Why FM is suddenly talking about Scottish independence
Six weeks ago John Swinney delivered his programme for government setting out his plans for the year ahead.
Some 12 months out from the next Holyrood elections the First Minister told MSPs his focus would be on "eradicating child poverty, growing the economy, tackling the climate emergency, delivering high quality and sustainable public services".
At no point did he mention independence.
The SNP's founding goal was not noted once in his speech nor in the 46-page accompanying document.
Instead, there were announcements on scrapping peak rail fares, on creating 100,000 more GP appointments and the lifting of the blanket ban on rail passengers drinking alcohol while travelling.
READ MORE:
But what was also telling was that the lack of any talk around independence did not even merit any news coverage.
That's because of the implicit acceptance by the SNP, by opposition parties and by the media that independence was now "off the radar", as Nicola Sturgeon pointed out in January.
Nobody was actually expecting the SNP's fourth First Minister to say anything about independence.
Now there are strong reasons why he didn't mention it.
First, Mr Swinney's SNP has not got a majority in Holyrood with his minority government requiring the support of opposition parties to get his legislation passed.
Earlier this year the SNP - perhaps wary of giving the Greens too much influence following the collapse of the Bute House Agreement last year - struck an agreement with the Lib Dems (as well as the Greens) to support the Budget.
But Alex Cole-Hamilton's price for his party's support was that Mr Swinney's government must not spend a "penny" promoting independence nor that the government spend time debating the issue in Holyrood.
Tickets for Unspun Live at the Edinburgh Fringe are available now — click here to book your place.
The second reason why Mr Swinney left out independence from his programme for government is likely grounded in what polling suggests are voters' priorities - namely, cutting NHS waiting times, improving living standards and tackling the cost of living through growing the economy and improving education.
YouGov research in March put independence much lower down the list of priorities for Scots with just 14% saying it should be a top priority for the Scottish Government.
However, what may explain Mr Swinney's about turn - giving a big speech today making the case for independence - is a pressing need to motivate SNP supporters.
The same YouGov polling in March found that independence is a high priority for this group of voters ranking third as their policy priority (behind health and education).
The SNP's defeat in the Hamilton, Larkhall, Stonehouse by-election, losing the seat to Labour, saw the party's support drop there from 46% in the 2021 election to 29% on June 5.
It is certainly a wake-up call to the party - and of course Mr Swinney - showing it that the SNP needs to regain the support of a large number of former voters, some of whom may have stayed at home or voted for other parties two weeks ago.
The SNP's hope is of course that ramping up the independence message ahead of the next Holyrood election will persuade disgruntled SNP voters to back them to win again.
The First Minister will be hoping for the same outcome - and that another win will secure his own position for the next parliamentary term amid rumblings of discontent in his party.
We'll find out whether the strategy works when Scotland heads to the polls in less than a year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Health secretary Neil Gray accused of 'arrogance and entitlement' after he was chauffeur-driven to a pub
Scotland's Health Secretary has been accused of 'arrogance and entitlement' after defending his decision to take a taxpayer-funded limousine to the pub. Neil Gray has refused to apologise and insisted he would not resign for taking a chauffeur-driven ride in the ministerial car to the Brig O'Don watering hole in Aberdeen before being taken on to watch his favourite team play a league match at Pittodrie. It follows calls for him to quit for the latest controversy, after previously coming under fire for using the ministerial car to travel to a series of Aberdeen fixtures. Scottish Government rules state limos cannot be used when the 'principal purpose' of a trip' is not connected to the performance of ministerial duties'. But when challenged on the issue yesterday, Mr Gray told the broadcaster LBC: 'I was on my way between ministerial engagements, I went from a dinner at a restaurant. 'It is all within the rules. I've said quite a bit on this in the past and I've got nothing further to add.' He said he would not be resigning and that he 'absolutely' has the backing of the First Minister and is focused on 'reform and renewal' of the NHS. Scottish Conservative deputy leader Rachael Hamilton said: 'This response smacks of arrogance and entitlement from Neil Gray. 'His refusal to apologise sums up why many Scots are disillusioned with politics and their trust in SNP politicians is broken. He is acting like there is nothing to see here when he has disgracefully misled Parliament. 'Neil Gray's position is health secretary is untenable. How can patients and staff ever trust him again on the NHS after his fabricated account of his use of the ministerial limo?' The journeys were initially logged in the official ministerial register as trips to and from a 'personal address, Aberdeen', and were only amended after an investigation showed no evidence of an address could be found. The Scottish Government insisted there had been an 'administration error' and officials admitted that Mr Gray has no home address in Aberdeen. But the revelation led to claims he had misled parliament for a second time over his ministerial car journeys. Mr Gray previously issued a humiliating apology in the Scottish Parliament last November following revelations that he was chauffuered to and from nine football matches involving Aberdeen FC or Scotland in the period between 2022 and 2024. He apologised to MSPs for giving 'the impression of acting more as a fan and less as a minister' but reassured them that officials had made a record of business meetings at the games. In January, he was forced to apologise again - and admit he had misled parliament - after it was revealed there was no such written record of discussions he was involved in when he attended the 2023 Scottish League Cup Final between Aberdeen and Rangers. On May 15, 2024, Mr Gray was invited by Aberdeen FC Community Trust to take part in a number of Mental Health Awareness Week events and after his meetings, the official Government record showed he was taken to a 'personal address' in Aberdeen. Yet when this claim was investigated, there was no evidence of Mr Gray having a second home in the region. When questioned over the irregularity, SNP spin doctors admitted to The Mail that the Health Secretary was not in fact returning to a home address in Aberdeen, as he did not have one - but was instead attending what they said was a 'personal engagement' at a 'restaurant'. A source confirmed that Mr Gray went to the Brig O'Don, which describes itself as a 'pub restaurant', and is located less than two miles from Pittodrie stadium. The insider confirmed Mr Gray picked up his own bill at the pub.
Leader Live
41 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Government recognises financial challenge in mitigating two-child cap
Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said applications will open for mitigation of the welfare policy on March 2, with payments being made 'as soon as possible' afterwards – meaning it will likely take place just ahead of the Scottish Parliament election. She said the move will lift 20,000 children out of relative poverty, according to Scottish Government estimates. However the minister also told MSPs she is 'deeply disappointed' that Scotland's interim child poverty targets have not been met, saying there is no single reason for them being missed. Plans to mitigate the two-child cap were first announced last year but First Minister John Swinney said his Government needed time to set up the system. Introduced under the Conservatives, the two-child cap limits benefits in most cases to the first two children born after April 2017. Labour has cited fiscal constraints for keeping the cap, but in May the Prime Minister said he will be 'looking at all options' to tackle child poverty. Ms Somerville said Scotland cannot wait for a decision at Westminster and implementing it in March – 15 months after the initial announcement – will be the fastest a new social security has even been introduced in Scotland. Following an announcement on Tuesday morning, Ms Somerville addressed MSPs on the Government's 'tackling child poverty delivery plan'. She said it is 'deeply disappointing' that interim child poverty targets have not been met, but rates are nevertheless coming down, and she pledged to 'build on that progress' ahead of 2030 targets. Conservative MSP Liz Smith pressed the minister on how the mitigation policy will be funded, saying the Scottish Fiscal Commission (SFC) has noted a 'widening gap' between the Scottish Government's welfare spending and its funding. She said: 'Can I ask where the other cuts will be made to pay for that mitigation?' Ms Somerville said her Government is 'resolute' in tackling economic inactivity, saying people should not be punished for having children. Decisions from the UK Government have pushed more people into poverty, she claimed. Discussing the SFC's forecasts, she said: 'Those are choices that we have taken – to ensure that we are protecting disabled people and children. 'Because we need to protect them from the effects of poverty. 'Those are decisions which will obviously be set out in the work that is being taken forward by the Cabinet Secretary for Finance as we look to the sustainability of our finances. 'We recognise that challenge.' She said the 'easiest way to deal with that challenge' would be for the UK Government to scrap the two-child cap and proposals to cut disabled benefits. Scottish Labour's Paul O'Kane said: 'For all the rhetoric we've had from the First Minister and the Cabinet Secretary after 18 years in office, relative child poverty after housing costs has only fallen by 1%. 'When the Cabinet Secretary says rates are broadly stable, what she means is that the dial hasn't shifted.' The Scottish Fiscal Commission said the mitigation will cost around £150 million next year, before rising to nearly £200 million by the end of the decade. Ms Somerville said around 43,000 children would benefit initially, rising to 50,000 by the end of the decade. In March, the Institute for Fiscal Studies warned the policy could harm incentives to work because some of the lowest-paid workers could earn more on welfare than in employment. The move has been welcomed by anti-poverty charities, who have urged the UK Government to scrap the cap, with the Child Poverty Action Group saying the move would lift 350,000 children across the UK out of poverty.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EUAN MCCOLM: As a delusional Swinney claims independence is just within his grasp, the stench of panic in the SNP is overwhelming
The stench of panic is overwhelming. First Minister John Swinney, humiliated by the SNP 's defeat in the recent Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse by-election, faces a revolution in his party. There have already been public calls for him to step down while, privately, colleagues have discussed a possible coup. In desperation, Mr Swinney is fighting back in the only way he knows how: by promising another push for Scottish independence. In a speech in Edinburgh yesterday afternoon, the First Minister set out what aides described as 'his vision' for what Scotland could achieve if only it was no longer part of the United Kingdom. Speaking at the Scotland 2050 conference, Mr Swinney waxed tiresome about the potential just bursting to be unleashed. It was time, he said, for Scotland 'to stand and flourish on our own two feet'. 'Independence,' said the First Minister, 'is the defining choice for this generation, have no doubt.' Like a 'clear majority' of Scots, he believed 'our nation should have the right to choose'. Of course, there is nothing especially notable about a Scottish Nationalist insisting the Union is in crisis. That mantra has existed for decades. But Mr Swinney knows not only that there is no second independence referendum on the horizon but that most Scots do not think the constitutional settlement a priority. A YouGov poll published in March showed that the question of whether Scotland should become independent sits at a lowly ninth on the list of things voters would like to see politicians deal with. More important to the overwhelming majority are such matters as the state of the NHS, the economy, the housing crisis, and the need to tackle crime. But Mr Swinney's speech was not directed at those voters. Facing the prospect of a destabilising leadership challenge, he was playing to the gallery of nationalist monomaniacs for whom independence must be achieved, no matter the cost. In common with other rigid ideologues – think supporters of former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn or hardcore Brexiteers – Scottish nationalists entertain no doubts about their convictions. To the obsessive 'Braveheart', rejection by voters – whether in a Lanarkshire by-election or a national referendum – is simply proof that they've not pushed their agenda hard enough. This crank mindset led to Corbynistas complaining they'd lost the 2017 general election to the Conservatives not because their leader was too Left-wing but because he wasn't Left-wing enough. Similarly, many SNP politicians and activists believe their party lost in Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse because Mr Swinney had not played the independence card often enough. There is no question that the First Minister made errors during the campaign which saw his party lose the seat, made vacant by the untimely death of sitting MSP Christina McKelvie, to Labour. Mr Swinney's insistence that the by-election was a two-horse race between the SNP and Reform was not merely wide of the mark, it was catastrophically wrong. In fact, the numbers show it was the collapse in the nationalist vote that allowed Reform to come third. Mr Swinney's speech in Edinburgh was straight from the Nicola Sturgeon playbook. During her nine years as leader of the SNP, Ms Sturgeon repeatedly declared that independence was just one last heave from being achieved. She promised referendums she could not deliver and she urged supporters to prepare for victory. Unfortunately, despite the undoubted passion with which Ms Sturgeon spoken on the subject, her words could not bend reality. Not only had she no power to deliver 'Indyref2', polls showed that the majority of Scots didn't want it. John Swinney now stands in the delusion zone, established by Ms Sturgeon. From there, he proclaims victory is within his grasp. The fact that the power to run another referendum remains with the UK Government is not the only bump in the road Swinney wishes to travel. His government's record of failure is another barrier to him achieving his ambition of shattering the Union. In yesterday's speech, the First Minister spoke of the ways in which Scotland had been held back by a 'broken' and 'failing' Westminster system. 'I have long believed,' he intoned, 'that Scotland is an afterthought to successive UK governments. 'Scotland is not on Westminster's radar in the same way, say, as London, the Midlands or the South East. 'It holds us back in ways big and small, leaving us waiting and praying, hoping that decisions taken at Westminster are not too damaging. 'We are prey to a broken system and a failing economic model – a system that delivers for a very few at the very top, while living standards stagnate and real wages are squeezed for the vast majority.' I have no doubt that this 'analysis' will satisfy nationalist fundamentalists for whom 'independence, nothing less' is the sole objective. But others may, I must inform Mr Swinney, have noticed that, for the past 18 years, the SNP government has taken the vast majority of decisions relating to public services in Scotland. Our NHS is not in crisis because of the actions of politicians at Westminster but because of the failure of the SNP to invest and reform. Standards in Scottish schools have not plummeted because of the decisions taken by successive Prime Ministers in London but because of the neglect of the Scottish Nationalists. Given the powers of the Scottish Government he leads, Mr Swinney's claim that Scots are 'prey' to a broken system is beyond laughable. The First Minister's characterisation of Scotland as victim of the Union is further undermined by the latest spending review, announced last week, by Chancellor Rachel Reeves, which will see Scottish Government coffers swell with an extra £9.1billion. When, two decades ago, the SNP moved from the fringes of Scottish politics to become the dominant force, the claim that the UK Government had forgotten Scotland had real power. Disillusionment with Tony Blair's Labour Government was widespread in Scotland and the Nationalists, under the late Alex Salmond, had real energy. But it's a very long time since the SNP could credibly blame 'Westminster' for Scotland's ills. Under the Nationalists, our devolved parliament has gained greater powers, including over taxation, yet these steps on the road towards independence have not improved living standards for Scots. Fighting to save his job, John Swinney wishes us to believe that Scotland will only truly prosper when it finally frees itself of the ties of Union. The truth is that the SNP government is to blame for the parlous state of Scottish public services. John Swinney and the SNP do not hold the solution to Scotland's problems. Rather, they are the cause of them.
