logo
Depriving women of inheritance 'un-Islamic'

Depriving women of inheritance 'un-Islamic'

Express Tribune20-03-2025

The Federal Shariat Court has declared any custom by virtue of which any female member of a family is being or has been denied or deprived of her right of inheritance, which is granted by the Holy Quran and Sunnah, as un-Islamic, hence having no legal force whatsoever.
"We have concluded that the inheritance right of women, if denied, under any form and manner whatsoever on the pretext of local custom or usage, is un-Islamic," read a 20-page judgement authored by FSC judge Dr Syed Muhammad Anwer.
"Although the respondent departments, i.e., the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, the Commissions on the Status of Women and Ombudspersons are working rightly but there is a need that they must act continuously, more vigilantly and proactively to eradicate this social evil, rather crime from society, of depriving women in any manner from claiming their right of inheritance or putting them under disadvantage to claim their due share in their inheritance," the order adds.
Four members of the FSC led by Chief Justice Iqbal Hameedur Rehman heard a petition filed under Article 203-D of the Constitution.
The petitioner, Syeda Fouzia Jalaal Shah, raised an issue whereby women are being deprived of their due right to inheritance in their ancestral property on the pretext of a local custom despite the fact that such right of inheritance is specifically and categorically recognised by Islam in the Holy Quran and Sunnah.
According to the petitioner, this custom is called "Chaddar" or "Parchi", which is in vogue in Bannu district, whereby women are being completely deprived of their right of inheritance in their ancestral property through jirga or they are forced to take less valuable property as of their inheritance share by putting pressure upon her.
In addition, the petitioner also sought a relief in-personam as her mother, Syeda Iftikhar Bibi, was allegedly deprived of her share in her father's and husband's inheritance due to the local custom or usage which the petitioner named as "Chaddar" or "Parchi", hence the petitioner also sought a personal relief for her mother from this Court through the same petition.
The judgement noted that as most of state departments have also acknowledged the need of the use of the penal law under the PPC as amended, to eradicate this social evil from society, "we are of the considered view that the relevant provincial departments, which are responsible to rectify this social evil of society and protecting the property rights of the women so granted to them by the Holy Quran and Sunnah, may also initiate criminal case against the perpetrator of the crime of serious and grave cases under Section 498-A of PPC, which is introduced in the Pakistan Penal Code vide the Criminal Law (Third Amendment) Act, 2011, as it was the object and reason of this amendment in the PPC".
It is also noted that from the response of the respondent, an important aspect is revealed that there is a need of understanding the gravity and seriousness of this crime in the staff of that relevant departments of the governments too. For instance, in this case they all acknowledged that women are being deprived of their right of inheritance yet they denied that no such custom or usage with the name of "Chaddar" or "Parchi" exists. Here they are required to understand the important aspect of any such case, that is the name of illegal action is not relevant but the act itself is important. Hence, while formulating the data and statistics regarding the denial of inheritance rights of women the relevant department, like the Commission on the Status of Women, must also categorize those different ways and the manners in which this heinous crime is being perpetrated, such efforts will help the relevant authorities to protect women from deprivation of their rights of inheritance in more efficient manner.
"It is clear from the statistics available and reports submitted by the parties that such criminal practice, whereby women are deprived of their right of inheritance, is quite common. In this regard generally a core illegal practice is commonly known as (Haq Bakhshwai) or (Haq Bakhshwana), which literally means "giving up of rights", is in vogue throughout the country in different forms, whereby the perpetrators or usurpers try to give a kind of legal cover to their illegal and criminal actions, whereby either forcibly or by emotionally blackmailing the female members of the family are asked to relinquish their right of inheritance in favour of male members.
The court rejected the Shariat petition to the extent whereby the petitioner has sought a relief in-personam being out of the scope of the jurisdiction of this court.
However, the petition is partially accepted whereby the petitioner is seeking a relief to declare a local custom which, according to her, is prevalent in K-P's Bannu district with the name of "Chaddar" or "Parchi", and the basis of which women of that area are being deprived of their rights of inheritance in their ancestral property, hence we declare any such custom or usage which either exists with the name of "Chaddar" or "Parchi" or with any other name in the area of Bannu district of K-P or in any part of any province of the country, as un-Islamic and illegal having no legal force whatsoever by virtue of which the right of inheritance of women is denied wholly or partly from their ancestral property which they have inherited or any other practice which deprives women from their right of inheritance, which is granted by the Holy Quran and Sunnah, is un-Islamic and against the principles of the Holy Quran and Sunnah, hence void and illegal, and may be subject to punishment also.
"We further declare that all or any such custom or usage, which affects the rights of inheritance of women in any manner whatsoever, irrespective of the name by which it is called or known in any area of the country, is un-Islamic and illegal and calls for actions against the perpetrator of such crime under Section 498-A of PPC, as such actions by the relevant authorities of the State falls within the scope of Amr bil Maroof Wa Nahi Anil Munkar, which is an important duty of the State under the Act X of 1991 (Enforcement of Shari'ah Act, 1991)."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cryptocurrency's future in Pakistan
Cryptocurrency's future in Pakistan

Business Recorder

time5 days ago

  • Business Recorder

Cryptocurrency's future in Pakistan

Legalization of cryptocurrency in Pakistan has evolved into a complex legal and financial dilemma. The Government of Pakistan established Pakistan Crypto Council (PCC) in February 2025 under chairmanship of the Federal Finance Minister, Senator Muhammad Aurangzeb. Appointment of Bilal Saqib as CEO of the PCC and subsequently as Special Assistant to the Prime Minister on blockchain and cryptocurrency has marked a symbolic elevation of digital assets in the national discourse. The PPC's announcement to allocate 2,000 megawatts of energy to crypto mining and formation of the Pakistan Digital Assets Authority are bold steps, but the licencing frameworks are yet to be developed. Although the reported appointment of World Liberty Financial as a key advisory firm has added international optics, domestic procedural clarity is still not available. Despite the passage of four months since the PPC's inception no 'white papers', consultation drafts, or public engagement forums to solicit expert feedback or industry alignment are in the offing. Absence of such foundational discourse tends to create regulatory ambiguity and a vacuum of informed public policy. The industry is operating in an atmosphere of speculation where neither the legal model nor its operational dynamics are known and this opacity frustrates stakeholders, impedes innovation, and delays essential compliance-building measures. Announcement by Bilal Saqib'at the Bitcoin 2025 Conference in Las Vegas declaring Pakistan's intention to establish a government-led Bitcoin Strategic Reserve was a dramatic disclosure and sudden escalation. Reference to the United States as an inspirational model also added geopolitical colour, but the declaration raised significant alarm. The notion of building strategic reserves in a highly volatile asset like Bitcoin without defined risk controls, legal backing, or multilateral support, especially under an active programme of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) creates a scenario fraught with institutional, constitutional, and international tensions. The IMF does not recognize cryptocurrency as reserve assets or legal tender, complicating any alignment with sovereign commitments. The existing legal framework, including the Constitution of Pakistan, the State Bank of Pakistan Act, 1956 and the Pakistan Currency Act, 1950, prohibits any parallel currency system or strategic reserves outside officially sanctioned instruments. Concerns intensify when factoring in risks such as foreign exchange reserve mismanagement, cyber security threats, lack of transparency, limited liquidity utilization, reputational exposure, and fragile policy credibility. The subsequent clarification by the CEO of PCC during a televised interview has further complicated the matter. His assertion that Pakistan would build its Bitcoin reserves using seized crypto assets rather than public funds revealed a glaring misunderstanding of international asset forfeiture law. In jurisdictions such as the United States, ownership of seized crypto remains with the accused until judicial forfeiture is finalized. The legal transfer process mandates court orders, after which assets are either returned to victims, retained by agencies, or liquidated into fiat and deposited into the treasury. The US government does not hold seized cryptocurrencies in reserve but auctions them post-forfeiture. The exposure of CEO of PCC, lacking comprehension and accurately communicating these mechanisms, reflects poorly on regulatory preparedness of the country. It has also eroded already fragile credibility of Pakistan on the global stage. Despite its economic fragility, Pakistan remains among the top ten crypto-friendly nations. The projected number of cryptocurrency users in Pakistan is expected to reach 28.9 million by 2026, with projected revenues of $2.4 billion in 2025. Legalization of crypto in such a volatile economic environment poses existential risks to monetary sovereignty and financial sector stability. The unregulated adoption of crypto could erode confidence in the rupee, weaken the ability of State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) to manage inflation, and incentivize capital flight. The risk of financial disintermediation grows as users shift to decentralized financial systems, bypassing the regulated banking infrastructure. The situation poses a dual risk of systemic instability and heightened scrutiny from global regulatory bodies, particularly Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the IMF. A more appropriate strategy under these conditions is to recognize crypto strictly as a digital asset class, not as legal tender. The asset treatment model preserves SBP's independence while allowing innovation under strict regulatory conditions. The formation of a regulated ecosystem of licensed Virtual Asset Service Providers must be the cornerstone of Pakistan's digital asset strategy. Exchanges, wallets, and custodians should operate within a tightly regulated framework governed by Security & Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) and SBP with mandatory know-your-client (KYC), anti-money laundering (AML) protocols, transaction reporting, and audit mechanisms. The development of a regulatory sandbox environment would enable controlled experimentation under the supervision of regulatory bodies. This approach will support technical learning, policy formulation, and risk detection without national exposure. The cross-border use of crypto must be initially restricted to prevent capital outflows and preserve foreign exchange stability. The government must distance itself from any notion of sovereign crypto reserves and instead focus on integrating blockchain into public services, such as tokenized bonds, digital land registries, welfare programmes, and logistics tracking. The need for dedicated digital asset legislation is critical at this point of time. The legal framework should classify various token types, outline custodial responsibilities, define consumer protection mechanisms, and ensure compliance with global financial regulations. Regulatory capacity must be developed in tandem. Training programmes must be established for regulators, law enforcement, forensic auditors, and judicial officials to develop the institutional fluency required for effective oversight. The international investment narrative around Pakistan's digital future must be repositioned. Pakistan should host a 'Crypto Summit' in Islamabad, followed by regional events in Lahore and Karachi. These summits should not pose as PR campaigns but as policy-shaping forums, connecting global blockchain firms with Pakistani fintechs, banks, academic institutions, and startups. These platforms must also educate and guide the next generation of developers, regulators, and entrepreneurs. The goal must be the formation of a trust-based public-private ecosystem capable of managing, scaling, and governing digital asset innovation securely and sustainably. The broader institutional ecosystem must be evaluated for performance and reform. The PCC, despite bold announcements, lacks transparency. It has also failed to launch consultative processes, technical papers, or stakeholder engagements. Its work remains confined to speeches and symbolic declarations without measurable progress or inclusion. The passive role of the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC) must also be addressed. The SIFC must assume leadership in developing Pakistan's crypto economy, beginning with the orchestration of global summits enabling the regulatory apparatus to scale in line with international best practices. The strategic vision should prioritize safe integration, regulatory maturity, and private sector participation. The global digital economy presents Pakistan with a unique opportunity to redefine itself as a competitive, secure, and innovation-driven hub. In Pakistan, the future of crypto is bright, anchored in its youthful demographic, entrepreneurial appetite, and capacity to leapfrog institutional bottlenecks through decentralized infrastructure. The right legal architecture, international cooperation, and governance transparency can turn this potential into a powerful national asset. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

94 out of 216 escapees recaptured after Karachi Malir jailbreak
94 out of 216 escapees recaptured after Karachi Malir jailbreak

Express Tribune

time04-06-2025

  • Express Tribune

94 out of 216 escapees recaptured after Karachi Malir jailbreak

Listen to article Following the mass jailbreak from Karachi's District Malir Jail, authorities recaptured three more escapees late Tuesday night, bringing the total number of arrested inmates to 94 out of the 216 escaped prisoners. However, 122 prisoners still remain at large, and a search operation is underway to apprehend them, officials confirmed. According to jail authorities, a case pertaining to the jailbreak has been registered at Shah Latif Town Police Station, where an FIR was filed by the prison's Deputy Superintendent Zulfiqar Ali Pirzada under different sections of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) and the Anti-Terrorism Act. The charges listed include attempted murder, dacoity, police encounter and terrorism, among others. The authorities have appealed to the public for assistance in locating the remaining fugitives and have ramped up coordination between law enforcement agencies to ensure their swift capture. Raids are being carried out in different parts of the city with surveillance increased at the known residences of the escaped prisoners. Furthermore, officials have announced that inmmates who return voluntarily to the jail will be granted leniency. Voluntary prisoner surrender Amidst the ongoing Malir Jail escape case, one more prisoner has voluntarily turned himself in. Asif, who was serving a sentence under Section 380 (theft), surrendered himself and upon recalling the jailbreak, he said the incident began the moment tremors from the earthquake were felt. 'As soon as the earthquake struck, prisoners started coming out of their barracks,' he said. 'There was no one there to stop us.' He described how all the inmates exited through the main gate and made their way to the road outside. Expressing remorse, Asif said, 'I want to complete my sentence'. He added that he had already spent 10 months in jail and his case is still ongoing. Earlier, a woman took her son and his friend back to the jail, one of whom was a drug addict and had reached home at 3.30am on the night of the jail break. The woman said she gave them meal before taking them back to the jail. She was hopeful that her son would recover from drug addiction in the jail. Read: Over 200 inmates escape from Malir Jail CM orders probe Meanwhile, in an emergency meeting held at the Chief Minister's House, Sindh CM Murad Ali Shah ordered a thorough investigation into the Malir Jail escape incident. He assigned Chief Secretary Asif Hyder Shah to oversee the probe by involving Karachi Commissioner Hassan Naqvi and Karachi Police Chief Javed Alam Odho. Addressing the press after the meeting, Murad criticised the jail administration for failing to seek immediate assistance from local authorities and law enforcement agencies. 'There seems to have been a complete breakdown in communication and preparedness,' he said during the press conference. He stressed that those found negligent would face consequences, 'Those responsible will be held accountable'. The chief minister also instructed the home secretary to carry out a detailed security audit of all prisons across Sindh. A robust search operation by the district and jail police and Rangers had followed the jail break, during which 90 escapees were recaptured on Tuesday. According to the police, the jail administration evacuated the prisoners from the barracks as a precautionary measure due to the potential danger following the earthquake. Around 3,000 prisoners gathered near the Mari Gate, causing a stampede. The Home and Law Minister dubbed this jailbreak as 'one of the largest-ever in Pak­istan". The prisoners took advantage of the situation, broke the locks of the Mari Gate, and started escaping by jumping over the jail walls. Read More: Inmates escape from Karachi's Malir jail after breaking wall Jail police and Frontier Corps (FC) personnel tried to stop the prisoners by firing warning shots. However, one prisoner snatched a kalashnikov from a police officer and started firing indiscriminately, injuring two FC personnel and one police officer. Other prisoners also injured officials with stones and sticks and managed to escape. The intense firing caused panic in the area, and traffic on the National Highway was suspended. The road from Quaidabad to Malir Jail was closed, resulting in long queues of vehicles between Malir Kala Board and Quaidabad. A large contingent of District Malir police, Rangers, and FC reached the scene. The IG and DIG prisons, Superintendent of Jail, SSP Malir, and other senior officials also reached the site. Sindh Home Minister Zia ul Hassan Lanjar took notice of the incident and directed SSP Malir to take immediate action and arrest the escaped prisoners. He instructed effective measures, surveillance, intelligence, and roadblocks, and ordered strict departmental action against negligent officials. The jailbreak started late night on June 2 and continued into early morning on June 3 after hundreds of inmates, unsettled by mild tremors, were brought into the prison yard as a safety measure, Sindh Home Minister Zia ul Hasan Lanjar said while speaking to reporters at the site. A door-to-door search was conducted in the surrounding areas. Locals captured videos of the escaping prisoners and shared them on social media, showing some shirtless prisoners fleeing barefoot and others escaping in six-seat rickshaws. In the initial search operation, 50 prisoners were arrested from the jail quarters, while Malir City police arrested 19 prisoners from different vehicles, and Sukhan police arrested eight others. The police also made announcements on mosque loudspeakers to inform the public about the prisoners' descriptions. Identity cards were checked, and suspicious individuals were taken into custody for questioning. IG Sindh Ghulam Nabi Memon also reached Malir Jail on Tuesday morning and received a briefing from the Superintendent on the situation. IG ellaborated to reporters that most of the prisoners were jailed in narcotics cases, and several of them had psychological issues. Murad has removed Inspector General of Prisons Qazi Nazir, suspended DIG Prisons Hassan Sehto and Malir Jail Super­intendent Arshad Hussain over the incident. Murad termed the incident "completely unacceptable" and vowed to hold those responsible accountable, citing gross negligence by jail authorities. Sindh Senior Minister Sharjeel Inam Memon has said announced that no strict action would be taken against prisoners who voluntarily return within 24 hours. However, those who fail to return, will be charged under the provisions of jailbreak, which carry a sentence of up to seven years in prison.

'Offer met with silence can't be accepted later'
'Offer met with silence can't be accepted later'

Express Tribune

time03-06-2025

  • Express Tribune

'Offer met with silence can't be accepted later'

The Lahore High Court (LHC) has set aside a family court's ruling, observing that an offer or proposal which is not expressly accepted and is instead met with silence, conduct or behaviour indicating disinterest or unwillingness, cannot be accepted at a later stage. The case involved petitioner Ahmed Raza, who, during family court proceedings, offered that he had no objection to the decreeing of two suits - one for recovery of maintenance allowance and another for dowry articles and gold ornaments - in favour of Respondent No.2. However, he made this conditional upon her parents or real brothers swearing a special oath on the Holy Quran, affirming that her claims were truthful. Interestingly, at the time, the respondents did not respond to the offer, neither accepting nor rejecting it. The petitioner subsequently closed his oral evidence, sought time to produce documentary evidence, and the case was fixed for final arguments on November 16, 2020. However, before the final arguments could proceed, the respondents filed an application expressing their willingness to accept the petitioner's earlier offer made during cross-examination. The petitioner contested this application, requesting the court to decide the suits on merit. Nevertheless, the family court ruled that the petitioner could not back out of the offer or proposal he had made. Challenging this decision, the petitioner approached the LHC, which overturned the family court's order. Justice Malik Waqar Haider Awan held that once the trial had moved forward, leaving the offer unaccepted, it became ineffective. "The party missed the train by not expressly accepting the offer promptly," the judge noted. Thereafter, the petitioner's documentary evidence was recorded, and the matter was set down for final arguments. Counsel for Respondents No. 2 to 4 contended that once the offer for a special oath was made, the petitioner could not withdraw from it. Subsequently, the LHC held that a lack of timely acceptance rendered the proposal null and void.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store