logo
Herbert P. Wilkins, former chief justice of the state Supreme Judicial Court, dies at 95

Herbert P. Wilkins, former chief justice of the state Supreme Judicial Court, dies at 95

Boston Globe2 days ago

'If you ask me who was the most significant chief justice certainly Herbert Wilkins would be a standout,' she said. 'I say that not only in the Commonwealth, but nationwide. He was an extraordinary man.'
Justice Wilkins, who also was committed to public service on community boards and with influential legal organizations before and after his years on the bench, was 95 when he died Tuesday at home in Concord.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
In rulings and in private conversations, Justice Wilkins was known for his brevity and clarity. His humor was also often present, even on the bench.
Advertisement
A 'Wilkins ruling' had certain hallmarks, said
'It's brief, it's concise, it says what it means to say,' she said of his opinions, which he wrote from draft to finish. His clerks submitted memoranda for him to review.
'He was not a man of many words, but each word counted,' she said, 'and he also was very funny and had a dry wit.'
Advertisement
In 1996, when Justice Wilkins was scheduled to be sworn in as chief justice in the governor's office, he noted in an interview that it was the same place where he had taken the oath as an associate justice in 1972. It also was the same place where his father, Raymond S. Wilkins, was sworn in as an SJC associate justice and later as chief justice.
'So it's going to be a four-fer,' Justice Wilkins told The Boston Globe.
Then he joked that he had picked
Though nominated to be an SJC associate justice by
'In my view, our state Constitution tells us today that the state may not engage in the senseless killing of a murderer, even though he is by definition a person who has committed a senseless killing himself,'
His more nationally lasting impact involved helping place the SJC at the cutting edge from the mid-1970s onward in issuing state Constitution rulings that more forcefully protected individual rights during an era when the US Supreme Court generally was not doing so.
'I rather regard it as an anchor to the windward to protect people's rights that we should all be in favor of,' Justice Wilkins said in a 1986 interview.
Advertisement
Justice Wilkins 'understood that state constitutions were terribly important,' Marshall said, and by doing so was 'was among the most highly regarded jurists among state jurists.'
From the outset as chief justice, he worked amiably with the state Legislature. That close work with lawmakers helped spur appropriations to build and rehabilitate courts across the state, Marshall said.
'That was a singular achievement that nobody else had been able to do,' she said.
Marshall added that Justice Wilkins also tried to ensure that legal assistance would be made more available to state residents who couldn't afford a lawyer when they found themselves caught up in complex court matters.
The current Supreme Judicial Court justices
'As a jurist, he was known for his incisive rulings and meticulous attention to detail,' the statement said. 'His respectful and polite demeanor on and off the bench earned him the respect and admiration of all who worked with him. The people of the Commonwealth are fortunate that a person of his intellect, dignity, and commitment to justice was willing to devote his talents in their service.'
The youngest of three siblings, Herbert Putnam Wilkins was born on Jan. 10, 1930, and grew up in Winchester.
His mother, Mary Louisa Aldrich Wilkins, died in 1954, the year Justice Wilkins graduated from Harvard Law School.
His father,
Advertisement
Before joining the SJC in 1972, the year after Raymond died, Justice Wilkins followed in his father's footsteps as a Harvard College and Harvard Law graduate.
A decades-long resident of Concord, he was town counsel for Concord and Acton and chaired Concord's Board of Selectmen before becoming a judge.
A Phillips Exeter Academy graduate, he formerly served on his alma mater's board of trustees and as president of the Harvard University Board of Overseers. Justice Wilkins also was a member of the council of the American Law Institute and a fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers. He also had been the
'He took his obligations seriously,' said
Justice Wilkins joined the Palmer & Dodge law firm after law school and was a partner from 1960 until becoming a judge.
In 1952, he married Angela Middleton, an internationally recognized expert in addressing learning disabilities and teaching those with dyslexia to read.
When he met with reporters in July 1996, after Weld nominated him to lead the SJC, Justice Wilkins spoke with pride about Angela's work and said he believed he would be the first chief justice whose wife worked full time.
With his four children, Justice Wilkins 'tried to instill a sense of social responsibility to do right by others, an obligation that we're all in this together,' said his son
Advertisement
Douglas's siblings are Stephen of Gloucester, an educator;
In addition to his wife and children, Justice Wilkins leaves eight grandchildren and 10 great-grandchildren.
A celebration of his life will be announced.
Justice Wilkins 'was a very, very kind man and I think he hired kind clerks,' said Dolberg, who added that the judge and his wife invited former clerks to gather for lunch each year around his birthday.
One by one, all stood each year to discuss and update their careers, becoming an extended family through the annual gatherings, inspired by his life and work.
'We were so full of gratitude,' Dolberg said. 'We really felt he had been an amazing mentor and that he had helped guide us in our careers.'
Bryan Marquard can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Virginia Beach Police Chief to discuss Oceanfront safety ahead of summer
Virginia Beach Police Chief to discuss Oceanfront safety ahead of summer

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Virginia Beach Police Chief to discuss Oceanfront safety ahead of summer

VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. (WAVY) — Virginia Beach Police Chief Paul Neudigate is expected to discuss Oceanfront safety and enforcement Tuesday afternoon ahead of the busier summer months. As more people head towards the beach while the weather heats up, Virginia Beach officials want to make sure everyone stays safe. Following several gun-related incidents over the spring at the Oceanfront, Neudigate is set to discuss some of the challenges his department is facing. Virginia Beach to address challenges of maintaining Oceanfront safety According to police, between April 25-27, over 50 were arrested and nearly 30 guns were confiscated at the Oceanfront. VBPD: 2 separate firearm-related incidents on Atlantic Ave. on Saturday The discussion comes after City Manager Patrick Duhaney said during a city council meeting that Neudigate will look into legislative changes that could implement new crime-fighting strategies. Currently, under the Dillon Rule, however, local governments are only able to do what the Commonwealth has given them permission to do. In May, Duhaney stated that some crimes that were once considered primary offenses were moved to second-tier offenses. '[The chief] is going to point out some things that happened through some General Assembly sessions where the pendulum swung one way, and it may be time that there's appropriate discussion about possibly the pendulum swinging legislatively another way,' Duhaney said. 'You know, some things that used to be primary offenses or moved to second-tier offenses, it may make sense to bring back some of those … back to being primary offenses. They give the police officers some opportunities to be more proactive on addressing some issues.' Neudigate is expected to speak with city councilmembers starting at 2:30 p.m. Continue to check for updates. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Trump vows ‘large scale fines' after transgender athlete wins California track and field events
Trump vows ‘large scale fines' after transgender athlete wins California track and field events

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump vows ‘large scale fines' after transgender athlete wins California track and field events

President Trump vowed to impose hefty fines on California after a transgender athlete won two high school track and field championships, stirring up national controversy. Trump called out California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) over the situation, saying he knows the administration could enforce penalties for allowing Jurupa Valley junior AB Hernandez to compete. 'A Biological Male competed in California Girls State Finals, WINNING BIG, despite the fact that they were warned by me not to do so. As Governor Gavin Newscum fully understands, large scale fines will be imposed!!!' Trump wrote on Truth Social. The Justice Department threatened to take legal action against California public schools Monday, arguing the state's bylaw that allowed the transgender athlete to compete violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution and discriminated against athletes on the basis of sex, The New York Times reported. After Hernandez's success earlier in the postseason drew national attention, California's high school sports governing body implemented a rule change for the state championship that allowed additional girls to compete and medal in Hernandez's events. She went on to win the triple jump and high jump and placed second in the long jump at this weekend's state championships. Trump signed an executive order in February that banned transgender athletes from competing in girls and women's sports after promising to do so on the campaign trail. The order directs his administration to halt funding for schools that refuse to ban transgender athletes but some states have not compiled, including Maine. Maine Gov. Janet Mills (D) has said the president's order violates the state's antidiscrimination law and Trump has argued the state is violating Title IX, the federal civil rights law against sex discrimination, by allowing trans girls to compete. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Congress should grow a backbone and reclaim tariff authority
Congress should grow a backbone and reclaim tariff authority

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Congress should grow a backbone and reclaim tariff authority

For decades Congress has been gradually ceding its constitutional authority to the executive branch of government. And the executive branch has stretched that authority far beyond anything Congress or the Constitution intended. As the branch of government charged with levying taxes, including tariffs, it's time for Congress to reclaim that constitutional authority. Article I, Section 8, of the U.S. Constitution says,'The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States …' It's Congress's job to impose and collect taxes and duties, which include tariffs. It's not about whether tariffs are good or bad economic policy. It's about who has the constitutional authority to impose them. Because of the challenges created by two world wars and the occasional need for a quick U.S. response to international developments, 'Congress enacted statutes authorizing the President to declare a state of emergency and make use of extraordinary delegated powers.' Over time, Congress became concerned that presidents were taking advantage of those 'extraordinary powers.' A bipartisan Senate report released in 1974, 'A Brief History of National Emergencies and Delegated Emergency Powers,' found 'at least 470 significant emergency statutes without time limitations delegating to the Executive extensive discretionary powers, ordinarily exercised by the Legislature, …' As a result, Congress passed the National Emergencies Act (1976), ending most 'emergencies' that gave the president the justification for imposing tariffs, and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (1977) or IEEPA to limit presidential overreach. According to an analysis on Congress's website, IEEPA affirmed that 'emergency authorities [are] employed only with respect to a specific set of circumstances which constitute a real emergency, and for no other purpose,' asserting that 'a state of emergency should not be a normal state of affairs.' In short, IEEPA was passed to keep a president from declaring an emergency to use tariffs as a basic tool for implementing economic and foreign policy. But that's exactly how President Trump is using them. A three-judge panel on the Court of International Trade recently called out Trump's abuse of IEEPA and ruled, 'The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariff Orders exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs,' thus striking down many of his tariffs. An Appeals Court has partially stayed the ruling to give the appellate judges time to consider the arguments. The case will likely go to the U.S. Supreme Court, where Trump's tariffs may have an uphill battle given the court's position on the 'major questions doctrine,' which says policies with significant economic impacts need clear congressional authority. No doubt that's what Republicans who are uneasy with Trump's tariff tantrums hope will happen — getting the country past the worst of the tariff turmoil without Republicans having to stand up to the president. But they may be disappointed. Trump has implied that if the court strikes down his tariff overreach, there are other ways to justify his tariffs. As the Wall Street Journal reports, 'U.S. officials are weighing their options should they need to find a new legal authority to impose the president's steep tariffs.' Remember how critical Republicans were of President Biden for searching for new legal authority when the Supremes ruled against his student loan forgiveness schemes? Would Republicans be just as critical if Trump does the same? Congress needs to reclaim its control over U.S. taxing authority, including tariffs. And the only way it can do that is either to amend IEEPA to strengthen presidential restrictions, pass a different law, or take stronger measures to challenge the president. Of course, the president would likely veto any bill. So, Congress would need the constitutionally required two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate to override the veto. That won't be easy. Every Democrat will vote for the bill, not to reclaim Congress's constitutional rights, but to embarrass the president. Democrats didn't speak out when President Barack Obama exceeded his authority in granting legal status to some 830,000 undocumented children brought to the U.S. by their parents. And even though Congress has the 'power of the purse,' Democrats largely remained silent when Biden tried to spend more than $400 billion on student loans. But it will take a lot of Republicans voting with Democrats to pass legislation over a presidential veto that limits Trump's tariff powers. There was a time when House and Senate leadership zealously protected the legislative branch's constitutional authority. House Speaker Sam Rayburn (D-Texas) and Senate Majority Leader Robert Byrd ( closely guarded Congress's constitutional prerogatives. Do Republicans have the courage to do the same? Merrill Matthews is a public policy and political analyst and the co-author of 'On the Edge: America Faces the Entitlements Cliff.' Follow him on X@MerrillMatthews.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store