Judge Nathan Erasmus denies defence counsel request to drop charges in Joshlin Smith trial
Jacquen Appollis, Steveno van Rhyn and Kelly Smith face charges of human trafficking and kidnapping.
Image: Robin-Lee Francke/IOL
As the State closed its case in the Joshlin Smith matter on Wednesday morning, it is now time for the defence to bring forth its case.
Earlier, the State called Colonel Riaan Morris from the provincial Commercial Crimes Unit, who played six videos for the court.
The videos include Kelly Smith being filmed on Sunday, March 3, 2024, at an open prayer service being held for Joshlin.
The other videos also show Kelly having a meeting at the Spur with now Minister Gayton McKenzie.
Judge Nathan Erasmus dismissed the applications.
Image: Ayanda Ndamane/Independent Newspapers
A few videos of the meeting with McKenzie are shown.
He was also provided with two links, which led to two videos of McKenzie, seated in the back of a vehicle, where he questions Steveno van Rhyn about his whereabouts and what happened to Joshlin.
As the State closed its case in the matter, Judge Nathan Erasmus was told that the defence counsel would bring forth Section 174 applications.
A Section 174 application, under South Africa's Criminal Procedure Act, allows an accused person to be discharged if the court believes there is no evidence to support a conviction at the close of the State's case.
Fanie Harmse, the legal representative for Jacquen 'Boeta' Appollis, chose not to bring forth an application.
Van Rhyn's lawyer, Nobuhle Mkabayi, brought forth an application.
'The defence will argue accused two has no case to answer. All state witnesses who testified didn't bring any evidence that this court can come to the conclusion that accused two has committed an offence. It will be unfair if the accused is only brought into the dock to supplement the State's case,' she submitted.
When Judge Erasmus mentions that State witness Laurentia Lombaard implicated van Rhyn, Mkabayi shot back, stating she was 'not credible'.
'Your client made a statement which I found admissible, that he admitted to being with when Joshlin was taken away, and he had gone back to find out what he's cut was,' Judge Erasmus said.
'I strongly submit there is no evidence,' Mkabayi submitted.
Kelly's lawyer, Rinesh Sivnarain, also brought forth an application to have charges discharged against his client.
'My submission case has not brought enough prima facie evidence against my client. In regards to human trafficking, only one witness, Laurentia Lombaard, and I submit that her evidence was of such poor quality that it should be rejected in its entirety,' he submitted.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
32 minutes ago
- IOL News
FOUND: Relief as missing Comrades Marathon runner, Moira Harding is found
The local running community has breathed a collective sigh of relief after reports circulated that Moira Harding has been found. IOL reported that Harding vanished after completing the Comrades Marathon in Durban on Sunday. A family friend confirmed to IOL that Harding is from Kommetjie in Cape Town. At this stage, it is alleged Harding was spotted in the Point Waterfront area. Garrith Jamieson of ALS Paramedics confirmed that emergency teams are treating her. "She was found after a wide-scale search was initiated for her. Paramedics, police and Metro Police managed to locate the runner. She is in a critical condition and is being stabilised at the scene before she will be taken to hospital for further care," Jamieson said. *This is a developing story. IOL
eNCA
4 hours ago
- eNCA
New evidence expected in Senzo Meyiwa murder trial
JOHANNESBURG - The Senzo Meyiwa murder trial resumes today at the High court in Pretoria, after a tense week. Judge Mokgoatlheng drew criticism last Thursday, for comparing black and white lawyers, after Advocate Charles Mnisi requested leave to run the Comrades Marathon. This Monday, the State is expected to introduce new evidence. It relates to photos allegedly retrieved from the phones of accused number 2, Bongani Ntanzi, and accused number 3 Mthobisi Mncube, during the re-examination of lead investigator Brigadier Gininda.
Daily Maverick
8 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Awful murders in SA can bring out the best and the worst in us
The murder of Olorato Mogale has gripped the country as gender-based violence, one of our biggest blights, has been put on full display yet again. For me it has brought up a few points of contention, however: the exceptionalisation of beauty, the benefits of proximity to social capital when action is needed, and the celebration of the suspected perpetrator dying during a shootout with the police. Much has been written about pretty privilege. As an article in Psychology Today by Dr Nafees Alam explains: 'Attractiveness can affect social mobility. Individuals who benefit from pretty privilege might have access to better social networks, which can open doors to opportunities and resources that are less accessible to others.' Social capital is 'any benefit that is derived from interaction between members of a social grouping or society'. In this instance, one could argue that a wealth of resources could be deployed for the speedy apprehension of Mongale's killer because of her network of friends and former colleagues who had access to both traditional and social media resources. There are many other cases of women perhaps not as attractive or socially connected who failed to galvanise similarly urgent action. Without wading into the 'damned if we do, damned if we don't' camp of thinking, I think it is certainly worth examining why certain cases grip our imagination, while others fall to the far reaches of our somnambulant, horror-fatigued minds. The other thing that worried me was the cheering of some when the number-one suspect was shot dead, the assertion being that he got his just deserts. I can definitely understand the anger at the injustice of Mongale's life being taken, but our Constitution warns us against such thinking because of the potential pitfalls it presents. In his paper reflecting on the death penalty as a deterrent in South Africa, Chris Derby Magobotiti, who holds a PhD in criminology, explains that the death penalty was abolished by the Constitutional Court as a sentence option for capital crimes in South Africa in 1995. Subsequently, section 277 of the Criminal Procedure Act was repealed because 'the Constitutional Court held that capital punishment infringed the rights to life and dignity, and constituted a cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment'. 'The court emphasised that various factors such as elements of arbitrariness, possibility of error in the enforcement of the death sentence, inequality and destruction of life make capital punishment cruel, inhumane and degrading, which is in conflict with the Constitution,' Magobotiti writes. In the Mongale case, a potentially fatal error was made when Fezile Ngubane was named as a suspect also linked to the case, but was later found not to have been involved. Magobotiti concludes that 'there is a lack of vigorous scientific analysis and empirical evidence to determine whether there is, historically, a deterrent effect of the death penalty in South Africa'. I say this not to invalidate the relief we all felt when Mongale's suspected killer was found, but to caution against extremes that would diminish the gains of humaneness and enlightenment we have made thus far. DM This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.
