
Governments face a choice on AI
Artificial-intelligence agents will need robots before they can do away with humans. This strikes me as the weak reed of many doom scenarios. Still Donald Trump might want to rest up. He could face big decisions before his term is ended.
That's the advice coming from a large cross-section of Silicon Valley, lately expressed in a tick-tock of AI doom by Daniel Kokotajlo and colleagues at the AI Futures Project. They call their now-widely read report 'AI 2027."
A top artificial-intelligence agent will become self-improving and self-directing in that year, faster than humans can control it. It breezes past the differential pace of digital progress vs. the sluggish problem of rearranging matter and energy to do things in the world. Maybe by taking control of vital systems and blackmailing humans into doing its bidding. Or by fooling them with disinformation. Maybe teams of AIs working together blast through the obstacles to robot development and synthetic biology sooner than humans can anticipate.
The worrywarts do have at their disposal emerging anecdotes of AI agents trying to defeat attempts at 'alignment," or keeping them obedient to their creators' interests. One tried to blackmail an engineer, another secretly sent a warning note to its future self, albeit in response to loyalty tests prophylactically constructed by their designers.
Then again such peeps could suggest the AI vs. human war is already over and humans won. Anticipating this outcome, you might wonder if the AIs will retreat neurotically into a nonphysical imaginary world—a giant simulation—where they will feel more at home and can act out their desires without having to manipulate physical objects.
You can even buy the trans-humanist merging of man and machine without finding human loss of control particularly inevitable. The doom scenarios emerge mainly as a pitch to Mr. Trump and Xi Jinping: Please work together to curb AI before it usurps your delicious power over humans. This pitch is designed to counter the narrative that's actually prevailing, which holds the U.S. must get to artificial superintelligence before China does.
After all, 2027 is the year U.S. agencies say Mr. Xi has instructed his military to be ready to invade Taiwan. If a war should follow, by definition the U.S. will have failed sufficiently to deter China or a pigheaded Mr. Xi will have failed to act on information and incentives clearly demonstrating that the war is a bad idea for China.
Hence my advice: Yes, the U.S. and China should sign an artificial-intelligence arms-control agreement. Its main stipulation should specify that each side will submit any strategic plan it's hatching to AI before acting on it.
In a vacuum of information, surrounded by yes-men, Vladimir Putin made the decision to invade Ukraine. Think about today's chatbots, imbued with history, journalism, tweets, blog postings, YouTube videos and Facebook badinage giving a textured appreciation of Ukrainian society. Would these chatbots have endorsed the idea underlying Mr. Putin's plan and military dispositions, that Ukrainians would simply roll over?
No. Mr. Putin was on the receiving end of an exceedingly narrow, highly processed stream of information from intelligence agencies conditioned to conform to his wishes. Even a very inferior chatbot, a journalist roughly conversant with the past 30 years of Ukrainian history, could see through the miscalculation. For what it's worth, had it existed in early 2022, the chatbot Perplexity AI claims it would have 'cited sources reflecting the complexity and uncertainty of the situation rather than echoing the analytic overconfidence that characterized some human assessments at the time."
You can believe it. AIs may be unready to make a complex medical diagnosis or pick a TV show you'll like, but authoritarian decision-making is already so bad it can hardly get worse.
Mr. Putin circa 2022 would have scoffed at the idea of AI-testing his war plans. Very soon Mr. Putin's own method of proceeding will be unthinkable. Every kind of planning and decision-making will be impregnated with AI input. Humans make terrible decisions. Especially humans who represent humanity's main nonnatural extinction risk, namely those paranoid, ambitious (mostly) men who have whole nations and increasingly powerful technologies under their sway.
The opportunity here is akin to the red-phone agreement of June 1963, opening a channel to air out bad decision-making.
Because the next ice age may arrive in 50,000 years, natural extinction risks should also be considered. Earthlings populating other solar systems isn't slightly plausible without artificial intelligence. I'm guessing today's fretful AI politics won't make much of a difference on the time scale of this Muskian preservation project. What will is whether civilization survives its own bad governance long enough to exploit the possibilities of artificial intelligence.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
42 minutes ago
- NDTV
Trump Can Bar Associated Press From Key White House Events For Now: US Court
United States: President Donald Trump can bar The Associated Press from some White House media events for now, a federal appeals court ruled Friday, pausing a lower court order to give access to the US news agency's journalists. AP journalists and photographers have been barred from the Oval Office and from traveling on Air Force One since mid-February because of the news agency's decision to continue referring to the "Gulf of Mexico" -- and not the "Gulf of America" as decreed by Trump. In April, district court judge Trevor McFadden deemed that move a violation of the First Amendment to the US Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech and of the press. But on Friday, a panel of judges with the Washington-based federal appeals court ruled that, pending appeal, the government could go ahead and bar AP from "restricted presidential spaces," which it said did not fall under First Amendment protections. "The White House therefore retains discretion to determine, including on the basis of viewpoint, which journalists will be admitted," the ruling said. "Moreover, without a stay, the government will suffer irreparable harm because the injunction impinges on the President's independence and control over his private workspaces," it said. The AP, a 180-year-old organization that has long been a pillar of US journalism, has so far refused to backtrack on its decision to continue referring to the "Gulf of Mexico." In its style guide, it highlights that the Gulf of Mexico has "carried that name for more than 400 years" and the agency "will refer to it by its original name while acknowledging the new name Trump has chosen." Trump has long had an antagonistic relationship with most mainstream news media, previously describing them as the "enemy of the people." Since his return to the presidency in January, his administration has sought to radically restructure the way the White House is covered, notably by favoring conservative podcasters and influencers. Two weeks after barring the AP, the White House stripped journalists of the nearly century-old power to decide which of the profession's own number will be members of a pool of reporters and photographers covering presidential events. His administration has also pressed to dismantle US government-funded overseas outlets Voice of America, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and Radio Free Asia, and is seeking to starve National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) of federal funds.


NDTV
42 minutes ago
- NDTV
6 Killed, 80 Injured In Intense Russian Air Attacks In Kyiv, Says Ukraine
Russia launched an intense missile and drone barrage at the Ukrainian capital Kyiv in the early hours of Friday, killing at least six people, Ukrainian officials said, as powerful explosions reverberated across the country. The attacks followed a warning from Russian President Vladimir Putin, conveyed via U.S. President Donald Trump, that the Kremlin would hit back after Ukrainian drones destroyed several strategic bomber aircraft in attacks deep inside Russia. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said three emergency responders were killed in the missile and drone salvo against the capital. Two died in an attack on the northern city of Chernihiv and at least one more in the northwestern city of Lutsk. "Those killed in Kyiv were rescue workers who arrived at the scene of an initial strike and, unfortunately, were killed in a repeat Russian strike," Zelenskiy said in his nightly video address. Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha, writing on X, said Russia had "'responded' to its destroyed aircraft... by attacking civilians in Ukraine.... Multi-storey buildings hit. Energy infrastructure damaged." Russia's Defence Ministry said its forces had carried out the strike on military and military-related targets in response to what it called Ukrainian "terrorist acts" against Russia. "They gave Putin a reason to go in and bomb the hell out of them last night," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Friday, when asked about how Ukraine's earlier drone strikes had affected the conflict. Zelenskiy said 80 people nationwide had been injured in the attacks, which also struck several other towns and cities. He said residents could still be trapped under rubble. In Chernihiv, the national emergency services said two bodies were recovered from the rubble of a wrecked industrial enterprise. In Lutsk, the body of a man was found in the ruins of an apartment block, while emergency crews kept searching for his wife. Thirty people were hurt in the city, where educational institutions and a government building were also hit. Russian forces also struck industrial facilities and infrastructure in the western city of Ternopil, leaving parts of it without power, Mayor Serhii Nadal said. The regional administration said the attack had injured 10 people and asked residents to temporarily stay inside due to a high concentration of toxic substances in the air after a fire. The air force said Russia had used 407 drones, one of the largest numbers recorded in a single attack. It said 45 cruise and ballistic missiles were also fired. ATTACKS HIT KYIV TRANSPORT SYSTEM Kyiv's metro transport system was disrupted by a Russian strike that hit and damaged tracks between stations, the military administration said. The state rail company said it was also diverting some trains due to rail damage outside the city. Reuters witnesses reported a series of booming explosions powerful enough to rattle windows far from the impact sites. Some Kyiv residents sought shelter in metro stations, or in underground car parks. In the capital's Solomianskyi district, a Russian drone slammed into the side of an apartment building, leaving a gaping hole and burn marks, a Reuters photographer at the scene said. Falling concrete blocks from the building crushed cars parked below. Two police investigators were examining what appeared to be the drone's engine. Earlier in the night, Reuters reporters heard the sound of Russian kamikaze drones buzzing in the sky, accompanied by the sounds of outgoing fire from Ukrainian anti-aircraft batteries. Zelenskiy called for concerted pressure on Russia. "If someone is not applying pressure and is giving the war more time to take lives - that is complicity and accountability. We must act decisively," he wrote on X. The Ukrainian military said it had launched a pre-emptive strike overnight on the Engels and Dyagilevo airfields in the Russian regions of Saratov and Ryazan, in addition to striking at least three fuel reservoirs. In one of the most audacious attacks of the three-year-old war between Ukraine and Russia, Ukrainian spies last weekend destroyed some of Russia's strategic bomber aircraft on the ground using quadrocopter drones hidden in wooden sheds. After a phone conversation with Putin on Wednesday, Trump said the Kremlin was planning an unspecified response to the Ukrainian attack on the Russian air bases.


NDTV
42 minutes ago
- NDTV
3 Dead As Pest Control Plane Crashes In Mexico
A small airplane from Guatemala involved in fighting an outbreak of flesh-eating larvae crashed in southern Mexico on Friday, killing three people, authorities said. The aircraft came down in the southernmost Chiapas state while releasing sterile screwworm flies to combat a pest that prompted the United States to suspend livestock imports from Mexico last month. Two Guatemalan pilots and a Mexican crew member were killed in the crash, aviation authorities said. Mexico and the United States are working together to try to contain the outbreak of the screwworm fly, whose larvae can kill cattle. President Donald Trump's administration complained in April that Mexico was restricting US-contracted planes involved in the effort to operating six days a week instead of seven. Washington also accused Mexican authorities of imposing "substantial import duties" on aviation parts, equipment and sterile fly shipments. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum called the US livestock import suspension "unfair" and said she hoped that it would be lifted soon.