logo
Disposable vape ban begins but will teens quit?

Disposable vape ban begins but will teens quit?

Yahoo2 days ago

The ban on the sale of single-use disposable vapes will come into force on Sunday across the UK, aimed at protecting children's health and the environment.
It means shops and supermarkets will no longer be able to stock them - but they can still sell rechargeable or refillable devices.
Disposable vapes have been cited as a key driver in the rise in youth vaping, while every year five million vapes are thrown away.
Ministers predict it will have a significant impact but health experts say further regulation is needed to tackle youth vaping.
Why are disposable vapes being banned and how harmful is vaping?
'I don't know what we'll do' - Vapers panic-buy ahead of disposables ban
Disposable vapes ban unlikely to reduce appeal, says campaigner
Retailers in England and Wales breaching the ban face a £200 fine for the first offence with potentially unlimited fines or jail for those who repeatedly re-offend.
The ban was first announced for England and Wales by the previous Conservative government but the law was not enacted before last summer's general election.
Labour then pushed ahead with it.
Scotland and Northern Ireland have introduced their own bans, timed to coincide with the one in England and Wales.
Vape use has risen rapidly over the last decade with 9% of the British public now buying and using e-cigarettes.
Latest figures suggest about one in four vapers use the disposable versions, although that proportion has fallen since the ban was announced.
And while it is illegal to sell vapes to anyone under 18, disposable vapes, often sold in smaller, more colourful packaging than refillable ones, have been cited as an important factor in the rise of youth vaping.
Currently one in seven 18 to 24-year-olds vape but have never smoked.
Vaping is substantially less harmful than smoking but it has not been around for long enough for its long-term risks to be known, according to the NHS.
The environmental impact is considerable. Single-use vapes are difficult to recycle and typically end up in landfill where their batteries can leak harmful chemicals like battery acid, lithium, and mercury into the environment, the government said.
Batteries thrown into household waste also cause hundreds of fires in bin lorries and waste-processing centres every year.
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs estimates almost five million single-use vapes were either littered or thrown into general waste each week last year.
Environment minister Mary Creagh said: "For too long, single-use vapes have blighted our streets as litter and hooked our children on nicotine. That ends today.
"The government calls time on these nasty devices."
But Action on Smoking and Health chief executive Hazel Cheeseman questioned what impact the ban would have, pointing out new refillable vape kits were coming on to the market that look and cost similar to the single-use ones.
She said it would not be until the Tobacco and Vapes Bill, which includes powers to regulate marketing, branding and advertising, came into power that the issue of youth vaping could be truly tackled.
"Their appeal is driven by bright colours, wide availability and cheap prices," she said.
"The new regulations will hopefully help to address the environmental impact, but government will need further regulations to address the appeal of products to teenagers."
She said this was very much a balancing act as vapes were an important tool to help people quit.
"Vaping is very much less harmful than smoking and is the most popular aid to quitting in the UK," she added.
John Dunne, of the UK Vaping Industry Association, said bans were "not the answer".
He said he was concerned that a black market in single-use vapes could develop and some people may be tempted to return to smoking cigarettes.
"Disposables have played a huge role in reducing smoking levels amongst adults to record low levels. It's why we are seeing stockpiling in the lead up to the ban," he added.
Scott Butler, executive director of Material Focus, an independent not-for-profit organisation, said that he was still concerned that vapes are still difficult to recycle and reuse.
He said customers and businesses should demand sustainable options.
"Given the rampant binning and littering that we already see, will we see any behaviour change? Only if producers, importers and retailers step up and meet their long existing legal obligations to provide and pay for takeback and recycling," he said.
Help young vapers and don't judge, consultant says

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK government faces inquiry into appointment of new independent football regulator chair
UK government faces inquiry into appointment of new independent football regulator chair

New York Times

time22 minutes ago

  • New York Times

UK government faces inquiry into appointment of new independent football regulator chair

The UK government faces a 'full inquiry' into the handling of its proposed appointment of the new chairman of the independent football regulator, David Kogan. Focus will fall on the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), which received an email addressed to Permanent Secretary, Susannah Storey last Thursday (May 29) from the Commissioner for Public Appointments, William Shawcross, who is likely to interview both Kogan and the secretary of state, Lisa Nandy, during his investigations. Advertisement Shawcross decided to proceed with an inquiry after initial 'spot checks' raised unspecified concerns about the process. Kogan, 67, was not on the initial three-person shortlist for the role but was recommended by Nandy after more than two decades negotiating TV rights sales on behalf of the Premier League, English Football League (EFL) and Women's Super League. Nandy named Kogan as her choice to chair the regulator in April and on May 9 he was revealed as the preferred candidate, with a report from the DCMS 'recognising his vast experience in the football and media sectors'. Shawcross, 79, was appointed to his role in 2021 following a long career in broadcasting and writing, which included a biography of media magnate Rupert Murdoch. It is his responsibility to provide independent assurance that public hires are made in accordance with a governance code that include principles such as integrity, merit, openness, diversity and fairness. Once the inquiry has been completed, Shawcross will advise whether the appointment process has followed certain guidelines. He does not have the power to decide what happens next but his findings will influence the credibility of any government decision about how it proceeds. A DCMS spokesperson said: 'We have received the letter from the Commissioner for Public Appointments and we look forward to co-operating fully with his office. The appointment is in the process of being ratified in the usual way.' Kogan started his career as a journalist and set up a media advisory company called Reel Enterprises in 1997, and this became the go-to advisor for any league or governing body trying to maximise the value of its broadcast rights. He sold Reel Enterprises to media company Wasserman in 2011 but has continued to work with clients including the English Football League, International Olympic Committee, Premier League and the NFL on their rights auctions, as well as advising companies such as CNN and the New York Times on their digital strategies. Advertisement Since 2022, Kogan has made nine donations to Labour candidates and the party itself, totalling more than £33,000. He has also written two books about the party's history. Kogan also applied for the role of independent football regulator chair in 2024 when the Conservative government attempted to get its version of the Football Governance Bill through parliament. However, Rishi Sunak called an election in the summer and the Conservatives ran out of time to pass the legislation while in office. A fan-led review called for the introduction of a regulator in November 2021 in the wake of the failed European Super League proposals, and the government announced plans to create one in February 2023. It will be tasked with ensuring the financial stability and sustainability of professional football in England, and will be independent from the government and football authorities.

Starmer acknowledges need for swift clarity on winter fuel payments
Starmer acknowledges need for swift clarity on winter fuel payments

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Starmer acknowledges need for swift clarity on winter fuel payments

The sooner the Government provides clarity about which pensioners will get the winter fuel payment in future, the better, Sir Keir Starmer has acknowledged. The Prime Minister also did not steer away from suggestions that an announcement on the payment could come at the spending review on June 11. Ministers decided to limit the payment, worth up to £300, to only the poorest pensioners in one of its first acts of Government. Some 10 million pensioners saw the payment withdrawn, which had previously been made universally to even the very rich. The move was aimed at addressing what the Government said was a £22 billion 'black hole' in the public finances. But last month in a partial U-turn, the Prime Minister suggested he wanted to see the payment go to more pensioners. The decision to means-test the payment was said to have come up on the doorstep with voters in recent local elections, and the Runcorn and Helsby by-election, which saw Reform UK win the constituency from Labour. Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, the Prime Minister said: 'I want to look again at where the threshold is. That's for sure. I'll be clear with you. 'In relation to that, I do think it was our duty to stabilise the economy and to fill in that £22 billion black hole. And I'm not going to resile from that.' Ministers 'need to be absolutely clear where the money is coming from' before they set out details of a partial U-turn on the winter fuel payment, Sir Keir said. He added: 'But I take your point, which is that if we want to look again at which pensioners are eligible, then the sooner we have clarity on that, the better.' Sir Keir did not rule out that further details could come at the spending review next week, only saying there were 'lots of moving parts' in the review. Last week, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner also signalled further details could come in the June 11 statement to the Commons, describing it as the 'first opportunity' to do so. Elsewhere in his interview with the BBC, the Prime Minister gave a strong signal he is considering scrapping the two-child benefit cap. Proponents of getting rid of the limit parents can claim for certain benefits related to their children say it could be the most effective way to eradicate child poverty. Asked by BBC Radio 4 about moves to scrap the cap, the Prime Minister said: 'I don't think this is a silver bullet. I will say that straight away. 'I think there are many measures that contribute to child poverty, and therefore I don't take the sort of binary approach: 'It's either this or nothing.' 'On the other hand, as I say, as we go forward with this review, I am clear in my own mind that I want this Labour Government to bring down child poverty, and I'm determined that that is what we will do.' The Government's flagship strategy aimed at tackling child poverty has been delayed until the autumn, with the aim of aligning it with the budget. Scrapping the cap is among the measures which could be unveiled as part of the child poverty strategy.

Reeves Says Tories Cost UK Taxpayer £1.4 Billion in Failed Covid Contracts
Reeves Says Tories Cost UK Taxpayer £1.4 Billion in Failed Covid Contracts

Bloomberg

time36 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Reeves Says Tories Cost UK Taxpayer £1.4 Billion in Failed Covid Contracts

Deficient pandemic-era contracts for protective equipment cost the British taxpayer £1.4 billion ($1.9 billion), the UK's Labour government said on Monday, blaming the former Conservative administration for 'reckless handling' of public money. The estimate includes £762 million that's unlikely ever to be recovered from suppliers because substandard gowns, masks and visors weren't inspected in a timely manner, the Treasury said in a statement. About £182 million has already been clawed back, and Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves is 'going further and faster' to get back the remaining £468 million, Britain's finance ministry said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store