Is Donald Trump allowed to send troops to stop LA protests? Here's what US law says
President Donald Trump has deployed National Guard troops to California after two days of protests by hundreds of demonstrators against immigration raids, saying that the protests interfered with federal law enforcement and framing them as a possible 'form of rebellion' against the authority of the U.S. government.
California Governor Gavin Newsom on Sunday said he had formally requested that the Trump Administration rescind "its unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles County" and return them to his command.
Trump cited Title 10 of the U.S. Code, a federal law that outlines the role of the U.S. Armed Forces, in his June 7 order to call members of the California National Guard into federal service.
A provision of Title 10 - Section 12406 - allows the president to deploy National Guard units into federal service if the U.S. is invaded, there is a 'rebellion or danger of rebellion' or the president is 'unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.'
An 1878 law, the Posse Comitatus Act, generally forbids the U.S. military, including the National Guard, from taking part in civilian law enforcement.
Section 12406 does not override that prohibition, but it allows the troops to protect federal agents who are carrying out law enforcement activity and to protect federal property.
For example, National Guard troops cannot arrest protesters, but they could protect U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement who are carrying out arrests.
The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to assembly, freedom of speech and the press.
Experts have said that Trump's decision to have U.S. troops respond to protests is an ominous sign for how far the president is willing to go to repress political speech and activity that he disagrees with or that criticises his administration's policies.
Four legal experts from both left- and right-leaning advocacy organizations have cast doubt on Trump's use of Title 10 in response to immigration protests calling it inflammatory and reckless, especially without the support of California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, who has said Trump's actions would only escalate tensions.
The protests in California do not rise to the level of 'rebellion' and do not prevent the federal government from executing the laws of the United States, experts said.
Title 10 also says "orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States," but legal experts said that language might not be an obstacle. Legislative history suggests that those words were likely meant to reflect the norms of how National Guard troops are typically deployed, rather than giving a governor the option to not comply with a president's decision to deploy troops.
California could file a lawsuit, arguing that deployment of National Guard troops was not justified by Title 10 because there was no 'rebellion' or threat to law enforcement. A lawsuit might take months to resolve, and the outcome would be uncertain. Because the protests may be over before a lawsuit is resolved, the decision to sue might be more of a political question than a legal one, experts said.
Trump could take a more far-reaching step by invoking the Insurrection Act of 1792, which would allow troops to directly participate in civilian law enforcement, for which there is little recent precedent.
Casting protests as an 'insurrection' that requires the deployment of troops against U.S. citizens would be riskier legal territory, one legal expert said, in part because mostly peaceful protests and minor incidents aren't the sort of thing that the Insurrection Act were designed to address.
The Insurrection Act has been used by past presidents to deploy troops within the U.S. in response to crises like the 1794 Whiskey Rebellion and the rise of the Ku Klux Klan in the immediate aftermath of the American Civil War. The law was last invoked by President George H.W. Bush in 1992, when the governor of California requested military aid to suppress unrest in Los Angeles following the Rodney King trial.
But, the last time a president deployed the National Guard in a state without a request from that state's governor was 1965, when President Lyndon Johnson sent troops to protect civil rights demonstrators in Montgomery, Alabama.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
22 minutes ago
- News18
Sensex Tanks 950 Points, Nifty Below 25,000; Key Reasons Why Market Is Down Today
Last Updated: Indian equity markets witnessed a sharp sell-off across segments on Thursday; Know key reasons behind the crash Stock Market Crash: Indian equity markets witnessed a sharp sell-off across segments on Thursday, June 12, as weak global cues and profit-booking triggered a broad-based decline. Benchmark indices — the Sensex and Nifty 50 — fell nearly 1%, while broader markets followed suit with mid- and small-cap indices sliding over 1% each. The BSE Sensex opened marginally higher at 82,571.67 but soon turned negative, plunging as much as 853 points to hit an intraday low of 81,661.68. It eventually closed deep in the red. Similarly, the Nifty 50, which opened at 25,164.45, slipped below the key 24,900 mark during the session, touching a low of 24,871. The sharp fall wiped off substantial investor wealth. The total market capitalisation of BSE-listed companies dropped to around Rs 451 lakh crore, compared to ₹456 lakh crore in the previous session — a loss of nearly Rs 5 lakh crore in a single trading day. Why is the Indian Stock Market Falling on June 12? 1. Escalating Geopolitical Tensions Global markets, including India, were rattled by renewed geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. Asian and European indices fell sharply amid rising fears of a conflict between the US and Iran. According to reports by The Times of Israel, the US is evacuating non-essential personnel from the Middle East due to heightened regional tensions and the deteriorating status of nuclear negotiations with Iran. There is growing speculation that Israeli forces may strike Iran's nuclear facilities, adding to investor nervousness. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump has reiterated his stance against allowing Iran to acquire nuclear weapons. The much-anticipated trade deal between the United States and China has failed to lift market sentiment, as investors were expecting a more comprehensive and conclusive agreement. On Wednesday, former US President Donald Trump claimed that China would supply the US with rare-earth minerals and magnets, while the US would continue to welcome Chinese students into its universities. However, the final terms of the deal still await approval from both Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. 'Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me," Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'We are getting a total of 55% tariffs, and China is getting 10%… The relationship is excellent!" Despite this optimistic tone, market experts remain skeptical. 'There are reports of a possible agreement between the US and China. But the Chinese haven't officially confirmed anything," said VK Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist at Geojit Financial Services. 'Trump is talking about a 55 percent tariff on China and a 10 percent tariff on the US. Given his track record, it's too early to view this as a positive for markets." 3. Global Markets Weaken Amid Risk-Off Mood Global equities extended losses on Thursday, adding pressure to Indian markets as investors grappled with a combination of tepid U.S. inflation data, ongoing trade concerns, and heightened geopolitical tensions. European markets were poised for a subdued start, with futures on Germany's DAX and the UK's FTSE 100 down 0.8% and 0.4%, respectively. U.S. equity futures also indicated a flat-to-negative open, reflecting caution on Wall Street. Across Asia, MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan dipped 0.2%, retreating from a three-year high recorded a day earlier. Japan's Nikkei 225 declined 0.5%, while key indices in China and Hong Kong also pulled back, reversing recent gains. 4. Dollar Slides as Fed Rate Cut Bets Rise The U.S. dollar weakened to its lowest level in nearly two months, amid rising expectations that the Federal Reserve could initiate rate cuts later this year. The dollar index, which tracks the greenback against a basket of major currencies, slipped to 98.246—its weakest since April 22—and was last seen at 98.419, down 0.04%. So far in 2025, the index has lost 10%. The retreat in the dollar followed softer-than-expected U.S. inflation data and lingering doubts over the durability of the recent U.S.-China trade framework. Combined with elevated geopolitical risks, this has prompted investors to scale back exposure to the dollar. According to Reuters, traders are now pricing in two 25-basis-point rate cuts by the end of 2025, and potentially up to 100 basis points by September 2026. 5. Oil Price Volatility Adds to Market Jitters Crude oil prices slipped on Thursday, following a sharp rally in the previous session driven by escalating tensions in the Middle East ahead of planned U.S.-Iran negotiations. Brent crude declined 0.7% to $69.28 per barrel after surging over 4% on Wednesday to hit a two-month high. top videos View all 'The spike in Brent crude to $70 on heightened security risks is a clear negative for oil-importing countries like India," noted Dr. VK Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist at Geojit Financial Services. 'Industries such as paints, tyres, aviation, and adhesives may come under pressure, while upstream oil producers stand to benefit." Shares of ONGC and Oil India gained up to 5% on improved realisation expectations, whereas oil marketing companies such as IOC, BPCL, and HPCL fell between 2% and 4.5% on margin concerns. Aviation and tyre stocks also saw declines due to rising input cost pressures, with MRF, CEAT, and IndiGo among the key losers. Stay updated with all the latest news on the Stock Market, including market trends, Sensex and Nifty updates, top gainers and losers, and expert analysis. Get real-time insights, financial reports, and investment strategies—only on News18. tags : Nifty sensex Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 12, 2025, 14:21 IST News business » markets Sensex Tanks 950 Points, Nifty Below 25,000; Key Reasons Why Market Is Down Today
News18
23 minutes ago
- News18
Hans Zimmer Brings In Reference Of Mahatma Gandhi To Fight Trump's ICE Raids: 'Demonstrate Non-Violence'
Zimmer in an Instagram post brought in the reference of Mahatma Gandhi and urged the protestors to demonstrate non-violence and peaceful protest. Hans Zimmer, a two-time Oscar-winning composer, on Thursday accused US President Donald Trump of planting violent protesters in peaceful protests to escalate the situation. Zimmer in an Instagram post brought in the reference of Mahatma Gandhi, one of the greatest apostle of peace in the world, and urged the protestors to demonstrate non-violence and peaceful protest despite the President trying to hamper the situation. Taking to Instagram, the German film composer wrote, 'I fear the Trump administration will plant violent protesters among our peaceful protests. They will use this as an excuse to use force against us." He further elaborated on what protestors can do to continue with their peaceful demonstration. 'The moment violence or property damage begins, EVERY OTHER PROTESTER must immediately sit on the floor or the ground in silence, with signs down. The media needs to film this. This will reveal paid fake thugs posing as protesters becoming violent. The sitting down must spread like a 'wave" in a football stadium throughout the crowd of protesters." 'Local police officers will immediately see WHO is doing the damage, and the rest of us will demonstrate our non-violent innocence and retain our Constitutional right to peaceful protest," he added The film composer then used hashtags mentioning Mahatma Gandhi and passive resistance. Protests In Across US Los Angeles on Thursday entered seventh day of protests that have been largely peaceful but occasionally punctuated by violence. The protests broke out last Friday in response to a series of immigration raids. Trump, in turn, called in the National Guard on Saturday, then summoned the Marines on Monday. 'If I didn't act quickly on that, Los Angeles would be burning to the ground right now," said Trump at an event at the John F Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. Similar protests have popped up across the US, including in New York, Seattle, Chicago, Austin, Las Vegas and Washington, DC. The mayor of Spokane, Washington, announced a state of emergency and a curfew after protesters blocked roads to protest the Immigration and Customs Enforcement activity. First Published: June 12, 2025, 14:04 IST
Mint
23 minutes ago
- Mint
China plus one: Apple and India might need to woo not just Trump but Xi too
Apple and its main manufacturing contractor, Hon Hai Precision Company, are still betting on India. When Hon Hai—better known as Foxconn—revealed through an exchange filing last week that it was putting another $1.5 billion into its operations there, it will have calmed a few nerves in New Delhi. Worries about the future of Apple in the country had been set off by US President Donald Trump, who said last month that he had told the company's CEO Tim Cook, 'I don't want you building in India." This seemed to contradict hopes, shared by both Cupertino and New Delhi, that most iPhones for the US market would come from India by the end of 2026. Also Read: Apple's Hotel California trap: It can check out but not leave China But on the ground, Apple Inc's turn to the South Asian country seems well-entrenched. Reports have emerged of a new Foxconn campus meant to house 30,000 employees. This would be the largest such effort in India's recent history. And another contract manufacturer, Tata Electronics, is now assembling the iPhone 16 at its South Indian plant. Yet, CEOs and politicians may have begun to realize that the difficulties involved in shifting—or duplicating—an entire manufacturing ecosystem extend beyond placating Trump. This is a complex environment and there are severe obstacles to moving it out of China. US politics is only one, though perhaps the loudest. Admittedly, Apple has had a lot of success in India already. That's why even Trump has been talking about it. In just the last year, the value of Apple products manufactured there has jumped 60% to $22 billion. Over $17 billion is exported; thanks to Apple, India's $38 billion of electronics exports now earn more than even its world-famous pharmaceutical sector. No other investment has produced anything near this scale of return. In fact, it may be the only success of the Narendra Modi government's pivot to industrial policy in the middle of his decade-plus in power. This rare win happened because Apple Inc and its suppliers were committed to moving production into India, and because both federal and state governments rewrote regulations and permissions to help them make the move. Also Read: Trump's policies assure China an edge in the race for AI dominance Politicians kept up this support, even when there might be a price to pay. After a border clash between China and India in 2020 that left 20 of its soldiers dead, Indian officials restricted investment from Beijing. Those restrictions have slowly softened since then, primarily to ensure that Apple's contractors didn't get caught up in red tape. That experience should have served as a reminder to New Delhi that attracting an entire ecosystem needs three sets of players to cooperate: companies, the destination market for their products and the source geography. Apple and Foxconn might be on board, Trump and his tariffs might be managed, but what of China? A recent book by the former Financial Times journalist Patrick McGee argues that Apple in China, and Foxconn in particular, grew because American investors and engineers helped. That's no surprise. Any industrial power trains its competitors and successors. That's what Great Britain did for America centuries ago. The financiers, engineers and suppliers that make up an existing manufacturing ecosystem need to be willing and able to cooperate in creating a new one. They are generally well rewarded for it. Also Read: Rahul Jacob: Manufacturing is crying out for a reality check Apple's contract manufacturers and component suppliers, large and small, in China might be willing to set up shop in India—after all, profits are profits wherever they are earned. Some of their engineers might be happy to move to supervise new shop floors. But, as it turns out, Beijing might not permit that to happen. Many experienced employees with crucial knowledge and skill-sets have found themselves forbidden to travel to India and Southeast Asia. Apple and New Delhi have both tried to woo Trump and make him accept the possibility that iPhones destined for the US will be made in India. But it appears that they may need to woo China's President Xi Jinping as well. Objectively, India's Apple-led mobile phone ecosystem is nowhere near challenging China's manufacturing dominance. China is, after all, an indispensable country not just for Apple, but for multiple companies struggling to shift production to India, Vietnam and elsewhere. But Beijing now appears to view Apple's India project as a risk—dangerous enough that a few barriers should be erected in its path. Trump, Apple, New Delhi and Beijing appear agreed on Indian manufacturing's potential over the next few years, whatever the rest of us might think. ©Bloomberg The author is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist.
