
National School Choice Movement Getting a Texas-Sized Boost
By the fall of 2026, the number of American K–12 students eligible for publicly funded school choice scholarships is expected to exceed 50 percent.
That's presuming Texas Gov. Greg Abbott soon signs into law a $1 billion bill that covers private school vouchers and other education-related expenses,
to the American Federation for Children, a nonprofit organization that promotes and tracks school choice growth.
It says Abbott's move would push the total number of children served by universal school choice laws into the national majority.
'This is over 20 years in the making,' Ryan Cantrell, the organization's president of government affairs, told The Epoch Times. 'Texas could provide a blueprint for a lot of places.'
The Texas bill, which passed both houses this month and would begin in the 2026–2027 academic year if signed into law by the governor, would provide at least $10,000 per selected child for an education savings account (ESA).
Children with special needs or from low-income households would be prioritized if demand is higher than funds available, according to the bill.
Related Stories
4/24/2025
4/17/2025
All 6 million K-12 students in that state would be eligible for consideration, and Abbott is expected to sign the bill soon.
Texas
The state would provide local schools up to $30,000 for a disabled student's individualized education plan, so under this school choice bill, the approved amount would follow the child to their desired school, public or private.
As an education savings plan in which qualifying recipients can set up a savings account for school expenses, similar to a health savings account, it would also provide money for school transportation, meals, and other services.
Universal school choice legislation had repeatedly failed in the Lone Star State, but the last election cycle brought in 14 new legislators who provided the votes to get it through.
Texas is on track to become the largest state with voucher or education savings account options, joining Florida and 22 other states plus the District of Columbia,
With Abbott's signature, universal school choice spending across the nation to include tax credit scholarships, vouchers, charter schools, home schooling and other associated services would increase from $3 billion in 2021 to $9 billion next year as the number of children served by these options during the same time increases from about 600,000 to more than 1.5 million, Cantrell said.
Growth of School Choice Options
School choice is a broad term. Many school districts across all states offer some alternative to schools assigned by neighborhood, whether it's the option to select a different school within a district, or a public charter or magnet school.
Universal school choice, by contrast, includes options for choosing a different public school district and taxpayer-funded private school vouchers.
Teachers and parents who oppose this measure say it removes state money from already underfunded public schools.
EdChoice, another national organization that advocates for and tracks school choice growth,
The organization notes that seven percent of students attend private schools that are paid for by their families, and only 2 percent of children between the ages of 5 and 18 are currently served by private school vouchers.
Most voucher programs require an admission test, do not disqualify applicants who are already attending private schools, and provide up to 100 percent of their respective state's per-pupil funding rate, which is usually less than $15,000 for students who aren't receiving special education services, according to the Education Commission of the States.
Katherine Munal Schulze, EdChoice policy and advocacy director, said universal school choice is expected to improve outcomes for all schools because it creates competition and provides opportunities for specialization.
'There's a new ownership level that occurs,' she told The Epoch Times. '[Whether] it's public or private, parents and teachers can say, 'My kids chose to be here.' Choice will restore more professional respect.'
Debating Merits and Local Impact
EdTrust, an organization that lobbies against school choice,
EdTrust said the program cost Arizona $738 million last year to cover tuition costs for families that otherwise would have paid average annual tuition amounts of at least $7,000 out of pocket, including many from wealthy public-school districts that aren't eligible for state aid.
'Overall, vouchers have funneled money to a select few, while ignoring the majority of Arizona's students and severely harming the state's financial future in the process,' EdTrust's report said.
Munal Schulze of rival organization EdChoice provided slides from the Arizona state legislature's budget committee, which noted that the state is operating with a $560 million budget surplus this year.
Voucher programs in Louisiana, Florida, Indiana, and Tennessee currently have waiting lists, she added.
A 2024 EdChoice
By contrast, the Parents' Campaign Research and Education Fund
Some said it might be too soon to gauge program success since private school vouchers at a statewide level emerged after the COVID-19 pandemic, although the concept of school choice has existed for decades.
States need data from standardized tests, student attendance and discipline records, college entrance exams, and college enrollment figures to evaluate the effectiveness of education savings account plans, the Rand Corporation think tank
'Politically, states may be hesitant to conduct evaluations of programs that are contentious, especially before those programs mature,' the report said.
Increased funding with growing universal school choice programs will also be hotly contested in the years to come.
Texas Democrats who opposed SB 2 noted that if demand for vouchers grows as expected, the program could increase from $1 billion to more than $7 billion within one year.
In response, proponents said that residents will always contribute to the local school tax base through state income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes, and, in some parts of the country, lottery revenues, regardless of whether their children attend private schools or whether they have children or not.
'There's a mischaracterization that all this money is flying away,' said Cantrell, of the American Federation for Children. 'In essence, it's not taking local funding away.'
Private Schools Anticipate Strong Interest
Laura Colangelo, executive director of the Texas Private Schools Association, said 941 accredited private schools in the Lone Star State would be eligible to participate in the bill's voucher program.
While private school applications require an admissions test and teacher recommendations, selection at most institutions is not considered highly competitive, and the process is more about making sure the school is a good fit for the interested student, Colangelo said.
She said the vast majority of private schools in Texas are religious and get help from their parent organizations, like the Catholic Diocese, to provide financial aid for students.
Annual tuition ranges from as low as $3,000 in the Rio Grande Valley to more than $30,000 for the most elite institutions in Houston, Dallas, and Austin.
Homeschooling is an increasingly popular option for families in more rural areas, though in many communities, parents are willing to make long drives to preferred schools.
Colangelo anticipates that many private schools will open small satellite campuses to accommodate children in remote areas.
'It will help, but to start, it's maybe helping 80,000 kids and isn't a huge program,' she said. 'We are cautioning our families: there's not going to be any schools that are overrun by ESA students.
'And I think the goal of a lot of parents is to get their children back in public schools eventually.'
School choice advocates offer tax credit programs as a compromise that they hope will be considered on both sides of the aisle.
Twenty-one states provide tax credits to those who donate to a private school voucher program.
National School Choice Initiative
At the national level, Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) has
'I think there's momentum for this nationally,' Cantrell said, adding that Texas's program is a barometer for other states to consider vouchers or education savings accounts, and a simultaneous national tax credit program is another way to expand school choice in states where lawmakers won't fund it.
'It gives people an option. If you don't like the established, entrenched education bureaucracy, you can contribute to school choice if you want to.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
37 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Photos show how National Guard troops are being deployed in L.A.
LOS ANGELES — California National Guard troops wielded M4 rifles, pistols, riot sticks and shields as they stared down demonstrators here Wednesday, under orders to protect federal personnel and buildings as protests continued in Southern California against immigration enforcement operations. Clad in camo fatigues, American flag patches on their right shoulders and with many obscured by masks and sunglasses, a half dozen stood in front of the entrance of the Federal Building in downtown Los Angeles, down from dozens a day earlier. The windows and exterior areas of the building, which houses Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other offices, were covered with 'F— ICE' and other graffiti opposing the Trump Administration's immigration policies. Protesters have descended on the building in recent days, as well as the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building and a jail operated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons. The presence of thousands of armed military troops on U.S. soil deployed to impose order throughout Los Angeles stood in stark contrast to the relatively small number of local residents clad in short-sleeved shirts, shorts and baseball caps, waving American and Mexican flags. As of early Wednesday afternoon the protests at the Federal Building remained peaceful, with troops standing watch but otherwise unoccupied. The scene was a small part of an otherwise placid section of the city, with restaurants and business open just two blocks away. 'This is inflammatory and stupid,' said Ellen Carpenter, 64. 'There are 100 protesters, probably 200 members of the press, and 80 guys with batons and guns. The reason there is a crowd here is because they are standing here. If they weren't here, there wouldn't be any crowds.' But the protests had been unruly over the previous days, with arrests and vandalism left in their wake. On Wednesday, graffiti-cleanup crews were seen throughout the streets, washing off many of the tags protesters sprayed on businesses and the federal building complex in downtown Los Angeles. While thousands of protesters had gathered Tuesday night, just a few dozen were visible around the complex Wednesday afternoon although that number was expected to grow later in the day. Among them was Lynn Sturgis, who described the federal deployment as 'very unnecessary.' 'It's scary,' she said. 'I am a 66 year-old woman here with my water bottle and some sunscreen. They are here with flashbang grenades and batons, there's no need for that. ' Sturgis had brought a homemade sign for the federal troops, with one side that said,'I'm so sorry that you are being used as PAWNS by your despotic commander and chief. BLINK if you are PISSED at him.' 'I understand they are stuck between a rock and a hard place,' she said as she waved the sign. 'I am hoping some don't want to be here.' A block away, a 39-year-old man who identified himself only by his first name, Albert, said it was his third day of protesting. Born in California, the son of Mexican immigrants, Albert said he was appalled by the presence of the National Guard. 'They're not supposed to be here. It hurts,' he said. 'Trump is making us look like we're animals and saying we are here to destroy things. Have people been destructive? Yes. Have they been provoked? Yes.' His friend, who identified himself as Chris, said the presence of federal troops and the National Guard seemed like an attempt by Trump 'to put fear in people's hearts so they won't protest.' It had the opposite reaction for him, he said. 'I think more people should come now that they are here,' he said. Another protester, 24 year-old William, said he thought deploying federal troops was a 'stupid thing to do,' and the presence of the National Guard was clearly intended to intimidate, describing them as 'armed state thugs.' 'Ninety-nine percent of the people out here are peaceful,' he said. 'You see people with guns, with live ammunition, not rubber bullets, it makes things way more aggravated.' Another protester, named Viviana, said that the presence of the Guard was a 'recipe for disaster,' and setting residents on edge. 'In combination with the ICE raids, it feeds into that hysteria, people are getting that sense of 'when am I next?'' While immigration raids have sparked unruly protests across the country, prompting arrests and the use of pepper spray and rubber bullets for crowd control, the Trump administration has so far only sought to subdue demonstrations in Southern California. As of Wednesday, protests in San Francisco, Oakland, Denver, Chicago, Dallas, New York, Detroit, Pittsburgh had been left to local law enforcement. In Texas, the governor said he will deploy the National Guard ahead of planned protests this weekend. Trump officials hinted that the deployment of military troops this week could become commonplace, with the federal armed forces deployed in Los Angeles for at least two months. 'I think we're entering another phase, especially under President Trump with his focus on the homeland, where the National Guard and Reserves become a critical component of how we secure that homeland,' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Tuesday during a Congressional subcommittee hearing. A minimum 60-day deployment of the Marines and National Guard troops to Los Angeles was expected to cost $134 million, according to Pentagon comptroller Bryn MacDonnell during the Tuesday hearing. 'We stated very publicly that it's 60 days because we want to ensure that those rioters, looters and thugs on the other side assaulting our police officers know that we're not going anywhere,' Hegseth told federal lawmakers. As of Wednesday morning in Los Angeles, 2,000 National Guard troops were deployed in the region, with another 2,000 expected to arrive by 3 p.m. Thursday, said commanding officer U.S. Army Major General Scott Sherman. Another 700 Marines were expected to follow after a two-day civil disturbance training at the Naval Weapons Station at Seal Beach, which included extensive work on crowd control and rules of engagement, Sherman said. Their job, the two-star general said, was to protect federal facilities and to federal workers doing their jobs. That included accompanying federal immigration officers on raids, actions targeted by protesters across the country. The military troops were not allowed to do search and seizure or arrest anyone, Sherman said. They could, however, detain individuals and then wait for law enforcement to arrest them. 'They're in the lead,' he said, referring to immigration agents. 'We're supporting them.' Rarely in recent history has the National Guard been requested to provide assistance to local law enforcement, and typically only in the wake of natural disasters or briefly at the request of governors in the midst of significant unrest. In 1992, President George H.W. Bush deployed the National Guard at the request of then-Gov. Pete Wilson amid the 4,000 fires, 30 deaths and hundreds of injuries during the riots over the Rodney King verdict. The National Guard was deployed then for six days. The recent protests in Los Angeles have included some vandalism and violence, much of it quelled by local law enforcement with arrests as well as a one-night curfew, which was lifted Wednesday morning. More protests, however, are planned in the coming days as immigration raids are expected to continue across the country.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge says Columbia University activist facing deportation should be freed
Supporters of Mahmoud Khalil rally outside the federal courthouse in Newark on March 28, 2025. (Reena Rose Sibayan for New Jersey Monitor) A federal judge ruled Wednesday that a Columbia University activist detained for partaking in pro-Palestinian protests cannot be held by the federal government over allegations that his presence in the United States undermines the nation's foreign policy interests. U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz issued the order Wednesday but gave federal prosecutors until Friday at 9:30 a.m. to ask the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals to step in. It's unclear if the activist, Mahmoud Khalil, will be released Friday if the government does indeed appeal. 'This is the news we've been waiting over three months for. Mahmoud must be released immediately and safely returned home to New York to be with me and our newborn baby, Deen,' Noor Abdalla, Khalil's wife, said in a statement from the American Civil Liberties Union of New York. 'True justice would mean Mahmoud was never taken away from us in the first place, that no Palestinian father, from New York to Gaza, would have to endure the painful separation of prison walls like Mahmoud has.' If it stands, Farbiarz's ruling, which comes on the heels of a previous decision that said the government's push to deport Khalil was likely unconstitutional, could deal a blow to the Trump administration's efforts to deport dissidents. Khalil was arrested by immigration authorities in March and has been held in Louisiana since. He's fighting two cases to fend off his deportation — one in Louisiana and one in New Jersey, because he was being transferred through Elizabeth Detention Center when his attorneys first filed a petition for his release. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio claimed Khalil supports terrorist group Hamas and called his presence in the country a national security risk. Rubio has cited a rarely used provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 to justify Khalil's deportation. Farbiarz noted in his Wednesday ruling that the government could argue that Khalil would have been detained anyway because he inaccurately filled out his lawful permanent resident application, which can be a basis for removal under very rare circumstances. But that argument won't work, he said. 'Lawful permanent residents are virtually never detained pending removal for the sort of alleged omission' Khalil is accused of, the judge wrote in the 14-page filing. Khalil, whose wife and newborn son are American citizens, has not been charged with any crime. He was among the first university students who were picked up by immigration authorities targeting pro-Palestine activists. Some students who were detained under similar circumstances have been released but still face deportation. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pulse shooting survivors, family members tour building before demolition
Survivors and family members of the victims of the 2016 Pulse nightclub shooting are touring the inside of the building for a final look before it's torn down. About 250 people accepted the city of Orlando's invitation to tour the building where Omar Mateen, who had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State group, killed 49 people and wounded 53 others during a Latin Night celebration at the popular LGBTQIA+ club on June 12, 2016. Mateen was killed following an hourslong standoff with police. At the time, it was the deadliest mass shooting in modern American history. The shooting at the Route 91 Harvest music festival in Las Vegas would eclipse the Pulse shooting's death toll the following year. The visits, which coincide with the shooting's nine-year mark, are being done in small groups over the course of four days, with survivors and family members spending about a half hour inside, according to The Associated Press. Christine Leionen lost her only child, 32-year-old Christopher, in the shooting. Wednesday marked the first time she saw where her son was killed. "My son died on that dance floor. He was shot nine times, and he bled to death on that dance floor," she told CBS News. She said going to Pulse was "a way to try to experience his last seconds of life. I just want to feel closer to him." Orlando Mayor Buddy Dyer, who also visited the site, said the visit "took me back nine years." "Reflecting on being in the command center on Orange Avenue as all the things are transpiring and, eventually, the shooting of the killer and then the realization of just how many people were impacted," he said, according to CBS affiliate WKMG-TV. Dyer said the people visiting included 25 of the 49 victims' families. The city of Orlando is planning to build a permanent memorial where the building currently stands. City officials approved a plan to buy the property for $2 million back in 2023, following several previous failed attempts to buy the land. Family members and some survivors had been pushing for a permanent memorial for years before the purchase. But some of the families and survivors still have questions about whether more could have been done to prevent the shooting or if police could have done more to save people. Questions also surround the ensuing investigation and the issue of whether the attack was a hate crime. "I lived that night, but it's a constant sacrifice to keep moving every day," survivor Maritza Gomez told WKMG back when the city approved the plan to buy the property. "I don't think that Pulse should be diminished. I think that an investigation should be taken care of first." An accused woman skips her pedicure, kills her ex-husband Watch California Gov. Gavin Newsom's full speech on federal response to Los Angeles protests LAPD chief speaks out about deployment of military forces to anti-ICE protests