Trump says Iran and Israel agree to total ceasefire
Trump says Iran and Israel agree to total ceasefire
Writing on social media, US President Donald Trump said the ceasefire would bring about an 'official end' to the 12-day conflict. File photo: AFP
US President Donald Trump has said that a "complete and total" ceasefire between Israel and Iran will go into force with a view to ending the conflict between the two nations.
"On the assumption that everything works as it should, which it will, I would like to congratulate both Countries, Israel and Iran, on having the Stamina, Courage, and Intelligence to end, what should be called, 'THE 12 DAY WAR'," Trump wrote on his Truth Social site.
Trump said the ceasefire would be phased in over a 24-hour period, starting at approximately 0400 GMT. (Agencies)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTHK
an hour ago
- RTHK
Trump says Middle East ceasefire is now in effect
Trump says Middle East ceasefire is now in effect Part of an apartment building in Beersheba, Israel, is left in ruins following a last-minute Iranian missile attack before the ceasefire is supposed to take effect. Photo: Reuters US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday a ceasefire between Israel and Iran was now in place and asked both countries not to violate it, only hours after Iran launched waves of missiles, which Israel's ambulance service said killed four people. "THE CEASEFIRE IS NOW IN EFFECT. PLEASE DO NOT VIOLATE IT!" Trump said in a Truth Social post. When Trump announced on Monday what he called a complete ceasefire to end a 12-day war, he appeared to suggest that Israel and Iran would have time to complete missions that were underway, at which point the ceasefire would begin in a staged process. Witnesses said they heard explosions near Tel Aviv and Beersheba in southern Israel before Trump's statement. Israel's military said six waves of missiles were launched by Iran and Israel's national ambulance service said four people were killed in Beersheba, the first reported deaths in Israel since Trump announced the ceasefire. Iran's semi-official SNN news agency reported on Tuesday that Tehran fired its last round of missiles before the ceasefire came into effect. A senior White House official said Trump had brokered a ceasefire deal in a call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel had agreed so long as Iran did not launch further attacks. "On the assumption that everything works as it should, which it will, I would like to congratulate both Countries, Israel and Iran, on having the Stamina, Courage, and Intelligence to end, what should be called, 'THE 12 DAY WAR'," Trump wrote on his Truth Social site. An Iranian official earlier confirmed that Tehran had agreed to a ceasefire, but the country's foreign minister said there would be no cessation of hostilities unless Israel stopped its attacks. Abbas Araqchi said early on Tuesday that if Israel stopped its "illegal aggression" against the Iranian people no later than 4 am Tehran time, or 8.30 am Hong Kong time, on Tuesday, Iran had no intention of continuing its response afterwards. "The final decision on the cessation of our military operations will be made later," Araqchi added in a post on X. Israel, joined by the United States on the weekend, has carried out attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities, after alleging Tehran was getting close to obtaining a nuclear weapon. Iran denies ever having a nuclear weapons program but Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has said that if it wanted to, world leaders "wouldn't be able to stop us". Israel, which is not a party to the international Non-Proliferation Treaty, is the only country in the Middle East believed to have nuclear weapons. Israel does not deny or confirm that. Qatar's Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani secured Tehran's agreement during a call with Iranian officials, an official briefed on the negotiations said on Tuesday. (Reuters)
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Iran-US conflict raises concerns for Philippines in South China Sea: ‘distracted America'
Advertisement Later on Tuesday, US President Donald Trump claimed that Israel and Iran have worked out a 'complete and total ceasefire'. But Iran's foreign minister said there would be no cessation of hostilities unless Israel stopped its attacks while Israel said hours after Trump's announcement that Iran had launched missiles towards it. Though the US remains rhetorically committed to the Indo-Pacific as its 'priority theatre', experts caution that it is not immune to strategic overstretch. Tankers at the Khor Fakkan Container Terminal on Monday. It is the only natural deep-sea port in the Middle East and one of the major container ports in the Sharjah Emirate, along the Strait of Hormuz, a waterway through which one-fifth of global oil output passes. Photo: AFP
Asia Times
2 hours ago
- Asia Times
A Strait of Hormuz blockade would barely hurt the US
The Strait of Hormuz has long stood as a symbol of global energy vulnerability. Stretching barely 39 kilometers at its narrowest point between Iran and Oman, it funnels nearly 20% of the world's oil supply and over one-third of liquefied natural gas. Any threat of its closure—whether rhetorical or real—inevitably triggers alarms across energy markets. Yet beneath the headlines and hyperbole lies a strategic paradox: closing the Strait of Hormuz would not deal a decisive economic blow to the United States. In fact, the economic and geopolitical recalibration underway since the US shale revolution suggests that Washington is less exposed than its adversaries and even some of its allies. Since the early 2010s, the United States has pursued a pathway toward energy self-reliance. The shale boom transformed the US from a net importer into one of the world's top oil producers. According to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), less than 10% of its crude imports now come from the Persian Gulf. Moreover, the US has fortified itself with a Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) capable of dampening supply shocks during times of geopolitical crisis. Though partially drawn down during the Ukraine and Gaza crises, the SPR remains a vital economic shield. This structural shift has dramatically reduced America's vulnerability to turmoil in the Gulf. In contrast to the 1970s oil shocks, when OPEC's embargo inflicted widespread inflation and recession, today's US economy is not tethered to the Strait of Hormuz. Energy independence has become a cornerstone of US strategic confidence, especially under the Trump administration's renewed emphasis on resource nationalism and transactional diplomacy. But the implications go deeper. For President Donald Trump and his circle of foreign policy strategists, any regional escalation in the Gulf—whether through Iranian retaliation or Israeli provocation—can be leveraged as a controlled escalation. When the US and Israel launched airstrikes on Iran's Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites in June 2025, the anticipation of Iranian closure of the strait was likely already priced in—not only by markets but by decision-makers. Ironically, such a disruption strengthens Washington's geopolitical hand. US naval dominance, particularly through the Fifth Fleet stationed in Bahrain, allows it to present itself once more as the guardian of maritime freedom. This plays well with allies such as Japan, South Korea and India, who depend heavily on Gulf energy. These countries, in turn, may deepen security alignments with Washington, reinforcing the hub-and-spokes model that underpins US regional primacy. In the meantime, American LNG producers could benefit. With Gulf LNG supplies constrained and threatened, US exports from terminals in Louisiana and Texas become more competitive, especially in European and East Asian markets. This is not just a security story—it is an economic windfall for key US constituencies in energy-rich states. Critically, one must distinguish between temporary inflationary pressures and systemic economic collapse. Yes, a Hormuz closure could push up global oil prices, and yes, US consumers may feel the pinch at the pump. But the broader US economy—now driven more by services, digital innovation and financial capital than by fossil fuel dependencies—can absorb these shocks. The US Federal Reserve, equipped with monetary tools and real-time data analytics, has repeatedly shown agility in stabilizing inflationary expectations. If economic pain is not evenly distributed, who then suffers most? The answer lies eastward. China, the world's largest energy importer, relies on Gulf oil to sustain its industrial output and urban development. Despite efforts to diversify sources—from Russia to Central Asia—Beijing remains structurally dependent on maritime routes that it does not militarily control. Iran's threats to blockade the Strait of Hormuz put China in a strategic bind: its top oil supplier (Iran) is also its potential liability and its maritime vulnerability remains unresolved. India, too, finds itself exposed. With over 80% of its oil imported, a significant portion of which passes through the Gulf, any prolonged disruption could spike inflation and slow economic growth. Japan and South Korea face similar risks. Lacking domestic energy resources and deeply reliant on maritime supply chains, both East Asian powers watch Gulf tensions with unease. Yet unlike the US, they lack either the military reach or economic fallback mechanisms to influence outcomes. Within Southeast Asia, the impact is nuanced but concerning. Association of Southeast Asian (ASEAN) economies, such as Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines, rely on Middle Eastern oil to varying degrees. Energy price volatility would exacerbate fiscal pressures, especially in economies already facing post-pandemic debt burdens. However, ASEAN has begun to recalibrate its strategic posture. Under the current ASEAN chairmanship of Malaysia and Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's leadership, the bloc has prioritized energy diversification and regional cooperation. Malaysia and Indonesia are expanding refining capacity and investing in LNG infrastructure. Thailand and Vietnam are integrating solar power into regional grids. Rather than being reactive, ASEAN's long-term recalibration reflects its quiet adaptability to global disruptions and refusal to be trapped in binary choices between great powers. This recalibration is not only economic—it is also diplomatic. ASEAN's recent engagement with both the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and China in trilateral forums reflects a conscious effort to de-escalate tensions through dialogue. The ASEAN-GCC-China Summit and Track 1.5 diplomacy provide a platform for coordinated responses that preserve economic stability without defaulting to militarization. Still, the US finds itself in an interesting contradiction. While it may not be economically crippled by the closure of Hormuz, its longer-term challenge lies in managing the unpredictability of its own military responses. The use of the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP)—designed originally for North Korean bunkers—in Iranian terrain poses strategic risks. The efficacy of such strikes remains uncertain, as the geological structures and subterranean complexity of Iranian nuclear sites are not easily neutralized. Moreover, Iran's calibrated retaliation, including its pre-notified missile strike on the Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, shows that Tehran seeks to balance deterrence with diplomatic signaling. This ambiguity is a calculated move not just toward Washington, but also toward Beijing and wider Asia. Iran does not want to be isolated, even while responding to aggression. In sum, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz is not the economic Achilles' heel of the United States that it once was. Thanks to energy independence, strategic reserves, diversified economic sectors and global alliances, Washington can absorb the shock. For others—especially in Asia—the costs are higher and the tools for mitigation fewer. Phar Kim Beng, PhD, is professor of ASEAN studies, International Islamic University Malaysia . Luthfy Hamzah is senior research fellow, Strategic Pan Indo Pacific Arena, Kuala Lumpur
