Americans celebrate Leo XIV as first US pontiff: ‘Everything dope, including the pope'
Americans are celebrating and speaking out after the US cardinal Robert Francis Prevost, who will be known as Pope Leo XIV, was announced as the next pope.
'Congratulations to Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost, who was just named Pope. It is such an honor to realize that he is the first American Pope. What excitement, and what a Great Honor for our Country. I look forward to meeting Pope Leo XIV. It will be a very meaningful moment!' Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social shortly after the pope, who was born in Chicago, appeared on the Vatican balcony in Rome on Thursday.
JD Vance, the US vice-president, congratulated the pope and said he was 'sure millions of American Catholics and other Christians will pray for his successful work leading the Church. May God bless him!'
The Chicago mayor, Brandon Johnson, said on X about Prevost's appointment: 'Everything dope, including the Pope, comes from Chicago! Congratulations to the first American Pope Leo XIV! We hope to welcome you back home soon.'
Related: Robert Francis Prevost becomes Pope Leo XIV as cardinals elect first US pontiff
Illinois's governor, JB Pritzker, called this pope's appointment 'a historic moment as we witness the first American leading the Catholic Church'.
'Hailing from Chicago, Pope Leo XIV ushers in a new chapter that I join those in our state welcoming in at a time when we need compassion, unity, and peace,' he said.
Meanwhile, at Our Lady of Mount Carmel Academy on Chicago's North Side, screams of 'Habemus papam!' echoed throughout the cafeteria.
Seventh-grader Vincent Wall and eighth-grader Ava Broz were in the cafeteria where students were waving US and Chicago flags.
'It really feels like a 2016 Cubs World series,' said Wall, referring to the North Side baseball team that endured a long drought before a triumphant victory in 2016. 'It's just, like, a pope from Chicago is just global and so is the World Series. It's crazy.'
Allison Foerster, who teaches Spanish and religion at the school, found out the pope's identity while monitoring recess. Earlier this week, she had students take part in a mock conclave, with younger students playing cardinals.
'For our students now, they're connecting it back to what they saw on Tuesday,' Foerster said. 'They immediately knew what part of the process it was. So they knew it was a moment of joy and a moment of celebration.'
For Broz and Wall, they are also hoping Pope Leo make a visit to his home town.
'I feel like we'll have a connection because we know what Chicago is, like what they strive to do and what their understanding of life is, and I feel like he'll incorporate that as pope,' Broz said.
The president of Villanova University, where the new pope graduated in 1977, the Rev Peter M Donohue, said in a statement: 'We celebrate this significant day for our University community and the global Church. Villanova, built on the teachings of St Augustine, has always been grounded in advancing a deeper understanding of the fundamental relationship between faith and reason – between spirituality and wisdom.
'With today's election of His Holiness, Pope Leo XIV, I cannot help but reflect on what his Augustinian papacy will mean to our University community and our world. Known for his humility, gentle spirit, prudence and warmth, Pope Leo XIV's leadership offers an opportunity to reaffirm our commitment to our educational mission.'
Back on social media, the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, who is a conservative Catholic, said in a statement: 'The United States looks forward to deepening our enduring relationship with the Holy See with the first American pontiff.'
The US embassy to the Holy See also lauded the new pope on X: 'With joy we extend our heartfelt congratulations to the first Pope from the United States of America.'
The archdiocese of Detroit issued a statement on behalf of Archbishop Edward J Weisenburger to WXYZ, reading in part: 'Pope Leo XIV's election leaves me exceptionally joyful, and I must humbly acknowledge that I did not anticipate a United States citizen would be elected Pope. His lifetime of ministry includes many years of ministry as a bishop in Peru, giving him a thorough understanding of South America. Moreover, his close association with Pope Francis, history of charitable efforts for the poor and marginalized, extensive prior experience in the Vatican, and personal humility are all qualities that perhaps focused the light of Christ upon him for his brother Cardinals to see.'
The official House Republicans account on X, which pointed out that the new pope is both 'a native of Chicago, Illinois', and the 'first American Pope', wrote: 'May God bless you, and may He guide you.'
Joaquin Castro, a Texas representative, called Pope Leo XIV 'a Pope reflective of the late Pope Francis' creed to be choose [sic] light over darkness, to be kind to our neighbor, and to work to uplift and unify all people in a divided world' on X.
The New York governor, Kathy Hochul, posted on X: 'The prayers of millions of Catholics around the globe are with you to guide the church forward and be a strong champion for compassion and dignity.'
Related: Pope Leo's in-tray: pontiff has many urgent issues to address
Around the world, the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, said: 'Ukraine deeply values the Holy See's consistent position in upholding international law, condemning the Russian Federation's military aggression against Ukraine, and protecting the rights of innocent civilians' in a statement on X.
'At this decisive moment for our country, we hope for the continued moral and spiritual support of the Vatican in Ukraine's efforts to restore justice and achieve a lasting peace,' he continued.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Is Using the National Guard as Bait
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. President Donald Trump is about to launch yet another assault on democracy, the Constitution, and American traditions of civil-military relations, this time in Los Angeles. Under a dubious legal rationale, he is activating 2,000 members of the National Guard to confront protests against actions by ICE, the immigration police who have used thuggish tactics against citizens and foreigners alike in the United States. By militarizing the situation in L.A., Trump is goading Americans more generally to take him on in the streets of their own cities, thus enabling his attacks on their constitutional freedoms. As I've listened to him and his advisers over the past several days, they seem almost eager for public violence that would justify the use of armed force against Americans. The president and the men and women around him are acting with great ambition in this moment, and they are likely hoping to achieve three goals in one dramatic action. First, they will turn America's attention away from Trump's many failures and inane feuds, and reestablish his campaign persona as a strongman who will brush aside the law if that's what it takes to keep order in the streets. Perhaps nothing would please Trump more than to replace weird stories about Elon Musk with video of masked protesters burning cars as lines of helmeted police and soldiers march over them and impose draconian silence in one of the nation's largest and most diverse cities. Second, as my colleague David Frum warned this morning, Trump is establishing that he is willing to use the military any way he pleases, perhaps as a proof of concept for suppressing free elections in 2026 or 2028. Trump sees the U.S. military as his personal honor guard and his private muscle. Those are his toy soldiers, and he's going to get a show from his honor guard in a birthday parade next weekend. In the meantime, he's going to flex that muscle, and prove that the officers and service members who will do whatever he orders are the real military. The rest are suckers and losers. During the George Floyd protests in 2020, Trump was furious at what he saw as the fecklessness of military leaders determined to thwart his attempts to use deadly force against protesters. He's learned his lesson: This time, he has installed a hapless sycophant at the Pentagon who is itching to execute the boss's orders. Third, Trump may be hoping to radicalize the citizen-soldiers drawn from the community who serve in the National Guard. (Seizing the California Guard is also a convenient way to humiliate California Governor Gavin Newsom and L.A. Mayor Karen Bass, with the president's often-used narrative that liberals can't control their own cities.) Trump has the right to 'federalize' Guard forces, which is how they were deployed overseas in America's various conflicts. He has never respected the traditions of American civil-military relations, which regard the domestic deployment of the military as an extreme measure to be avoided whenever possible. Using the Guard could be a devious tactic: He may be hoping to set neighbor against neighbor, so that the people called to duty return to their home and workplace with stories of violence and injuries. In the longer run, Trump may be trying to create a national emergency that will enable him to exercise authoritarian control. (Such an emergency was a rationalization, for example, for the tariffs that he has mostly had to abandon.) He has for years been trying to desensitize the citizens of the United States to un-American ideas and unconstitutional actions. The American system of government was never meant to cope with a rogue president. Yet Trump is not unstoppable. Thwarting his authoritarianism will require restraint on the part of the public, some steely nerves on the part of state and local authorities, and vigilant action from national elected representatives, who should be stepping in to raise the alarm and to demand explanations about the president's misuse of the military. As unsatisfying as it may be for some citizens to hear, the last thing anyone should do is take to the streets of Los Angeles and try to confront the military or any of California's law-enforcement authorities. ICE is on a rampage, but physically assaulting or obstructing its agents—and thus causing a confrontation with the cops who have to protect them, whether those police officers like it or not—will provide precisely the pretext that some of the people in Trump's White House are trying to create. The president and his coterie want people walking around taking selfies in gas clouds, waving Mexican flags, holding up traffic, and burning cars. Judging by reactions on social media and interviews on television, a lot of people seem to think such performances are heroic—which means they're poised to give Trump's enforcers what they're hoping for. Be warned: Trump is expecting resistance. You will not be heroes. You will be the pretext. [Conor Friedersdorf: Averting the worst-case scenario in Los Angeles] Instead, the most dramatic public action the residents of Southern California could take right now would be to ensure that Trump's forces arrive on calm streets. Imagine the reactions of the Guard members as they look around and wonder what, exactly, the commander in chief was thinking. Why are they carrying their rifles in the streets of downtown America? What does anyone expect them to do? Put another way: What if the president throws a crackdown and nobody comes? This kind of restraint will deny Trump the political oxygen he's trying to generate. He is resorting to the grand theater of militarism because he is losing on multiple fronts in the courts—and he knows it. The law, for most people, is dreary to hear about, but one of the most important stories of Trump's second term is that lawyers and judges are so far holding a vital line against the administration, sometimes at great personal risk. Trump is also losing public support, which is another reason he's zeroing in on California. He is resolutely ignorant in many ways, but he has an excellent instinct for picking the right fights. The fact of the matter is that tens of millions of Americans believe that almost everything about immigration in the United States has long been deeply dysfunctional. (I'm one of them.) If he sends the military into L.A. and Guard members end up clashing in high-definition video with wannabe resistance gladiators in balaclavas, many people who have not been paying attention to his other ghastly antics will support him. (For the record, I am not one of them.) So far, even the Los Angeles Police Department—not exactly a bastion of squishy suburban book-club liberals—has emphasized that the protests have been mostly peaceful. Trump is apparently trying to change that. Sending in the National Guard is meant to provoke, not pacify, and his power will only grow if he succeeds in tempting Americans to intemperate reactions that give him the authoritarian opening he's seeking. Article originally published at The Atlantic
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Effort to rename Navy ships honoring minority, gay leaders is wrong
Nothing spells homophobia and discrimination like Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's order to the Navy on Tuesday to review the names of ships honoring Harvey Milk – one of the country's first openly gay elected officials – and other prominent civil rights leaders. That his demand was made at the dawn of Pride Month is a slap at the LGBTQ+ community. 'Secretary Hegseth is committed to ensuring that the names attached to all (Department of Defense) installations and assets are reflective of the commander in chief's priorities, our nation's history, and the warrior ethos,' the Pentagon said in a statement. The story was first reported by which said the renaming of the USNS Harvey Milk, an oiler ship, was scheduled to be made June 13. The timing during Pride Month was intentional, the site said. If Milk – who served in the U.S. Navy during the Korean War aboard a submarine rescue ship – does not fit the warrior ethos, then we are living under the wrong leadership. The USNS Harvey Milk was launched in November 2021 after a 2016 decision by Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus to name all John Lewis-class oilers after civil rights leaders. Milk, who was assassinated while in office in 1978, is an icon in the LGBTQ+ community. At a Friday morning raising of the Pride flag at Fresno City Hall, four individuals or their organizations were honored with the Harvey Milk Community Leader Award. The condemnations of the Trump administration's efforts to erase the memories of big swaths of Americans were quick. Gov. Gavin Newsom said Milk was more than a civil rights icon, 'he was a Korean War combat veteran whose commander called him 'outstanding.'' 'Stripping his name from a Navy ship won't erase his legacy as an American icon, but it does reveal Trump's contempt for the very values our veterans fight to protect.' Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-San Francisco, nailed it on X (formerly Twitter): 'Our military is the most powerful in the world – but this spiteful move does not strengthen our national security or the 'warrior' ethos. It is a shameful, vindictive erasure of those who fought to break down barriers for all to chase the American Dream.' It's time that Trump and his cronies realize that this great country has been built by generations of immigrants and people from all walks of life, religion and gender identity. They won wars, built cities, sacrificed for their families and inspired the innovation that continues to bless our nation. Hegseth's efforts to downplay their contributions reflects his weakness as a human being. It also reveals his racism and sexism. The names of the first Black Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall and civil rights leader Medgar Evers are among the names the defense secretary wants banished. It's not as if minorities are absent in the military. According to the Navy, 38.4% of its service members are from minority communities. That includes Latinos (18.3%) and Blacks (17.2%). Milk, Marshall, Evers and others have served their country with distinction. Their service to this country was just as valuable as any other individual's. They represented not only their community but also their country. Others on the list include Underground Railroad figure Harriet Tubman, suffragist/abolitionist Lucy Stone and United Farm Workers co-founders César E. Chávez and Dolores Huerta. Some ships with their names have yet to be constructed, like the one for Huerta, who at 95 years of age remains active. The USNS Cesar Chavez was launched in 2012 in honor of the labor leader who died in 1993. He was 17 when he joined the Navy during World War II and served for two years. The USNS Dolores Huerta, a future John Lewis-class oiler, was named in 2024 by Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro. 'Dolores Huerta has been a leading figure in the Hispanic community and a champion of civil and workers' rights for over 70 years,' said Del Toro in announcing the name. 'Dolores Huerta dedicated her life to caring for those voiceless and underrepresented – she dedicated her life to taking care of people.' If you search the Defense Department's website and search for 'warrior ethos,' you'll get 98 replies. Unfortunately, rallying service members by yelling 'warrior ethos' at the same time you're diminishing the service of minority Americans doesn't make you a warrior. It just shows how pathetic and racist you can be. Shame on Hegseth. He shows no pride in the men and women under his command.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
LA unrest marks latest clash of US presidents, states over National Guard
Donald Trump's deployment of California's National Guard marks the first time in decades that a US president openly defied a state governor and sent troops to an emergency zone. By ordering 2,000 guardsmen to Los Angeles to help quell protests against raids by US immigration agents, Trump essentially mounted a takeover of the state's military regiments to address "lawlessness" on the city's streets. The National Guard is a reserve military rooted in the 17th century local militias created in the American colonies before the country's founding. Since then the guard has had multiple responsibilities: domestic disaster relief and security, homeland defense and prevention of civil unrest; and acting as reserve forces for US military deployments overseas. Presidential orders to deploy guardsmen domestically are not uncommon. But clashes between a president and governor over deployments -- or the lack thereof, such as during the US Capitol riot by Trump supporters on January 6, 2021 while he was still in office -- have been rare. - Los Angeles, 2025 - The White House said Trump relied on a seldom used law, known as Title 10, that permits National Guard federalization in times of "a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States." California Governor Gavin Newsom called the decision "purposefully inflammatory." But Trump's order proceeded, and the guard troops were on LA streets Sunday. "This is the first time since 1965 that a president has deployed the National Guard without a request by a state governor," Kenneth Roth, a longtime former Human Rights Watch executive director, posted on X. "Then it was (president Lyndon) Johnson protecting civil rights protesters. Now it's Trump creating a spectacle so he can continue his immigration raids." Elizabeth Goitein of the Brennan Center for Justice warned of a "shocking abuse of power" by Trump, whose memorandum authorizes federalization of National Guard troops "at locations where protests against (federal immigration) functions are occurring or are likely to occur." "Trump has authorized the deployment of troops anywhere in the country where protests against ICE activity might occur," Goitein posted on X. "That is a huge red flag." - Alabama, 1965 - A landmark civil rights moment led to a National Guard clash between a president and a segregationist governor. With demonstrators led by Martin Luther King Jr on a five-day march from Selma to Alabama's capital Montgomery, governor George Wallace pledged National Guard security -- but then reneged. The U-turn incensed Johnson who, in defiance of Wallace, called up the guard. The march was protected by thousands of Army soldiers and federalized guard members. - Arkansas, 1957 - When the Little Rock school system was ordered desegregated, Arkansas' pro-segregationist governor Orval Faubus deployed the National Guard to surround a high school and prevent nine Black students from entering. President Dwight Eisenhower bristled at the standoff and told Faubus the guard must maintain order so the Black students could attend. Instead, Faubus pulled the guardsmen, leaving security to local forces. Eisenhower issued an executive order federalizing the Arkansas National Guard, and ordered 1,000 US Army troops to join them. - Kent State, 1970 - Perhaps no anti-Vietnam war protest was more pivotal than at Ohio's Kent State University, where students slammed Richard Nixon's war expansion. As unrest swelled, the National Guard opened fire, killing four students and wounding nine others. The shootings sparked outrage, but also led to reforms regarding how the guard handles civil unrest and use of force. - Hurricane Katrina, 2005 - The massive hurricane left much of New Orleans underwater, leading to the largest-ever peacetime deployment of the National Guard. But critics accused then-president George W Bush of favoring a militaristic response over humanitarian relief. Louisiana's governor, Kathleen Blanco, warned that many among the thousands of National Guard and federal troops were battle-tested Iraq war veterans. "These troops know how to shoot and kill and I expect they will," she reportedly said. - Outside White House, 2020 - June 1, 2020 saw a brutal crackdown on demonstrators following the police murder of African-American George Floyd. With people aggressively protesting near the White House, the National Guard joined police to maintain order. Flash grenades and tear gas were deployed. Unlike in the nation's 50 states, the DC National Guard is under direct command of the US president, who at the time was Trump. mlm/st
