&w=3840&q=100)
Foreign policy in Amrit Kaal: 75 key events, limited fresh insight
Harsh Pant and Anant Singh Mann draw on 75 years of history to chart India's foreign policy course for the next 25
Premium
Listen to This Article
POWER AND PURPOSE: Rediscovering Indian Foreign Policy in Amrit Kaal
Authors: Harsh V Pant and Anant Singh Mann
Publisher: Rupa
Pages: 228
Price: ₹595
Prime Minister Narendra Modi had outlined the idea of Amrit Kaal on Independence Day in 2021. In 2024, he explained the concept in a speech at the Vibrant Gujarat Summit: 'In the recent past, India completed 75 years of Independence. Now, India is working on its goal for the next 25 years. We have the goal of making it a developed country by the time it celebrates 100 years of Independence. Therefore, this 25-year period is India's Amrit Kaal.'
Against
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
Bangladesh anti-Sheikh Hasina student protester Newton Das found to be Bengal voter
A man allegedly linked to the 2024 students' protests in Bangladesh was found to be a voter in West Bengal's Kakdwip Assembly constituency, The Hindu reported on Sunday. Several images of the man, identified as Newton Das, participating in the agitation in the neighbouring country were widely shared on social media. Das has claimed that he was an Indian citizen but acknowledged that he had actively participated in the protests in Bangladesh, The Hindu reported. 'I went to Bangladesh in 2024 for issues related to an ancestral property and got caught in the revolution,' The Hindu quoted Newton Das as saying in a video. 'I have been a voter in Kakdwip since 2014 but lost my voter card in 2017.' Newton Das said that he had received a fresh voter card in 2018 with the help of Trinamool Congress MLA Manturam Pakhira. He also claimed that he had voted for Pakhira, who represents Kakdwip, in the 2016 Assembly polls, The Hindu reported. The constituency is in South 24 Parganas district. 'This is a conspiracy against me by a particular community,' India Today quoted Newton Das as saying in the video. He did not specify whether he was currently in India or Bangladesh. His cousin Tapan Das, who resides in Kakdwip, claimed that Newton Das was born in Bangladesh and had exercised voting rights in both countries, The Hindu reported. Tapan Das claimed that his cousin had gone to Bangladesh after the Covid-19 pandemic to sell land and had not returned. 'Since he was born in Bangladesh, he is a voter of Bangladesh too,' The Hindu quoted Tapan Das as saying. 'It is his fault that he is registered as a voter in both the countries.' Kakdwip is close to the Sundarbans and India's border with Bangladesh. Political row The incident sparked a political row in the state. The Bharatiya Janata Party's West Bengal unit on Sunday criticised West Bengal's ruling Trinamool Congress claiming that a ' Bangladeshi protester ' was voting in both countries. 'Let that sink in,' the Hindutva party said on social media. 'This isn't an accident. This is the TMC blueprint – flood Bengal's voter rolls with illegal infiltrators and secure elections with ghost votes.' West Bengal 'isn't just lawless – it's compromised from within', the BJP claimed. BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari claimed that lakhs of Bangladesh citizens were registered as voters in the state, The Hindu reported. The Opposition leader claimed that an alleged member of Bangladeshi militant group Ansarullah Bangla was also enlisted as a voter in Murshidabad. West Bengal BJP chief Sukanta Majumdar on Saturday described the incident as an example of the 'so-called Egiye [progressive] Bangla Model'. 'The same Newton who was seen wielding a stick during Bangladesh's quota reform movement is now a registered voter in Kakdwip,' the BJP leader said on social media. 'Thousands of Bangladeshi 'Newtons' voting in Bengal – courtesy of [Chief Minister] Mamata Banerjee's infiltration theory and appeasement politics,' he alleged. 'With illegal voters and these lathi-wielders miscreants as her support base, she's not running West Bengal… she's scripting a blueprint for Greater Bangladesh.' The Trinamool Congress rejected the BJP's allegations and said that the responsibility for border security was with the Border Security Force, India Today reported. The Border Security Force reports to the Union home ministry. 'Whether these people come from land, water or air, the BSF and Union government are responsible,' The Hindu quoted Trinamool leader Kunal Ghosh as saying. 'The state administration will do its role for sure.' The state's ruling party also claimed that the Election Commission was complicit in voter list tampering. In February, Banerjee had accused the BJP of allegedly attempting to add residents of Gujarat, Rajasthan, Punjab and Haryana to West Bengal's voter lists. The chief minister had also accused the BJP of adding fake voters to electoral lists to win the Assembly elections in Delhi and Maharashtra. In 2024, weeks of widespread student-led protests in Bangladesh against Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and her Awami League government had led to her resignation and her fleeing to India on August 5. In August, weeks of student-led protests in Bangladesh against a controversial quota scheme for government jobs snowballed into a broader agitation against the Sheikh Hasina government.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Taiwan wants to buy India's D4 anti-drone system? Taiwanese official calls reports ‘unconfirmed'
In a statement to Firstpost, Taipei Economic and Cultural Center has clarified that the island nation has not released any official statement confirming its interest in India's D4 anti-drone system read more Last week, several media outlets reported that Taiwan has shown interest in purchasing India's state-of-the-art D4 anti-drone system, developed by the Defence Research and Developed Organisation (DRDO) and manufactured by Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL). The reports suggested that Taiwan's interest in the D4 system grew following its success in the Operation Sindoor where it jammed and neutralised Pakistani drones, including Turkish-supplied Bayraktar TB2 drones. Clarification from Taiwan However, the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center (TECC) in India has now clarified that the country's Ministry of National Defense has not released any official statement corroborating the same. The TECC in a statement to Firstpost stated that the Taiwanese government has not released any statement confirming any such interest. 'While these news reports have circulated, there has been no official corroboration from Taipei. Officials in Taiwan have not publicly commented on any potential defense acquisitions from India, including the D4 anti-drone system,' said Col. Huang Ming Chieh of TECC. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The statement also added that details regarding D4 anti-drone system's operational deployment and specific successes were not confirmed by the government of India and were only reported by media outlets. 'Details regarding its operational deployment and specific successes, including those attributed to 'Operation Sindoor,' are based on media reporting and have not been officially detailed by the Indian government,' it added. While the TECC didn't reject the reports in Indian media, it also refused to confirm them. 'Therefore, based on the current information available from official Taiwanese channels, the reports of an impending purchase of the Indian D4 anti-drone system by Taiwan remain unconfirmed. The TECC's statement underscores the lack of any official communication or planning regarding such a defense procurement,' said Huang in the statement. Significance of India-Taiwan defence ties A successful agreement with Taiwan could foster enhanced defence collaboration, possibly involving joint development of cutting-edge counter-drone systems. Moreover, amid China's assertive actions in the Indo-Pacific, India's strategic engagement with Taiwan could act as a vital counterbalance, transforming the region's security landscape.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Evaluate life-cycle costs for big-ticket acquisitions by the Indian Navy
The Indian Navy has embarked upon aggressive shipbuilding. Indian shipyards have been active, with a large number of ships and submarines on order. The shipbuilding cycle has significantly reduced in India and platforms are being inducted into service at an accelerated pace. Though ship design and construction are predominantly indigenous, India still imports high-technology equipment of the so-called 'Move' category (which includes high-power engines, gas turbines and propulsion motors and the like), 'Fight' category (radars, missile systems and so on) and special category systems for specialized platforms such as tankers, aircraft carriers and submarines. Indigenization efforts in these categories, however, are currently on a fast track. Also Read: Why we must celebrate the three new warships joining India's naval fleet Military hardware projects typically require large amounts of funding. Let us take a broad look at the costs involved in warship projects. Official data is hard to come by, but we have indicative numbers. According to Defence News, Visakhapatnam Class Destroyers, inducted into service between years 2021 and 2025, have been built at a cost of about ₹36,000 crore. Their indigenization level was put at 70%, which suggests an import bill in the range of ₹10,000 crore. The next-generation destroyers that are in the pipeline are expected to cost about ₹85,000 crore; these will have an import component of about ₹20,000 crore (less than 25%), as projected. The volatility of the current geopolitical situation will demand more and more ships to be built quickly. Debates on India's defence requirements suggest that one or two aircraft carriers will be needed, along with a larger number of submarines. Can the country afford such high budgets for naval upgradation? Probably not. Also Read: Arming up: 'Be Indian, buy Indian' is a useful mantra for strategic autonomy However, all defence projects, including warship-building, have a multiplier effect on the country's economy. Prasanna Tantri and Aditya Kuvalekar on 18 May 2025 argued in the Times of India that state expenditure on defence projects in India could deliver a fiscal multiplier of around 2. This means that every rupee spent by the government on these projects should result in ₹2 added to India's annual output. Tantri and Kuvalekar propose the use of long-term borrowing to fund India's defence expenditure. This article takes their argument forward to suggest ways of funding warship-building projects of the Indian Navy. Seen from a life-cycle perspective, warship equipment has two cost components: the one-time acquisition cost and the ongoing operation and maintenance (O&M) costs. With 25-30 years of ship life, O&M costs typically far outweigh acquisition costs. New-technology equipment can either be imported or developed by an Indian supplier. While advanced systems can be bought from foreign suppliers, an Indian supplier would need to make significant capital investments in research and development (R&D) and establishing a manufacturing set-up with skilled manpower. Since project tenders under the current system go solely by acquisition costs, Indian suppliers cannot compete with their foreign counterparts on price, as the latter need not bear heavy capital costs. Also Read: China's latest naval exercises have shown how far it can project power Acquisition costs are deal-sealers because they are covered by the capital budget, whereas O&M costs come under the revenue budget. We have no structural or regulatory provision for evaluating the two costs together. But these two costs can be clubbed into 'life-cycle cost' (LCC) by following the principles of life-cycle management (LCM). The US Navy and some other naval forces follow LCM and integrated logistics support (ILS) principles for evaluating a high-cost project at its early concept or design stage to decide on the best option. There is a strong case for the Indian Navy to adopt LCM and ILS processes and consider LCC for sourcing costly equipment and systems, especially at a time when India is exploring import substitution opportunities. Research studies indicate that Indian suppliers would be far more cost effective for new-technology equipment if LCC is taken into consideration. The basic logic of this is clear: R&D costs can be amortized over the equipment life-cycle. The Navy benefits from support during the equipment's life-cycle through local maintenance contracts and shore repair facilities, while onshore testing and training set-ups smoothen the induction of platforms. It aids upgradation planning for obsolescence too. Tender decisions should thus be made on an LCC basis. There has been much debate on the affordability of aircraft carriers and submarines. Once LCC becomes the norm for comparing the bids of suppliers, the picture will change. Equipment suppliers, assured of a revenue stream throughout the life-cycle of a ship, will recalculate their offers. It could lead to a new funding model. By assuring Indian suppliers a revenue stream for 25-30 years, the country could expect them to bear a large part of the initial acquisition cost of equipment against that assurance. The capital cost burden of the ministry of defence could significantly be reduced this way, making fiscal space for the induction of more ships. Partnerships with private suppliers like L&T, the Tata Group, Adani Group, Kalyani Group, Mahindra Group and many others could make a big difference to India's naval defence preparedness. The key is to do away with the upfront funding of capital-intensive warship-building. The author is an Indian Navy veteran with a PhD in life cycle management of naval warship equipment.
