Putin Placates Trump, But Dodges Wider Ukrainian Peace Deal
President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin held an extended phone call today to discuss the war in Ukraine, which the U.S. president has touted as a major step toward kicking off peace talks in the devastating conflict.
However, statements from both the Kremlin and the White House indicate only a limited agreement was reached – while Putin has shifted the onus for further progress onto Ukraine, demanding that Kyiv stop mobilizing and arming its soldiers before Moscow will agree to a broader ceasefire.
'My phone conversation today with President Putin of Russia was a very good and productive one,' Trump wrote in a social media post. 'This war would never have started if I were president!'
While no full transcript of the call has been made public, the White House released a brief read-out with carefully curated details.
'The leaders agreed that the movement to peace would begin with an energy and infrastructure ceasefire,' the White House read-out said. 'The two leaders agreed that a future with an improved bilateral relationship between the United States and Russia has huge upside.'
In its version, the Kremlin noted that it had agreed to a 30-day ceasefire on energy targets, but emphasized that it wanted a full halt to all foreign military and intelligence assistance to Ukraine as a precondition for ending the conflict.
The tenor of the discussion between the two leaders described in the read-outs accords with the analysis of several experts, who see Putin's intentions as placating the American president, while staving off meaningful progress toward a ceasefire as Russian forces advance on the battlefield.
'Today's Putin-Trump conversation will be about Russia-U.S. relations and what they each think they can extort from Kyiv, not peace in Ukraine,' Prof. Ruth Deyermond, a senior lecturer at King's College London's Department of War Studies who specializes in U.S.-Russia relations, observed ahead of the call.
'Russia and Ukraine were negotiating a halt to strikes on energy infrastructure well before Trump won the presidential election. So not a single concession comes from the Russian side after 2-plus [hours] of [a] Trump-Putin call,' Daniel Szegelowski, the head of the Eastern Europe Program at the Polish Institute for International Affairs, wrote after it ended.
The Kremlin has previously said that any negotiations with the U.S. toward a ceasefire must also involve a wider discussion aimed at lifting sanctions and normalizing ties — and reshaping the world order to Putin's liking.
That appears to have happened, as Trump and Putin also 'spoke broadly about the Middle East,' 'the need to stop the proliferation of strategic weapons,' and 'enormous economic deals and geopolitical stability,' according to the White House read-out.
A cessation of missile and drone attacks on energy infrastructure will be welcome in Ukraine, but falls short of the wider pause in hostilities for which officials in Kyiv had hoped. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky had agreed to a U.S. proposal for an immediate and total 30-day ceasefire, but has been pessimistic about the prospects for progress — and anticipated Russia would delay in today's Trump-Putin call.
'It is clear to everyone in the world — even to those who refused to acknowledge the truth for the past three years — that it is Putin who continues to drag out this war,' Zelensky said in a video address posted to social media on Monday night. 'For a week now, Putin has been unable to squeeze out 'yes' to the ceasefire proposal.'
Russia, too, will welcome a pause in attacks on energy infrastructure, as oil production and storage facilities have been the primary target for Ukraine's increasingly sophisticated long-range attack drones.
Putin's delaying tactics, in offering a win for Trump without making a larger commitment that affects Russia's favorable military momentum, also plays into a broader strategy to encourage and exploit growing rifts between the United States and its European allies, in order to neutralize NATO.
'Western dominance is slipping away and new centers of global growth are emerging,' Putin told a gathering of business leaders in Moscow, just minutes before his phone call with Trump.
Moscow is gleeful that the pro-Russia camp within Trump's inner circle has vocally embraced its longstanding worldview, with influential Russian commentators praising the American president.
'[Trump] is much more conservative. He is in favor of traditional values. He is in favor of the patriotism of the nation, and I define that as the great power's world order. Putin and Trump coincide in accepting this model instead of liberal globalism,' Alexander Dugin, an ultranationalist philosopher who has been influential on Putin's regime, told CNN in an interview earlier on Tuesday.
Putin also likely hopes that Washington's relationship with Kyiv will continue to deteriorate amid Trump's personal animosity toward the Ukrainian president.
Trump has echoed the Kremlin's view that Zelensky is an 'illegitimate' leader, at one point even calling on him to step down.
The administration's antipathy toward Zelensky was on full display in a tactless meeting at the Oval Office last month, in which Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance verbally attacked the Ukrainian leader, saying he 'was not ready for peace.' Multiple U.S. officials have echoed Trump's assertion that Zelensky is a 'dictator,' calling for elections in Ukraine — which are currently prohibited under martial law.
One of Putin's primary goals in starting the war three years ago was to remove the pro-Western, democratically elected government in Ukraine, and install a puppet government friendly to Moscow.
Putin has long maintained that his fundamental goals in Ukraine are non-negotiable: no NATO membership; no foreign military support or troops; demilitarization of Ukraine's armed forces; the installment of a 'neutral' regime in Kyiv; and territorial concessions.
The U.S. has already signaled its willingness to support at least some of these goals, including a ban on NATO membership and territorial concessions. Trump further said that his goal was 'dividing up certain assets' in Ukraine between Russia and the U.S. — an unfortunate echo of the secret deal between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union on the eve of World War II in 1939, the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, in which the two authoritarian powers agreed to divide Poland.
Ahead of the phone call today, Trump demonstrated that his views about the conflict were in alignment with Moscow's claims, specifically pointing to a Russian offensive to retake territory captured by Ukraine in Kursk province.
'Tomorrow, I will speak with President Putin to save Ukrainian soldiers who are in a very difficult situation,' Trump said on Monday. 'They are surrounded by Russian forces. If it weren't for me, they'd be gone already. I managed to convince them to hold off for now.'
Multiple independent analysts in both Russia and Ukraine contest this characterization, acknowledging that while the Ukrainians were losing ground in Kursk, no large units were 'surrounded' and the bulk of forces were retreating in good order.
Fundamentally, the war in Ukraine is not going well for either of the warring parties. Three years into the conflict, there have been nearly a million casualties, according to estimates by U.S. officials.
Across the nearly 500 mile line of contact, much of the war has devolved into attritional trench warfare. Ukraine's military situation is dire, with the embattled nation unable to muster the manpower it needs to hold the line. Meanwhile, more than 1,000 Russian soldiers are killed or wounded every day, eking out incremental gains. But tens of thousands more are sent to the front each month, to fight and die in Ukraine as Russia continues to advance.
There remains a significant gap between these realities on the ground and the Trump administration's assertions that it can achieve peace quickly.
Neither Ukraine nor any of the U.S.' NATO allies have been directly included in discussions between Moscow and Washington at this point.
Leaders in Europe are watching developments closely, and have already been alarmed by Trump's earlier decision to cut off military and intelligence aid to Ukraine — a decision the American president reversed when Kyiv agreed to Washington's ceasefire proposal.
While many European leaders have used strong rhetoric when speaking about the war, and the European Union taken together is the largest overall contributor of aid to Ukraine, the reality is that the United States has shouldered the bulk of the burden in supplying direct military aid to Kyiv.
But there are signs that – after three years of brutal armored and trench warfare, and nightly missile and drone attacks by Russia against civilians in Ukraine – Europe is awakening to its own danger.
'Russia poses the greatest threat to European security,' said German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius, just moments before legislators in the Bundestag voted to pass a massive defense spending bill, unprecedented in modern Germany and a collateral result of the crisis in Euro-American relations.
That threat was manifested clearly only hours after Putin ended his call with Trump, as air raid alerts sounded across nearly half of Ukraine, including in the capital Kyiv.
Russian one-way attack drones had started their nightly journeys toward Ukrainian cities, and the sound of air defense machine guns and interceptors began echoing through their streets.
More from Rolling Stone
Teslas Torched at Las Vegas Facility in 'Targeted Attack'
Supreme Court Chief Justice Slams Trump's Call to Impeach Judge
'Move Fast': Inside Team Trump's Furious Defiance of the Courts
Best of Rolling Stone
The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign
Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal
The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge says Columbia University activist facing deportation should be freed
Supporters of Mahmoud Khalil rally outside the federal courthouse in Newark on March 28, 2025. (Reena Rose Sibayan for New Jersey Monitor) A federal judge ruled Wednesday that a Columbia University activist detained for partaking in pro-Palestinian protests cannot be held by the federal government over allegations that his presence in the United States undermines the nation's foreign policy interests. U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz issued the order Wednesday but gave federal prosecutors until Friday at 9:30 a.m. to ask the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals to step in. It's unclear if the activist, Mahmoud Khalil, will be released Friday if the government does indeed appeal. 'This is the news we've been waiting over three months for. Mahmoud must be released immediately and safely returned home to New York to be with me and our newborn baby, Deen,' Noor Abdalla, Khalil's wife, said in a statement from the American Civil Liberties Union of New York. 'True justice would mean Mahmoud was never taken away from us in the first place, that no Palestinian father, from New York to Gaza, would have to endure the painful separation of prison walls like Mahmoud has.' If it stands, Farbiarz's ruling, which comes on the heels of a previous decision that said the government's push to deport Khalil was likely unconstitutional, could deal a blow to the Trump administration's efforts to deport dissidents. Khalil was arrested by immigration authorities in March and has been held in Louisiana since. He's fighting two cases to fend off his deportation — one in Louisiana and one in New Jersey, because he was being transferred through Elizabeth Detention Center when his attorneys first filed a petition for his release. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio claimed Khalil supports terrorist group Hamas and called his presence in the country a national security risk. Rubio has cited a rarely used provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 to justify Khalil's deportation. Farbiarz noted in his Wednesday ruling that the government could argue that Khalil would have been detained anyway because he inaccurately filled out his lawful permanent resident application, which can be a basis for removal under very rare circumstances. But that argument won't work, he said. 'Lawful permanent residents are virtually never detained pending removal for the sort of alleged omission' Khalil is accused of, the judge wrote in the 14-page filing. Khalil, whose wife and newborn son are American citizens, has not been charged with any crime. He was among the first university students who were picked up by immigration authorities targeting pro-Palestine activists. Some students who were detained under similar circumstances have been released but still face deportation. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's DOGE efficiency agency says it slashes $25B in federal spending as rehiring begins
The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) announced on Wednesday it has decreased its annual non-defense federal obligations by an additional ~1.9% since last month. As of June 8th, annual non-defense federal obligations are down 22.4%, or ~$25B, as compared to 2024, DOGE announced on X. The cut marks an additional ~1.9% reduction from last month's figures, which were announced on May 8. Doge's Greatest Hits: Look Back At The Department's Most High-profile Cuts During Trump's First 100 Days "Cash outlays will follow as obligations come due," DOGE wrote in the post. "Our initiative to reduce wasteful spend, consistent with the DOGE Cost Efficiency Executive Order, continues to bear fruit." On May 14, DOGE announced the current year's non-defense federal obligations were down 20.5% as compared to 2024. Read On The Fox News App The announcement came minutes before Fox News Digital was first to report the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is rehiring more than 450 previously fired employees belonging to multiple divisions within the agency's Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The rehired CDC employees came from the National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and Tuberculosis Prevention; the National Center for Environmental Health; the Immediate Office of the Director, and the Global Health Center, according to an HHS official familiar with the matter. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told CBS News in April some personnel who were cut shouldn't have been. Doge Ends 108 'Wasteful' Contracts, Including For An 'Executive Transformational Leadership Training Program' "We're reinstating them, and that was always the plan," Kennedy said. "Part of the—at DOGE, we talked about this from the beginning, is we're going to do 80% cuts, but 20% of those are going to have to be reinstated, because we'll make mistakes." In addition to the HHS rehires, the Internal Revenue Service, Food and Drug Administration, State Department, and Department of Housing and Urban Development started rehiring employees let go during DOGE cuts, the Washington Post reported. Doge Takes A Chainsaw To Federal Spending With 7 Major Victories This Week: 'Got To Be Done' Another roadblock this week was a ruling from U.S. District Judge Denise Cote of the Southern District of New York, who ruled to restrict the agency's access to federal databases. The Trump administration previously said DOGE could not work effectively with the limitations, noting DOGE needed to access Social Security information to root out fraud. Fox News Digital's Alec Schemmel and Danielle Wallace contributed to this article source: Trump's DOGE efficiency agency says it slashes $25B in federal spending as rehiring begins
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hegseth defends $961.6B Defense Department budget request
June 11 (UPI) -- The proposed Department of Defense budget puts "America first" while addressing Ukraine, the Indo-Pacific and the Middle East, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told the Senate Appropriations Committee on Wednesday. Hegseth and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dan Caine fielded questions during a more than 2-hour hearing regarding the proposed $961.6 billion DOD budget for the 2026 fiscal year. The Defense Department is improving pay, housing, healthcare and other services to improve the quality of life for military members and their families, Hegseth told committee members. "This budget puts America first and gives our warriors what they need," he said during his opening statement. The proposed budget request also would "end four years of chronic underinvestment in our military by the Biden administration," Hegseth added. Russia and the Ukraine war Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., opened the hearing with questions about the Ukraine War, including who is the aggressor and preferred outcomes. Hegseth said Russia is the aggressor and China would prefer to keep the conflict going as long as possible to distract from its moves in the Indo-Pacific region. Europe needs to do more to defend its territory against Russian aggression, Hegseth said, and the United States must remain strategic in its handling of the war while addressing matters in the Indo-Pacific region. Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., cited ongoing Russian aggression against civilian targets in Ukraine as evidence that Russia has no intention of ending the war there. The 2026 budget request eliminates aid to Ukraine, while senators are working to impose more sanctions on Russia, Coons said. "What message do you think it sends" when Russia "attacks civilian centers in Ukraine and the United States does not send additional air defense and interceptors to Ukraine?" Coons asked. Hegseth said arms are still flowing to Ukraine, but other NATO allies are not doing enough to end the war. "You're not a real coalition, you're not a real defense alliance, unless you have real defense capability and real armies that can bring those to bear," Hegseth said. "That's a reality that Europe is waking up to quickly," he added, "and we're glad." Coons said the United States should not negotiate a cease-fire in Ukraine "at any cost" and instead should continue supporting Ukraine to achieve an enduring peace. "Putin will only stop when we stop him," Coons said. "The best way to stop him is through a stronger NATO." Chinese military threats and Hegseth's DOD leadership Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said China has more than 400 warships and is rapidly expanding its fleet versus 293 ships for the United States. She asked why the Defense Department only seeks funding to build two submarines and an ocean surveillance ship, plus some destroyers. Hegseth said the 2026 budget request reflects a 13% increase for investing in national defense over the current fiscal year. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., then questioned Hegseth's leadership. "I am repeatedly hearing that your policy and personnel changes at the Pentagon are only undermining [and] not strengthening our military's preparedness to protect our country," Murray said. She accused Hegseth of using the military to police areas in the United States, including sending the National Guard and Marines to California to use against "peaceful protesters." Murray then asked Hegseth if the Defense Department would continue to fire shipbuilders, which he denied it has done. "We are investing historically in our shipbuilding defense industrial base and workforce and ships in this budget," Hegseth said. Murray said the Navy is firing shipbuilder staff in the state of Washington and accused it of asking welders if they ever donated to the Democratic Party. Hegseth said no welders are subject to litmus tests to work on naval projects and denied that political questions are asked. Iranian, Russian, Chinese and North Korean coalition Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., asked Hegseth and Caine if the world is underestimating Iran's intent to "kill all the Jews," including using a nuclear weapon against Israel if Iran had one. Caine said Iran would use one to pressure Israel but doesn't know if Iran would use it to "wipe out Israel." Hegseth said a radical cleric in Iran would use one to wipe out Israel. "They're going to use a nuclear weapon if they get it," Graham said. He also asked if China intends to "take Taiwan by force if necessary." Hegseth said the DOD doesn't know that China has made the decision to do so. Caine suggested China might use military force against Taiwan, and the United States needs to prepare for it. Coons said China, Russia, North Korea and Iran are aligned and pose the greatest threat to world peace since the Cold War. He cited Ukraine as an example of the future of warfare, but said the Department of Defense is "internally divided" and operating on a continuing resolution for the first time. The current state within the Defense Department "cannot continue," Coons added. Next-generation fighter and collaborative drones are planned The Defense Department also wants to spend $4 billion during the 2026 fiscal year to develop the F-47 fighter and "collaborative combat" drone aircraft, according to DefenseScoop. The $4 billion request is just part of the 2026 budget request, but the amount of the entire proposed budget has not been released. The Air Force wants to spend $3.5 billion on the F-47 fighter project, which would give it a fighter capable of exceeding Mach 2 with a range of more than 1,000 nautical miles. The current F-22 and F-35A fighter jets have top speeds of greater than Mach 2 and Mach 1.6 and ranges of 590 and 670 nautical miles, respectively. The Air Force wants to buy up to 185 F-47 fighters during the program's duration. The Air Force's Collaborative Combat Aircraft program would promote the development of next-generation drone aircraft that are capable of flying with the manned F-47 and other next-generation fighters.