and 'zero marks'. Speaking on the anniversary, Siddaramaiah questioned the government's performance and the numerous commitments it made but failed to keep.'Modi is surviving only because of continuous campaigning. What happened to demonetisation? Who benefited from it? He promised Achhe Din, where are they? What happened to the promise of providing two crore jobs every year? He also assured the resolution of farmers' issues, what happened to that? Why did farmers protest for a year if their issues were being addressed?' Siddaramaiah He criticised the government for not delivering on its promises and suggested that the Prime Minister's frequent campaigning was a distraction. 'Most of the promises made by the Modi government were not fulfilled. They have only completed 11 years, that's all. What actually happened is, since he's always involved in campaigning, the media gives him excessive coverage.'Siddaramaiah also accused the Modi government of copying schemes pioneered by his state government. 'When we announced our guarantee schemes, they said it was impossible to implement and that the state would go bankrupt. But now, they've copied our schemes. Isn't that true? They have implemented similar programs in Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Delhi, and Rajasthan.'He went on to highlight the Prime Minister's record on fiscal federalism, saying, 'When he was the Chief Minister of Gujarat, he demanded 50 per cent devolution of taxes. But after becoming the Prime Minister, what did he do? Nothing. And you in the media don't even highlight that.'advertisementSiddaramaiah also accused the central government of neglecting Karnataka financially. 'Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman promised to give Rs 5,300 crore, did they give it? The 11th Pay Commission recommended Rs 11,495 crore for the state, was that given? When we ask the Bharatiya Janata Party to demand justice for Karnataka, they remain silent. Instead, they continue spreading fake narratives.'Concluding his remarks, the Chief Minister gave the Modi government a harsh assessment. 'I give the Modi government zero marks.' IN THIS STORY#Karnataka#Bengaluru
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
SC refuses immediate hearing as Tamil Nadu accuses Centre of withholding over Rs 2,150 crore in school funds
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has declined an urgent hearing request from the Tamil Nadu government regarding their plea against the central government. The state claims that Rs 2,151 crore in central education funds under the Samagra Shiksha Scheme for 2024-2025 is being withheld by the Centre. The state government sought immediate intervention from the Supreme Court in this matter on Monday. The dispute centers around the allocation and disbursement of funds meant for education initiatives in Tamil Nadu under the federal education scheme. A bench comprising Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan took note of the fact that the state government filed the petition in May alleging withholding of central funds for 2024 and this year also. "There is no urgency and it can be taken up after the 'partial working days' (the new name of summer vacation)," the bench said. In May, the Tamil Nadu government moved the top court against the Centre for allegedly withholding the funds. The DMK government's plea, filed against the Union Ministry of Education, invokes Article 131 of the Constitution which provides exclusive jurisdiction to the top court to hear pleas between the Centre and one or more states, or between one or more states. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo The state government alleged the Centre attempted to force the implementation of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 and the associated PM SHRI Schools Scheme which it strongly objected to, particularly the contentious three-language formula. The top court, therefore, was urged to declare that the NEP and the PM SHRI Schools Scheme are not binding on the plaintiff state unless and until a formal agreement is entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant for their implementation within Tamil Nadu . The lawsuit has also sought a declaration that the action of the Centre to link Tamil Nadu's entitlement to receive funds under the Samagra Shiksha Scheme to the implementation of the NEP, 2020, and the PM SHRI Schools Scheme within the state are unconstitutional, illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable . It has also urged the top court to declare the Centre's letters of February 23, 2024 and March 07, 2024 as illegal, null, void ab initio and not binding on the state government. The plea sought a direction to the Centre to pay "Rs 2,291,30,24,769 (two thousand two hundred and ninety-one crore thirty lakhs twenty-four thousand seven hundred and sixty-nine) within a time frame to be fixed by this court" along with a future interest of 6 per cent per annum on the "principal sum of Rs 2,151,59,61,000 (two thousand one hundred and fifty-one crore fifty nine lakh and sixty one thousand) from May 1, 2025 until realisation of the decree". The dispute stems from the non-release of central funds under the Scheme, a flagship centrally sponsored programme for school education aimed at universalising quality education. The Project Approval Board (PAB) of the Ministry of Education had approved a total outlay of Rs 3,585.99 crore for Tamil Nadu for FY 2024 25, of which the Union Government's committed 60 per cent share amounted to Rs 2,151.59 crore. The plea said despite this approval, no instalments have been disbursed by the Centre as yet. The Centre, it said, unilaterally linked the release of these funds to Tamil Nadu's full implementation of NEP 2020 and the signing of an MoU for the PM SHRI Schools Scheme, conditions which were neither part of the original Samagra Shiksha Scheme nor agreed upon by the state. The reason for such non-disbursement is that the defendant has linked the release of Samagra Shiksha Scheme funds with the implementation of national education policy and NEP exemplary PM SHRI Schools' Scheme despite the fact that these policy/scheme are separate schemes, it said. Referring to the impact of non-release of Samagra Shiksha funds, the plea said paying salaries was crucial in maintaining competent and motivated teachers and supporting staff. It directly impacts the quality of education provided to students and contributes to overall societal development by nurturing the next generation with the skills and knowledge needed for success, it added. PTI Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Phone-tapping case: Ex-SIB chief appears before police for questioning
Hyderabad, Former Special Intelligence Bureau chief of Telangana, T Prabhakar Rao, the prime accused in the alleged phone-tapping case on Monday appeared before the police for questioning. Prabhakar Rao, who earlier cited ill health and was believed to be in the United States, landed in Hyderabad on Sunday night. The Supreme Court on May 29 granted interim protection from coercive action to Prabhakar Rao and directed him to appear before the investigating officer. Rao had moved the Supreme Court challenging an order of the Telangana High Court, which dismissed his anticipatory bail plea. Earlier, a Red Corner Notice was issued against him and his passport was revoked. On May 20, a Hyderabad court issued a proclamation order against Rao in the phone-tapping case. According to the order, Rao may be declared a "proclaimed offender" if he does not appear before the court by June 20. Rao, who was 'absconding' in the case, has been accused of forming a "Special Operations Team" under a suspended DSP within the SIB for carrying out certain specific tasks related to political surveillance to benefit the then ruling political party and its leaders. The suspended DSP of the SIB was among the four police officials arrested by the Hyderabad police since March 2024 for allegedly erasing intelligence information from various electronic gadgets as well as for phone-tapping during the previous Bharat Rashtra Samithi regime in Telangana. They were subsequently granted bail. The accused are part of a "conspiracy", in which they allegedly misused the SIB's resources for political purposes by putting citizens from different walks of life under surveillance. Those named as accused in the case, along with others, had allegedly developed profiles of several people in an unauthorised manner and were accused of monitoring them clandestinely and illegally in the SIB and using them in a partisan manner to favour a political party at the behest of some people. They were also involved in a conspiracy to destroy records to cause disappearance of evidence of their crime, police had said.
