NEA suspends rule after ACLU files lawsuit contesting ‘gender ideology' ban
Lynette Labinger, who is representing four plaintiffs in a suit against the National Endowment for the Arts, is seen with Steven Brown, executive director of the ACLU of Rhode Island, at a press conference on March 6, 2025. (Photo by Alexander Castro/Rhode Island Current)
Arts organizations applying for grants from the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) don't have to confirm that their potential projects won't 'promote gender ideology' — at least for the time being, while litigation is pending.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Rhode Island announced last Friday evening that its court challenge, filed against the NEA last Thursday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island, was at least temporarily successful in suspending an ideological pledge for grant applicants.
Prompting the lawsuit in part was that potential grantees would need to tick a box verifying their proposals would not clash with the tenets outlined in an executive order signed by President Donald Trump on his first day in office, titled 'Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government.'
'Artists and artist organizations can move forward on preparing and presenting proposals for critically needed NEA grants without being forced to subscribe to a principle that may be contrary to their core beliefs and mission,' Lynette Labinger, the ACLU of RI's cooperating attorney on the case, said in a statement Friday.
The NEA policy page which sought to align the agency's funding policy to the executive order has been updated since the lawsuit's announcement to read: 'PLEASE NOTE: Pending the outcome of litigation in the United States District Court of Rhode Island…The NEA is not currently requiring any grantee to make any 'certification' or other representation pursuant to Executive Order 14168.'
The four plaintiffs in the suit are Rhode Island Latino Arts, National Queer Theater, The Theater Offensive, and the Theater Communications Group. The groups argued last Thursday that the new rules would force the groups to assert values incompatible with the basic premises of their arts organizations, many of which highlight queer and LGBTQ+ stories.
But the ACLU of RI said the NEA has not yet agreed to remove the eligibility criteria for funding, and that projects which are viewed as having unfavorable viewpoints might still not be funded.
'We will continue to seek urgent relief against the NEA's unconstitutional bar on projects that express messages the government doesn't like, but this is a huge step towards initial relief. We won't stop fighting until these new requirements are struck down for good,' Vera Eidelman, senior staff attorney at the ACLU, said in a statement.
Eidelman advised organizations that they could still apply for 'Part 1 of the NEA application on March 11 without having to agree to a certification that could have compromised their values or their vision.' Applicants can also note their objection to the new certification procedure.
The ACLU wants to see a preliminary injunction on the funding prohibition ahead of the final grant deadline on March 24. A court hearing is scheduled for March 18.
Labinger said at a March 6 press briefing that the lawsuit identifies the federal preference for one perspective over another as 'viewpoint discrimination,' which may violate the First Amendment.
'Our lawsuit points out that that is contrary to the statute that created the NEA, it is arbitrary and capricious, the standard of 'promoting gender ideology' is unknown, and therefore vague and inapplicable,' Labinger said. 'Also it's apparently saying that it's okay to be anti- gender ideology, but not for it. If that's what 'promoting' is, that's what we call viewpoint discrimination.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bill limiting protests at public universities awaits Gov. Abbott's approval
The Brief A new bill, SB 2972, limiting protests on Texas public university campuses has passed both the Senate and House. The bill prohibits activities like using amplified sound during class, protesting in the last two weeks of the semester, and wearing masks to conceal identity. Critics, including the ACLU of Texas, argue the bill violates First Amendment rights. AUSTIN - A bill that passed through the Texas legislature last weekend would prohibit certain times and locations of protests on public university campuses. Critics worry the bill is in direct violation of the First Amendment, as well as the Texas Constitution. Senate Bill 2972 defines "expressive activities" in the same manner as the First Amendment and the Texas Constitution, directly citing those documents to include assemblies, protests, speeches, the distribution of written materials, the carrying of signs, and the circulation of petitions. Under the new bill, the following would be prohibited at Texas universities: Using devices to amplify sound during class hours while engaging in expressive activities. Engaging in expressive activities during the last two weeks of the semester. Camping or setting up tents on campus. Wearing a mask or other disguise while engaging in expressive activities. Lowering the U.S. flag with the intent to raise another flag. Engaging in expressive activities between 10 p.m. and 8 a.m. Note that these are limited and expanded upon individually within the bill's text. The Senate passed the bill 21-10 on May 14. The House passed it 97-39 on May 28. What they're saying The bill's text says it may not be construed to limit freedom of speech or expression as protected by the First Amendment or Texas Constitution. Critics wonder how this is possible, saying the bill in its entirety is an imposition of prohibitions on rights defined in those texts. Caro Achar, the engagement coordinator for free speech at the ACLU of Texas, released the following statement to that point. "S.B. 2972 threatens the free expression of all Texans, regardless of political beliefs. This bill imposes broad restrictions that allow school officials to restrict how, when, and where Texans can speak on campus — undermining the First Amendment rights of students, faculty, staff, and the general public." Dig deeper The new bill comes on the heels of recent major protests on Texas university campuses, largely related to the conflict between Israel and Palestine, as well as developments with mass deportations. At one UT Austin protest in April 2024, 79 pro-Palestine protesters were taken into custody. The university was later found to have violated several institutional rules when handling the incident. Feds to screen social media of migrants, foreign students for antisemitic activity Columbia must notify students before handing records to Congress amid antisemitism probe ICE detains U of M student at Twin Cities campus, officials say What's next SB 2972 now awaits Gov. Greg Abbott's signature. According to the ACLU, he is expected to sign it into law. If he neither signs nor vetoes the bill, it will become law without his action. The Source Information in this article comes from Texas Legislature Online, the ACLU of Texas and previous coverage by FOX 7.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Protests erupt over immigration raids in Los Angeles
Protests erupted in Los Angeles over ongoing Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in the city. Federal agents have raided multiple workplaces in the fashion district, a Home Depot and other local areas, according to the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California. Hundreds of people, including children, were detained by ICE agents on Friday at the Edward Roybal Federal Building in downtown Los Angeles, the ACLU said. ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons said in a statement Saturday, "The brave men and women of ICE were in Los Angeles arresting criminal illegal aliens including gang members, drug traffickers and those with a history of assault, cruelty to children, domestic violence, robbery, and smuggling." Large crowds began gathering near the federal detention center in downtown Los Angeles Friday protesting the immigration raids and leading to some reported clashes with authorities. Lyons said that the "violent rioters will be held accountable" and vowed that ICE will continue to make arrests. "What took place in Los Angeles yesterday was appalling. As rioters attacked federal ICE and law enforcement officers on the LA streets, Mayor Bass took the side of chaos and lawlessness over law enforcement," Lyons said Saturday. Mayor Karen Bass, meanwhile, condemned the ICE raids in a statement. "As Mayor of a proud city of immigrants, who contribute to our city in so many ways, I am deeply angered by what has taken place. These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city. My Office is in close coordination with immigrant rights community organizations. We will not stand for this," Bass said. Bass told KABC that neither she nor the Los Angeles Police Department were aware that the ICE raids were going to happen. Some protesters could be seen throwing objects at vehicles and others tried to block vans from leaving on Friday, KABC reported. Shortly after 7 p.m. the Los Angeles Police Department declared an unlawful assembly, warning protesters they risked being arrested if they remained in the area. LAPD officers were seen lining the streets near the federal building, KABC reported. The LAPD said in a social media post late Friday that officers had reported a "small group of violent individuals" were throwing large pieces of concrete. "Once again, an UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY has been declared. You must leave the area. The use of less lethal munitions has been authorized by the Incident Commander," the LAPD said in the post. The Department of Homeland Security said the targeting of law enforcement in Los Angeles is "despicable." "Mayor Bass, ICE is not responsible for "sowing a sense of terror" the protestors YOU enabled are," DHS said. FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino said the FBI has already made arrests for "obstructing our operations." Federal law enforcement operations will proceed as planned this weekend in Los Angeles County, U.S. attorney Bill Essayli added. -ABC News' Luke Barr and Vanessa Navarrete contributed to this report.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
As a generation of gay and lesbian people ages, memories of worse — and better — times swirl
WASHINGTON (AP) — David Perry recalls being young and gay in 1980s Washington D.C. and having 'an absolute blast.' He was fresh out of college, raised in Richmond, Virginia, and had long viewed the nation's capital as 'the big city' where he could finally embrace his true self. He came out of the closet here, got a job at the National Endowment for the Arts where his boss was a gay Republican, and 'lost my virginity in D.C. on August 27, 1980,' he says, chuckling. The bars and clubs were packed with gay men and women — Republican and Democrat — and almost all of them deep in the closet. 'There were a lot of gay men in D.C., and they all seemed to work for the White House or members of Congress. It was kind of a joke. This was pre-Internet, pre-Facebook, pre-all of that. So people could be kind of on the down-low. You would run into congresspeople at the bar,' Perry says. 'The closet was pretty transparent. It's just that no one talked about it.' He also remembers a billboard near the Dupont Circle Metro station with a counter ticking off the total number of of AIDS deaths in the District of Columbia. 'I remember when the number was three,' says Perry, 63. Now Perry, a public relations professional in San Francisco, is part of a generation that can find itself overshadowed amidst the after-parties and DJ sets of World Pride, which wraps up this weekend with a two-day block party on Pennsylvania Avenue. Advocates warn of a quiet crisis among retirement-age LGBTQ+ people and a community at risk of becoming marginalized inside their own community. 'It's really easy for Pride to be about young people and parties,' says Sophie Fisher, LGBTQ program coordinator for Seabury Resources for Aging, a company that runs queer-friendly retirement homes and assisted-living facilities and which organized a pair of Silver Pride events last month for LGBTQ+ people over age 55. These were 'the first people through the wall' in the battle for gay rights and protections, Fisher says. Now, 'they kind of get swept under the rug.' Loneliness and isolation The challenges and obstacles for elderly LGBTQ+ people can be daunting. 'We're a society that really values youth as is. When you throw in LGBTQ on top of that, it's a double whammy,' says Christina Da Costa of the group SAGE — Services and Advocacy for Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Elders. 'When you combine so many factors, you have a population that's a lot less likely to thrive than their younger brethren.' Older LGBTQ+ people are far more likely to have no contact with their family and less likely to have children to help care for them, Da Costa says. Gay men over 60 are the precise generation that saw their peer group decimated by AIDS. The result: chronic loneliness and isolation. 'As you age, it becomes difficult to find your peer group because you don't go out to bars anymore,' says Yvonne Smith, a 73-year-old D.C. resident who moved to Washington at age 14. 'There are people isolated and alone out there.' These seniors are also often poorer than their younger brethren. Many were kicked out of the house the moment they came out of the closet, and being openly queer or nonbinary could make you unemployable or vulnerable to firing deep into the 1990s. 'You didn't want to be coming out of a gay bar, see one of your co-workers or one of your students,' Smith says. 'People were afraid that if it was known you were gay, they would lose their security clearance or not be hired at all.' In April, founders cut the ribbon on Mary's House, a new 15-unit living facility for LGBTQ+ seniors in southeast Washington. These kind of inclusive senior-care centers are becoming an increasing priority for LGBTQ+ elders. Rayceen Pendarvis, a D.C. queer icon, performer and presenter, says older community members who enter retirement homes or assisted-living centers can face social isolation or hostility from judgmental residents. 'As we age, we lose our peers. We lose our loved ones and some of us no longer have the ability to maintain our homes,' says Pendarvis, who identifies as 'two-spirit' and eschews all pronouns. 'Sometimes they go in, and they go back into the closet. It's very painful for some.' A generation gap Perry and others see a clear divide between their generation and the younger LGBTQ+ crowd. Younger people, Perry says, drink and smoke a lot less and do much less bar-hopping in the dating-app age. Others can't help but gripe a bit about how these youngsters don't know how good they have it. 'They take all these protections for granted,' Smith says. The younger generation 'got comfortable,' Pendarvis says, and sometimes doesn't fully understand the multigenerational fight that came before. 'We had to fight to get the rights that we have today,' Pendarvis said. 'We fought for a place at the table. We CREATED the table!' Now that fight is on again as President Donald Trump's administration sets the community on edge with an open culture war targeting trans protections and drag shows, and enforcing a binary view of gender identity. The struggle against that campaign may be complicated by a quiet reality inside the LGBTQ+ community: These issues remain a topic of controversy among some LGBTQ+ seniors. Perry said he has observed that some older lesbians remain leery of trans women; likewise, he said, some older gay men are leery of the drag-queen phenomenon. 'There is a good deal of generational sensitivity that needs to be practiced by our older gay brethren,' he says. 'The gender fluidity that has come about in the last 15 years, I would be lying if I said I didn't have to adjust my understanding of it sometimes.' Despite the internal complexities, many are hoping to see a renewed sense of militancy and street politics in the younger LGBTQ+ generation. Sunday's rally and March for Freedom, starting at the Lincoln Memorial, is expected to be particularly defiant given the 2025 context. 'I think we're going to see a whole new era of activism,' Perry says. 'I think we will find our spine and our walking shoes – maybe orthopedic – and protest again. But I really hope that the younger generation helps us pick up this torch.'
