Fate of trail project uncertain after about-face by Cass County Board
Mike Sousek, general manager of the Lower Platte South Natural Resources District, addresses the Cass County Board prior to its vote Tuesday, March 25, 2025, to rescind approval of a recreational trail route across the county. (Paul Hammel/Nebraska Examiner)
PLATTSMOUTH, Nebraska — The prospects are again uncertain for a long-sought recreation trail across rural Cass County.
On Tuesday, the Cass County Board voted 4-1 to withdraw its November approval of a route for the trail, a 10-mile segment that would achieve a long-held dream to connect Lincoln and Omaha via a hike and bike trail.
The vote was an abrupt about-face for the board, which had voted 3-2 in November to OK a memorandum of understanding with the Lower Platte South Natural Resources District to build the trail from the end of the Wabash Trail south of Elmwood to the Lied Bridge that spans the Platte River near South Bend.
Since November, two members of the County Board changed, and both voted against the route that had been OK'd by the previous board — 'Route D,' which roughly follows a little-traveled, north-south gravel road along 334th Street.
Complicating matters involving the construction of a connector trail across Cass County is that a lawsuit was filed recently against the County Board there.
Mark Meyer, a Cass County resident whose family has land on the proposed route, accused the Board of violating the Open Meetings and Interlocal Agreement Acts when they approved a route for the trail in November.
The lawsuit, filed March 4, by J.L. Spray and Raymond Daugherty of the Mattson Ricketts Law Firm in Lincoln, asked that the November approval of the route and the agreement to work with the NRD be nullified.
The request and a response from the county are pending.
Board member Daniel Stohlmann of Louisville, a new board member elected in November, said commissioners weren't give enough information about the precise route the trail would take — including which side of the road it would impact — and that commissioners needed that before giving a final OK.
'I think it's really important to evaluate all options,' Stohlmann said after the vote. 'This trail is a permanent thing. It's really important to get it right the first time.'
Tuesday's vote was reminiscent of two decades ago, when a similar trail proposal, following a different route, was shot down over landowner complaints that a trail would devalue their property, provide a hazard for farm equipment and put an eyesore in the ditch before their homes.
Representatives of bicycle and trail groups from Bellevue, Omaha and Lincoln disputed that during public comments at the meeting, saying that existing vehicle traffic poses more of a safety risk and that projections indicate a completed trail would generate $2.5 million in economic activity for the county.
Already, there's a weekly 'nacho ride' from Lincoln to Eagle, and a regular 'pie ride' to Elmwood that draws dozens of bikers.
When asked the status of the estimated $15.5 million trail project, Mike Sousek, general manager of the Lower Platte South NRD, responded 'I'll have to figure that out myself.'
'We will have to sit down with the county and reevaluate Route D and go from there,' Sousek said.
In rejecting the once-approved route — agreed to after months of public meetings and discussion — the Cass County Board set its April 22 meeting for the NRD to return with more precise plans for the route.
While a big win for local landowners who dispute the benefits of a recreational trail, it was a crushing defeat for bike enthusiasts, who see completion of the connector as a major step in the state and national development of a trail network.
The state, in 2022, allocated $8.3 million toward completion of the trail link.
Sousek said Tuesday that $400,000 had been spent on a consultant's study of possible routes, and to conduct several public meetings to gather input. A $1.9 million contract was recently signed with JEO Consulting to design and engineer the trail, a limestone path that would be built in existing right-of-way in ditches parallel to existing county roads.
November's agreement made clear that no private property would be used for the trail, and thus, the use of eminent domain was off limits. Route D was chosen in large part because it crossed the fewest residential driveways, nine, than the three other routes considered.
Sousek said the 'gap' in financing the trail — between the $8.3 million allocated and the final cost, which he said he hoped to get down to $10 million or $12 million — would be covered by private donations from trail enthusiasts or, if the NRD Board deemed appropriate, property tax revenue. Trail advocates have said private donations would not be difficult to obtain.
Cass County is not contributing financially to the project, and the NRD has agreed to cover all costs of operation and maintenance. But because county road ditches are being used, the county has a big say on the route.
Over and over at Tuesday's meeting, Sousek said that the NRD would work with landowners who don't want the trail crossing their driveways. Already, he said, he'd worked around the objections of one family by rerouting the trail to the other side of the road.
'I hear the complaints … I understand your concerns,' he told landowners attending the meeting, which overflowed the board meeting room. 'I'm going to do everything in my power to address them.'
'We don't come in and act like a bulldozer,' Sousek added. 'We have a history that shows that partnerships work.'
Cass County Attorney Chris Perrone told county board members that they had a say in the final design of the trail, and if the trail caused any damage to county roads — by washing out a road or gravel — the county could seek legal action for the NRD to pay for it.
Perrone also told the board that the county could be liable for the costs already spent on the trail if it eventually doesn't get built. He added that the county could also be sued for not proceeding with the trail project, noting that one lawsuit has already been filed to block the completion of the trail.
Stohlmann, who introduced the motion to rescind approval of the trail route, told the Examiner he wasn't against the trail in any location, but wanted to talk to the NRD about other options.
Alex DeGarmo, chairman of the Cass County Board and the lone 'no' vote to rescind the route decision, said after the meeting that a lot of the objections to the trail had been voiced, and heard, over the past few months.
'Hopefully, we'll find an amiable resolution,' DeGarmo said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Brown County and C. Reiss agree to lease Pulliam property, but not for coal
The Brown County Board voted to approve a deal June 5 with Green Bay and C. Reiss Co. to relocate the coal piles to the Fox River Terminal and use the former Pulliam site to store C. Reiss' bulk commodities. Many eyes were on Green Bay and Brown County this week as officials inched closer to a deal that had $15 million at stake. The deal marks a historic milestone to a decades-long effort to relocate the coal piles from its 125-year home at 115 W. Mason St. Under the agreement, C. Reiss will lease the former Pulliam power plant to store salt and other bulk commodities instead of coal. The terms still fulfill decades of community leaders' goal to free up prime riverfront property for industrial, commercial and residential use at the mouth of the Fox River. The Brown County Board unanimously voted to approve the terms of the agreement. Board member Dixon Wolfe was not at the meeting. Former Green Bay mayors Jim Schmitt and Paul Jadin awaited the County Board's momentous vote, along with state Sens. Eric Wimberger, R-Oconto, and Jamie Wall, D-Green Bay; and state Reps. David Steffen, R-Howard; Ben Franklin, R-De Pere; Ryan Spaude, D-Ashwaubenon; and Amaad Rivera-Wagner, D-Green Bay. C. Reiss will lease 16 acres of the Pulliam site to store bulk commodities. The coal piles will be housed at the Fox River Terminal. Lease payments with a rate of $350,000 per year with increases every five years during the first 25 years based on the Consumer Price Index. The length of the lease is 60 years and can be extended. The lease needs to be executed by Sept. 25, according to the agreement. The new plan is a notable shift from previous proposals that had intended to make the Pulliam site the new home of the coal piles. Key parties were sorting out the agreement just a few minutes before starting the County Board meeting June 5, Buckley said ahead of the vote. The board voted on the deal June 5, just hours before the deadline to retain the $15 million state grant. The Wisconsin Department of Administration gave the County Board until June 6 to approve terms of a deal after extending the deadline from the end of May. Brown County agrees to buy the 43.75-acre Pulliam site for $2.7 million in January 2021. Brown County approves the Pulliam site purchase and agrees to sell almost 10 acres of the site to GLC Minerals for an expansion in February 2021. Gov. Tony Evers awards the city and county a $15 million Neighborhood Investment Fund Program grant funded through American Rescue Plan Act dollars in March 2022. Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg presents the county with a federal $10.1 million Port Infrastructure Development grant to support the project in May 2023. Offers, counteroffers and rejections began in mid-December 2024 when the county officials and C. Reiss tentatively agreed to a $26 million plan that would lease 14.5 acres of the Pulliam property to C. Reiss for up to 75 years at a rate of $110,000 per year with an annual 2.5% increase. The County Board on Dec. 18, 2024, approved modified terms that reduced the lease to 40 years, changed the portion of the Pulliam property C. Reiss would use and added air quality compliance measures. C. Reiss considered the changes a rejection of the negotiated deal. The county's Port of Green Bay published a request for companies' general interest in using the new port site envisioned for the Pulliam property in January 2025. C. Reiss was one of eight to respond with a $28.5 million proposal to improve and use the Pulliam site for coal storage. C. Reiss in mid-March formally rejected the County Board's terms and proposed the county and company spend several months negotiating a deal. The County Board on March 19 rejected the company's offer. The county instead sought to shift negotiations to two alternate sites for coal storage, saying the Pulliam property's future use would be determined by the request for interest process. State officials in March gave the county, company and city a May 30 deadline to reach a deal to relocate the coal piles to the Pulliam site or lose the $15 million grant. Two new proposals emerged in late May as the county, company and city jointly met to discuss options and ideas. State Sen. Eric Wimberger, R-Oconto, on May 23 asked the state to extend the May 30 deadline and the Department of Administration did so on May 30, giving the parties until June 3. Brown County and C. Reiss reached a tentative agreement June 3 and announced the parties would put together the terms in writing June 4 and 5. More: Who still uses coal? Answers to questions about Green Bay coal piles and the possible move More: Brown County, C. Reiss strike deal to move coal piles after extensive negotiations Press-Gazette reporter Jeff Bollier contributed to this report. Contact Benita Mathew at bmathew@ This article originally appeared on Green Bay Press-Gazette: Brown County votes on C. Reiss deal for coal piles
Yahoo
12-05-2025
- Yahoo
State: Drick violated campaign finance law when criticizing opponent from the dais
LIVINGSTON — In response to a complaint filed against County Board Chair Jay Drick by Livingston Democratic Party Judy Daubenmier, the Michigan Bureau of Elections has concluded Drick violated campaign finance law. Drick has reimbursed the county $2.56 and received a formal warning for his actions. During a board meeting on July 22, 2024, Drick responded to criticism during public comment from former commissioner Steve Williams. At the time, Drick was running for re-election against challenger Heather Williams, who is married to Steve. 'I've sat here quietly week after week, listening to a litany of allegations, bogus issues about three commissioners running for re-election. I've looked the three challengers and their husband and their father and their friends in the eye from this seat as they've attempted time and time to discredit our good works and I've never responded until now," Drick said, proceeding to argue some of the points made against him. More: Livingston County Board Chair accused of campaigning during public meeting More: State: Drick overstepped by criticizing his opponent during a public meeting After a second round of public comment, Drick 'exercised (his) option to be the last to speak.' From the dais, he criticized Williams for how long she's lived in the county and for a lack of experience in public office. He also alleged she'd filed for bankruptcy and had $358,000 in unsecured debt she hadn't repaid. Williams told The Daily the bankruptcy filing and debt were her ex-husband's. Drick went on to list his qualifications and experience in the community and on the board. Daubenmier filed her complaint soon after, arguing Drick's criticism of his opponent and promotion of his own campaign violated campaign during an official meeting, in an official capacity, violated campaign finance law. Daubenmier cited Michigan Campaign Finance Act Sec. 57 '... which prohibits public officials from campaigning while on the job and being paid.' Drick's attorney, Mattis Nordfjord, said the complaint failed to show his comments were outside the "scope of exemption." He also argued Drick had a right, under the First Amendment, to express his views on policy issues. On Dec. 18, 2024, an attorney with the Michigan Department of State sent a letter to Nordfjord. In the letter, the state found, after reviewing the video, Drick's first statement where he defended the actions of the board weren't a violation — but his critiques of Williams and the promotion of his own campaign were. '(The second comment was) directed at his opponent and criticizing their qualifications for public office," the letter read. The letter cited an opinion from former attorney general Frank Kelley, which said a commission or board can 'expend appropriated funds to inform the public in an objective manner on issues relevant to the function of the commission or board,' but not to encourage support or opposition for a specific candidate or ballot proposal. On Thursday, May 8, the state sent a letter to a different attorney for Drick, Rich McNulty. The letter acknowledged that Drick reimbursed the county for the two-minute comment, for a total of $2.56. 'Given this, the department concludes that a formal warning is a sufficient resolution to the complaint,' the letter read. The price tag left Daubenmier frustrated, she said. 'The paltry reimbursement to the county, calculated by someone who reports to Jay Drick in the county chain of command, will not deter any elected official from blatantly campaigning during county meetings,' she wrote in an emailed statement to the Daily. 'But the stigma remains that the state did find there is reason to believe that Jay Drick, a lawyer who should know better, violated the law — and that will always be on his record.' — Contact reporter Tess Ware at tware@ This article originally appeared on Livingston Daily: State finds Livingston County's Jay Drick violated campaign finance law
Yahoo
06-05-2025
- Yahoo
Milwaukee County Exec David Crowley signs off on carbon-zero emissions plan
Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley signed off on a carbon-neutral action plan for the county, amid efforts to dismantle climate-driven initiatives from the Trump administration. The plan aims to achieve net-zero carbon emissions across the county's operations by 2050. It outlines specific and measurable ways to reduce emissions over the next 25 years, including energy-efficient equipment, upgrades to renewable energy generation and alternative transportation fuel. "It's imperative that we protect and preserve these spaces and our environment as a whole generation who get the opportunity to enjoy these parks," Crowley told supervisors and constituents at Tippecanoe Park. "We are here to take action, but also to recommit ourselves to environmental sustainability as well as stewardship." Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley signed off legislation approving the Milwaukee County Climate Action 2050 (CA50) Plan on April 25, 2025, which aims at achieving net-zero carbon emissions in Milwaukee County operations by the year 2050. According to Crowley, the county is already seeing progress, including a 46% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions since 2005, the baseline year for tracking the county's carbon reduction. The county is on track to achieve 50% reduction in carbon by 2030, a county report noted. The plan is estimated to cost roughly $441 million, with energy efficiency and fleet upgrades as well as on-site solar energy installations. But efforts to make Milwaukee County carbon neutral are not new, as the county has previously retrofitted LED lighting, established sustainable design standards to reforestation, and roadway to trail conversions. "These diverse strategies will help Milwaukee County to achieve our emissions reduction goals," said Grant Helle, director of the county's Office of Sustainability Helle said the climate action plan outlines ways for the county to reduce emissions over the next 25 years, such as by using energy-efficient equipment, upgrades to renewable energy generation, and alternative fuel transportation. These efforts, in turn, will create green jobs and reduce urban heat islands across the Milwaukee area. "I'm proud of the way this plan acknowledges our changing realities, more severe temperature fluctuations, more extreme weather events and a growing labor market for careers that address our changing climate together," County Board Supervisor Anne O'Connor said. Contact Vanessa Swales at 414-308-5881 or vswales@ Follow her on X @Vanessa_Swales. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Milwaukee County Executive Crowley OKs carbon-zero emissions plan