Ex-surgeon jailed over sex attacks on 299 victims in France's largest-ever child abuse trial
A former surgeon has been sentenced to a maximum of 20 years in prison after being found guilty of raping or sexually abusing 299 victims – most of whom were his child patients – in France 's largest-ever child abuse trial.
Joel Le Scouarnec, 74, was accused of a pattern of violence spanning more than three decades, between 1989 and 2014, committed against 158 boys and 141 girls. The survivors were aged 11 on average and alone in their hospital rooms when he attacked them, with some unconscious at the time and so having no memory of the assaults.
The 74-year-old's four-month trial began in February, and he admitted to all charges the following month. He previously told the court in Vannes: "I committed odious acts. They were only children... I am aware that these injuries are irreparable. I cannot go back in time, but I owe it to all of these people and their loved ones to take responsibility for my actions."
Prosecutors sought a 20-year term as it is the maximum sentence for aggravated rape and under French law, sentences cannot be added together.
However state prosecutor, Stephane Kellenberger had also made the rare request for a post-sentence preventative detention order, saying there was 'no way to verify' Le Scouarnec's claim he no longer felt any sexual attraction to children.
He is already serving a 15-year sentence after being found guilty in 2020 of rape and sexual assault of four children, including two of his nieces.
Kellenberger said Le Scouarnec may face an additional trial in the future, after new allegations were raised in this trial including abuse involving his granddaughter.
Not all victims were initially aware they had been abused. Some were contacted by investigators after their names appeared in journals kept by Le Scouarnec, in which he meticulously documented his crimes.
One man, now in his 30s, told Le Scouarnec's trial he was assaulted during a consultation in 1995 when he was a young boy. "I remember certain things in the recovery room. I was in total panic. I called my dad," he told the court.
Despite the scope of the allegations, Le Scouarnec has remained calm and composed throughout the trial.
"I didn't see them as people," he told the court. "They were the destination of my fantasies. As the trial went on, I began to see them as individuals, with emotions, anger, suffering and distress."
Le Scouarnec's trial comes as activists are pushing to tackle taboos that have long surrounded sexual abuse in France.
The most prominent case was that of Gisèle Pelicot, who was drugged and raped by her now ex-husband and dozens of other men. The defendants were all convicted and sentenced in December to three to 20 years in prison, following a horrific three-month trial in Avignon.
Campaigners for the rights of women and children protested outside the courthouse before Le Scouarnec's trial. Their placards read: "Impunity is over," "We believe you" and "Silence Violence".
Ms Pelicot's lawyer Stéphane Babonneau told The Independent he believes the courageous example of his client, who has become a symbol in the struggle against sexual violence, inspired Le Scouarnec's victims after she waived her anonymity in her case. Spokespeople for the appeals court in Rennes overseeing the case confirmed that some of the civil parties had expressed the wish to testify publicly.
The Le Scouarnec case began in 2017 when a six-year-old neighbour said the doctor had touched her over the fence separating their properties.
A search of his home uncovered more than 300,000 photos, 650 paedophilic, zoophilic and scatological video files, as well as notebooks where he described himself as a paedophile and detailed his actions, according to investigation documents.
He has also admitted to child abuse dating to 1985-1986, but some cases could not be prosecuted because the statute of limitations had expired.
Le Scouarnec had been convicted in 2005 for possessing and importing child sexual abuse material and sentenced to four months of suspended prison time.
Despite that conviction, he was appointed as a hospital practitioner the following year.
Some child protection groups had joined the proceedings as civil parties, saying they hoped to toughen the legal framework to prevent such abuse.
More about
France child abuse trial court
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Trial of man accused over Leigh baby's crash death postponed
The trial of a man accused of killing a baby girl during a crash in a car park has been postponed until next Naghi, 34, faces two charges of causing the death of six-month-old Sophia Kelemen by dangerous driving and causing death by careless driving while unfit through Sophia, from Leigh, near Wigan, died after being hit in a car park in Tenby, Wales on 2 January Catherine Richards, sitting at Swansea Crown Court, said delaying the trail was "regretful" but argued it was necessary to allow for more expert evidence to be who previously lived in Wigan, was released on bail. Naghi, now of Rondini Avenue, Luton, spoke through an interpreter to confirm his name and enter a plea during a brief hearing on judge agreed an application to adjourn the trial until 5 January, Crowther KC appeared for the prosecution while John Hipkin KC represented the the incident, Sophia was airlifted to the University Hospital of Wales and underwent emergency inquest opening at Pembrokeshire Coroner's Court in January heard Sophia died of an "intracranial haemorrhage" caused by a road traffic collision. Sophia's father Alex Keleman, 27, has said his family had been left "devastated" by her death and described his experience as being like "a horror movie".The family had taken some final holiday photographs and had packed their bags and were preparing to head home when the incident happened. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Manchester on Sounds and follow BBC Manchester on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
Former Buxton school pupil speaks about alleged abuse
Leon was a teenager when he was sent to a children's home now at the centre of allegations of physical, sexual and mental 44, he is one of more than 40 survivors suing councils for damages in a civil County Council, which licensed The Small School at Red House in Buxton, near Aylsham, has received several "letters of action", a formality required before court action can be local authorities are facing legal action for placing children at the told the BBC how abuse was normalised, claiming it led him to commit an act of violence that put him in is his story in his own words. At the time, I was a problem child for my local authority and I was under the impression I was going there [to Red House] because it could offer me an education; it could offer me everything I couldn't be offered where I was it didn't turn out like that, for me and many others.I was a child and I was being physically hurt by an adult and they didn't care about us. We would be pinned on the floor. We would be punched. We would be scratched. We would have our legs tied behind our we were on the floor, you'd have a knee in your side, you'd have a teacher's elbow across your neck and then other kids wanted to jump on you just to be involved because they were teachers' the kids that were helping the teachers were being rewarded, even if it was just an extra £5 pocket money or extra free cigarettes... they were all happy to get I got away with it quite lightly because I was quite a big lad. I had friends in the school, but those friends would soon turn on you if there was an extra five cigarettes a day and the teachers said 'Go and sort them out.' We used to have a telephone booth which had a little counter on it so we were able to ring our parents or social services, but [the calls] were all mum came to the school and I said 'Please take me home with you' and she wouldn't. Everybody thought we were lying - this place was all hunky dory. Well, it wasn't. We were being abused, and very physically abused as so many people - not myself, I'm a strong lad and I carry on - that I'm in contact with that have got a bad life. They don't know any other way of life... They can't leave the Red House is one of the reasons why we have to have closure... because people just can't move on. They're stuck in the past and that's not fair on them.I want someone held accountable for why some of us are the way we are. I've had a really bad life myself, but this stems from the school. It took me a long time to realise wrong isn't right and right isn't wrong.I've done some bad things in my life that I'm not proud of, but when you're being brought up to be that, that's ok. You can be rewarded for that and you don't know any school was shut down in 1998. I was placed back into a children's home in Oxford and by the time I was 16 I discharged myself from care... and I was out to cause misery to every single person that crossed my path, because that's the life I'd been brought up in.I have been abusive to people. I have been arrested for things I'm not proud of being arrested for.I've tried to make amends as the years have gone on but that was the sort of life we were being brought up in.I didn't have an adult figure in my life as a child to show me what was right and wrong. I've been through the justice system up until I was 27. I did my last prison sentence in 2007, and from then I've just tried to keep my head down and hold down a job and just be a normal I not been there [at the Red House], I may have been a different person. My past has come back to bite me on the backside too many times and I don't want to live that life any more.I want to be a normal bloke where people like me and [do] not associate me with being the bad person that I was.I still see my mum... She says when she used to come to see me that the teachers used to say we were off doing this or that, so they couldn't see my mum now believes something happened. She's apologised immensely, knowing she couldn't do anything about it because I was under the care of social taken a lot for her to understand it [and] it helped when I got my social services reports; that she got to see some of the things that happened in the now we are being believed, it's a bit of a relief. 'The allegations are deeply concerning' A Norfolk County Council inspection report, seen by the BBC, said the school was registered as a children's home in August report, based on an inspection carried out in April 1994, said that since June 1992 there had been 16 reported incidents of suspected abuse of children comprised seven incidents of suspected sexual abuse and nine of suspected physical abuse or inappropriate restraint, involving 20 children in a statement, the council said it did not place any of the claimants in the case at Red it had received 14 "letters before action", it said: "The allegations made by former pupils of the independent Small School at Red House are deeply concerning and we have co-operated fully with investigations, which relate to children that were placed there by other local authorities more than 30 years ago."Our thoughts are with all survivors of abuse but as there is an ongoing legal claim we cannot comment further."Red House was operated by Tvind, a controversial Danish-based group founded in the 1960s that has been embroiled in financial scandals since the a company of the same name that provides teacher training told the BBC it was unrelated to the business that ran Red House."We are unable to provide comment as we have no status in relation to the former Tvind School Co-operation, and we are not aware of any legal action," it said. Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Abramovich billions may never reach Ukraine – and ‘Government knew it' from day one
The row centres on the interpretation of a 'deed of undertaking' between the Government and Abramovich in which he agreed for the money to be committed to charity 'for the purposes of helping victims of the war in Ukraine'. When putting Chelsea up for sale, Abramovich publicly stated that he wanted the proceeds to be used 'for the benefit of all victims of the war in Ukraine' – including those from his native Russia, something successive governments have refused to countenance. An official involved in the negotiations in 2022, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Telegraph Sport: 'Day one, we were concerned. We went eyes open with the fact that this was a possibility. But there genuinely wasn't an alternative.' The official said the danger of Abramovich blocking the release of the Ukraine fund had taken a back seat to fears he 'would let Chelsea go to the wall' if a deal was not struck to sell the club before the end of that season, or that he would try to 'legally get the money back himself' if sanctions against him were lifted. 'The decision was to put it in a place where we knew he couldn't get at it, and then there was a principle that this charity would be formed and that it would spend the money wisely,' the official added. 'That it's dragged on to this point is just as much a testament to the fact that the Government hasn't invested financial pressure, resources or political capital in dealing with what was, from day one, very clearly going to be a problem.' Three-year delay 'incomprehensible' Indeed, Reeves and Lammy have taken until this week to threaten legal action, something Telegraph Sport has been told the previous Conservative government had ruled out. That is despite a report by a House of Lords committee in January last year finding it 'incomprehensible' the issue had not been resolved and urging ministers 'to use all available legal levers to solve this impasse rapidly, so that Ukraine can receive much-needed, promised, and long overdue relief'. The report was published by the European Affairs Committee, chaired by cross-bench peer Lord Ricketts, a former permanent secretary to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, British ambassador to France and national security adviser. He told Telegraph Sport it had taken too long for the Government to act upon the report's recommendations and acknowledged an acrimonious legal battle could delay things much further when it comes to accessing a fund likely to have accrued more than a hundred million pounds in interest. 'It's getting ridiculous that this delay should be dragging on and on,' Ricketts said. 'I'm not a lawyer and I can't explain exactly what the Government are going to do, but I think it's now really urgent to get this sorted. And I think 'incomprehensible' is still a pretty good word to describe why, three years later, we're still waiting for the money to go to the people who really need it in Ukraine.' Concerns over the delay had been raised even earlier, including by Mike Penrose, the former chief executive of Unicef UK, heading the independent foundation set up to administer the fund. He was joined two years ago by Oxfam, Save the Children, Kyiv-based charities and UK families hosting Ukrainian refugees in calling for then prime minister Rishi Sunak to urgently break the deadlock. That was after the European Union, like the Government, ruled the money could only be spent within Ukraine's borders, an edict the charities urged Sunak to ignore. Labour peer Lord Foulkes also wrote to then chancellor Jeremy Hunt in September 2023 over the 'unacceptable delay' in releasing the funds, adding in his letter: 'The only barrier, as far as I can tell, seems to be bureaucracy, and it strikes me as ridiculous that we should let a matter of paperwork confound these efforts, when our Ukrainian allies overcome incredible adversity on a daily basis.' Foulkes told Telegraph Sport: 'The trouble is we've been playing by the rules that the Russians never acknowledge, never play by, and we have been trying to get some agreement on it. 'That was always likely to fail – and certainly take a long time. I'm glad that, at last, they're now taking action and I think it's the right thing to do, and they should press ahead with it as quickly and as forcibly as possible.' Seizing of Russian assets 'politically explosive' Telegraph Sport has been told the previous government ruled out legal action after concluding there were too many downsides, including the risk investors could shun the UK. Various sources with knowledge of negotiations with lawyers for Abramovich have branded the ongoing row as a 'nightmare issue', describing the seizing of Russian assets as 'politically explosive'. Explaining the difference between freezing and seizing assets, a source said: 'Seizing assets is a whole new ball game. There's a sizeable chunk that is frozen in Britain that are Russian-state assets. There are huge numbers of countries and lots and lots of lawyers who would explain to you that if you even try taking it and just seizing it and say that money is now ours, you are facing intense pressure.' The source said that could include 'lobbying' from other countries which invest in the UK who might say: 'OK then, we're pulling out billions of billions from your economy now.' Bart De Wever, the Belgian prime minister, also warned in March that confiscating almost €200 billion (£168 billion) of frozen Russian assets would be 'an act of war' and would carry 'systemic risks to the entire financial world system'. Telegraph Sport has also been told the last government was split on whether to compromise on Abramovich's demands, with Andrew Mitchell said by one source to have discussed ways ministers could 'cut a deal' with the oligarch when he was at the Foreign Office. Explaining the power Abramovich currently held over the frozen Chelsea sale fund, a source said: 'He can't access the money. He can't spend the money, but he can stop the trust spending it and, at the moment, he's always hidden behind, 'No, the terms that I agreed to the sale are not quite the same as the terms that the British Government are now insisting on'.' Telegraph Sport has approached a representative for Abramovich for comment on the Government's legal threat against him. A book entitled Sanctioned is being released next week in which he is expected to be quoted about the sale of Chelsea and the sanctions imposed on him.
