logo
Child care issues on back burner despite need in WV; budget questions could derail potential fixes

Child care issues on back burner despite need in WV; budget questions could derail potential fixes

Yahoo20-02-2025

Despite issues with child care in West Virginia, lawmakers aren't making it a priority during the legislative session. (Getty Images)
More than 25,000 children in West Virginia don't have access to child care, and last year, budget concerns stalled bills meant to tackle the issue. This year, a new wave of budget questions could put the problem on the back burner.
Addressing a web of child care issues was a 2024 priority in the West Virginia House of Delegates, where members said the issue was key to improving the state's abysmal workforce participation rate. A stack of child care related bills, including measures creating new spots, never made it to the governor's desk largely due to their price tag.
This year, a House task force meant to tackle the issue isn't meeting, and Republicans leaders, who oversee a supermajority, have so far publicly put their priorities elsewhere.
'We said this was a priority, and we didn't get this done in the way we said we wanted to,' said Del. Kayla Young, D-Kanawha, a mother of two who has spearheaded child care reform legislation. 'Now it's just fallen off the radar. It's no longer a priority.'
Gov. Patrick Morrisey made no mention of child care in his first State of the State address or, so far, put forth any bills on the issue. His proposed budget doesn't increase money for child care.
In the last year, around 150 centers have closed, worsening the state's child care access. Child care centers in West Virginia and across the country are struggling to retain staff and stay open while trying to keep prices reasonable for working families.
'A lot of lawmakers said they were going to make it a priority, and we believed them,' said Tiffany Gale, owner of Miss Tiffany's Early Childhood Education House in Weirton. 'When no bills got passed, it was really disheartening. We're still in the same boat.'
This year, lawmakers are re-introducing similar child care measures, but another year of budget concerns — Morrisey says the state is facing a projected $400 million deficit — has some concerned that bills that require funding could struggle to get traction.
Del. Kathie Hess Crouse, R-Putnam, said she will again sponsor a bill to create a 'Tri-Share Program,' where the state, participating employers and their employees would contribute one-third of the total cost of child care. Crouse said that the program is currently being piloted in eight counties, including Putnam.
'I'm a mom, and I just want women to have those options, and I know there's fathers out there too, but I know it's primarily women that end up staying home with the kids,' she said. 'So I want to make sure that women have those options, whether they want to stay home, whether they want to go to work, whatever it is … and on top of that, we need to work on our workforce.'
Crouse filed the measure last year, saying that she believed it was the biggest share of money she'd ever requested in legislation. The West Virginia Chamber of Commerce, which backed the bill, believes it allows the state to allocate a set amount of funding to prevent costs from rising indefinitely. The price could run around $10 million, but it's up to the state what they want to invest.
'[House Finance Committee] is going through all the committee budget hearings, and hopefully we'll have a little bit better knowledge of what's going on after those are completed, and we'll see where we're at and what we can do,' Crouse said on Tuesday. 'But I am really hoping that maybe we can at least get the Tri-Share through.'
The West Virginia Chamber of Commerce has said addressing the child care desert is pivotal in an effort to grow the state's workforce.
'The budget situation is a real concern because you can't fix this issue without putting a lot of resources in it,' said Brian Dayton, vice president of policy and advocacy for the chamber.
Most families are paying $600 to $700 a month for day care, and lawmakers last year did approve former Gov. Jim Justice's proposed Child Care Tax Credit, available to families who already claim the federal child care tax credit. Child care providers said the measure did nothing to create new day care spots as it only helped families already receiving care.
The state's spending on child care has declined over the last decade, said Sean O'Leary, senior policy analyst for the state's Center on Budget and Policy.
'What we've seen in the budget is that funding for child care is flat and it's declined over the past decade. It's not a penny different,' he said.
The Department of Human Services is currently using money from federal grants, state funds and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families dollars to fund a state-run program that reimburses child care centers that serve low-income children.
The state's Early Childhood Education program is serving 7,046 families and 11,537 children.
Pandemic-era funding allowed child care providers that serve families receiving state assistance to be paid based on enrollment in their programs rather than daily attendance so they could stabilize their income. The federal government recently mandated that change.
'DoHS has been paying by enrollment since March 2020. Monthly certificate expenditures for January 2025 were $7.75 million,' said DoHS spokesperson Angelica Hightower.
Young said there's no single fix for child care but noted that adequately funding the program, which is reliant on temporary money, is the biggest issue to address.
'Right now, we're using those excess TANF dollars, and [DoHS] has told providers that they'll be available at the end of this fiscal year. So what happens on July 1?' Young said.
DoHS faced a similar funding cliff last year, telling lawmakers that it needed a long-term funding plan.
Melissa Colagrasso, director of A Place to Grow, a child care center in Oak Hill, estimated that 2,000 children could be removed from the state assistance program if funding issues aren't addressed. She said that child care providers' communication with DoHS had improved under Morssiey's new agency Secretary Alex Mayer.
'It's time for this to be a priority,' Colagrasso said.
Gale added that they'd like to see individuals working at child care centers to automatically qualify for the state assistance program.
Last year, lawmakers questioned why DoHS hadn't used a $200 million surplus to adequately fund the child care assistance program.
Del. Wayne Clark, R-Jefferson, said the department's failure to fund child care led him to introduce a bill, House Bill 2059, that would move child care and early childhood education from DoHS and under the oversight of the state Department of Education. Other states have done a similar change.
'If we take all that line item out of DoHS and put it under the [Department] of Education … we get a fresh start,' he said. 'It's a big lift. Would I love to see it get passed this year, absolutely. But, sometimes you gotta put these big changes in to open up eyes.'
Clark represents one of the few areas of the state experiencing population growth. He regularly hears from constituents about the child care desert.
'The last report that I saw, we have one space for every 51 eligible kids,' he said.
Del. Bob Fehrenbacher, R-Wood, will again try to push a bill to increase the tax credit for employers providing child care for employees. Nonprofit businesses, like church-operated day care centers, would be eligible for a transferable credit where owners could recapture some of those dollars.
'This doesn't cost the state anything because it's a tax credit and I think it would have the most impact,' Young said.
She added that child care also provides early education for children as the state has some of the country's lowest education outcomes. Additionally, the state's substance abuse crisis, including babies born with Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome, can mean children are in need of early interventions.
'As we are seeing countless headlines about school behavior and school readiness — especially at the kindergarten level — we know this is another way we can get our kids ready for school,' Young said.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Congress to grill Kathy Hochul on NY sanctuary laws — and local GOP offers spicy advice over what questions they should ask
Congress to grill Kathy Hochul on NY sanctuary laws — and local GOP offers spicy advice over what questions they should ask

New York Post

time20 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Congress to grill Kathy Hochul on NY sanctuary laws — and local GOP offers spicy advice over what questions they should ask

ALBANY – State Republican lawmakers offered advice to their congressional counterparts ahead of Gov. Kathy Hochul testimony on Thursday over sanctuary policies – outlining a list of questions to fling at the Democrat. The GOP legislators sent a letter to House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer ahead of Hochul's trip to Washington, DC where she'll be grilled by a congressional panel on the Empire State's sanctuary laws. 'Governor Hochul's sanctuary state policies have played a direct role in the ongoing migrant crisis throughout our state, despite bipartisan concern including repeated warnings from New York City Mayor Eric Adams,' Assemblyman Michael Tannousis (R-Staten Island) wrote in the letter, cosigned by various other New York GOP lawmakers. Advertisement 'We believe that Governor Hochul must be held accountable for her failure to reverse the state's sanctuary policies and recklessness with taxpayer dollars,' Tannousis continued. Gov. Kathy Hochul is set to testify on capitol hill Thursday on New York's sanctuary city laws and its handling of the influx of migrants. Hochul is voluntarily appearing before the House committee on Capitol Hill and will testify alongside Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker. The hearing is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. Advertisement In their letter, the Republican state lawmakers ask the House Republicans to ask Hochul to outline: Why New York continued to accept migrants during the height of the crisis The vetting process for migrants and concerns about public safety A shady $432 million no-bid contract awarded to DocGo to help mitigate the crisis Her justification for roughly $4 billion the state has spent dealing with migrants Why some municipalities weren't reimbursed with costs associated with the migrants Tannousis said he wants the House Oversight committee to follow through after Hochul's testimony to deliver 'accountability.' The governor has tried to navigate a vague middle ground when it comes to the state's sanctuary policy, which is still based on a 2017 executive order issued by then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo who is now running for mayor of New York City. Advertisement Assemblyman Michael Tannousis and other Albany Republicans wrote a letter to the House panel suggesting areas where they should hammer Hochul. Michael McWeeney Hochul had promised specifics and clarity over her guidance on how New York would work with federal immigration authorities. Instead, her office only provided a list of four broad categories of situations that would trigger state law enforcement to work with the feds, such as if ICE has a judicial warrant or when relevant to investigating another crime committed in New York. Hochul had previously said she was 'happy to go down' to DC for the hearing. 'I'll tell them our policy in the state of New York is not to use state resources, our state police, to enforce the civil infractions,' Hochul said earlier this year.

Democrats are in the polling dumps — fighting America on this key demand
Democrats are in the polling dumps — fighting America on this key demand

New York Post

time25 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Democrats are in the polling dumps — fighting America on this key demand

The Democratic Party has never been more unpopular — yet no Democrat seems to understand why. Some say they're not fighting President Donald Trump hard enough. Others say they aren't messaging their agenda well enough. In reality, they're fighting too hard for an agenda that Americans reject, with a central demand of welfare for all. Thirty-two years after President Bill Clinton promised to 'end welfare as we know it,' no idea unifies the Democratic Party more than the belief that welfare should be never-ending. This vision of government dependency spurred their most notable policies of recent years, and explains their intransigent opposition to Republican reforms. While some Democrats show an increasing willingness to compromise on other leftist priorities, such as biological men in women's sports, the party brooks no dissent on welfare — even though Americans want to fix the system's many failures. Consider the ongoing federal budget battle. House Republicans have put together a reconciliation bill that would slow the rate of Medicaid growth — from a projected 59.6% increase to 40% — over the next decade. Democrats oppose even that, including GOP attempts to end waste, fraud and abuse. Yet the latest federal data show that 22% of Medicaid payments and 12% of food-stamp payments went to ineligible recipients. More than 70% of likely voters want to protect taxpayers from fraud and abuse, polls show, yet Democrats essentially deny there's a problem that needs to be solved. In fact, when the Trump administration proposed a rule in March to end $11 billion in improper ObamaCare subsidies — aiming solely to curtail fraud — Democrats immediately opposed it. Democrats are just as adamant when it comes to work requirements for welfare recipients. My organization, the Foundation for Government Accountability, recently found that six in 10 able-bodied adults on Medicaid don't work at all, hoovering up resources that would benefit the truly vulnerable. When voters in purple Wisconsin were asked two years ago if welfare recipients should work as a condition of receiving benefits, nearly 80% said yes — but national Democrats now say no. They also reject Republican attempts to block Medicaid payments for illegal immigrants, which would save billions of dollars over the next decade. More than 70% of voters don't want illegal immigrants to receive government benefits, yet Democrats bizarrely disagree. But it's not just Congress; Democrats are striking the same strange tune in state capitols. Over the past 10 years, virtually all Republican-led states have taken steps to purge waste, fraud and abuse from welfare programs. By contrast, Democrat-run states have expanded illegal immigrants' access to Medicaid and pushed able-bodied adults onto welfare programs. In recent months, Democratic governors in Kansas and Arizona have vetoed Republican bills that would ban food-stamp purchases of soda and junk food — a reform that could lower state and federal Medicaid spending and encourage healthier choices. Democrats have a long history of supporting restrictions on consumers' options, but as soon as welfare enters the picture, they oppose it. Apparently limiting freedom is fine by them, but limiting federal welfare is unthinkable. The left's unwillingness to support even modest welfare reforms reflects the reality that government dependency is the biggest thing Democrats now offer Americans — even beyond limitless immigration and the Green New Deal. The Affordable Care Act, the central achievement of Barack Obama's presidency, dramatically expanded Medicaid while creating a new welfare system for the individual health-insurance market. Joe Biden enacted a work-destroying child tax credit and sought perpetual expansions of Medicaid and food stamps under the guise of pandemic relief. A slew of Biden regulations made it easier for people to abuse the taxpayer's generosity, from Medicaid to food stamps to free school lunches for rich kids. Democrats' end goal is clear: Get every American on the dole. Yet insisting that government dependency is always the answer means Democrats can't publicly admit that seemingly infinite welfare has any shortcomings. In fact, the left's agenda of welfare-for-all is profoundly harmful, and voters know it. Democrats have built a welfare system that taxpayers can't afford while pushing millions of people out of the workforce — a dual assault on the economic growth. They've left fewer resources for disabled children and the elderly by prioritizing able-bodied adults and illegal immigrants. And they're corrupting the foundational American belief that welfare is temporary assistance whose recipients should work to get back on their feet. No wonder Democrats are so unpopular: They're fleecing taxpayers, crippling the economy, hurting the truly needy and giving handouts to those who don't deserve them — none of which has Americans' support. The first Democrat who wakes up on welfare will be the hero their party desperately needs. Hayden Dublois is data and analytics director at the Foundation for Government Accountability.

Kathy Hochul's gutless silence on assisted suicide is a betrayal: Rep. Stefanik
Kathy Hochul's gutless silence on assisted suicide is a betrayal: Rep. Stefanik

New York Post

time25 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Kathy Hochul's gutless silence on assisted suicide is a betrayal: Rep. Stefanik

Last month, Gov. Kathy Hochul attacked Republicans for their budget bill that aims to rein in wasteful and fraudulent federal spending. 'I believe that we should try to prevent our constituents from dying,' she declared. Now, just two weeks later, New Yorkers have proof that these words from Hochul's lips are a cruel lie. My heart shatters for our state: Hochul's gutless silence on the so-called assisted suicide bill passed by Albany's far-left Democrats isn't just cowardice; it's a betrayal of every New Yorker clinging to hope, a dagger in the backs of the vulnerable she swore to protect. In the last days of this year's legislative session, New York state Senate Democrats forced through a despicable measure, in a 35-27 vote, empowering doctors to prescribe lethal drugs to the terminally ill. This isn't 'dignity' or 'choice,' but a death sentence cloaked in deception, telling our elderly, our disabled and our sick that their lives aren't worth fighting for. The bill now sits on Hochul's desk, and where is she? Hiding. Silent. Dodging with a spineless 'she'll review the legislation' statement from her team. All while families of all political and spiritual backgrounds, all across New York, weep at the thought of our state allowing companies to profit off death. Hochul's hypocrisy knows no bounds. New York ranks dead last in access to palliative care, a compassionate lifeline that eases suffering and restores dignity for the terminally ill. Palliative care envelops patients in holistic support to manage pain and address emotional and spiritual needs, and it helps families navigate the unthinkable. It's doctors and nurses sitting bedside, listening to fears and crafting plans that honor life. It's the hand squeezed during a sleepless night, the reassurance that no one faces the end alone. Yet in Hochul's New York, only a fraction of those who need palliative services can access them — leaving the suffering to beg for comfort while leftist Democrats under her watch push a culture of death and despair. This failure compounds a broader crisis caused by Kathy Hochul's worthless leadership. One in five New Yorkers battles mental illness yearly, and hundreds of thousands go untreated. Those who live with disabilities are crushed by a cruel bureaucratic maze, worsened by Hochul's heartless overhaul of the Consumer Directed Personal Assistance Program, which put the desires of politically connected contractors over the needs of suffering families and caregivers. Again and again, her policies destroy hope for those in need — and yet she stands mute and inept as her party peddles a bill that whispers 'Give up' to a depressed veteran, tells a grandmother with cancer 'You're a burden' and screams to a disabled New Yorker, 'Your life isn't worth saving.' It's anti-human, it's anti-American, and it's a betrayal of the values that bind us as New Yorkers. Hochul's silence here speaks volumes, and it isn't indecision but complicity, trading vulnerable lives for political points with her far-left Democrat base. New Yorkers are heartbroken and furious. Under Hochul's catastrophic reign, crime surges, costs crush families, corruption festers — and now the sanctity of life itself is under assault. People are fleeing to Florida and other states, driven out by the worst governor in America who fails them at every turn. Hochul has the power to veto this moral travesty. She could champion life by investing in palliative care that wraps the suffering in dignity and love. Instead, her silence screams surrender. I won't stay silent. My heart burns for the mother praying for one more day with her child, for the disabled New Yorker fighting for respect, for every soul this bill would discard. New York needs real leadership — robust palliative-care programs, accessible mental-health services and dignified support for the disabled — not a state-encouraged push toward the grave. In 2026, New Yorkers will reject this failed governor at the ballot box and restore principled leadership that cherishes every life. Kathy Hochul, the clock is ticking. Veto this bill or you'll be remembered as the governor who truly let hope die. New Yorkers are watching — and we won't forget. Republican Elise Stefanik represents New York's 21st District in Congress.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store