
Harvard agrees to relinquish early images of enslaved people, ending a long legal battle
BOSTON — Harvard University will relinquish 175-year-old photographs believed to be the earliest taken of enslaved people to a South Carolina museum devoted to African American history as part of a settlement with a woman who says she is one of the subjects' descendants.
The photos of the subjects identified by Tamara Lanier as her great-great-great-grandfather Renty, whom she calls 'Papa Renty,' and his daughter Delia will be transferred from the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology to the International African American Museum in Charleston, South Carolina, the state where they were enslaved in 1850 when the photos were taken, a lawyer for Lanier said Wednesday.
The settlement marks the end of a 15-year battle between Lanier and the university to release the 19th-century daguerreotypes, a precursor to modern-day photographs. Lanier's attorney Joshua Koskoff told The Associated Press that the resolution is an 'unprecedented' victory for descendants of those enslaved in the U.S. and praised his client's yearslong determination in pursuing justice for the people she had identified as her ancestors.
'I think it's one of one in American history, because of the combination of unlikely features: to have a case that dates back 175 years, to win control over images dating back that long of enslaved people — that's never happened before,' Koskoff said.
A key question of the case was whether Harvard could legally be allowed to continue owning dehumanizing images of enslaved people who couldn't consent to taking part. The Massachusetts court system ultimately sided with Harvard on the question of ownership, but allowed Lanier to continue to pursue emotional damages from the institution.
Harvard said Wednesday that it had long been working to relinquish ownership of the images 'to put them in the appropriate context and increase access to them for all Americans.'
Negotiations between Harvard and Lanier lawyers resulted in a settlement that included the removal of the images from Harvard's ownership.
On Wednesday, Lanier stood holding a portrait of Papa Renty while arm-in-arm with Susanna Moore, the great-great-great-granddaughter of Harvard biologist Louis Agassiz, who commissioned the images on behalf of the university and whose theories on racial difference were once used to support slavery in the U.S. Both great-great-great grandaughters — one of enslaved people and another of a man who exploited them — praised the resolution.
'This is a moment in history where the sons and daughters of stolen ancestors can stand with pride and rightfully proclaim a victory for reparations,' Lanier said. 'This pilfered property, images taken without dignity or consent and used to promote a racist psychoscience will now be repatriated to a home where their stories can be told and their humanity can be restored.'
Moore called the images captured by her ancestor, Agassiz, a 'deeply racist project.'
'This victory reminds us that the meaning of such objects in museums can and should change,' she said. 'This woman standing next to me, she knew all along she was not small and she was not alone.'
A question of ownership
In 2019, Lanier sued Harvard, alleging the images were taken 'without Renty's and Delia's consent and therefore unlawfully retained.' The suit attacked Harvard for its 'exploitation' of Renty's image at a 2017 conference and in other uses. It said Harvard has capitalized on the images by demanding a 'hefty' licensing fee to reproduce them.
Agassiz came across Renty and Delia while touring plantations in search of racially 'pure' enslaved individuals born in Africa, according to Lanier's suit. To create the images, both Renty and Delia were posed shirtless and photographed from several angles.
'To Agassiz, Renty and Delia were nothing more than research specimens,' the suit said. 'The violence of compelling them to participate in a degrading exercise designed to prove their own subhuman status would not have occurred to him, let alone mattered.'
In 2021, a Massachusetts court ruled that photos are the property of the photographer, not the subject — a stance affirmed by the Massachusetts Supreme Court.
However, while Harvard sought to have the case dismissed, the state high court allowed the case to proceed on Lanier's claim to emotional distress damages.
The state's highest court recognized 'Harvard's complicity in the horrific actions surrounding the creation of the daguerreotypes,' saying that 'Harvard's present obligations cannot be divorced from its past abuses.'
In a statement, Harvard said it had 'long been eager to place the Zealy Daguerreotypes with another museum or other public institution.'
'This settlement now allows us to move forward towards that goal,' the university said. 'While we are grateful to Ms. Lanier for sparking important conversations about these images, this was a complex situation, particularly since Harvard has not confirmed that Ms. Lanier was related to the individuals in the daguerreotypes.'
A new home for Renty and Delia
Tonya M. Matthews, the CEO of the International African American Museum, called Harvard's relinquishing of the images a moment '175 years in the making.'
'The bravery, tenacity, and grace shown by Ms. Lanier throughout the long and arduous process of returning these critical pieces of Renty and Delia's story to South Carolina is a model for us all,' she said in a statement.
The South Carolina museum has committed to working with Lanier and including her in decisions about how the story of the images will be told.
In Lanier's lawsuit, she asked for Harvard to acknowledge its complicity in slavery, listen to Lanier's oral family history and pay an unspecified sum in damages. An undisclosed financial settlement was part of the resolution with Harvard announced Wednesday, but Koskoff said Harvard still hasn't publicly acknowledged Lanier's connection to them or its connection to perpetuating slavery in the U.S., Koskoff said.
'That is just left unanswered by Harvard,' he said. Koskoff said he wants to be clear that Lanier and his team 'firmly support' Harvard's current fight against the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump as the White House moves to cut billions in federal aid and block the enrollment of international students, accusing the institution of being a hotbed of liberalism and antisemitism.
'We are not here today to bash Harvard... but that doesn't mean that they are perfect, and that doesn't mean that they don't have the obligation to tell a full history, even one that sheds poorly on their own veritas,' he said.
He said Lanier isn't expecting or waiting to hear from the institution, but that the settlement speaks for itself.
'In the end, the truth will find you — you can you can only hide from it for so long,' he said. 'Yes, history is written by the winners. But over time, you know, those winners look like losers sometimes.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Welsh first year at Harvard fears Trump ban will stop him finishing degree
A British freshman at Harvard fears he will not be able to return to the US to complete his degree after Donald Trump demanded it stops teaching international students. Alfred Williamson, 20, from Cardiff, left Boston when the academic year ended two weeks ago to visit family in Denmark, only to wake up on 23 May to dozens of missed calls and messages from loved ones about the decision to prevent the Ivy League university from enrolling or retaining foreign nationals. Approximately a quarter of Harvard's 30,000-strong student body comes from abroad. The university filed a lawsuit last week challenging the government order and on Thursday a Boston judge issued a two-week injunction but the futures of thousands of students like Williamson remain uncertain. 'I was in shock. I had kept a close eye on Trump's threats but I never thought he'd actually do it, I thought it was just a scare tactic,' said the physics and government student. 'People struggled for years to study somewhere like this only for it to be taken away in a matter of moments and we are being called illegal immigrants and aliens. Things are moving quickly and no one knows what to expect.' The Trump administration has demanded that Harvard's international students transfer to other universities in order to hang on to their visas. Both Germany and Hong Kong have floated the idea of hosting 'exile campuses' for international students unable to return to the school, but Harvard has yet to respond to the proposals. Since taking office in January, Ivy League and other elite US universities have been in Trump's crosshairs, with the president repeatedly accusing Harvard of kowtowing to 'wokism' and 'radical left lunatics' as well as fostering violence and antisemitism since the outbreak of the war in Gaza. He has also claimed, without providing evidence, the university is coordinating with the Chinese Communist party. Williamson has also wondered whether the US president singled him out during the announcement of the new measures targeting Harvard. Sign up to Headlines UK Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion 'They're taking people from areas of the world that are very radicalised and we don't want them making trouble in our country,' Trump said earlier this week. 'I saw yesterday that in the middle of the UK, there was a nice young man who wants to go back to school at Harvard and he looked good to me but I want to check.' 'The mood on campus after Trump was elected was very difficult, people were scared. Rumours Ice agents were around would spread and the international students would all go hide in their dorms,' Williamson said. He has not yet heard if his visa has been renewed for next year. He is aware that some peers have already faced delays and other issues, but the university has been 'very supportive'. While he is unsure about whether he will be able to continue his studies at Harvard, for now, Williamson said he is not entertaining the idea of applying or transferring elsewhere. He added: 'My first year at Harvard was the best year of my life. I don't want to give up on that unless there is no other choice.'

Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Live updates: Supreme Court lets Trump revoke status of 530,000 migrants
a minute ago 12:01 EDT Ted Hesson The decision expands the pool of migrants who could be potentially deported as the Trump administration seeks to ramp up removals. Stephen Miller, a top White House official and the architect of Trump's immigration agenda, said this week that the administration was calling on federal immigration officers to arrest 3,000 migrants per day - 10 times the daily average last year under Biden. Trump vs. Biden on 'immigration parole' 19 minutes ago 11:43 EDT Andrew Chung Immigration parole is a form of temporary permission under American law to be in the country for "urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit." That allows recipients to live and work in the United States. Biden, a Democrat, used parole as part of his administration's approach by to deter illegal immigration at the U.S.-Mexican border. Biden starting in 2022 allowed Venezuelans who entered the United States by air to request a two-year parole if they passed security checks and had a U.S. financial sponsor. Biden expanded that process to Cubans, Haitians and Nicaraguans in 2023 as his administration grappled with high levels of illegal immigration from those nationalities. Trump called for ending humanitarian parole programs in an executive order signed on January 20, his first day back in office. The Department of Homeland Security subsequently moved to terminate them in March, cutting short the two-year parole grants. The administration said revoking the parole status would make it easier to place migrants in a fast-track deportation process called "expedited removal." What led up to the Supreme Court ruling? 26 minutes ago 11:37 EDT Andrew Chung The plaintiffs, a group of migrants granted parole and Americans who serve as their sponsors, sued administration officials claiming the administration violated federal law governing the actions of government agencies. Boston-based U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in April found that the law governing such parole did not allow for the program's blanket termination, instead requiring a case-by-case review. The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined to put the judge's decision on hold. In its filing, the Justice Department told the Supreme Court that Talwani's order had upended "critical immigration policies that are carefully calibrated to deter illegal entry," effectively "undoing democratically approved policies that featured heavily in the November election" that returned Trump to the presidency. The plaintiffs told the Supreme Court they would face grave harm if their parole is cut short given that the administration has indefinitely suspended processing their pending applications for asylum and other immigration relief. They said they would be separated from their families and immediately subject to expedited deportation "to the same despotic and unstable countries from which they fled, where many will face serious risks of danger, persecution and even death." Justices Sotomayor and Jackson dissented 11:19 EDT Andrew Chung FILE PHOTO: Ketanji Brown Jackson in Washington, February 13, 2025. Jacquelyn Martin/Pool via REUTERS As with many of the court's orders issued in an emergency fashion, the decision was unsigned and gave no reasoning. Two of the court's three liberal justices, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor, publicly dissented. The court botched its assessment of whether the administration was entitled to freeze Talwani's decision pending the litigation, Jackson wrote in an accompanying opinion. The outcome, Jackson wrote, "undervalues the devastating consequences of allowing the government to precipitously upend the lives and livelihoods of nearly half a million noncitizens while their legal claims are pending." 44 minutes ago 11:18 EDT The U.S. Supreme court published its unsigned order on its website Friday morning. The order tops Jackson's dissent. The Supreme Court lets Trump revoke 'parole' status for 500,000+ migrants an hour ago 11:17 EDT Andrew Chung The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday let President Donald Trump 's administration revoke the temporary legal status of hundreds of thousands of Venezuelan, Cuban, Haitian and Nicaraguan migrants living in the United States The move bolsters the Republican president's drive to step up deportations. The court put on hold Boston-based U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani's order halting the administration's move to end the immigration "parole" granted to 532,000 of these migrants by Trump's predecessor Joe Biden, potentially exposing many of them to rapid removal, while the case plays out in lower courts.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Unions representing Harvard workers fear Trump's ‘authoritarian turn'
Labor unions representing undergraduate, graduate, postdoctoral and academic workers at Harvard University criticized the Trump administration's efforts to prevent Harvard from enrolling foreign students, calling it 'one of the single largest concentrated deportation threats against a unionized workforce in our nation's history'. A judge on 29 May extended an injunction blocking the Trump administration from revoking Harvard's ability to host international students, which would affect 5,000 current students and 2,000 graduates in a post-graduation work programme. Some 4,000 student workers represented by unions at Harvard who would be impacted. 'The Trump's administration's threat to international scholars is a huge attack on thousands of UAW-represented workers on Harvard's campus. We are seeing escalations against immigrant workers across the country and this is no different,' said the director of the United Auto Workers Region 9A, Brandon Mancilla. 'The labor movement must see these attacks as what they are – an attempt to divide workers and create false enemies in a time of rampant corporate greed.' Sudipta Saha, a fourth-year PhD candidate in population health sciences at Harvard who holds citizenship with Canada and Bangladesh, and is a member of the executive board of the Harvard Graduate Students Union, explained the fears the move has instilled in international student workers on campus who are worried about their visa status, education and research. 'Even if Harvard wins this particular case, the broader authoritarian turn that this represents is still being successful, because a lot of people are worried about whether they can actually speak out,' said Saha. 'International students who have been asking me, have been asking each other, is it safe to go on the record? Is it safe to even write an op ed? And I think when people are asking questions like that, that kind of shows how already, how successful this kind of crackdown has been.' 'We do a lot of vital work. There are people working on robotics, cancer drugs and Alzheimer's research. All of that is impacted when they're forced to stop,' he added. 'All of this research work is tangled with a ton of other industries that are not necessarily within the university, from development of these pharmaceutical drugs to research equipment, all of those things are affected if they were forced to stop their work and leave.' The Trump administration has also halted interviews for all student exchanges and visas and secretary of state Marco Rubio has vowed to begin revoking visas of students from China with ties to the China Communist party or working in critical fields. Ellen Yi, a Rhodes scholar from China who was admitted to a doctoral program at Harvard, was set to join Harvard in fall 2025, but is now looking for different options. 'I feel a strong sense of insecurity and uncertainty. The policy keeps swinging back and forth and we don't know what is the next step of the government,' said Yi. 'I'm very pessimistic about the future and I'm looking for some safer options.' In response to Rubio's threats of revoking visas from Chinese students, she said: 'I was not very surprised, but still very disappointed, frustrated and kind of panicked, because the policy statement was very unclear,' adding it remains unclear how the Trump administration will define connections to the Chinese Communist party or critical fields. 'I find this absurd,' said Ozan Baytaş, a postdoctoral researcher at Harvard Medical School from Turkey. 'There's a clear attack on the universities, freedom of speech, academic freedom and science, and there's a clear intention to purge the current system of many non-citizen workers who are very talented.' He cited Maureen Martin, the director of immigration services at Harvard, who wrote in a court declaration that the revocation notice has made students afraid to attend graduation ceremonies, have forced international students to reconsider their futures at Harvard and inquire about transferring, and that incoming international students have already reported experiencing issues in obtaining visas. 'Many internationals, non-citizen workers are afraid to speak out. Many want to leave. Many don't want to come back to the US, because they think their future plans may be interrupted by a whimsical move from the government at any moment,' Baytas added. 'The best of the best in the world wants to come here to Harvard because there are opportunities. There are many good research labs, and they simply won't come here, and the science here will suffer.' Despite the policies and rhetoric coming from the Trump administration, Baytaş argued that student workers and unions, in and out of the legal system, intend to fight back. 'People in the US here say stand up, fight back, so I am confident academic freedom will rise,' he concluded. 'I'm very hopeful, despite all the failings of the current administration.' Harvard and the White House did not respond to multiple requests for comment.