logo
Badenoch: Let bosses ban burkas in the workplace

Badenoch: Let bosses ban burkas in the workplace

Telegraph5 hours ago

A number of countries, including France, have banned the burka.
But Mrs Badenoch said: 'France has a ban and they have worse problems than we do in this country on integration. So banning the burka clearly is not the thing that's going to fix things.'
British law leaves it to individual employers to set their own rules around dress codes.
However, they could face legal challenges under equality and human rights laws if they were to tell staff to remove burkas or niqabs, on the grounds that they were discriminating against a religious belief.
An organisation would have to demonstrate its ban was 'proportionate' and for a 'legitimate aim', such as ensuring health and safety or enabling effective communication.
The main UK case law comes from 2007, when a bilingual support worker at a school in Dewsbury claimed constructive dismissal after she was refused permission to wear a niqab.
An employment tribunal sided with the school, which had argued the face covering would impede communication with her pupils, finding that there was no discrimination.
In her interview, Mrs Badenoch also fired a warning shot to would-be liberal rebels within the Tories who might oppose the commission she has set up examining the ECHR.
The Lawfare Commission is looking into how Britain could leave the convention and will report its findings by the party conference in October.
The question of whether to quit the ECHR has proved a divisive one within the party, with moderate Conservatives warning it could lead to a schism.
'I've moved a little bit on digital identity'
Mrs Badenoch said she is ready to block any candidates from standing for the party at a future election if they refuse to support her on the issue.
'If we make that decision that we have to leave the ECHR, then that will be a condition of standing for Parliament under the Tory banner.
'I'm afraid anybody who disagrees with that policy cannot and should not stand for Parliament as a Conservative MP.'
Mrs Badenoch also revealed that she is open to the introduction of digital ID cards if they would help clamp down on illegal migration.
The Government confirmed it is considering the proposals, published by the Tony Blair Institute, to crack down on visa overstaying and the black market.
Shortly after winning last summer's election, ministers had ruled out such an approach.
Mrs Badenoch said: 'I've actually moved a little bit on digital identity, mainly because every other company seems to have so many of our details.
'Google, the supermarkets, they all know so much about us, even more than the Government. If this is something that will help us solve other problems, then yes.
'We're not here just to oppose every single thing the government does, we want them to have good ideas. If they can show us that this is a good idea, then I think we'll support them.'
'We cannot leave the security of our country by the side because we're trying to save a few pennies'
If you want evidence that Kemi Badenoch is up for the fight against her critics, then look no further than the venue she chose for her speech on Friday.
The Tory leader was flanked by no fewer than six Union flags as she took to the podium at the Royal United Services Institute, a prestigious defence think tank founded by the Duke of Wellington.
During a 21-minute address, she railed against the ECHR and its Labour defenders, warning 'Britain is being mugged' by activist lawyers and judges.
The speech followed a bruising six weeks for the Tories, culminating in Thursday night's rout at the Hamilton by-election, which has left some internal critics asking whether it is time for Mrs Badenoch to meet her Waterloo.
But as we meet across a large table, on which the surrender of the German High Seas Fleet was signed at the end of World War One, there is no sign that she is preparing to wave the white flag.
Instead, the Tory leader channels the Iron Duke's uncompromising stance as she uses our interview to lay down the law to the liberal wing of her party.
'If we make that decision that we have to leave the ECHR, then that will be a condition of standing for Parliament under the Tory banner,' she insists.
'I'm afraid anybody who disagrees with that policy cannot and should not stand for Parliament as a Conservative MP.'
'We've tried reform and we end up messing around'
It is a bold proclamation from Mrs Badenoch on an issue which has split her party for years and frequently prompted apocalyptic warnings that leaving could cause a permanent schism.
Like all other recent Tory leaders, she has been pulled between its Left wing, for which adherence to international law is an article of faith, and the Right, which is pressuring her to match Reform UK, which has already pledged to quit the ECHR.
She has now firmly nailed her colours to the mast, announcing on Friday that she now sees no other way to regain control of migration and restore law and order than to quit the convention.
What is her message to the moderates, who want to see Britain work with other countries to secure changes to the 75-year-old treaty?
'We've tried reform and we end up messing around,' she says. 'Reform also takes years, and this problem is getting worse every single day. On Saturday, we saw 1,200 people come over.
'All of that is costing the British taxpayer money. There are people out there worried about the cost of living crisis. They're deciding to choose between heating and eating, and then they've got to pay for somebody else to stay in a B&B. That's not right.'
Conservative HQ will hope such muscular rhetoric can help the party stem the flow of support to poll-topping Reform, a subject which dominated the media Q&A session that followed Mrs Badenoch's speech.
She admits that she must do better to win back millions of centre-Right voters who have been attracted by its offer, but also urges critics within her party to hold their nerve with an election still almost four years away.
We are meeting less than 48 hours after Nigel Farage suffered a major blow with the shock resignation of Zia Yusuf, the Reform chairman who rejoined the party on Saturday night. His initial departure left fresh questions about Mr Farage's ability to keep the upstart outfit united and focused on victory.
'What we're seeing is what we've always seen with Nigel Farage,' the Tory leader said. 'He's left a wake of broken parties and very disgruntled people behind.
'Rupert Lowe, who was their best parliamentary performer, said that Nigel Farage should never be prime minister. These are the people who have been in the room with him. What do they know that the rest of us don't?'
'We are in a bad way, growth is disappearing'
What about the oft-floated idea of an electoral pact, which reared its head again last week following the Hamilton by-election, which a combined Tory-Reform candidate would have won instead of Labour?
It is an emphatic no. 'There are many Conservative voters who do not want Nigel Farage. So talking about a coalition means that we would lose those people.
'When I hear people talk about the polling and what's going on there, I just tell them that there's no election today. It doesn't matter whether protest parties or challenger parties are doing well, we've got four more years of this. What kind of country are we going to have left when Labour is done with it?'
Much of the answer to that question could be determined by Rachel Reeves this week when she delivers her long-awaited spending review, which is expected to herald heavy cuts for unprotected departments.
The NHS will once more get a bumper, inflation-busting settlement, while billions more will also be set aside to boost the defence budget, given the growing global threat.
Mrs Badenoch says that is the wrong approach and that, after decades of huge funding increases, including under the Tories, the problems with the health service are no longer about money.
'It is absolutely not sustainable to just keep spending more and more money on it and taxing the people who are generating the money,' she warns.
'We are in a bad way, growth is disappearing. All they're doing is carving out a fixed pie – in fact, a shrinking pie – and then trying to give more to the NHS, having to make cuts elsewhere.'
'Many politicians are not brave'
The inevitable result is that, once again, other departments will lose out. They include ministries on the front line of delivering Labour's manifesto promises, with even Border Force facing substantial cuts, despite Sir Keir Starmer's promise to crack down on illegal migration.
'That cannot possibly be true,' Mrs Badenoch gasps when I put it to her. 'It will show that they're a party that does not care about law and order.
'If you cut back on Border Force, you're going to end up spending billions more on asylum seekers staying in hotels. It is a completely false economy.
'We cannot leave one of the most important issues of our time, the security of our country, by the side because we're trying to save a few pennies.'
She is clear that, were she the one in Downing Street, the savings would be coming from the welfare budget, something which Labour is struggling to achieve amid a backbench revolt.
'They're talking about increasing child benefits, that's not what the country needs right now. They're giving free school meals to many more middle-class children. They should stop doing that and fund the police, fund Border Force.'
Up until last summer's Tory defeat, Mrs Badenoch, who was first elected to Parliament in 2017, had only known life in power and the trappings of ministerial office.
She served in four junior posts across three different departments before becoming International Trade Secretary and then, when that job was abolished, business secretary.
Now she has seen six months on the other side of the fence, I hope she can help answer one of the most perennially puzzling questions in politics. Just what is it that happens to politicians when they enter office?
Why is it that the same people who can clearly articulate voters' concerns whilst in opposition – the anger at dirty and dangerous streets, unchecked anti-social behaviour, increasingly scarce bin collections – immediately lose interest in those things as soon as they get their feet behind a Whitehall desk?
'It's a very interesting thing,' she muses. 'Many politicians are not brave and many politicians come in to do easy things, not difficult things. They think many of the things that they promise at election are going to be easy, and then when it starts to get difficult, they want to show that they're doing something.
'International summits look like you're doing something. You're taking pictures, it's very performative, but it is rare that you're actually shifting the dial. So that they're trying to look busy because they either don't know how to fix a problem or they're too scared to.'
'I will have a fight if a fight is necessary'
On top of that, she explains, life can be made difficult for those in government who try to take a stance on controversial or difficult topics.
'When I was talking about all of the children taking puberty blockers and being sterilised, I had so much opprobrium, people saying 'why are you talking about this? Just leave it alone. Oh, you're just doing this anti-woke thing. Just talk about the economy'.
'So there's pressure from your peers as well, to just keep your head down and take nice pictures. That's not something I've ever believed in. When I see something wrong, I want to deal with it, and I will have a fight if a fight is necessary.'
Mrs Badenoch blames this risk-averse approach to problem solving for the state of the economy, which is the root of the 'very visual decline' that Britons increasingly see around them every day.
She also subscribes to the 'broken windows theory', which states that when the police turn a blind eye to low-level offending such as anti-social behaviour and shoplifting, it allows a rot to set in which quickly spreads through society.
The Tory leader laments both a lack of official enforcement by the police and also social enforcement by ordinary citizens, who she says are now too afraid to step in and stop bad behaviour for fear of violence or online ridicule.
'So much that people thought was low level just isn't done any more. I've spoken to security guards in supermarkets who say if someone comes in to shoplift, they're just going to leave them, because when they catch them, they are then accused of assault.
'Once upon a time, if somebody was putting their feet on seats or behaving anti-socially on a train, other people in the carriage would stand up. Now people are worried about getting stabbed or being videoed on social media and it going viral.
'So there's a chilling effect. Enforcement is dying not just from the state, but also social enforcement. We have to tackle both those things.'
'I will tell the truth, I'm always direct'
Mrs Badenoch says she has told Robert Jenrick, her high-profile shadow justice secretary, to 'just go hell for leather on this stuff'. He has made a string of high-profile videos, most notably last month when he confronted fare dodgers on the London Underground.
'One of the other things that happens is that if people see that someone gets away with it, then others are encouraged to try it,' she says. 'Once you start normalising things, people who probably would never steal a sausage roll from Greggs then think 'well, I'll have that because everybody else is doing it'. So there's a domino effect that needs to be arrested.'
The mention of Mr Jenrick brings us back to the question of her leadership, with some mutterings within the party that the Tories would have been performing better in the polls had they picked him over her last November.
Her response to those briefers is as uncompromising as that to the left wing of her party. 'Anonymous briefings for me are always from cowards,' she hits back.
'Many of them are people who have had issues, scandals, problems, been sacked, and they know what sort of person I am. They know that I'm somebody who's a straight shooter, I'm not giving people jobs and favours.
'I'm not somebody who will flatter. I will tell the truth, I'm always direct, and many people don't like that. So I know that they will brief. It's like a sailor complaining about the sea.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour at war over spending plans as Number 10 tries to stem threat from Farage
Labour at war over spending plans as Number 10 tries to stem threat from Farage

Daily Mail​

time41 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Labour at war over spending plans as Number 10 tries to stem threat from Farage

Sir Keir Starmer is fighting to quell mounting Labour tensions over how to deal with the threat from Nigel Farage, as bitter Whitehall negotiations over the Government's Spending Review go down to the wire. Sources describe 'very unpleasant' exchanges between Rachel Reeves and senior Cabinet ministers, including Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Local Government Secretary Angela Rayner, as the Chancellor prepares to give the NHS a £30billion boost at the expense of the police and local councils. Preparations for Wednesday's announcement have been held against the backdrop of slamming doors and raised voices, as No 10 and the Treasury work out how to divide a limited pot of public money in a way most likely to arrest the surge in support for Mr Farage's Reform UK. Ms Reeves is expected to set out plans for an extra £113billion in spending on infrastructure projects such as Sizewell C nuclear power plant, and an extra 2.8 per cent real-terms increase in the NHS's £200billion-a-year budget, amounting to an extra £30billion by 2028. But with the economy barely growing, other departments have had to take a hit as a result. A source said: 'It turned nasty between Yvette and Rachel. It was just as bad as that between Rachel and Angela, who walked out during her negotiations. 'Yvette was just passing on the concerns of the police, who said that without more money they would be forced to make stark choices about which crimes they prioritise. 'The anger of the police shows they've been briefed by Cooper on how the negotiations are going, and they're not happy.' Reeves plotting £3bn tax raid on pension By CALUM MUIRHEAD Rachel Reeves is planning a £3billion tax raid on millions of pensions. The new Pension Schemes Bill lays out a blueprint for companies to take out 'surplus' cash from certain schemes. The theory behind the plan is that companies can use the money to invest in their business and that would fuel growth. But experts fear this could lead to a repeat of the Robert Maxwell scandal of the early 1990s, when the late tycoon stole £400 million from his staff pension fund to prop up his companies. The Chancellor, who is desperate to raise tax revenues, would benefit because any 'surpluses' released are taxed at 25 per cent, which could raise almost £3billion over a decade. The bill, tabled in Parliament last week, will affect old-style pension schemes where retirement incomes are linked to people's pay packets, which have around nine million members. A minister said: 'The negotiations over the final settlements are still not sorted for some departments. They're going to carry on fighting it out over the weekend.' Another source added: 'Rachel will stand up and promise things she can't deliver. There will be a lot of guff about how she will deliver security for the country. 'But how can you promise to deliver security when Trump's doing what he's doing on tariffs and Putin is so active?' At the heart of the schism is an ideological divide between the party's Blairites, represented in No 10 by Liz Lloyd, Sir Keir's head of policy delivery, and Morgan McSweeney, the Downing Street chief of staff. Mr McSweeney is desperate to tackle small boats migration while Ms Lloyd is encouraging spending more on the NHS. Rachel Reeves is planning a £3billion tax raid on millions of pensions. The new Pension Schemes Bill lays out a blueprint for companies to take out 'surplus' cash from certain schemes. The theory behind the plan is that companies can use the money to invest in their business and that would fuel growth. But experts fear this could lead to a repeat of the Robert Maxwell scandal of the early 1990s, when the late tycoon stole £400 million from his staff pension fund to prop up his companies. The Chancellor, who is desperate to raise tax revenues, would benefit because any 'surpluses' released are taxed at 25 per cent, which could raise almost £3billion over a decade. The bill, tabled in Parliament last week, will affect old-style pension schemes where retirement incomes are linked to people's pay packets, which have around nine million members.

Whitehall staff are flouting the Supreme Court ruling on biological sex 'by telling transgender women it's okay to use the female toilets'
Whitehall staff are flouting the Supreme Court ruling on biological sex 'by telling transgender women it's okay to use the female toilets'

Daily Mail​

time41 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Whitehall staff are flouting the Supreme Court ruling on biological sex 'by telling transgender women it's okay to use the female toilets'

Civil servants are flouting the Supreme Court ruling on biological sex, with some declaring it is 'completely the choice' of a man who is transitioning to choose which bathroom they use. A message sent to officials by the LGBT + network in the Department of Transport after the landmark court judgment said staff can decide themselves if they can use 'any appropriate single sex toilets and other facilities'. 'It is assumed that the individual knows which facilities are the best match for their gender identity and expression,' it added. The message, obtained using Freedom of Information requests, was sent to staff on April 22, the week after the Supreme Court ruling that men who change gender are not legally women. It says 'HR have assured us that all current guidance and policies still stand' and gives the example that a recently transitioned man may need to 'build confidence in his new gender expression' and that the bathroom they choose is 'completely his choice'. Members of LGBT+ networks in other government departments also sent messages expressing disappointment with the court ruling, including staff in the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology being told: 'While the judgment itself is outside of our hands, we want to say clearly that we're disappointed by the decision.' A message sent to officials by the LGBT + network in the Department of Transport after the landmark court judgment said staff can decide themselves if they can use 'any appropriate single sex toilets and other facilities' Elliot Keck, of the TaxPayers' Alliance, which compiled the research, said: 'The correspondence demonstrates how out of control staff networks are.' A Government spokesman said: 'Staff networks do not set policy in this space. We will update policy wherever it is necessary.' It comes as another report, by think-tank the Policy Exchange, has found that dozens of organisations question the Supreme Court's ruling on the definition of a woman. Independent MP Rosie Duffield said: 'Government ministers must lead from the top to ensure public bodies comply with the law.'

Is Angela 'Two Homes' Rayner paying the council tax surcharge on her grace-and-favour second residence?
Is Angela 'Two Homes' Rayner paying the council tax surcharge on her grace-and-favour second residence?

Daily Mail​

time41 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Is Angela 'Two Homes' Rayner paying the council tax surcharge on her grace-and-favour second residence?

Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner was last night facing questions over whether she is paying her own council tax surcharge on her second home. 'Two Homes' Rayner moved into her four-bedroom, grace-and-favour residence in Admiralty House in December – four months before her Local Government Department started levying an extra 100 per cent council tax charge on second homes. Official records of MPs' expenses show that when she entered the Government, Ms Rayner designated her Ashton-under-Lyne constituency home as her 'primary residence', and her pre-Admiralty home – a rented London flat – as her second home. That allowed her to claim back the £1,621 council tax bill on the London flat from the taxpayer as one of the housing costs reimbursed by Commons authorities. But if she is still designating Ashton as her primary residence now, the £2,034 council tax bill for Admiralty House doubles to a whopping £4,068 if classed as a second home. And, as a minister living in an official residence, she would have to pay both that and the £3,338 bill for the Ashton house herself – a total of £7,406. Ashton does not attract a second-home premium because she has family members living there permanently, but questions have been raised as to whether or not she is paying the full £7,406. Tory Shadow Minister Richard Holden asked the PM and the Chancellor if they were paying council tax on their Downing St flats as primary residences, and was informed that they were. If she is still designating Ashton as her primary residence now, the £2,034 council tax bill for Admiralty House (pictured) doubles to a whopping £4,068 if classed as a second home But on asking the same of Ms Rayner, he was stonewalled with: 'The Deputy Prime Minister's council tax responsibility is properly discharged.' In a letter to Ms Rayner, Kevin Hollinrake, Shadow Secretary for Housing and Communities, asked if she had evaded the surcharge by 'flipping' her primary residence designation. He said: 'If the minister in charge of council tax has dodged the super-tax by 'flipping', this raises serious concerns about the ethics and integrity of Labour ministers.' She became known as 'Two Homes' Rayner after this newspaper revealed she shuttled between two council properties early in her marriage. When her office was asked if she was paying a bill of £4,068 in London and £3,338 in her constituency, a source said: 'The administration of council tax for Admiralty House is for the Cabinet Office and Westminster Council, as has been the case for successive Secretaries of State.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store