logo
What Alito got right in his El Salvador case dissent

What Alito got right in his El Salvador case dissent

Washington Post25-04-2025

Mary McCord is executive director of Georgetown Law School's Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection and a former acting assistant attorney general for national security and longtime federal prosecutor.
Critically, on the fundamental point, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. did not dissent.
When Americans are so profoundly divided about so much, it appears there's still one thing we agree on: Before the government deprives someone of 'life, liberty, or property,' it must provide what the Fifth Amendment requires: due process of law.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate Democrat: Trump travel ban a distraction from GOP policy package
Senate Democrat: Trump travel ban a distraction from GOP policy package

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Senate Democrat: Trump travel ban a distraction from GOP policy package

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said late Wednesday that President Trump's revived travel ban is meant to 'distract' the nation from what he described as 'super unpopular' aspects of the massive GOP policy package working its way through Congress. During an interview on MSNBC's 'The Briefing with Jen Psaki,' the Senate Democrat said that the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' will 'steal from regular Americans in order to pad the rich.' 'Nobody wants that. That's super unpopular. So how do you get that done?' he continued. 'You distract people by making them think that they're at war with other Americans — making them think that they have something to fear from people who look different from them or speak a different language.' Murphy described the strategy as something 'demagogues have done all throughout time… while, on the side, they're stealing from us.' Trump earlier Wednesday signed a proclamation banning travel to the United States for individuals from 12 countries, citing national security concerns. He also announced new restrictions for entry into the U.S. for travelers from an additional seven countries. The proclamation, which echoes a travel ban Trump instituted in his first term, takes effect Monday. Trump, in another move on Wednesday, ordered a probe of former President Biden's mental state and executive actions his predecessor took while in office. The actions come as Trump's agenda faces new roadblocks in the Senate, with tech billionaire Elon Musk vocalizing criticism of the massive bill and calling on lawmakers to block it from passing. Murphy said Trump's moves are 'chiefly in service' of changing the focus of the national conversation. 'This is important, you know, anytime you ban people coming to the United States from other countries, it has a real impact,' Murphy told Psaki. 'But it is chiefly in service of trying to get us all talking about that — or talking about the Biden investigation they launched today — instead of talking about the centerpiece of this story, which is this bill to make the rich even richer at the expense of everybody else.' The Hill has reached out to the White House for a response to Murphy's remarks. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

What Trump Shutting Down Job Corps Means For Young Black Folks Entering the Workforce
What Trump Shutting Down Job Corps Means For Young Black Folks Entering the Workforce

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What Trump Shutting Down Job Corps Means For Young Black Folks Entering the Workforce

For decades, the Job Corps program served as the anchor for young adults seeking to transition into the workforce. But now, the Department of Labor delivered devastating news that all Job Corps centers will pause operations nationwide by June 30, 2025. The shocking news has left thousands of young people and families unsure about their future, and communities nationwide enraged. The federally funded program served as a cornerstone for providing free education and vocational training to young Americans aged 16 to 24. The news came as a shock to many students in targeted cities such as Detroit, St. Louis, and several others when they were notified to clear their rooms and exit the premises. Families in various cities scrambled to help their children move out of the centers, while others had nowhere to go. According to The Hill, the Labor Secretary said the program no longer achieves 'the intended outcomes that students deserve,' citing 'a startling number of serious incident reports and our in-depth fiscal analysis.' The Root spoke with Illinois attorney Henderson Banks ,who explained the unlawful measures taken by the Trump administration to dismantle the Job Corps program. 'What the Trump administration and the Department of Labor is doing is not what legislation stated or enacted for the program or certain job sites to be dismantled.' Banks shared. 'There's an administrative process that was not followed, which gives those contractors who received and depended on funding a claim against the Trump administration and the Department of Labor to sue the government. The way that the program was discontinued was illegal.' Banks further discussed these actions are enough to file a lawsuit against the administration. 'I would say they don't it's not readily apparent that they have a a claim based on discrimination,' he explained. 'They could potentially have a claim for a class action or a claim against the Department of Labor for not following the administrative process that they should have followed in order to dismantle the program.' Families and communities were stunned by the Job Corps' sudden pause. One TikTok user shared that the government wants young people to be homeless. 'They want minors ages 16 to 24 to be homeless,' the TikTok user said, 'because that's what going to happen. Reports show that 47% of the students are African American, and some are saying that this was a targeted move. 'The nationwide shutdown of Job Corps feels like an attack,' another TikTok user said. 'People went to Job Corps when they had nowhere else to go; this was a resource for them.' Conspiracy theorists believe that the removal of Job Corp is timely given the shortage of military enlistments. 'They're shutting down JobCorps to boost military enlistments,' an X user shared. 'Military recruitment has been at an all time low for the past couple years.' In 2020, military recruitment dropped down 58% due to COVID. Between 2023 and 2024, there has been a uptick in enrollment, increasing by 12.8% across all military branches, but they did not successfully meet their fiscal year goals. According to reports, the Army is expected to surpass its goal with new enlistments. Online users share stories on how Job Corps saved their lives while expressing their disbelief at the closing of the centers. 'Job Corps actually saved my life,' an X commenter posted. 'I was at the end of the road and had nowhere else to turn to. I couldn't afford to finish college, I was homeless at 17, working meaningless part-time jobs. That is the reality for so many people at job corps.' Others shared their frustration on how the Trump administration is stripping away resources for young adults. 'Job Corps can sometimes be the only means for low-income kids to find opportunity in a world that doesn't want them to thrive,' a Thread user shared. 'Trust me, I've been there – Job Corp saved my ass from homelessness and got me into a trade school at 17 yrs old. This move by this administration is f**king diabolical and further proof that they don't give a sh*t about helping those kids that need it the most.'

Opinion - Democrats are trying to ‘Biden' Fetterman
Opinion - Democrats are trying to ‘Biden' Fetterman

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - Democrats are trying to ‘Biden' Fetterman

Democrats are trying to force out Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) like they pushed out former President Joe Biden. Their orchestrated campaign against a senator is a carbon copy of last year's leaks and pressure against a president, only this time it is sooner and less subtle. For the last few weeks, there's been a steady flow of stories from former Fetterman staffers divulging damaging details about Pennsylvania's senior, and now, only Democratic, senator. Fetterman is a striking figure personally — tall, bald and raw-boned, he looks like a mixed martial arts fighter in his signature hoodie. He has been no less of a fighter politically. Having battled back from a stroke, he won a close race (just under a 5 percent margin) for his seat in 2022; even in office, he has had health scares. When Fetterman ran, and even early on in his Senate tenure, Democrats stood with him (in 2023, the Senate Majority Leader even relaxed floor rules for Fetterman). Now, they are clearly moving away with an increasingly loud whispering campaign. Sound familiar? It should. Democrats did the same to their sitting president less than a year ago. Following a debate that convinced them Biden couldn't win reelection (though it only showed what nonpartisan Americans had already been seeing), they ratcheted up the pressure to drive him out. Now, in that debacle's aftermath, and attempting to exculpate themselves from blame, they can't write books fast enough to reveal the infirmities Biden had, but they worked to hide throughout his term. History is repeating itself. We witnessed an aggressive cover-up during his 2022 election, and now we are seeing a leaking and whispering campaign against Fetterman, now that he's politically inconvenient. And this is not a case of staffers going off the reservation. No staffer or Senate colleague behaves in this way without a tacit understanding that this is blessed by the party and party retribution will follow. So, what provoked Democrats' ire at Fetterman? Unlike Biden, who toed the left line into political oblivion (evidenced by his abysmal job approval ratings), Fetterman has been unwilling to go along to get along with Democrats' leftist lunacy, especially when it comes to fudging a moral equivalency between Israel's self-defense and Hamas's terrorism. The Democrats' ouster effort isn't cutting off their noses to spite their face. If Fetterman seeks reelection, he's virtually certain to be primaried by challengers seeking to exploit the rift between him and the party's left. For Democrats, only bad things come from such internecine fighting. For one thing, Fetterman could win: after all he has won before, and he is the incumbent. Then Democratic leaders are stuck spending precious money on a candidate they clearly don't want (and who likely displeases some elite lefty donors) to retain a seat they need. Even if a challenger beats Fetterman in a primary, it costs a lot of Democratic cash and opens intra-party wounds that may cause some to sit out a general election when Democrats will need all supporters on deck — after all, they just lost their other Senate incumbent in the state 2024. However, if Fetterman resigns, Gov. Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, gets to name a replacement. This would give Democrats a new senator now, one more to their ideological liking, and give that candidate a boost with incumbency and on fundraising. But what if Democrats so alienate Fetterman that he jumps ship and switches parties? Isn't that the Democrats' worst-case scenario? Nope. Their worst nightmare is the primary fight just mentioned. Yes, a party switch means short-term loss of a Senate seat; however, Democrats are already four seats away from a majority — another doesn't make much difference now. Compared to longer-term primary havoc, and possibly losing the seat to a Republican for a full term (and potentially more) or having to deal with Fetterman for six more years, it's a risk they're willing to take. And if he switches, he becomes the Republicans' problem — an unreliable vote and primary confusion they'd have to sort out. The ultimate proof of what Democrats are doing to Fetterman is what they and their media allies didn't do to Biden for four years. If there really were problems with Fetterman, the Democrats and their allies could keep them quiet … if they wanted to. The fact that they aren't says everything. Emboldened by pushing out a president, now they're aiming for a senator. To paraphrase Ronald Reagan, 'there they go again.' J.T. Young is the author of the recent book, 'Unprecedented Assault: How Big Government Unleashed America's Socialist Left,' from RealClear Publishing and has over three decades of experience working in Congress, the Department of the Treasury, the Office of Management and Budget, and representing a Fortune 20 company. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store