GE2025: Think of S'pore's future, pick the right candidates, says PM Wong in last leg of hustings
GE2025: Think of S'pore's future, pick the right candidates, says PM Wong in last leg of hustings
SINGAPORE – Think about Singapore's future in a changing world and choose the right candidates this election, said Prime Minister Lawrence Wong on April 30, the second-last day of the hustings.
He urged voters to consider three things, as the nation heads into the last stretch of campaigning.
'First, this election is about your future – for you, your families, your children, in a very changed world where we are facing serious and growing challenges,' said PM Wong, who was at a Tampines walkabout with PAP's slates for Tampines GRC and Tampines Changkat SMC.
These challenges will have an impact on issues that matter deeply to Singaporeans, like cost-of-living, incomes, jobs and livelihoods; and or whether Singapore can even make a good living in this new world, he added.
His second point, reiterating his message from the past week of campaigning, was that the election is about choosing candidates who are honest, trustworthy and of good character who can serve in the constituencies and represent residents in Parliament.
Some of these candidates will form the leadership to govern Singapore and help to steer the country through the many storms it is facing and to take the nation to greater heights, said PM Wong.
'Thirdly, this election is about our ideals, what we want Singapore to be, the society that we envisage for ourselves, especially a harmonious, multiracial and multireligious society,' he said.
This was reminded to all in the middle of the campaign, he noted. On April 25, the authorities had moved to block three foreigners on social media for attempting to influence the election.
A day later, PM Wong called on the leaders of all political parties to clarify their stance on two fundamental principles: that identity politics has no place in Singapore, and that religion and politics should not mix.
'I'm glad everyone agrees that we should reject the mixing of race and religion into politics, and so I call on all Singaporeans to uphold these ideals of a multiracial and multireligious society and to uphold our harmony,' he said on April 30.
Such issues are always sensitive, and can get people riled up, said PM Wong.
But Singapore has come a long way in building a strong, multiracial and cohesive society as well as in forging a strong and enduring Singaporean identity, he said.
'I am confident that Singaporeans will understand what the issues are and what's at stake, but in the end, Singaporeans will decide and we respect the wishes of Singaporeans in the election outcomes.'
The secretary-general of the PAP was making a visit to Tampines a day after he had visited Punggol and Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong had visited Aljunied and Tampines.
When asked by reporters why they were making these visits, PM Wong said the party takes the election seriously.
'We make sure that we present the best possible case to residents, and we go where we are needed, particularly the senior leaders… Wherever we are needed, we will be there to support our teams,' he said.
'It shows that we take the national election seriously but we also take the local, the constituency seriously, and we want to provide the assurance to all residents, including the residents here in Tampines, that they will have a good, strong team with the full capabilities of the PAP behind them to serve them and to make sure we improve their lives.'
PM Wong also spoke on the transformation of Tampines over the decades, with national infrastructure upgrades as well as local initiatives.
'This is what previous PAP teams have done, and I'm confident that this PAP team will continue to do the same, and there is so much more potential to continue making Tampines better,' he said.
'We know there are concerns, we know there are needs. We know there are improvements that can be made. We are doing it at the national level, but I'm sure we can also do more at the local level,' he added.
PM Wong also noted that resources for upgrading programmes are allocated to all constituencies, whether it is PAP or opposition-held.
But local representatives in the constituency can make an additional difference, he said.
Government-allocated resources are the minimum, and depending on the quality of the team, they can go well beyond the minimum with projects taken on with residents, he added.
Speaking to the media after PM Wong, Minister for Social and Family Development Masagos Zulkifli said the team plans to make Tampines a model town together with the inputs of residents.
If elected, he will appoint incumbent MP Baey Yam Keng to chair the Tampines Town Council, said Mr Masagos, who is leading the PAP's Tampines GRC slate that also includes Senior Minister for Manpower and Sustainability and the Environment Koh Poh Koon and new faces Charlene Chen and David Neo.
They are facing a multi-cornered fight with line-ups from the Workers' Party, National Solidarity Party and People's Power Party.
Goh Yan Han is political correspondent at The Straits Times. She writes Unpacked, a weekly newsletter on Singapore politics and policy.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
‘A beautiful experience': Singapore Cardinal William Goh on being part of the conclave
Singaporean Cardinal William Goh was among the 133 cardinals who participated in the conclave to elect the new pope. ST PHOTO: GIN TAY SINGAPORE – Amid the cheering in St Peter's Square and excitement from Catholics across the world on May 8 , the election of a new pope also brought about another element: surprise. The newly elected Pope Leo XIV – or Cardinal Robert Prevost as he was known then – became the first American pope in the 2,000-year history of the Church. Within the hallowed walls of the Sistine Chapel in Rome , where the election process known as the conclave took place, the surprise was not lost on Singaporean William Goh , who was one of the 133 cardinals who took part in the voting. 'He was not one of the well-known candidates for the papacy... and most of us did not know him except for those perhaps from Latin America or Rome,' said Cardinal Goh, referring to Pope Leo. But discussions about the pope's nationality do not matter, he said, as the pontiff's role is to be a symbol of unity and to serve the Church and everyone else. Cardinal Goh became the first Singaporean to vote for a new head of the Roman Catholic Church. Now back in Singapore, the 67-year-old archbishop described the experience as 'beautiful' during an interview with The Straits Times on June 4 . 'I went in without knowing exactly what I would be doing, and how this whole process would evolve,' he said. '(But) I went in with a great sense of responsibility that being one of the 133 electors, the person we chose to be next pope would have serious implications – not just for the Church, but for the world.' Although Pope Leo was elected in just two days, the preparation process that preceded the vote took nine days, when all 252 cardinals – both electors and non-electors – gathered to share with one another their views, concerns and challenges that each country faces. 'We come from all over the world; we have different views of what we think the new pope should do and can do, because we come from diverse circumstances,' said Cardinal Goh, adding that he felt this period was the most important part of the election process. 'But we are all agreeable that the pope must be one that can promote unity within the Church and peace among nations.' Informal interactions between the cardinals during breaks or at dinner allowed them to get to know one another better. 'We never had the chance to meet each other and to hear from one another, so it was a very beautiful moment, and for me, the most enriching part of the whole experience,' Cardinal Goh said. The 2025 conclave was a historic moment not just for Singapore, but also for Asia. There were 23 cardinals from the region present, reportedly the most in the history of the conclave, a process that dates back to the Middle Ages. 'In the past, most of the cardinals came from Europe. But the church has become too euro-centric, which is not the universal church today,' said Cardinal Goh, adding that Christianity has been growing in Asia and Africa. The religion has been declining in many parts of Europe, but there has been a revival of faith, especially within younger people in the region, he said. As such, the late Pope Francis' move to pick cardinals from across the world was important in helping the Church preserve its Catholicity, he added. The Argentinian pontiff, who died in April , was known for his humility and advocacy for the poor and marginalised. When deciding whom to vote for as the new pope, Cardinal Goh said he felt that the world today needed someone who would bring unity not just to the world, but also within the Church. 'But of course, unity doesn't mean uniformity,' he said, adding that unity also recognises diversity, which should be encouraged as long as it is consistent with scripture. 'It is in diversity that we really see the richness of the Church... the different cultures, liturgies, rites and ways of living out the pastoral mission in affluent countries, in poor countries, countries under oppression and discrimination.' Cardinal Goh posing for a picture near St Peter's Square at the Vatican on May 5, before the conclave began. PHOTO: REUTERS Unity should also involve clarity of doctrine, said Cardinal Goh, who cautioned against a form of inclusiveness that allows anyone to do whatever they want. 'The Church is not a clubhouse, where you can choose to swim, sing or play in the casino. The Church is where all of us are members of this body of Christ, (and) we believe in the gospel. We want to live out that teaching,' he said. 'Inclusivity means all are welcome... So long as you know that you are here not to change the gospel to suit your own preference, but that you will change your life to suit the gospel. That, for me, is inclusivity.' The conclave has long been the subject of much speculation and intrigue, due to the shroud of secrecy surrounding the voting process. But the death of Pope Francis also sparked strong interest in a different conclave – the Oscar-winning film starring Ralph Fiennes and Stanley Tucci. Viewership of the movie reportedly spiked 283 per cent after the pope's death. Parts of the movie, such as the tight security, strict ban on bringing in any digital devices and meetings between the cardinals before the conclave to share their views, are true, said Cardinal Goh, who watched it at The Projector with his staff. But other parts are over-exaggerated, he added. Cardinals do not try to manipulate the situation, lobby one group against another or have secret meetings at night. He said that once the conclave began, the cardinals were busy with masses and voting rounds, adding that their day would start at around 8am and end at 9pm. 'We are too tired to be able to hold all these other meetings at night.' As the world was introduced to Pope Leo on May 8, Cardinal Goh stood alongside his fellow cardinals on the balcony of St Peter's Basilica while thousands cheered from below. Witnessing this was very inspiring, he said, adding that the response was 'one of deep faith, unity, support and joy'. Newly elected Pope Leo XIV appearing on the balcony of St Peter's Basilica at the Vatican on May 8 to greet the thousands of faithful who had gathered. PHOTO: REUTERS In describing the new pontiff, Cardinal Goh said he found Pope Leo to be very prayerful and meditative. '(He) is someone who really wants to listen, learn and try to understand... He doesn't react suddenly and is a man who thinks through what he wants to say,' Cardinal Goh said. For non-Catholics who had followed the conclave, the cardinal said he hopes they can come to appreciate what the Church is doing for humanity, and that it welcomes everyone. 'We want to promote authentic life, respect for every human person, and respect for people of other religions and cultures,' he said. 'And we can work together in unity for the good of humanity.' Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
Hear Me Out: Has the swing against elitism gone too far?
An art installation at the Padang. Vocal naysayers recently accused the Government's SG Culture Pass initiative of being the very thing it counteracted: elitism. PHOTO: ST FILE Hear Me Out: Has the swing against elitism gone too far? SINGAPORE – At a time when most people understand that the personal is political, individual views have become a battleground of virtue – equality, good; hierarchy, bad. Elitism? The worst possible kind of social evil. Yet, take a step back from this instinctive repulsion and there might be benefits to muddying the waters. Elitism, the belief that an elite group, however defined, should be entitled to the reins of power has been the norm throughout much of history. Whether it is the clergy, kings with their divine right, the Confucian scholar or today's fintech bros, there have been groups in each time period that societies tend to value and reward. It was only with increasing democratisation, and a growing disenfranchisement at the chasm between the top and the rest, that elitism has become a byword for undeserved privilege and gross injustice. This brief trip back in time is not to rehabilitate elitism, but to show that the current period against it – or at least one that pays lip service to not believing in an elite class – may be an aberrant one. In the West, this has been taken to extremes, manifesting in a debilitating disregard fo r e xperts and fatal results during the Covid-19 pandemic against the advice of doctors to vaccinate. In Singapore, it is the elite schools that are targeted, in the idealistic slogan that every school is a good school. Though, for perplexing reasons, this scepticism has not yet been extended to the natural reverence the majority of Singaporeans harbour for lawyers and doctors. Their expertise is assumed to be universally applicable – a mentality that has narrowed parents and students' conception of what success looks like. In any case, the ills of elitism have been thoroughly aired, including the type of entitled, discompassionate divas that it ends up producing. The very consensus of who deserves to be elite has also fractured. I wonder, though, if this enmity has led to some unexpected side effects. This is a train of thought sparked by recent reactions to the Government's SG Culture Pass initiative set out during the Budget statement in 2025. Self-sabotage Under the scheme, $100 would be given t o Si ngaporeans aged 18 and above for the consumption of the local arts, redeemable from September. One would expect rejoicing, but there was uproar from a group of vocal naysayers. They accused the credits of being the very thing it counteracted: elitism. Why? Because the money could be better spent on support for groceries. This, I thought, was a case of anti-elitism as self-sabotage. Central to this worldview was that the arts is an elitist activity patronised only by the rich and the hyper-educated aesthete, when one type of activity for the elite and one for the others is exactly the sort of segregation and self-limiting mentality that perpetuates divides. There was no sense that this $100 in credits was a way of making the perceived barrier more permeable. To put it in context, the Government also announced $800 in CDC vouchers. This was bread for all, and roses too. Yet another potentially problematic by-product is that the word 'elite' has since been tainted by association. No one dares lay claim to the word 'elite', or acknowledge that someone else may be elite in his or her field. The rare exemption is perhaps in sports, where athletes accept the cut-throat nature of their competition, and where non-athletes are so tangibly outside their league that there is no point in pretending otherwise. This is not in itself a problem – elite is after all just a word – though I find no easy replacement term that can immediately convey excellence to the same degree. But it incidentally comes at a time when there is a general reluctance to impose any kind of objective standard, supplemented by that compassionate but useless invention: the consolation prize. This applies to things: Is no one taste now better than another? As well as people, where so many takes on social media are considered equally valid, measured just by virality. It is the kind of ChatGPT mentality where how often something is repeated or the number of clicks on a website can influence results, with no regard to its truth value. The war against elitism may have come at the expense of standards and good sense. Reclaiming elite This impulse to drag discourse to the same level – usually downwards – has the right intentions, timely given that, for so long, highly selective elitist standards have been imposed as objective metrics. To right the ship so discourse is levelled upwards though, perhaps elite can be thought of as separate from elitism, rehabilitated without the corresponding concentration of resources and power. This should be expanded so that who is elite becomes not just about education but also because of other qualities – role models people can aspire to in different contexts. What constitutes an elite has always been reliant on man-made barometers, negotiated by the community. There should be no shame in aspiring to be elite. Anti-elitism should not mean an absence of the elite, but that all who put their heart and minds to it should have a fair shot at claiming its pedigree, or getting closer to it. It is a lifelong dusting off of mediocrity, and it begins with first recognising what is good. Hear Me Out is a new series where young journalists (over)share on topics ranging from navigating friendships to self-loathing, and the occasional intrusive thought. Check out the Headstart chatbot for answers to your questions on careers and work trends.
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
S'pore embassy in Washington seeking US clarification on Harvard's visa ban
SINGAPORE - Singapore's embassy in Washington has been seeking clarification from the US State Department and Department of Homeland Security on President Donald Trump's directive prohibiting foreigners from entering the country to study at Harvard University. The embassy is hoping for clarity from US authorities in the next few days, including on whether there will be any delay in the processing of visas for Singaporeans hoping to study in the US, Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan said on June 7. In a zoom call with Singapore media to wrap up his five-day visit to Washington, he noted that many current and prospective students looking to study in the United States had expressed their concern to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs over potential visa delays. Asked to elaborate on contingencies being planned should Singaporean students find themselves unable to proceeds with their plans to study in the US, he said the Government is trying to find solutions to deal with the worst case scenario where students are not able to physically study in Boston. 'We've got some ideas for how we can help them to, in a sense, deal with that eventuality without impairing their academic and professional progress,' said Dr Balakrishnan. 'For others who are not yet here, who have not yet secured visas, you may also need to have backup plans, but my main point is we will stay in touch, and we will continue to keep you informed.' Dr Balakrishnan noted that Singapore's ambassador to the US Lui Tuck Yew has also held a virtual town hall with students currently studying in Harvard. In the virtual town hall on May 30, Mr Lui told Singaporean students at Harvard that the Republic's autonomous universities can offer them placements if they wish to discontinue their studies in the US and return home. A Ministry of Education spokesperson said this message was shared with affected students so they could consider returning to Singapore as a possible option to continue their studies. There are six autonomous universities here: National University of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Management University, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore University of Technology and Design and Singapore Institute of Technology. University statistics show that there are currently 151 Singaporean students in Harvard. Among them are 12 Public Service Commission scholarship holders. Foreign students at Harvard were thrown into limbo after Mr Trump's administration announced on May 22 that it had revoked Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Programme certification with immediate effect. The nearly 6,800 international students in the Ivy League college were given an ultimatum to either transfer to another institution, or face deportation. A federal judge later blocked the move, with the Trump administration rolling back its stance on May 29 and giving Harvard 30 days to submit evidence contesting the administration's plan to revoke the school's right to enrol international students. International students make up more than a quarter of Harvard's student body, but Mr Trump said the university should cap its international intake at 15 per cent. Dr Balakrishnan said the situation confronting international students stems from domestic political issues within the US. But students, including from Singapore, can become affected as collateral damage, and there will be a period of uncertainty of at least a few days or weeks. 'Nevertheless, we will continue to pursue this with the American authorities, and I hope we'll be able to find suitable solutions for our students who want to pursue educational opportunities in the United States.' At a macro level, it remains in both Singapore and the US' interests to keep opportunities open for Singaporeans who want to study and work in the US to expand their domain experience and their networks, he added. 'So this is an issue that we will continue to pursue with the State Department.' Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
