logo
Prison task force rejects original Lincoln County site, tightens budget for new facility

Prison task force rejects original Lincoln County site, tightens budget for new facility

Yahoo3 days ago

Mike Quinn and Mike Conder of Arrington Watkins consultants in Phoenix, speak to members of the Project Prison Reset work group on June 3, 2025 in Pierre, SD. (Makenzie Huber/South Dakota Searchlight)
PIERRE – After years of political upheaval, court battles and legislative tugs-of-war, the plan to build a new men's prison in Lincoln County south of Harrisburg is dead.
Members of the Project Prison Reset work group spent more than eight hours at the Capitol on Tuesday running through possible site locations, building designs, budget needs and public comments before voting unanimously to scratch the original site from its list of replacement options for the aging state penitentiary in Sioux Falls.
Also gone? The former Citibank site in Sioux Falls, a patch of land outside of Huron, a former cheese plant in Grant County – and more than $50 million in cash, spent to prepare the Lincoln County site for a prison that now won't be built.
The members set a $600 million cap on a penitentiary replacement, budgeting for between 1,500 and 1,700 beds – about the same capacity as the original Lincoln County site, but $125 million under that version's guaranteed maximum price.
The legislature spent three years dumping money into an incarceration construction fund in the run up to February, the month lawmakers balked at the Lincoln County project's location and price tag. The project needed but couldn't secure two-thirds majority support. The failure spurred the creation of the prison reset group by Gov. Larry Rhoden, who'd pushed for the Lincoln County prison.
Now, the task force has asked the state's contractor, JE Dunn, to study a site in Mitchell, another near Worthing, and state-owned land on the grounds of the Mike Durfee Prison in Springfield and at the penitentiary in Sioux Falls.
House Speaker and task force member Jon Hansen, R-Dell Rapids, said the new parameters are a 'departure' from the original plan, but a 'necessary step' to find consensus.
'The Legislature has already said we don't need that big of a prison, we don't want to spend that much money all in one big shot,' Hansen said.
In a report presented to the group Tuesday, consultants with Phoenix-based Arrington Watkins Architects projected that the state's total prison population will grow by 31.7% by 2036 — from 3,926 in 2025 to 5,172 in 2036. That's largely driven by the state's truth in sentencing law, which requires people convicted of violent offenses to serve between 85% and 100% of their sentences, depending on the category of their crime.
Even without considering projected growth in prison population, the consultants said, every correctional facility in South Dakota is beyond its capacity now. The state needs more than 1,500 beds to deal with current capacity issues at Durfee and the penitentiary are needed immediately.
'You need to build beds now,' said Mike Quinn, managing principal at Arrington Watkins.
Report: Tough-on-crime policies could push prison construction costs as high as $2.1 billion
The parameters set Tuesday significantly restrict the project's scope, said Vance McMillan, senior vice president of JE Dunn. That includes additions to existing facilities or building cheaper, steel-celled options that'll last 50 years. The original campus-style prison was meant to stand for 100 years.
'A hundred years is out the door with the new budget challenge, in my opinion,' McMillan said.
That 'not really' a responsible use of taxpayer funds, Senate Majority Leader Jim Mehlhaff, R-Pierre, told South Dakota Searchlight. But it's politically necessary.
The $600 million cap is more 'palatable,' he said, since it's roughly the amount of money the state has on hand to fund the project already.
'We have nearly 800 inmates living in a medieval setting,' Mehlhaff said, referencing the penitentiary in Sioux Falls, which opened in 1881 and predates statehood. 'We have to do something to correct that as soon as possible.'
The state engineer and contractors are expected to present designs that meet the new parameters by the task force's July 8 meeting. Legislators will convene for a special session at the state Capitol on July 22.
JE Dunn will present options, but McMillan said they might not be able to pull together many details in five weeks.
Open process and publicity draw wide range of offers for state prison site
Members of the task force, especially the lawmakers, want to build on or expand upon existing prison sites. Increasing capacity on land the state already uses for prisons avoids the public's general distaste for a new location, said Rep. Karla Lems, R-Canton. Lems was an outspoken opponent of the original Lincoln County site.
'You take some of the heartburn away,' she said. 'Then you just deal with the money.'
JE Dunn representatives said the state could expand capacity at Springfield with new dorms or barracks facilities for around $55 million. A barracks would fit another 420 minimum security beds in an open space filled with bunkbeds.
Members also considered building a compact facility on unused acres at the state penitentiary and adding a second floor to the Jameson Annex in Sioux Falls.
Options to build on existing DOC land is limited and more costly, because it would limit a construction workforce to non-felons, take more time to get in and out of the site, and impact operational hours, said Sen. Ernie Otten, R-Tea. JE Dunn representatives estimated it'd cost more than $130 million to build 192 beds on top of the facility.
'Modifying Jameson is a no-go,' Otten said.
Business and local government leaders from Mitchell enthusiastically pitched their site to the task force. The city brought letters and resolutions of support and said a prison would drive economic growth.
The site got a tepid recommendation from consultants because it's about an hour's drive from Sioux Falls. It's also located next to several possible escape routes:he interstate, the James River and a railroad.
The Mitchell City Council unanimously approved a resolution supporting the prison being built in Davison County.
But division is already surfacing in the community. Mitchell residents voiced concerns at its Monday city council meeting. According to reporting from the Mitchell Republic, some residents are concerned about the prison's location, parolees released in the city, property taxes and a lack of a citywide vote on the matter.
Sen. Joy Hohn, R-Hartford, said she listened to the city council meeting and said residents are 'just becoming aware of the proposal.'
City officials plan to hold community forums to increase awareness, educate residents about the impacts, and listen to concerns from community members.
The DOC plans to survey its staff to determine if they're willing to commute to Mitchell or Worthing.
The Worthing site in Lincoln County received a slightly more positive response from consultants, but the only speaker during public testimony who spoke to the location raised concerns about drainage and flooding at the site.
Several members said they'd vote for the budget restrictions and new plan, but added they might not be able to support a decision next month.
Rep. Tim Reisch, R-Howard, is a former Department of Corrections secretary. He aired 'serious operational concerns' about the current administration's handling of the prison in recent months and years due to recent suicides, overdoses, attacks on correctional officers and gang activity.
Reisch recalled walking through the minimum custody unit during a penitentiary tour and observing that of 230 inmates in the unit, 'only nine of them had jobs, and the rest of them were sitting around watching Oprah Winfrey every day.'
'These are inmates that are getting ready to go out and rejoin society,' Reisch said, 'and we are failing them.'
Venhuizen told reporters after the meeting he believes it would be easier to manage such issues in a more modern facility.
Sioux Falls Democrats Sen. Jamie Smith and Erin Healy both expressed hesitancy. The budget could limit space needed for rehabilitation and education efforts, they both said.
Healy emphasized that her 'number one goal' is to build a safe prison with proper rehabilitation space.
'We absolutely need to ensure that our responsibility for taking care of people is of our greatest concern,' Healy said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cardano's ADA Finds 'Strong Support' After Dramatic Price Swings Amid Heightened Volatility
Cardano's ADA Finds 'Strong Support' After Dramatic Price Swings Amid Heightened Volatility

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Cardano's ADA Finds 'Strong Support' After Dramatic Price Swings Amid Heightened Volatility

The cryptocurrency market is experiencing heightened volatility amid an escalating feud between President Donald Trump and his former head of the Department of Government Efficiency, Elon Musk, over the state of the U.S. economy. Cardano's ADA ADA has also seen extreme price swings amid market uncertainties. After dropping from $0.688 to $0.621, ADA found strong support and rebounded, forming an ascending channel with resistance at $0.644, according to CoinDesk Research's technical analysis model. The technical indicators suggest a potential renewed bullish momentum as the cryptocurrency reclaims the $0.640 level with decreasing volatility. At press time, ADA is trading at $0.66, down about 1.8% over the past 24 hours, while the broader market gauge CoinDesk 20 Index fell 1%. Some recent news within the ADA ecosystem has provided the market with potential catalysts for the token. Institutional interest in the Cardano blockchain continues to grow, with Franklin Templeton, a $1.6 trillion asset manager, now running Cardano nodes. Additionally, Norway's NBX has recently partnered with Cardano to build Bitcoin-based DeFi, highlighting the blockchain's secure design for institutional adoption. The successful execution of the first Bitcoin-to-Cardano transaction involving Ordinals marks a significant milestone that could potentially unlock $1.5 trillion in cross-chain trading opportunities. Technical Analysis Highlights Sharp decline from $0.688 to $0.621 (10.29% drop) occurred on exceptionally high volume. Strong support zone established at $0.620-$0.623 where buyers aggressively stepped in. Recovery formed an ascending channel with resistance at $0.644. Overall range of $0.070 (10.29%) highlights the extreme market conditions. Potential renewed bullish momentum as ADA reclaimed the $0.640 level with decreasing volatility. Hourly price action showed a possible recovery pattern from $0.641 to $0.643. Short-term resistance level established at $0.643-$0.644. Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk's full AI Policy.

How Ford is navigating rare earth mineral supply chain disruptions, tariffs and more
How Ford is navigating rare earth mineral supply chain disruptions, tariffs and more

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How Ford is navigating rare earth mineral supply chain disruptions, tariffs and more

Ford Motor Co.'s chief financial officer outlined how tariffs and supply chain disruptions are expected to impact Ford's vehicle production and its costs during a wide-reaching interview with a Wall Street analyst June 4. Ford CFO Sherry House said the Dearborn, Michigan-based carmaker will provide more details on the economic impact from President Donald Trump's tariffs and other policy changes in its second-quarter earnings next month. But she cautioned there are still many unknowns being sorted out, all of which could make Ford's upcoming financials "a bit lumpy," she said. "As we move into the next couple of weeks to prepare for the quarter, if we give guidance it will be in the caveats of what we can't define," House said. "If we don't, we're going to give you every piece of information that we feel we can to help you, other analysts and investors to understand the business as much as possible.' Here are the top takeaways from House's fireside chat with analyst Joe Spak at the UBS Auto and Auto Tech Conference in New York on June 4: House said Ford has seen some backlogs to getting rare earth minerals into the supply chain, so Spak asked how that could impact vehicle production. 'There are many components that rare earth minerals are in and many of those that are coming from China require you to now go through export controls, so there's an additional layer of administrative process that has to happen," House said. She said sometimes the components pass through smoothly, other times there are holdups and that's when Ford has to take action to mitigate any disruptions. "You have to look for alternative parts or alternative ways to get things," House said. "Frequently, it goes through, it just may take more time. So then you might be facing expedited shipment costs that you weren't anticipating and it just puts stress on a system that's highly organized with parts being ordered many weeks in advance." She said Ford has been managing the issue so far, but warned, "I don't know if at some point this is going to be a larger issue for us?" In case you missed it: Ford recall could force over 1 million drivers to use this safety technique As for Trump's latest tariff: a boost in steel and aluminum to 50%, House said the impact on Ford should be minimal because Ford buys all its aluminum from domestic suppliers and it buys 80% of steel from U.S. sources. Ford will manage any price increases in steel through "contract pricing," meaning prices have already been set. "So when all of this hits, there is a delayed impact," she said. On April 29, Trump signed an executive order that set up a complicated system of federal reimbursements on certain imports of auto parts and components for the next two years used in vehicles made in the United States. The order gives Detroit's automakers some relief from what Trump earlier had ordered — 25% tariffs on all imported autos which began in April and another 25% on all imported auto parts set to begin by May 3. Spak asked House how Ford is getting the federal reimbursements for the parts that are compliant with the United States Mexico Canada Agreement as outlined in the order Trump signed at the end of April. She said a lot of that is still being defined. "I don't completely know," House said. "So you're paying the tariffs now. I think it's very possible that there will be a delay in getting those offset. I'm talking about the parts offset. It could be by a quarter, it could be by a couple of quarters. But all of you who are looking at our financials in Q2, Q3 and Q4, are going to have to know that it's going to be a bit lumpy. You might have more expense before you actually get the money reimbursed.' The good news for Ford is 80% of the parts used on its vehicles are USMCA-compliant and 80% of the vehicles it sells in the United States are built here. Still, the automaker warned during its first-quarter earnings report that tariffs will add $1.5 billion in net costs this year. For the 20% of suppliers who import parts, House said Ford is having conversations with them, seeking ways to help mitigate Ford's exposure to tariffs and lower those costs, while also meeting the business obligations of its suppliers. 'As we face the tariff situation, we face it together," House said of Ford's suppliers. "The types of conversations we are having are around: Do you have additional capacity in the U.S.? Could you move to the U.S.? What types of investments might help you get there?' But she explained that it is "a very complex and nuanced situation" with the supply base as to which suppliers to press for changes. Ford considers the kinds of quality, cost, technology and performance a supplier has provided in the past as to how it works with them around the tariffs, she said. 'But on an individual basis we're decided whether or not it makes sense to make some of these changes," House said. "I don't have anything to announce with you right now, but, of course, you would look at some of your higher priced components first, items that affect more vehicles, that would be the order of operations.' House did not address a May 25 report in the Wall Street Journal that cited sources as saying Ford would share production space in its battery plant in Kentucky with rival Nissan. The move signals Ford's retrenchment from electric vehicle investments and it helps the Japanese automaker reduce its exposure to tariffs on imported vehicles and parts. But House did say given the "very competitive global landscape" with companies having different needs and levels of technology, it makes sense to be thinking about partnerships so as to get more efficiency, especially if it is an area where Ford does not need to be No. 1. She said the automaker is "absolutely open" to doing more partnerships than the ones it currently has in place. House joined Ford about a year ago and became its CFO in recent months. When asked how she has seen the company change culturally, she listed a few ways: First, Ford has started to put more specialists in roles as opposed to putting a really great generalist in roles. For example, when it named Liz Door as its chief supply chain officer in 2023. House called her "an amazing supply chain leader at the forefront of that thinking." House said she has challenged Ford to think about "not letting your governance define what the pace of the business is going to be." "What happens is big companies … you have weekly meetings on a topic, you have monthly meetings on topic, you have quarterly meetings on a topic. What happens when you set up your business that way is you are running to that governance structure and you're only doing the work to get ready for that weekly meeting or monthly meeting," House said. "But if you can step back and let the priorities define the pace versus the governance structure, the business define the pace, I think you can go a lot faster and you can make sure you're focused on the right things.' She said Ford also has looked to "break boundary constraints" in its strategy meetings. "If you're having meetings with just one function, a lot of times you can't break the boundary constraints because you don't have everybody in the room that can tell you can do something. So you feel like you can't," House said. "So having more cross functional meetings as well. These are all tactics that can make a difference." Jamie L. LaReau is the senior autos writer who covers Ford Motor Co. for the Detroit Free Press. Contact Jamie at jlareau@ Follow her on Twitter @jlareauan. To sign up for our autos newsletter. Become a subscriber. This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Ford CFO outlines how company is working through supply, tariff issues

Unshackled Wells Fargo Fights to Regain Momentum Lost in Penalty Box
Unshackled Wells Fargo Fights to Regain Momentum Lost in Penalty Box

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Unshackled Wells Fargo Fights to Regain Momentum Lost in Penalty Box

Wells Fargo shares rose over 2% early Wednesday, hitting a three-month high, after the Federal Reserve lifted an asset cap imposed following regulators' determination that the bank had exploited its own customers. The stock, a little hot out of the gate, spent the rest of the day ticking downward and, by the time the closing bell rang, had fallen 0.3% for the day. While a banking juggernaut may have been unshackled to pursue a determined growth strategy, some Wall Street observers think its ambitions are already priced in. READ ALSO: Tariffs Deliver Record Drop in US Trade Deficit and Circle Spirals Upward in $1 Billion IPO There was a period in the late 2010s when Wells Fargo tallied up more scandals than the National Enquirer, the most notorious being when its employees juiced sales numbers by setting up millions of fake deposit and credit card accounts in customers' names without their consent. US regulators got so fed up that they imposed a $1.95 trillion asset cap in 2018, ordering the lender to keep its balance sheet frozen at 2017 levels. Obviously, that left the lender — which Bloomberg estimates lost out on $39 billion in profits under the cap — hamstrung for seven years in the face of fierce competition. From the end of 2017 to March of this year, JPMorgan Chase's assets grew from $2.5 trillion to $4.3 trillion, while Bank of America's rose from $2.3 trillion to $3.3 trillion. Now, Wells Fargo is free to pursue growth, which post-scandal CEO Charlie Scharf has been plotting for years: Once home to the largest US mortgage operation, Wells Fargo has retreated from the multi-trillion-dollar sector under Scharf, who has sold the bank's asset management business, corporate trust division, student loan portfolio, rail equipment leasing unit, and most recently, the bulk of its commercial mortgage-servicing unit. What he's positioned for expansion are trading and investment banking, which were handcuffed by the cap. Wells Fargo has added over four dozen senior bankers since 2020 and scored a major coup last year when Scharf convinced the departing head of JPMorgan's North American investment banking, Fernando Rivas, to run the San Francisco-based lender's corporate and investment bank. Early results are promising: Investment banking fees grew 62%, investment advisory fees 13%, and trading revenues 10% in 2024 — though Wells' operations are a fraction of the size of JPMorgan's. Taking Stock: Apart from the muted performance on Wednesday, Wells Fargo shares have climbed 7.3% in 2025, outperforming the 4.3% gain by the S&P 500 Banks Index. But that explains why some investors are cautious. HSBC analysts noted in a report that 'markets have been increasingly pricing in the asset cap removal, possibly limiting near-term upside.' Shares are already up 28% in the past year. JPMorgan analysts, for example, kept their $73.50 price target after the news of the cap removal. But others on Wall Street are betting Wells Fargo will muscle its way higher as it beefs up investment banking operations: Bank of America hiked its target to $90 a share from $83 after the asset cap's removal, and Morgan Stanley raised its target to $87 from $77. This post first appeared on The Daily Upside. To receive delivering razor sharp analysis and perspective on all things finance, economics, and markets, subscribe to our free The Daily Upside newsletter. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store