Pressure mounts on a reluctant Trump to impose sanctions on Russia
Some Republicans in Congress and White House advisers are urging U.S. President Donald Trump to finally embrace new sanctions on Moscow as frustration mounts over Russian President Vladimir Putin's military assault on Ukraine.
Trump has held off on such penalties for months, believing he could have fruitful dealings with Putin to end the war while also considering sanctions, in general, to be overused and often ineffective.
White House officials say Trump still hopes to develop an economic partnership with Russia. He sees sanctions as an escalation in tensions with Moscow that could derail hopes of a ceasefire in the 3-year-old conflict.
But his frustration with Putin is genuine and increasingly severe, according to aides. They said he is giving sanctions serious consideration after Russia escalated its attacks in recent days.
"He is always looking at different ways to apply pressure," a senior White House official said. "This is no different. He's always weighing his options."
U.S. officials have prepared new economic sanctions against Russia, including banking and energy measures. They say that a sanctions package is ready to be implemented based on Trump's order.
One option supported by some Trump advisers would be for the president to embrace, or at least not obstruct, legislation introduced by Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham and Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal last month that would set a 500% tariff on goods imported from countries that buy Russian oil.
A heavily damaged convent in Donetsk, a Russian controlled region of Ukraine |
REUTERS
Some advisers believe the bill could be useful because it would allow consequential sanctions to go into effect while Trump could in essence tell Putin the sanctions decision was out of his hands, according to one U.S. official with direct knowledge of the matter. That, in turn, could help Trump maintain a viable line of communication with Putin.
That U.S. official and another person familiar with internal deliberations said the Trump White House believes secondary sanctions — that is to say sanctions on countries that do business with Russia, not just Russia, itself — are needed for them to be effective.
Graham and fellow Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley, both close Trump allies, said this week that now is the time to increase pressure on Putin.
"I believe President Trump was sincere when he thought his friendship w Putin would end the war. Now that being the case, IT'S TIME FOR SANCTIONS STRONG ENUF SO PUTIN KNOWS 'game over,'" Grassley said in a social media post on Tuesday.
Trump entered office in January predicting he would be able to end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours. But in the months since, he has absorbed the grim reality that the conflict is more intractable than he originally believed and has blamed his predecessor, Joe Biden, for allowing it to happen.
Last week, Trump spoke with Putin for two hours and thought he had a deal to begin ceasefire negotiations immediately. Then, Russia launched a barrage of drone and missile attacks on Ukraine, prompting Trump to say Putin had "gone absolutely CRAZY" and that he was "playing with fire" by refusing to engage in ceasefire talks with Kyiv.
Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Wednesday, Trump explained why he felt imposing sanctions could antagonize Putin.
"If I think I'm close to getting a deal, I don't want to screw it up by doing that," he said.
Russian soldiers march in columns during a military parade in Red Square in central Moscow. |
REUTERS
Asked whether Putin wanted to end the war, Trump said, "I can't tell you that, but I'll let you know in about two weeks," noting he was waiting on Russia to submit its latest peace proposal.
"We're going to find out whether or not he's tapping us along or not, and if he is, we'll respond a little bit differently," Trump added.
Trump has threatened sanctions before, only to back off. He talked about the possibility of sanctions back in January and again before his most recent call with Putin.
Putin said last week that he had agreed to work with Ukraine on a memorandum that would establish the contours of a peace accord, including the timing of a ceasefire. Russia says it is currently drafting its version of the memorandum and cannot estimate how long that will take.
Republicans generally have followed Trump's lead on foreign policy in the months since he began his second term in office, making their pursuit of sanctions on their own noteworthy.
White House officials have held conversations with Senate Republicans about the contents of the sanctions bill, according to one of the U.S. officials.
Should the Senate bill move forward, there is a bipartisan companion bill in the House of Representatives, although support for Ukraine among House Republicans has been notably weaker than in the Senate.
The European Union, meanwhile, has been ramping up sanctions on Russia. An EU measure adopted last week hit over 130 entities and individuals, and listed 75 new sanctions entities including major oil firm Surgutneftegaz.
In meetings in recent days in Washington, U.S. officials have said they have no qualms with the new measures, according to one person with direct knowledge of the matter.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Yomiuri Shimbun
14 minutes ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
U.S. Tariffs Blocked: Can Judiciary Prevent The President from Abusing Power?
Whether the principle of checks and balances, which has been in place since the founding of the United States to prevent a president from abusing their power, still functions properly is being tested. The tariff policy of the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump has created a situation in which the future of U.S. democracy is in question. The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled that the Trump administration's 'reciprocal tariffs' imposed on countries and regions around the world and other measures are illegal and invalid and ordered a permanent injunction. The ruling said the Constitution in principle gives Congress the power to lay and collect taxes and other such matters. As to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which the administration cited as grounds for imposing Trump's tariffs, the court argued the law does not confer on the president such unbound authority. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which serves as the court of second instance, suspended the enforcement of the lower court ruling, and a thorough review of the appropriateness of the tariffs will be carried out. The case will likely be brought to the Supreme Court. Although the tariffs issue will likely see a lot of twists and turns, there is no doubt that this ruling has dealt a blow to the Trump administration's signature policy. The lawsuit was filed by small and medium-sized U.S. companies and 12 states, including New York and Arizona. This shows that dissatisfaction with the tariff policy is growing not only overseas but also within the United States. Shouldn't Trump face the criticism head-on and reconsider the tariff policy? In the United States, authority over tariffs and trade is primarily vested in Congress, while certain powers are delegated to the president through various laws. The IEEPA was enacted in 1977. In cases in which there is an 'unusual and extraordinary threat' to national security, foreign policy or the economy of the United States, the president can impose restrictions on imports and exports without prior examination after declaring a state of national emergency. Previously, the IEEPA has been mainly applied to economic sanctions against countries such as North Korea and Iran. The Trump administration was the first to impose tariffs under the law. The administration argues that the massive trade deficit poses a threat to national security. However, as the latest ruling shows, doubts about the validity of such an argument for the tariffs remain strong. Since its founding, the United States has thoroughly upheld the separation of powers among the judicial, legislative and executive branches as the foundation of democracy. This system in which the three powers keep each other in check has prevented the emergence of authoritarian rule and protected the freedom and rights of the people. However, with both the House of Representatives and the Senate being controlled by the Republican Party, which has become increasingly Trump's party, the checks and balances are not functioning as they should. Amid growing concerns over Trump abusing his power, the ruling demonstrates that the judiciary can serve as a check on that power to a certain degree. If the court ultimately rules that the reciprocal tariffs are illegal, they will lose their efficacy. This could also influence the negotiation strategies of other countries. The Japanese government must carefully analyze the details of the ruling and future developments. (From The Yomiuri Shimbun, May 31, 2025)


The Mainichi
29 minutes ago
- The Mainichi
Trump lauds Nippon Steel as 'great partner' for US Steel
WEST MIFFLIN, Pennsylvania (Kyodo) -- President Donald Trump on Friday heaped praise on Nippon Steel Corp. over what he views as a partnership deal with United States Steel Corp., offering backing to the Japanese company's $14 billion investment into the iconic but struggling American producer. During a speech at a U.S. Steel plant in Pennsylvania, Trump called Nippon Steel a "great partner" and said the two steelmakers will form a "tremendous relationship" without offering many details about the deal, which he has never described as being the buyout the Japanese company has desired. "Most importantly, U.S. Steel will continue to be controlled by the USA," said Trump, who was against Nippon Steel's $14.1 billion takeover bid of U.S. Steel during the 2024 election campaign. "Otherwise, I wouldn't have done the deal." After returning from Pennsylvania, Trump told reporters at Joint Base Andrews near Washington that he still has to approve "the final deal" between the two steelmakers. His remarks during a visit to the plant in West Mifflin for a rally with steelworkers came after he unexpectedly struck a positive note a week earlier on "a planned partnership" between U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel, welcoming the prospect of the at least 70,000 jobs it will create and $14 billion it will add to the U.S. economy. Trump also said he will raise tariffs on steel imports to 50 percent from the 25 percent that took effect in March along with the same rate charged on aluminum from most countries, citing national security. Trump later said on social media that the new tariff rate will go into effect on Wednesday. "Our steel and aluminum industries are coming back like never before," he said. Nippon Steel, the world's fourth-largest producer, has sought to make U.S. Steel a wholly owned subsidiary. The Tokyo-headquartered company has yet to provide details of the latest status of the deal. "A strong steel industry is not just a matter of dignity or prosperity and pride," Trump said. "It's above all, a matter of national security." Trump said Nippon Steel's investment is the largest of any kind in the history of Pennsylvania and that the $14 billion is unprecedented in the history of the steel industry in the United States. He said it is "an incredible deal" that will ensure all U.S. Steel workers keep their jobs and all the company's facilities in the country remain open and thriving. The attendees of the rally included U.S. Steel CEO David Burritt and Takahiro Mori, Nippon Steel's vice chairman, who played a central role in negotiating the takeover bid. In addition to praising Burritt, Trump extolled Mori's contribution to making the landmark investment happen, saying, "He's highly respected all over the world for what he's done with steel." Trump said U.S. Steel will maintain all its existing operating blast furnaces "at full capacity for a minimum of the next 10 years, and we have that as a commitment." Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel announced their merger plan in December 2023. However, then President Joe Biden in early January this year issued an order blocking the sale of U.S. Steel to the Japanese firm, citing national security grounds, following a recommendation by a panel of federal agencies. Trump, who took office for a second term in January, ordered the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to conduct another review of Nippon Steel's proposed acquisition. With the review now complete, although its outcome remains unknown, Trump has until Thursday to determine whether to approve Nippon Steel's set of proposals. During the 2024 presidential election cycle, Biden and Trump stated that U.S. Steel should remain in domestic hands, a view shared by the leadership of the powerful United Steelworkers union. Both U.S. Steel and the powerful union are based in Pennsylvania, which was a key battleground state in the Nov. 5 presidential election, and the planned acquisition became highly political, although the proposed buyout came from a leading company from Japan, a close U.S. ally. Founded in 1901, U.S. Steel was once a symbol of American economic prowess, but it has struggled to keep up with competition from Chinese and other foreign rivals. U.S. Steel and its shareholders were supportive of the takeover, which would make it more competitive globally and create the world's third-largest steelmaker by volume.

an hour ago
Trump Hails Nippon Steel as Great Partner of U.S. Steel
News from Japan Economy May 31, 2025 14:52 (JST) West Mifflin, Pennsylvania, May 30 (Jiji Press)--U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday welcomed a possible partnership between Japan's Nippon Steel Corp. and United States Steel Corp. at a political rally held near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. "We are going to have a great partner," Trump said in a speech at a U.S. Steel plant, referring to Nippon Steel's planned acquisition of the U.S. company. Nippon Steel offered to invest a total of 14 billion dollars in U.S. Steel, the president said, describing the move as "the largest investment in the history of American steel industry." The president stopped short of unveiling details, including the framework of the acquisition, but said after the speech that a final agreement had not been reached. Also in the speech, Trump said that he would double additional tariffs on imported steel to 50 pct. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.] Jiji Press