logo
Super common habit is keeping your brain awake while you sleep

Super common habit is keeping your brain awake while you sleep

News.com.au2 days ago

Late-night scrolling isn't the only thing sabotaging your slumber.
New research suggests a common daily habit may send your brain into overdrive while you sleep — even if you do it hours before bedtime.
Scientists warn the disruption could interfere with the brain's overnight recovery processes, potentially taking a toll on your cognitive health.
In the study, Canadian researchers had 40 healthy adults spend two non-consecutive nights in a sleep lab.
On one night, participants consumed 200 milligrams of caffeine — the equivalent of about two cups of coffee — a few hours before bed.
On the other, they were given a placebo.
While most people know caffeine can make it harder to fall asleep, researchers used EEG scans to track brain activity after participants dozed off and found it kept their brains in a heightened state of alertness long after they shut their eyes.
They found, for the first time, that the stimulant pushed the brain into a state of 'criticality', making it more awake, alert and reactive than it should be while snoozing.
'While this is useful during the day for concentration, this state could interfere with rest at night: the brain would neither relax nor recover properly,' said Dr Julie Carrier, a psychology professor at the University of Montreal and co-author of the study.
The team used artificial intelligence to detect subtle changes in neuronal activity and found caffeine increased the complexity of brain signals, preventing the brain from fully powering down during sleep.
The effect was especially strong during non-REM sleep — the deep stage critical for memory and cognitive recovery.
Researchers also observed changes in brain wave patterns. Slow waves linked to deep, restorative rest were reduced, while faster waves associated with wakefulness and mental activity increased.
'These changes suggest that even during sleep, the brain remains in a more activated, less restorative state under the influence of caffeine,' said Dr Karim Jerbi, a psychology professor at the University of Montreal and researcher at the Mila Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute, who co-authored the study.
'This change in the brain's rhythmical activity may help explain why caffeine affects the efficiency with which the brain recovers during the night, with potential consequences for memory processing,' he added.
Notably, the stimulant's effects were far more pronounced in participants aged 20 to 27 compared to those aged 41 to 58 — especially during REM sleep, the dreaming phase tied to emotional and cognitive processing.
Researchers believe younger adults responded more strongly due to having more adenosine receptors. These molecules gradually accumulate in the brain throughout the day, triggering fatigue.
'Adenosine receptors naturally decrease with age, reducing caffeine's ability to block them and improve brain complexity, which may partly explain the reduced effect of caffeine observed in middle-aged participants,' Dr Carrier said.
The findings suggest younger brains may be especially vulnerable to caffeine's hidden impact on rest.
Caffeine is the most widely consumed psychoactive drug in the world, commonly found in products such as coffee, tea, chocolate, sodas and energy drinks.
Three in four Australians (75 per cent) enjoy at least one cup of coffee per day, and of those, 28 per cent have three or more cups per day, according to McCrindle.
While the Mayo Clinic says up to 400 milligrams of caffeine per day is generally safe for healthy adults, the study suggests it could still be interfering with sleep quality — even hours after your last sip.
The scientists are calling for further research exploring how these night-time brain changes affect day-to-day functioning and cognitive health.
This, they said, could one day shape personalised caffeine recommendations.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A one-night stand brought this couple together — now they have 11 children
A one-night stand brought this couple together — now they have 11 children

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

A one-night stand brought this couple together — now they have 11 children

A real-life 'Cheaper by the Dozen' family. One-night stands can usually go one of two ways. This couple got together for a night, fell in love and the rest is history. Alicia and Josh Dougherty moved in together after only knowing each other for two days — and now they are the parents to 11 children. The New York-based family has quite a following on social media – 7.5 million TikTok followers to be exact – where they consistently post videos about the chaos of life as a family of 13. The couple have four biological children — Zoey, Dash, Bodhi and Harlee — and eight children that they're fostering or adopting: Alex, James, Jordan, Jason, Patrick, Bree, Nevaeh and Dayshawn. With such a massive following, it's clear people cannot get enough of this charming family. Oftentimes, Alicia will provide a glimpse to the family's millions of followers of what a day of feeding her kids looks like. While the jaw-dropping spread looks like something a person would only find at a hotel buffet breakfast — in the Dougherty household, it's just another regular day for them. To feed the mouths of that many kids — the couple revealed on TikTok that an average trip to Walmart consists of filling up four shopping carts supposedly totalling a little over $US1,500 – and that's just for the week. Having that many kids is clearly not for the weak. Alicia has also posted the family's morning routine, which requires making 11 sandwiches, packing monogrammed lunch bags complete with snacks and all the fixings — in addition to getting breakfast on the table – all before the kiddos head off to school. Clearly, this giant family has their routines down to a science — and viewers can't get enough of them. 'You're a great mum!' a follower commented on one of the Dougherty's videos. 'The food looks so good!! Such a sweet mum,' wrote someone else on a video of Alicia preparing breakfast and lunch for her clan. 'How does she do it?' chimed in someone else. 'How big is your fridge?!!!' someone commented on the video of Alicia food shopping for her family.

Multi-millionaire brands four-day work week the ‘stupidest idea I've ever heard'
Multi-millionaire brands four-day work week the ‘stupidest idea I've ever heard'

News.com.au

time4 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Multi-millionaire brands four-day work week the ‘stupidest idea I've ever heard'

A Canadian businessman and multi-millionaire has fired up at the suggestion of a four-day work week being widely adopted, swiftly branding the idea 'stupid' during an interview. Kevin O'Leary, known for his role as one of the investors on the program Shark Tank, didn't hold back when sharing his thoughts during a recent appearance on Fox News. 'There is a big push now for a four day work week, do you think we will become like the French?' one of the presenters asked. The four-day work week is becoming increasingly popular in France, with the country launching it's first official pilot of the program in 2024. In 2000, the country also legally mandated a 35-hour work week, with any hours worked beyond this considered overtime. In 2023, the France's Labor Ministry announced that around 10,000 employees were already working under a four-day model. France isn't the only country where the four-day movement is growing, with pilots taking place all over the world in recent years, including Australia. However, Mr O'Leary is not convinced by the working model's increased popularity. 'That's the stupidest idea I have ever heard,' he said. 'I think we should let the French go to a two-day work week and then kick their arse internationally.' The outspoken businessman claimed that in our post-pandemic world and new digital economy, there is 'no such thing as a work week' anymore. But this isn't to say Mr O'Leary thinks a traditional five-day work week is the answer either, with the multi-millionaire taking a more outcome focused approach. 'Look at my staff, 40 per cent of them work remotely all around the world,' he said. For example, if a project is due by June 15, then he doesn't care how many days a week his staff work, so long as the work is done on time. The businessman's brutal assessment sparked a heated debate, with many defending the four-day work model. One person claimed the 'best job' they ever had operated on a four-day work week, claiming their quality of life went up and they had time to study and upskill. 'I have a four-day work week. I can't express the difference in how much better my work week is given one extra day to decompress,' another said. One added: 'I have been running my company on a four-day work week for a few years now. I can't imagine going back to a five-day week.' However, there were others who agreed with Mr O'Leary's point of view. 'I couldn't agree more with you! I think that is so stupid!' one said. 'The people who want a four-day work week should start their own company,' another claimed. Another agreed, saying the focus should be on getting the work done by specific deadlines, with less focus on how many days a week it may take to complete. One of the common ways that companies implement a four-day week is by using the 100:80:100 model, in which staff keep 100 per cent of their pay but have their work hours reduced to 80 per cent. However, they must maintain 100 per cent of their productivity in order for the change to work. Other options include allowing staff to work a shorter week but for less pay, or offering standard 40 hour weeks condensed over four days. This isn't the first time Mr O'Leary has shared his opinion on divisive workplace topics. In August last year he raged at the Australian government following the introduction of the Right To Disconnect law. The law gives employees the right to refuse contact outside of their working hours. Staff are not required to monitor, read, or respond to contact from an employer or third party – within reason. The change left Mr O'Leary baffled. 'What happens if you have an event in the office and it is closed? Or you have an emergency room somewhere and you have to get of hold of them at 2am in the morning because it affects the job they are on,' he told Fox News at the time. 'This kind of stuff just makes me crazy. It is so dumb. Who dreams this crap up? Why would anyone propose such a stupid idea?' He added that he would 'fire' an employee if they ignored his calls and didn't get back to him. Doubling down in a lengthy post to X, Mr O'Leary wrote: 'If you can't be reached when the job depends on it, you're out.' 'Who dreams up these ridiculous ideas? If someone tells me they're in 'silent mode,' they're fired,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store