Soda and candy targeted by three states in government crack down
Hundreds of thousands of food stamp recipients across Arkansas, Idaho and Utah will soon be banned from using their benefits to buy sugary snacks and sodas.
It the latest part of a sweeping new crackdown backed by Robert F. Kennedy Jr on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which helps low-income families pay for groceries.
The three Republican-led states have been granted waivers to restrict purchases with food stamp, aligning with Kennedy's 'Make America Healthy Again' campaign.
The bans, which mirror similar restrictions already approved in Indiana, Iowa and Nebraska, will block the use of SNAP funds on items like candy, soft drinks and other ultra-processed sugar-laden products.
Agriculture Secretary Brooke L. Rollins said the move reflects a broader push under the Trump administration to promote healthier eating habits while protecting taxpayer dollars. 'The Trump Administration is unified in improving the health of our nation,' she said.
'America's governors have proudly answered the call to innovate by improving nutrition programs, ensuring better choices while respecting the generosity of the American taxpayer.'
The changes will kick in on January 1, 2026 in Idaho and Utah. Arkansas will follow on July 1, 2026.
Critics have long argued that restricting SNAP purchases is a form of government overreach, while supporters say it's a necessary step to address America's obesity and diabetes crisis, which disproportionately impacts low-income communities.
The push for SNAP restrictions had been going on for years, and some are already on alcohol, tobacco, hot and prepared foods, and personal care products.
However, Nebraska got the ball rolling on the latest restrictions of soda and energy drinks, which will be implemented for at least two years.
'There's absolutely zero reason for taxpayers to be subsidizing purchases of soda and energy drinks,' said Nebraska Governor Jim Pillen.
Indiana and Idaho approved the restrictions a few days later. Indiana's restrictions will be on soft drinks and Candy, while Idaho's will be on soda and candy.
Arkansas and Iowa SNAP recipients will have a high amount of restrictions compared to other states.
Arkansas' waivers excludes low and no-calorie soda, fruit and vegetable drinks with less than 50% natural juice, and candy. Iowa excludes any food item eligible for sales tax such sweetened beverages, snacks and candy.
'This approval sends a clear message: President Trump and his administration are tackling America's chronic disease epidemic and Arkansas stands with him in that fight,' said Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders.
'Arkansas leads the nation in getting unhealthy, ultra-processed foods off food stamps and helping our most vulnerable citizens lead healthier lives.'
Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins insisted the Trump Administration is 'unified' in improving the nation's health
Kennedy, a government official known for his strong opinions of processed food, praised the six states planning to enable these restrictions.
'I call on every governor in the nation to submit a SNAP waiver to eliminate sugary drinks—taxpayer dollars should never bankroll products that fuel the chronic disease epidemic,' he said.
Besides these states, Montana, Arizona, Texas, Missouri, Tennessee, and West Virginia have considered or proposed bills for similar restrictions.
It is unclear if restrictions will take affect in these other states next year if the bills are passed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump poised to join war against Iran
Donald Trump was on Tuesday night poised to enter the war between Israel and Iran. The US president met his senior national security advisers shortly after sending a series of social media posts in which he warned Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's supreme leader, that the US knew where he was hiding. JD Vance, the vice-president, and other Trump loyalists also appeared to be preparing supporters for a new phase in the conflict, with Mr Vance posting on X that the president 'may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment'. Five days after Israel launched strikes on Iran, it puts the Middle East on the brink of a significant new escalation. Former Trump administration officials said the president was shifting to a more warlike posture after warnings of devastating Iranian reprisals against Israel had failed to materialise. Mr Trump called for Iran's immediate 'unconditional surrender' as missiles flew between the two countries. He added: 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there – we are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. But we don't want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin.' John Healey, the Defence Secretary, said on Tuesday that British Typhoon fighter jets could be deployed to support the UK's allies, although he stressed the need for de-escalation in the region. Speaking at the Rusi Land Warfare conference, he said: 'The deployment of Typhoons and other military assets are part of the moves to reinforce de-escalation in the region, security in the region and may also be used to help support our allies.' Earlier in the day, Sir Keir Starmer had said there was nothing to suggest that Mr Trump 'is about to get involved in this conflict'. In contrast, speaking on the sidelines of the G7 summit, Friedrick Merz, the German chancellor, warned that the complete destruction of Iran's nuclear weapons programme was on the agenda if Tehran did not return to talks. He said: 'The Israeli army is obviously unable to accomplish that. It lacks the necessary weapons. But the Americans have them.' Israel and Iran exchanged rocket fire again on Tuesday. Abdolrahim Mousavi, Iran's armed forces chief, urged residents of the major Israeli cities of Haifa and Tel Aviv to evacuate, warning: ' Punitive operations will be carried out soon.' Mr Trump hurried home early from the G7 summit in Canada, arriving back at the White House at dawn on Tuesday. He accused Emmanuel Macron, the French president, of wrongly saying that he had left to work on a 'ceasefire' when in fact he was needed for something 'much bigger than that'. That Mr Trump was weighing up entering the conflict seemed to be confirmed when he shared on Truth Social a text message he had received from Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel. Mr Huckabee said that God had saved Mr Trump from an assassination attempt 'to be the most consequential president in a century – maybe ever'. Likening the stakes to the US decision to drop nuclear bombs on Japan in the Second World War, he told Mr Trump 'only' to listen to God when it came to making his next choices. On his return to Washington, Mr Trump convened a meeting of his National Security Council to consider his next moves. At the same time, the Pentagon has been moving military hardware, including refuelling aircraft, closer to the Middle East. Flightradar 24, an aircraft tracking service, reported that 30 US Air Force planes were on their way to Europe. The US Navy has dispatched a second aircraft carrier group to the region. The carrier USS Nimitz, with its nine air squadrons and an escort force of five destroyers, is en route to join the USS Carl Vinson strike group in the Arabian Sea. A former Trump administration official said the president had become more bullish as warnings of mass casualties in Israel had proven unfounded. 'A lot of his generals gave him very ugly intel assessments, and those did not pan out,' he said. Simone Ledeen, former deputy assistant of defence for the Middle East under Mr Trump, said Israel's offensive had been far more decisive than expected. 'For all these years, smart thinking people and the intelligence community had been saying it would be an extremely bloody, protracted conflict, with thousands and thousands of casualties,' she said. 'That hasn't been the case.' Mr Trump trumpeted Israel's air supremacy on Tuesday, using a collective 'we', which commentators suggested could indicate forthcoming US action. 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran,' he posted on Truth Social. Fred Fleitz, who served on the National Security Council during Mr Trump's first term said the president had made the case that destroying Iran's nuclear facilities was in US interests. The most likely move, he said, was sending US heavy bombers to use bunker-busting weapons to target the Fordow uranium enrichment plant, buried deep within a mountain. 'That doesn't mean putting boots on the ground,' he added. Israel believes it can deal a permanent blow to Iran's nuclear ambitions if it has the help of the US. But deepening American involvement may alienate many of the voters who elected Mr Trump to keep the nation out of foreign wars. Mr Vance appeared to be preparing supporters for US military action, writing on X: 'The president has shown remarkable restraint in keeping our military's focus on protecting our troops and protecting our citizens. He may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment. That decision ultimately belongs to the president.' Charlie Kirk, a Maga figurehead who is hugely influential with younger, male Trump supporters, also fell into line behind the president. After having warned against any US intervention, on Tuesday he reminded followers that Mr Trump had long promised to prevent Iran building nuclear weapons. Mr Trump joined other G7 leaders on Monday to call for 'de-escalation'.
The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump administration demands action from 36 countries to avoid travel ban
The Trump administration has given 36 countries, most of them in Africa, a Wednesday deadline to commit to improve vetting or face a ban on their citizens visiting the United States. A weekend diplomatic cable sent by the State Department instructs embassies and consulates in the 36 countries to gauge their host countries' willingness by Wednesday to improve their citizens' travel documentation and take steps to address the status of their nationals who are in the United States illegally. The cable, which was described to The Associated Press, asks the countries to take action to address the U.S. concerns within 60 days or risk being added to the travel ban, which now includes 12 nations. Of the 36 new countries targeted, 25 are in Africa. State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce declined to comment on the specifics in the cable. She confirmed that the administration wanted nations to improve their own vetting processes for passport holders, accept their nationals deported from the U.S. and take other steps to ensure their citizens are not a threat to the U.S. 'We're looking at providing a period of time, (where if countries) don't get to that point where we can trust them and they've got to change the system, update it, do whatever they need to do to convince us that we can trust the process and the information they have,' she said. The 36 countries identified in the cable are: Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Benin, Bhutan, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Djibouti, Dominica, Ethiopia, Egypt, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Malawi, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, South Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Tonga, Tuvalu, Uganda, Vanuatu, Zambia and Zimbabwe. The Washington Post first reported on the cable.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump swats US intelligence reports on Iran's nuclear threat to align with Israel
Tulsi Gabbard, the US director of national intelligence, delivered a concise verdict during congressional testimony this March: the intelligence community 'continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme leader Khomeini has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003'. As he rushed back to Washington on Tuesday morning, Donald Trump swatted aside the assessment from the official that he handpicked to deliver him information from 18 US intelligence agencies. 'I don't care what she said,' said Trump. 'I think they were very close to having one.' Trump's assessment aligned him with Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, who has warned that Iran's 'imminent' plans to produce nuclear weapons required a pre-emptive strike from Israel – and, he hopes, from the United States – in order to shut down the Iranian uranium enrichment program for good. It also isolates Trump's spy chief, whom he nominated specifically because of her skepticism for past US interventions in the Middle East and of the broader intelligence community, which he has described as a 'deep state'. Gabbard sought to tamp down on a schism with Trump, telling CNN that Trump 'was saying the same thing that I said in my annual threat assessment back in March. Unfortunately too many people in the media don't care to actually read what I said.' But as the Trump administration now appears closer than ever before to a strike on Iran, Gabbard has been left out of key decision-making discussions and her assessments that Iran is not close to a nuclear breakout has become decidedly inconvenient for an administration now mulling a pre-emptive strike. 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!' he wrote in a social media post on Tuesday. The US has dispatched an additional carrier group, KC-135 refueling tankers and additional fighter jets to the region. Those assets have been sent to give Trump 'more options' for a direct intervention in the conflict, US media have reported. Deliberations over the intelligence regarding Iran's breakout time to a nuclear weapon will be pored over if the US moves forward with a strike that initiates a new foreign conflict for the US that could potentially reshape the Middle East and redefine a Trump presidency that was supposed to end the US era of 'forever wars'. Israel launched airstrikes last week in the wake of an International Atomic Energy Agency report that formally declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in 20 years and said the country had enriched enough uranium to near weapons grade to potentially make nine nuclear bombs. Gen Michael Erik Kurilla, the head of US Central Command who has forcefully campaigned for a tougher stance on Iran, told members of the armed services committee in the House of Representatives last week that Iran could have enough weapons-grade uranium for 'up to 10 nuclear weapons in three weeks'. Yet a CNN report on Tuesday challenged that claim. Four sources familiar with a US intelligence assessment said that Iran was 'not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon' and that the country was 'up to three years away from being able to produce and deliver one to a target of its choosing'. The skepticism over Iran's potential for a nuclear breakout has also been reflected in Gabbard's distancing from Trump's inner circle. People often represent policy in the Trump administration and those with unpopular views find themselves on the outside looking in. Trump last Sunday held a policy discussion with all the top member of his cabinet on national security. But Gabbard was not there. Her absence was taken as a sign that US policy was shifting in a direction against Iran. 'Why was Gabbard not invited to the Camp David meeting all day?' asked Steve Bannon, a member of Trump's Maga isolationist wing that has pushed against the US launching a direct strike against Iran. 'You know why,' responded Tucker Carlson, an influential pundit in Trump's America First coalition who had slammed 'warmongers' in the administration including popular Fox News hosts like Mark Levin. Days after the Camp David meeting, Gabbard released a bizarre video in which she warned about the threat of nuclear war, saying that this is the 'reality of what's at stake, what we are facing now'. 'Because as we stand here today, closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before, political elite and warmongers are carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers,' she said. The remarks could have referred to US involvement in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. But it is with Iran that US policy appears to be changing rapidly and avowed opponents of foreign interventions appear to be falling in line in order to avoid losing clout in the Trump administration. Trump 'may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment', said vice-president JD Vance, who has publicly called on the US to avoid costly overseas interventions but has remained muted over Iran. 'That decision ultimately belongs to the president. 'But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue,' he continued. 'And having seen this up close and personal, I can assure you that he is only interested in using the American military to accomplish the American people's goals. Whatever he does, that is his focus.'
