
Champions In The C-Suite: Reimagining Talent Strategy For ‘Wild Success'
In today's dynamic work environment, matching employee talent to business needs is a challenge for most organizations. Yet recruiters often miss a huge pool of high-potential candidates for one simple reason: They rely on a talent strategy that focuses on credentials at the exclusion of equally important success indicators — such as local knowledge and the ability and motivation to learn.
Stand Together
Casting a wider talent recruitment net can significantly boost business results. Three organizations that are engaged with the Corporate Coalition of Chicago — an alliance of companies working to address inequities in the Chicago region — are proof. Leaders at each had breakthroughs in their thinking about talent that delivered major business benefits:
Each had a different catalyst that inspired them to make the change, but they all drew the same conclusion: Thinking outside the box on hiring practices created profound, positive change in their organization. Here's how Accenture, Brown, and University of Chicago Medicine did it.
A 'wild success' is how Jim Coleman, former managing director of Accenture Chicago, described the company's learn-and-earn apprenticeship program, which launched in 2016. Tapping into and developing a new source of talent, Coleman said, 'gave us a more informed and diverse workforce.'
This was a mission-critical goal for the people-oriented management consulting company. Prior to expanding its recruitment parameters, Accenture Chicago had a hiring system that required most job candidates to have a four-year college degree. This meant motivated talent without the credential didn't have a way to get in the door.
Inspired by a talk from then-Mayor Rahm Emanuel about the need to make Chicago's community colleges more relevant — and reflecting on his own experience as a community college student when he was young — Coleman and his team crafted the Chicago Apprenticeship Network as well as Accenture's apprenticeship program. For the latter, Accenture recruiters identify promising local students and invite them to join a 12-month, on-the-job training program with salaries and benefits. Those who are judged to be a good fit at the end of the 12 months are offered full-time employment.
'The apprentices were … very dedicated, very hardworking — they brought a different perspective to our business,' Coleman said of the initial cohorts. Because they came from different backgrounds, they approached work from a nontraditional perspective. 'They were immediately additive to our culture — not only in the office, but in our client work as well.'
Coleman noted that Accenture Chicago's goal in launching the program was never about philanthropy or being just a 'nice thing to do.'
'I knew it had to be purposely built into our P&L,' he said. 'To really achieve scale and full potential, it needed to have a place in our DNA.'
Now, nearly a decade later, Accenture's apprenticeship program has proven to be good business for Accenture and transformative for the individuals involved.
Coleman acknowledged that it's 'a big change,' in that it offers a different way to think about recruiting, onboarding, mentoring, and day-to-day management of the people who now constitute a significant portion of Accenture's national entry-level roles.
While it can be challenging to alter the way things have always been done, according to Coleman it's well worth the journey.
For Brown's Super Stores, a supermarket chain in the Philadelphia area, hiring from the local community gave it unparalleled insight into its customers that no degree could have provided. CEO Jeff Brown's inspiration came when he was challenged to solve another problem — food deserts, which were impacting health outcomes in disadvantaged parts of Philadelphia.
Brown said these conversations revealed an important insight: Many customers had criminal records, creating barriers to employment and participation in the community. That realization reinforced the importance of removing those barriers and creating pathways for people to get a second chance and contribute.
He also learned a hard lesson. At a town hall, an employee called Brown out directly. Overlooking hardworking people just because they've interacted with the justice system, they said, is a 'bad business model.'
Brown knew that for a store to succeed, it has to meet the real needs of its community. In this case, that meant more than selling groceries — it was about creating a space where people could connect and feel a sense of belonging. That pushed him to ask a new question: What would it look like to build something that works for everyone?
'Investing in the community is good for business,' Brown said.
Despite some pushback from his team, Brown made the call to hire six individuals with criminal records at a store in Southwest Philadelphia — giving people who had been impacted by the justice system a shot at meaningful work.
'I said, 'We're going to judge the future based on how these six people do. We're going to give them a fair chance and we're not going to worry about what they did in the past.'' Over time, the success of those six people led Brown's to hire thousands like them.
Adopting a fair chance employment policy turned out to be a game changer (and inspired Brown to support the Chicago Coalition's efforts to promote these practices). 'While our competitors struggled during the pandemic and other times when the labor market was tight, we did not struggle at all,' Brown said. 'We could out-operate our competitors. Our policy led directly to better business performance.' Before implementing the new approach to talent recruitment, Brown said, the Southwest Philly store had annual revenue of $5 million. Afterward, he said, 'We ended up doing $35 million a year.'
Brown admitted that developing more flexible hiring practices took some imagination, but the results created a new mindset among managers. A lot of the applicants had not graduated high school, and some had been in the drug trade, but they understood business. 'They're not permanently broken people,' Brown said. 'So many of the problems that occur can be addressed through education and training.'
These hires also brought something new to the table: an elevated understanding of the business's social context. Brown recalled one supermarket that was having a problem with a local man with mental health issues. He would disrupt the store every day, late in the afternoon. The group replaced the store manager with a local hire and the problem evaporated.
How? With food. 'When I asked what had changed, the new manager said, 'Yes, he's got problems, he's homeless, he comes every day at 5 p.m. for dinner, we make him a bologna sandwich. He leaves.' A Harvard MBA wouldn't see it, but a person from the neighborhood could.'
Tom Jackiewicz, president of University of Chicago Medicine, which employs 13,000 people, adjusted his hiring practices after a chance conversation with an Uber driver in Las Vegas. She'd moved away from the South Side of Chicago, due in part to the fear of random violence in her neighborhood. 'Only innocent people get shot,' he recalled her saying.
Her story was a reminder that barriers like safety and limited opportunity can quietly hold people back. For business leaders like Jackiewicz, addressing those barriers is part of creating a future where more people can contribute and thrive.
Jackiewicz realized there was a huge untapped source of workers on his doorstep. If he could invest in them, it could rejuvenate the area and bring real benefits to the university's health system. The key to success was to look at what the community needed and build from there.
'It wasn't a case of 'here's what we're going to do,'' he said. 'We talked to community leaders to analyze the need and try to fill it, rather than just focusing on what we could bring.'
The results of this experiment are paying dividends:
'Our participation is going to be tremendous for the South Side community, but it's also going to be tremendous for the University of Chicago,' Jackiewicz said. 'It's a true win-win situation.'
Jackiewicz now understands firsthand the cost of untapped potential when people aren't given a chance. He sees this moment as a call to action: While business leaders can't fix everything, they can lead by removing barriers and creating opportunities. 'This is a time to be bold,' he said. 'We have a chance to change things for the better.'
The Stand Together community is proud to support the Corporate Coalition of Chicago.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
21 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Manhattan Renters Already Paying Record Prices Face More Hikes
Manhattan apartment rents reached yet another all-time high last month and are expected to keep rising as the market's most competitive season collides with the city's new broker-fee law. The median rent on new leases signed in May was $4,571, according to appraiser Miller Samuel Inc. and brokerage Douglas Elliman. It was the third record price reached in the past four months and exceeded the previous peak by $71.


Digital Trends
21 minutes ago
- Digital Trends
SpaceX Starlink rivalry grows as next Kuiper deployment nears
Amazon is about to send another batch of Project Kuiper internet satellites to orbit as it seeks to take on SpaceX's Starlink service to provide broadband internet to customers around the world. The tech giant has a long way to go before it has any hope of effectively challenging Starlink, but with its second launch set for next week, progress is being made toward its goal. Recommended Videos Project Kuiper is currently targeting Monday, June 16, for the launch of 27 internet satellites aboard a United Launch Alliance (ULA) Atlas V rocket from Cape Canaveral in Florida. The KA-02 mission comes seven weeks after the first Project Kuiper launch, which also deployed 27 internet satellites. Commenting after the inaugural launch, Rajeev Badyal, vice president of Project Kuiper, said: 'We've designed some of the most advanced communications satellites ever built, and every launch is an opportunity to add more capacity and coverage to our network.' SpaceX began deploying its Starlink internet satellites six years ago and now has more than 7,000 of them in low-Earth orbit, bringing broadband connectivity to more than 5 million customers globally. Project Kuiper says its initial constellation will be made up of more than 3,200 satellites, with more than 80 missions needed to reach that goal. To that end, Amazon has put together a busy launch schedule, with six additional satellite deployments planned for ULA's Atlas V rocket, at least 38 on ULA's Vulcan Centaur rocket, and dozens more with Arianespace and Blue Origin. SpaceX's workhorse Falcon 9 rocket may even help out. Amazon is targeting as early as the end of this year for the launch of a high-speed, low-latency satellite-powered internet service, with as few as 1,000 satellites needed for global coverage. Building out the constellation to the targeted 3,200 satellites will help to boost network performance and reliability for paying customers.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House Republicans draft competing budget as Senate nears deal with Hobbs
Photo by Jerod MacDonald-Evoy | Arizona Mirror Arizona lawmakers are at odds again, but this time it's the Republicans in the House of Representatives and Senate who can't agree on how to forge the state budget. Creating the state budget — deciding how much to allocate to departments, projects and initiatives or whether to fund them at all — is the most important job that legislators do each year, and the only thing they are constitutionally required to complete. Before the group of bills that will become the state budget becomes law, it must be approved by a majority in both the Arizona Senate and House — which are both controlled by Republicans — and garner a signature from Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs. In recent history, budget negotiations in Arizona have occurred behind closed doors among the governor and legislative leaders in the House and Senate. But this year is different, with Hobbs and Republican leaders in the Senate nearing a deal after weeks of negotiations. GOP leaders in the House, who haven't been involved in those talks, have responded by drafting their own budget, which was introduced late Wednesday afternoon. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX 'This is a sound, disciplined budget that delivers safe communities, strong families, and a government that lives within its means,' House Speaker Steve Montenegro said in a Wednesday evening statement. 'We're raising pay for our state law enforcement officers, reducing tuition at public universities, fully funding school choice, fixing critical infrastructure and roads, and protecting taxpayers. Our budget reins in government and puts it back to work for the people it serves.' But the spending package, which is chock-full of proposals that are unlikely to pass muster with Hobbs, will never become law. Instead, it is better viewed as a way for House Republicans to lay down a marker in order to force Hobbs and the Senate to move closer to the House's proposal. Republican political consultant Barrett Marson said House GOP leaders are hoping to demonstrate that the chamber can pass a spending plan in order to get leverage in the negotiations. 'Sometimes there's just gotta be movement to unstick a sticky situation,' he said. 'The House has an equal voice. And unlike previous years when one or both chambers had a go-it-alone ethos, the House isn't looking to be draconian or anything. They want something more responsible.' Marson said a major point of contention between the House and Senate is what to do with the budget surplus. While the Senate and Hobbs have settled on copying the novel process from 2023, in which each lawmaker was given a pot of money from the surplus that was used to fund whatever initiatives they wanted, the House wants to negotiate all of those details and not surrender control of that money to individual legislators. During a House Rules Committee meeting earlier Wednesday afternoon, House Minority Leader Oscar De Los Santos, of Laveen, said he was disappointed in the way the budgeting process was happening this year. 'We should not be moving forward with a House Republican-only budget that is destined to fail,' he said. 'This will not get signed by the governor. I don't even think it's going to pass out of the Senate.' De Los Santos even questioned whether the proposal would get enough votes to pass through the House, where Republicans hold 33 of the chamber's 60 seats. 'What we do know is that this is not a negotiated, bipartisan deal in good faith,' he said. 'House Democrats are at the table negotiating in a bipartisan way with the executive, with our (Senate) counterparts across the courtyard. That is the way to get things done in shared government.' But Republican Rep. Neal Carter, of San Tan Valley, replied that the work of governing should be done transparently, instead of in private — and that it should allow for input from the public. 'As a Republican, I stand for full transparency and not for back-room deals or negotiated budgets with parties that are somehow outside of this public process,' Carter said. The House Republican budget, introduced by House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Livingston, proposes significant changes in how federal money allocated to the state, but not restricted to specific uses, is controlled. The billions in unrestricted federal funds, currently controlled by the governor, would shift to legislative control and could only be spent on essential government services. The House GOP's budget proposal would also place new restrictions and monitoring requirements on entitlement programs, like the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System — the state's Medicaid program — and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly called food stamps. Both programs would be monitored on at least a quarterly basis for participants who don't qualify, to be kicked off. And any participants who win $3,000 or more through gambling or playing the state lottery and don't report those winnings would become ineligible. It would also give the Arizona Department of Economic Security the authority to screen recipients of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families for illegal drug use and would ban anyone who tests positive for drugs not prescribed to them from the cash assistance program for a year. House Republicans also intend to increase the percentage of money spent in K-12 classrooms, as opposed to on administration; to decrease tuition for students attending the state's three public universities; and to ban those universities from using public or private money to give scholarships to students without legal immigration status. Hobbs introduced her budget proposal, which includes a much different list of priorities, back in January. Shortly after that, Livingston and Rep. Matt Gress, R-Phoenix, panned her proposal for leaving out projected cost increases for programs like AHCCCS. Hobbs spokesman Christian Slater told the Arizona Mirror on Wednesday that Livingston and Gress were to blame for the House's lack of collaboration on the budget. 'This is DDD all over again,' Slater said via email, referring to a fight earlier this year over funding for the Department of Developmental Disabilities. 'It's another circus led by the Speaker, David Livingston, and Matt Gress where they have refused to participate with any caucuses, including their Republican counterparts in the Senate, in a meaningful manner and are once again just trying to score some political points even though they know their plan is going absolutely nowhere.' Livingston and Gress, a former budget director for Republican Gov. Doug Ducey, were both key players in the fight over an extra $122 million in emergency funding for DDD that put vital services for the developmentally disabled in jeopardy. 'Rather than being productive, the House Republican leadership continues to show they are in over their head and unserious about governing,' Slater said. The House Appropriations Committee is set to discuss the proposal Thursday morning. The Senate Republicans have not introduced their budget proposal. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE