Car-free streets, geothermal heating and solar panels: Paris's new eco-district
In recent years, Paris has undergone several transformations in an effort to become a greener, more pedestrian-friendly city. This commitment to sustainability and livability is on full display in the north-western neighborhood of Clichy-Batignolles. Photograph: Ed Alcock/Guardian
Designers have spent the last two decades redeveloping a 54-hectare (133-acre) former rail yard into a dense, green, walkable neighborhood. Photograph: Ed Alcock/Guardian
The new neighborhood, in the city's 17th arrondissement, exemplifies the '15-minute city' concept of urban planning, in which residents can access most services they need within a 15-minute walk, bike or transit ride from their homes. Photograph: Ed Alcock/Guardian
The new development has a population of about 7,500 people, according to city estimates. About 70% of the neighborhood's 3,400 homes are either mixed-income social housing or rent-controlled. Photograph: Ed Alcock/Guardian
Buildings, including the 13-story UNIC (pictured), are built to passive design standards. Photograph: Ed Alcock/Guardian
The UNIC building houses a metro station and a kindergarten. Photograph: Ed Alcock/Guardian
Clichy-Batignolles uses a geothermal heating system, and solar panels power many of the buildings. Photograph: Ed Alcock/Guardian
The site is home to several ambitious and high-profile architecture projects, including the Paris courthouse, which was designed by the Renzo Piano Building Workshop. Photograph: Ed Alcock/Guardian
The 10-hectare Martin Luther King Park, also known as Parc Clichy-Batignolles, anchors the neighborhood. Photograph: Ed Alcock/Guardian
The park features a pond with native plants, as well as a fruit orchard, playgrounds and a skatepark. Photograph: Ed Alcock/Guardian
The neighborhood is connected to public transit and features car-free streets and walking paths.
Photograph: Ed Alcock/Guardian
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
17 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The baby names that are banned in different countries - including 'Nutella', 'King' and the one place you can't be called Tom
The name a child is given can determine a lot about their future experience - from relentless bullying in school to being considered for jobs when they get older. And given there are many subtle biases at play when we hear someone's name for the first time, it's not surprising that there are laws in place to prevent babies from being marked for life. While the US is the least strict as far as freedom to choose wacky and wonderful baby names, other jurisdictions have cracked down on certain titles, banning them by law. Some names are rejected in order to protect newborns from a lifetime of embarrassment, but others are struck off the list for being offensive, misleading or even unpatriotic. France France has come down hard on names that could be alienating for children, both in adolescence and adulthood. But the law was set in stone when a French family tried to name their child Nutella - after the popular hazelnut chocolate spread. In 2015, the state intervened and a judge in the northern French commune of Valenciennes refused to allow the child to be named after the pantry item, according to BBC Bitesize. There was concern over the legal ability to use a trademarked name, but the final decision came down to the risk of humiliation for the child. It was argued the name would make the baby girl 'the target of derision' throughout her life. But when the parents declined to attend the hearing, the judge named the child Ella instead - a perceived compromise on the original name. Other countries have banned similar attempts to use a brand as a name - with the names Mercedes and Chanel not allowed in Switzerland. Also banned in the land of baguettes and frogs' legs is the name Fraise - the French word for strawberry. When a determined couple tried naming their daughter after the summer fruit, a court disallowed it, arguing it could be mistaken as the slang word for a bottom, the Telegraph reported. Instead, the parents opted for Fraisine - an elegant and classic 19th century name. Technically, French parents can name their children as they please, but the onus is on the registrar to seek to ban monikers they feel are inappropriate or against the child's interests. In another such example, a French family was told in 2009 that they could not name their child after the cartoon character Titeuf. And in 2015, French parents tried to give their son the first name Prince William, which was rejected because it would lead to 'a lifetime of mockery', according to The Local. Sweden Sweden has strict rules for the naming of children, with the primary aim of preventing embarrassment for the child. But in 1996, a defiant couple opted for the name Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxvclmnckssqlbb11116, to be pronounced simply 'Albin'. They did this to protest the fine issued to them for failing to register their son's name before his fifth birthday. Unsurprisingly, the 43-character moniker was not approved. When it was rejected, the still-determined pair tried to name their son simply 'A' to be pronounced 'Albin' as before. This was also turned down and, finally, they gave in and went for Albin. The names Superman, Ikea and Veranda have also been turned down in Sweden over the years, having been deemed unacceptable. But in 2008, Swedish parents won a legal battle, earning the right to name their child Lego - after the colourful building block toys. New Zealand In the home of Kiwis, names that resemble official titles or ranks are strictly banned. One of the most common among this list is the name Justice, according to the BBC, being that it's a formal title belonging to a judge. Also on the list of banned names are Saint, Knight, Mr. and Bishop - as well as any other variations along those lines. New Zealand also has rules around the length of names - having ruled that they must not be unreasonably long. An infamous case came to the fore in 2008, after it was discovered that a then nine-year-old girl had been named 'Talula Does The Hula From Hawaii' without any pushback from authorities. It emerged that the young girl detested her name so much, she had never told anyone what she was really called. The judge allowed her to legally change her name, and sternly reprimanded her parents for the ill-informed decision. In 2018, a New Zealand court ruled against naming a child the Roman numeral name III. The country has rules around calling children 'anything unpronounceable', like dashes and punctuation marks. Indeed, one set of parents who tried to name their child '.' - which they would have pronounced 'full stop' - were prevented from doing so. At the time, Jeff Montgomery, the Registrar-General of Births, Deaths and Marriages said: 'There's no problem if you want to give your child a spelled-out number or even a silly name, but remember your child has to live with it!' Among the most commonly rejected names in the country in 2018 were any regal monikers, such as Prince, King and Royal. In the same year, the names Allah, Heaven-Princezz-Star, Queen, Roil, Royale-Bubz and Sire were also flatly rejected. Japan A 1994 attempt to name a child was so controversial that a member of the Prime Minister's cabinet stepped in and issued a statement advising against it. A family decided to name their newborn son Akuma - which translates literally to Devil. The father said he settled on the name because he wanted his son to stand out with an unforgettable moniker selected by no one else. Bizarrely, the name was initially approved, but officials later intervened on the basis that allowing the name would lead the child to be discriminated against. The case prompted a nationwide debate on whether the state should have a say in the naming of children. But the parents eventually conceded after a lengthy court battle. Also banned in Japan was a name combining the Chinese characters for 'child' and 'water'. In 2014, the parents voluntarily changed the name after being alerted by a government employee about its sinister meaning. The word, read as chishi/mizuko, means a baby that has died in the womb either by abortion or miscarriage, Japan Today writes. The grateful parents were happy to have been informed of the double meaning, which was unfamiliar to many young people in Japan at the time. Portugal One of the most popular boys' names with many language variations globally, the name Tom is banned in Portugal. This is because official names in Portugal are required by law to take traditional Portuguese spellings. So, instead of Tom, a baby boy must be named Tomás, much to the dismay of Tom Holland, Tom Cruise and Tom Hanks. In fact, the Portuguese government has a list of pre-approved baby names that all expectant parents must select from. Where one of the parents is not Portuguese, or if they hold dual citizenship, the rules are bent slightly. Perhaps one of the strictest countries when it comes to names, Portugal has an 82-page list of banned monikers. The list includes the names Paris, Nirvana and Thor. Also forbidden are any non-Portuguese names. Malaysia In 2006, Malaysia's government tightened the rules on which names would be allowed in the country. On the list of banned names are 007, Hitler, the Chinese word for snake and a word meaning 'hunchback'. Parents are also banned from naming their kids after animals, insects, fruits, vegetables or colours. The names Chow Tow, meaning 'smelly head', and Sor Chai, meaning 'insane', were also forbidden. Although it's a trend that's hugely popular in the US, Malaysia frowns upon natural names that come from plants or flowers - Gwyeth Paltrow's 'Apple', for example, would be banned. By the same logic, Jennifer Garner's daughter Violet would need to be renamed. Unfortunately for some creative parents, but luckily for their children, courts globally are more or less united in their desire to spare children awful names. Italy has vetoed the name Venderdi, meaning Friday, as a 'ridiculous or shameful' name. In Denmark, parents choose from a list of 7,000 pre-approved names. They have previously rejected 'Molli' because of its unusual spelling and the animal name 'Monkey', according to Good Housekeeping. Germany rejected the first name Schmitz, on the basis that it is a common last name and therefore not appropriate. The country also turned down Pfefferminze, meaning peppermint, and the name Stone. And in Wales, a mother decided on the name Cynaide for her daughter, arguing it was a positive choice as the poison that killed Hitler. In a very unusual ruling, the court decided that the baby girl and her twin brother would get to be named by their older half siblings. For those who have names they feel are outdated or that they've always despised, perhaps now they will consider themselves lucky.
The Sun
2 days ago
- The Sun
Mystery of UK shipwreck is solved 140 years after bodies of crew who used mattresses to plug holes in vessel washed up
A SHIPWRECK mystery has been solved after divers uncovered a vessel which sunk nearly 140 years ago. Crew on board the SS Nantes made desperate attempts to plug the ship's holes with mattresses when it sunk in 1888. 7 The wreckage of the SS Nantes, has been discovered, having sunk 137 years ago - killing almost everyone onboard. The boat tragically collided with a German sailing vessel, the Theodor Ruger, in November 1888, as reported by NeedToKnow. Only two people survived, with two people jumping to safety on the Ruger, and one person who stayed on the Nantes trying to keep it afloat. The Nantes sank approximately ten hours after the collision, this took place off the coast of Plymouth, in the early hours of the morning. Diver Dominic Robinson discovered the wreckage of the SS Nantes last week, 246 feet below sea level. The 50-year-old former Army Officer found a plate with the Cunard Steamship Company logo, belonging to the forgotten vessel. This enabled him to work out that the wreck he had found was that of the SS Nantes. Dominic and his crew then carefully examined the site of the wreck, and discovered old crockery which was key in identifying the wreck. He said: 'The Nantes was built in 1874, in Glasgow, and very sadly lasted a mere 14 years before it was sunk,' said Dominic. 'It was on a passage from Liverpool to La Havre, when it was sunk in France carrying cargo of coal. 'It's quite a sad story.' After the ship went down, it became lost until Dominic and his team discovered it. Dominic, who has been an underwater explorer for around 35 years, first caught wind of the unidentified shipwreck from the UK Hydrographic Office. Maritime Historian Dr Harry Bennett, who works at the institute, explained why the wreck has taken well over a century to find: "Obviously you're dealing in a period with no satellite navigation. "While the crew tried to save the ship it drifted for several hours, before it finally made its way to the bottom, sadly with many of its crewmen on board". Dominic added: "The wreck was lost until a local dive team identified it in 2024. 'We got the size of the wreck from the information on the UK Hydrographic Office. 'We knew the boat is about 78 or 79 metres long. 'We also knew that there was a Cunard plate from it - which was basically what we're looking for. 'So what you do is you try to find a list of all the Cunard ships that were sunk. 'You then try and narrow them down to, to a relatively small one, and an old one. 'We obviously know where it sank, so if you can find information about the sinking and the wreck that aligns all those things up, then it's fairly straightforward to identify it.' The Cunard plate which Dominic found was crucial in the ship's identification. He said: 'Even though the wreck had been dived before, it was never identified and this small piece of broken plate allowed us to do exactly that. 'The more eagle eyed amongst you may already have noticed the logo from the famous Cunard shipping line. 'And not surprisingly, this is what gave us the most significant clue.' 7 7 7 7
BBC News
3 days ago
- BBC News
Ocean damage 'unspeakably awful', Attenborough tells William
Sir David Attenborough has told Prince William he is "appalled" by the damage certain fishing methods are wreaking on the world's Prince of Wales interviewed the TV naturalist ahead of a key UN Oceans conference which kicks off on world's countries are gathering for the first time in three years to discuss how to better protect the oceans, which are facing growing threats from plastic pollution, climate change and UN's key aim is to get the High Seas Treaty - an agreement signed two years ago to put 30% of the ocean into protected areas - ratified by 60 countries to bring it into force. "What we have done to the deep ocean floor is just unspeakably awful," said Sir David."If you did anything remotely like it on land, everybody would be up in arms," he said in the interview released on Saturday. It was conducted at the premiere of his new documentary, Ocean, last documentary draws attention to the potential damage from some fishing practices, like bottom trawling, for marine life and the ability of the ocean to lock up planet-warming charities and scientists will come together at the UN Oceans Conference (UNOC) in Nice to try and agree how to accelerate action on the issues most affecting the world's David said he hopes the leaders gathering for the UN conference will "realise how much the oceans matter to all of us, the citizens of the world". Planetary life support system The ocean is crucial for the survival of all organisms on the planet - it is the largest ecosystem, is estimated to contribute $2.5 trillion to world economies and provides up to 80% of the oxygen we breath. The key aim for the UN is to galvanise enough support to bring the High Seas Treaty into force - including commitment from the years ago countries agreed to protect 30% of the world's oceans by 2030, across national and international waters - or high seas - are a common resource with no ruling country so nations signed the High Seas Treaty in 2023 agreeing to work together to put a third of them into Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). Since then only 32 countries have ratified the treaty - 60 are needed to bring it into force. But many scientists and NGOs are worried MPAs will not be effective whilst practices like bottom trawling are still allowed within them. "Our ocean is 99% of our living space on the globe, we have huge dependency on the ocean in every possible way, but bottom trawling does a lot of damage," Dr Amanda Vincent, Professor in Marine Conservation at The University of British Columbia told BBC's Inside trawling or dredging is currently allowed in 90% of the UK's MPAs, according to environmental campaigners Oceana, and the Environment Audit Committee (EAC) has called for a ban on it within them. What is the UN High Seas Treaty and why is it needed?But some fishing communities have pushed back on the assertion that certain fishing practices need to be banned in these areas. "Bottom trawling is only a destructive process if it's taking place in the wrong place, otherwise, it is an efficient way to produce food from our seas," Elspeth Macdonald, CEO of Scottish Fisherman's Association told the point to evidence that restricting the practice in some areas allows fish stocks to recover and be better in the long term for the industry. The conference had been called after concern by the UN that oceans were facing irreparable damage, particularly from climate change. The oceans are a crucial buffer against the worst impacts of a warming planet, absorbing excess heat and greenhouse gases, said Callum Roberts, Professor of Marine Conservation at the University of Exeter."If the sea had not absorbed more than 90% of the excess heat that has been added to the planet as a result of greenhouse gas emissions, then the world wouldn't just be one and a half degrees warmer it would be about 36 degrees warmer."Those of us who were left would be struggling with Death Valley temperatures everywhere," he excess heat is having significant impacts on marine life, warn scientists. "Coral reefs, for the past 20 years, have been subject to mass bleaching and mass mortality and that is due to extreme temperatures," said Dr Jean-Pierre Gattuso, senior research scientist at Laboratoire d'Océanographie de Villefranche and co-chair of the One Ocean Science Congress (OOSC). "This really is the first marine ecosystem and perhaps the first ecosystem which is potentially subject to disappearance."The OOSC is a gathering of 2,000 of the world's scientists, prior to the UN conference, where the latest data on ocean health is assessed and recommendations put forward to efforts on climate change the scientists recommended an end to deep sea activities. The most controversial issue to be discussed is perhaps deep sea more than a decade countries have been trying to agree how deep sea mining in international waters could work - how resources could be shared and environmental damage could be in April President Trump bypassed those discussions and signed an executive order saying he would permit mining within international and France called it a breach of international law, although no formal legal proceedings have yet been have warned that too little is understood about the ecosystems in the deep sea and therefore no commercial activities should go forward without more research."Deep sea biology is the most threatened of global biology, and of what we know the least. We must act with precaution where we don't have the science," said Prof Peter Haugan, Co-chair of the International Science Council Expert Group on the Ocean. Sign up for our Future Earth newsletter to keep up with the latest climate and environment stories with the BBC's Justin Rowlatt. Outside the UK? Sign up to our international newsletter here.
