
India must be ‘circumspect', rules-based order has collapsed—Manish Tewari on Iran conflict
What complicates the situation for India, he said, is unlike during the Cold War era, New Delhi has no Soviet Union to fall back upon, while Chinese influence has grown over the past decade, especially since Xi Jinping took over as president of the neighbouring country.
In an interview to ThePrint, Tewari, who serves as general secretary of the Congress party's foreign affairs department, said India must also tread carefully due to what he called a 'new dynamic' developing between the US, Pakistan and China. 'I think we need to be extremely careful. We should feel the stones as we go along, because only fools rush in where wise men fear to tread,' Tewari said, pointing to the new dynamic 'at play again'.
New Delhi: Congress Lok Sabha MP Manish Tewari Sunday said that India should approach the conflict in the Middle East, which has escalated with the United States joining Israel's war with Iran, with 'extreme circumspection' and a 'degree of exceptionalism' given that the rules-based liberal democratic international order has 'collapsed'.
'Under those circumstances, India must approach the situation with a degree of exceptionalism, whereby we engage with situations and problems on our own and not really try to play 'vishwa guru'. Not that we have tried to mediate in any of these conflicts which have very complex historical and geopolitical roots. However, after this latest escalation. You know, circumspection and extreme circumspection should be the order of the day,' Tewari said.
While the Congress, the principal opposition party, is yet to issue a statement on the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites, it had on 15 June accused Israel of violating Iran's sovereignty and encroaching on its rights.
Tewari said the Congress's position was correct from the public international law perspective.
'Because there has been a violation of Iranian sovereignty. And albeit unprovoked because there is no empirical evidence to substantiate that Iran was close to actually acquiring a nuclear bomb for a nuclear weapon. In fact, the only nuclear weapon state in the de facto nuclear weapon state in the Middle East is Israel, which purportedly has 90 warheads,' said the Chandigarh MP and former Union minister who recently travelled to Egypt, Qatar, South Africa, and Ethiopia as the member of a multi-party delegation formed by the Centre after Operation Sindoor.
In an opinion piece on the Middle East crisis published in The Hindu Saturday, Congress parliamentary party chairperson Sonia Gandhi criticised the Modi government's 'silence on the devastation in Gaza and now on the unprovoked escalation against Iran,' saying it reflects a disturbing departure from 'our moral and diplomatic traditions,' and amounts to a 'surrender of values'.
Tewari endorsed that line, underlining India's historic position with regard to the two-state solution as Israel and Palestine was concerned and also with regard to respecting the sovereignty of independent countries.
'These are templates or postulates of Indian foreign policy which stretch back into time, and we have repeatedly called out such transgressions and invasions … this has been a consistent position. So is New Delhi really going to be taking a revisionist view on this position?'
'Also there is a domestic imperative. We have a large, diverse, heterogeneous population—a population which, notwithstanding their religious affiliations, does believe in a semblance of equity and fair play and so under those circumstances, even people would be very close to watching the positions which India would take,' Tewari, a three-term MP, said.
Sharing his assessment of the geopolitical situation, Tewari said the world order and frames of an international rule of law stand completely and absolutely upended with concurrent conflicts playing out across the globe.
'In Europe, it is Russia versus Ukraine. In the Middle East, it is Israel versus Hamas versus Hezbollah versus Iran, and then you have the India-Pakistan standoff, which may have lasted a few days, but has lingering implications. And then you have the continuous militarization of the East China and South China sea as a consequence of the not too peaceful rise of China.
'What you are really witnessing is that the liberal democratic international order, built post World War II undergirded by the principles of public international law, has completely collapsed. The irrelevance of the United Nations and even the United Nations Security Council could not be more stark in what we are seeing today.'
(Edited by Amrtansh Arora)
Also Read: Iran has fewer options & more risks than before. Its choices will affect all of Middle East
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
21 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Pak to hold National Security Committee meeting after US strikes on Iran
The Pakistan government will hold an emergency meeting of its top security body on Monday to discuss the regional situation after the US airstrikes on Iran's three nuclear facilities. The National Security Committee (NSC) is the highest forum for security deliberations in the country, and its meeting is chaired by the Prime Minister. The country's top civil and military leadership, including Army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir, are part of the committee. Sources in the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) told the Dawn newspaper that the NSC meeting will be held on Monday evening. Munir, who recently returned from a trip to the US, will brief the committee on the details of his meeting with US President Donald Trump. The US strikes on Iran's three nuclear sites - Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz - came a day after Pakistan's announcement to recommend Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize. Pakistan condemned the US strikes in Iran. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, in a phone call with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, reaffirmed Pakistan's unwavering solidarity with the people and government of Iran and expressed condolences on the loss of lives.


Mint
23 minutes ago
- Mint
US warns of violence, cyberattacks for citizens amid escalating tensions with Iran - Top things to know
Livemint Published 23 Jun 2025, 12:51 PM IST US Issues advisory amid heightened threat environment from Iran tensions. (AFP) The United States has issued an advisory for citizens cautioning them about a "heightened threat environment" amid tensions with Iran . The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued the notice, which read, 'The ongoing Iran conflict is causing a heightened threat environment in the United States. Low-level cyber attacks against US networks by pro-Iranian hacktivists are likely, and cyber actors affiliated with the Iranian government may conduct attacks against US networks. Iran also has a long-standing commitment to target US Government officials it views as responsible for the death of an Iranian military commander killed in January 2020.'


Hans India
25 minutes ago
- Hans India
Congress Condemns Trump's Iran Airstrikes, Criticizes Modi Government's Silence
The Indian National Congress has strongly criticized US President Donald Trump's decision to launch airstrikes against Iran's nuclear installations, describing the military action as contradictory to his previous diplomatic overtures toward Tehran. The opposition party has simultaneously condemned the Modi government for its perceived inaction regarding American bombardments and Israeli military operations in the region. Congress General Secretary for Communications Jairam Ramesh expressed his party's disapproval through social media, emphasizing the urgent need for diplomatic engagement with Iran rather than military confrontation. He characterized Trump's use of American air power against Iranian nuclear sites as undermining the President's own public statements advocating for continued negotiations with the Islamic Republic. The senior Congress leader reinforced his party's position calling for immediate diplomatic intervention and meaningful dialogue with Iran to address escalating regional tensions. He argued that military strikes represent a fundamental departure from peaceful conflict resolution mechanisms that should guide international relations in the volatile Middle East landscape. As persources, Ramesh directed sharp criticism toward the Indian government's response to the unfolding crisis, describing the administration's silence as deeply troubling. He accused the Modi government of failing to condemn or even criticize American bombing campaigns and Israeli military aggression, suggesting that India's foreign policy stance lacks moral clarity during this critical period. The Congress spokesperson extended his critique to encompass the broader humanitarian crisis affecting the region, particularly highlighting what he termed India's "deafening silence" regarding the situation in Gaza. He characterized the ongoing conflict as constituting genocide against Palestinian populations, arguing that the Indian government has failed to take a principled stand on this humanitarian catastrophe. These statements emerged following American military strikes targeting three significant Iranian nuclear facilities located at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. The attacks effectively drew the United States directly into the escalating confrontation between Israel and Iran, raising concerns about broader regional destabilization and potential for expanded conflict. Despite the opposition's criticism, Prime Minister Narendra Modi engaged in diplomatic outreach by conducting a telephone conversation with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on Sunday. During this discussion, the Prime Minister expressed India's profound concern regarding mounting tensions between Iran and Israel, while advocating for immediate de-escalation of hostilities through peaceful means. Modi emphasized the importance of resolving the crisis through diplomatic channels and constructive dialogue rather than military escalation. In his subsequent social media communication, the Prime Minister detailed their comprehensive discussion of current regional developments and reiterated India's commitment to promoting peace, security, and stability throughout the Middle East. The Prime Minister's diplomatic engagement represents India's attempt to maintain balanced relationships with all parties while advocating for peaceful resolution of conflicts. However, the Congress party's criticism suggests ongoing political disagreement regarding the appropriate level of Indian involvement and public positioning on these complex international issues. This controversy reflects broader debates within Indian politics about the country's foreign policy approach toward Middle Eastern conflicts and the balance between strategic interests and moral positioning on international humanitarian concerns.