Both Labour and the Tories should be terrified
Reform are, of course, the night's big winers. By the end of today, it looks likely that gains by the Liberal Democrats and Greens in their target areas will show that it is not just Reform that is benefitting from the decline in the old two-party duopoly – last year's collapse in Conservative support, compounded by this year's haemorrhage of Labour votes.
Last week, previewing yesterday's Runcorn & Helsby by-election, I suggested a political version of the Micawber principle: victory by 50 votes, the result happiness; defeat by 50 votes, result misery. OK, Reform's Sarah Pochin won by just six votes. But the principle holds; and by the same token Labour can celebrate three narrow mayoral victories overnight. However, Labour's vote fell alarmingly in each of the mayoral contests; and early indications from county council contests confirm the pattern. Labour should not seek to comfort itself by claiming 'it could have been worse'.
The table below summarises the main overnight results. It compares the share of votes won by each party yesterday with the results from last year's general election, applying the figures from the relevant constituencies are added together.
As the figures show, Labour suffered double-digit declines everywhere. Their three victories, in North Tyneside, the West of England and Doncaster, were achieved with alarmingly low support: 30, 25 and 33 per cent respectively. These are not kinds of figures that have normally led to victories in the past. Coming from nowhere, Reform won Greater Lincolnshire as well as the Runcorn by-election, and ran Labour close in the other three mayoral contests. It is an astonishing performance, likely to be confirmed by the county council results later today.
What now? In the past, third-party eruptions between general elections have subsided. In the end, for more than a century, the Labour-Conservative domination has returned whenever voters have decided who they want to govern Britain. Maybe the same will happen again. But as well as the long-term social and economic trends chipping away at the old class-based party loyalties, there is a technical reason why we may be witnessing a transformation in our politics.
It's to do with the way our First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) voting system works. It rewards a) large national parties (traditionally Labour and Conservative), b) parties with specific geographical roots (notably the SNP in their good years) and c) minority parties that successfully target particular seats (as the Liberal Democrats did last year). It punishes medium-sized parties with the kind of broad support that amasses millions of votes nationally, but not enough in particular seats to have many MPs. This used to be the curse that afflicted the old Liberal party and more recently the Lib Dems. Last year it was Reform that suffered, winning half a million more votes than the Lib Dems but 67 fewer seats.
When it was just the Lib Dems trying to break the Labour-Tory duopoly, a rough rule of thumb was that they, and their predecessor parties, needed at least 30 per cent to overcome the biases inherent in FPTP. In 1983, the Liberal/SDP Alliance won just 23 seats with 26 per cent of the vote. Labour was narrowly ahead in the national vote, with 28 per cent, but because its support was more concentrated in winnable areas, ended up with 209 seats.
The arithmetic has changed. With the Greens, Lib Dems and Reform all seeking to undermine the old duopoly – and the nationalists in Scotland and Wales – local candidates need fewer votes to be elected. This, indeed, is the common feature of all the overnight results.
What is true locally is true nationally. The tipping point for a party such Reform is no longer 30 per cent. It's probably around 25 per cent. That is where they stand in the polls. Later today the BBC will publish its estimate of the national vote share from the country council elections. I would not be surprised if Reform ends up with at least 25 per cent and possibly more.
The scattering of overnight council results shows Reform winning half the seats that have declared. We have yet to hear from southern counties where Reform is weaker and the Greens and Lib Dems stronger. But, for the moment, Reform no longer suffers from an FPTP penalty. It looks as if their share of county councillors will end up broadly in line with their overall share of votes. And that transformation of the way votes translate into seats really should terrify both Labour and the Conservatives.
Peter Kellner is the founder of YouGov. You can find his Substack here
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Ed Miliband's nuclear golden era could soon become a new dark age
This Government is fond of making grandiose claims for things that are yet to happen. The latest is Ed Miliband's declaration that we are in 'a golden era of nuclear power.' He has made a series of announcements that may or may not come to fruition over the next two decades, including a new nuclear plant at Sizewell with £14 billion of public money behind it. But Mr Miliband is getting well ahead of himself. History shows that few public policies of modern times have been more mishandled. Britain once led the world in nuclear energy and it was very much a cross-party venture. The post-war Attlee government established the Atomic Energy Research Establishment and the first ever commercial nuclear reactor was built at Calder Hall under the Tories in 1956 just as the Suez crisis increased concerns over the supply of oil. British nuclear expertise was second to none and sought around the world. Under both Conservative and Labour administrations, the UK became a leader in nuclear power development, commencing operations on 26 Magnox reactors between 1956 and 1971. The technology chopped and changed, moving from advanced gas-cooled reactors (AGRs) in the 1970s to pressurised water reactors (PWRs) and even a fast-breeder reactor experiment at Dounreay in Scotland, opened amid great fanfare by Margaret Thatcher but which has now closed. Her government set in train a plan for eight new PWRs, only one of which – Sizewell B – was ever built. What happened? One answer is North Sea oil and gas. Fears about fuel scarcity and sky high prices abated as more came ashore. Cheap gas made the cost of nuclear look prohibitive to politicians fixated only on the short term. Meanwhile, across the Channel, the French, with no oil and depleted coal reserves, invested instead in nuclear power. By 1979 they had installed 56 reactors, satisfying their power needs and even exporting electricity to other European countries, including us. The French are even going to be building Sizewell C. They produce 70 per cent of their electricity by nuclear fission, which does not emit CO2, and are not dependent on energy from volatile regions like the Gulf or despotic regimes like Russia. This serendipity was as much a function of force majeure as foresight. As the French said 'no oil, no gas, no coal, no choice'. As a result they have found themselves in a better position than Britain in the switch to low carbon renewables. Because of the apparent bonanza provided by North Sea oil, we neglected the one source of power that would help create self-sufficiency and meet climate change objectives. Only when it was too late and much of the industry's expertise had been lost did the last Labour government try to reactivate the nuclear programme. Ironically, it was Mr Miliband as Environment Secretary who revived the programme 15 years ago in the teeth of objections from Labour 'greens'. Yet only one new reactor at Hinkley Point – using French technology and, to begin with, Chinese finance – has been given the go ahead. It is way behind schedule by at least six years and massively over budget. For all the trumpet-blowing is the new Sizewell announcement just another milestone along a road paved with good intentions and wretched decision-making? We know it will be hugely expensive and the idea of it coming on stream within 10 years is for the birds. Since it is a copy of Hinkley it should benefit by learning from the mistakes made there. But few can have confidence in the project meeting any of its financial targets or the timetable for construction because nothing in this country ever does. Around the world there is a boom in nuclear power building as countries see it as an essential complement to wind and solar, not least because it provides a baseload and is not dependent on the weather. Sixty reactors are being built globally – 30 of them in China, which has also opened a thorium plant, something we could have done years ago since we have plentiful supplies and the process reduces waste. Is there any area in which the UK can press ahead? Tucked away in his Telegraph article this week, Miliband says the Government is ramping up spending on nuclear fusion research, though this seems more a token mention than an enthusiastic embrace. Yet fusion is one area where the British do have a great deal of expertise, with start-up companies well ahead of any European competitors in raising investment. It is always said that fusion is the future that never arrives because it involves replicating the same processes seen on the Sun. About 35 years ago two chemists shocked the world by claiming they had come up with 'cold fusion' obviating the need to produce the excessive temperatures needed. But the science was flawed, even though some adherents still think cold fusion is possible. Fusion technology is advancing rapidly and is likely to accelerate with the help of AI, high temperature superconducting magnets and supercomputers. But those in the business fear the Government is making the same mistakes as its predecessors in failing to measure the long-term in decades, not parliamentary sessions. China, Japan and America are now in the vanguard of a technology in which the UK once led, as it did with nuclear fission. Arguably, the most important aspect of Miliband's plan is the green light for a fleet of small modular reactors (SMRs), though getting planning agreements past local communities will be hard. Even this has been fraught with bureaucracy and delay. A competition to find a developer for SMRs has taken two years before alighting on Rolls Royce. Why has it taken so long? The potential offered by SMRs was identified years ago; yet once again, government dithering has led to everything being done when it is too late to fill the energy gap that will threaten black-outs in a few years' time. This is because the switch to renewables, the ban on new North Sea extraction licences and the demise of coal will make the decommissioning of existing nuclear power stations even more problematic before new ones come on stream. How long before Mr Miliband's golden era turns into a dark age?
The Guardian
12 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Farage's press conference tour is the ideal way to indulging his narcissism
If it's Tuesday, it must be … checks notes … London. We've reached the point where Nigel Farage has taken to arranging press conferences for himself in various locations around the country on an almost daily basis. On Monday he was in Port Talbot telling the Welsh to get back down the mines, today he was in Westminster to reveal the identity of Reform's new party chair after Zia Yusuf's abrupt resignation last week. Who knows where he will be tomorrow? The press conference is Nige's happy place. The ideal way to indulge his narcissism. A room full of people all there to listen to him. And him alone. Others are only admitted into his world on sufferance. They must know their place in life. That they owe their chance of glory only as a satellite of his own ego. He only knows he's truly alive if there are cameras there to record his existence. To get to sleep at night, he watches his greatest hits on TikTok, all the while murmuring to himself, 'You're the best, Nige. You're the best.' Moments before Nige made his appearance, the supporting cast took their seats. First Richard Tice. The loyal Dicky who has made being a bridesmaid to Nigel his life's work. Every humiliation heaped upon him – sudden demotion to deputy leader – accepted with a permatanned grin. Not even a hint of annoyance. Ask not what Nige can do for you. Ask what you can do for Nige. Then Sarah Pochin. Reform's very own Nurse Ratched. Never knowingly caught with a smile. She had transgressed by suggesting a burqa ban at last week's PMQs. Her punishment was to be a sharp put-down from Nige himself. Reform had had some defections from the Tories, he would say. And all of them had been failures. Time for Nurse Ratched to perform electric shock therapy on himself. Lee Anderson just looked fed-up and bored. Another Nige presser for which he was obliged to be part of the furniture. James McMurdock was just bewildered. Out of his depth. As usual. Hard to believe, but this hapless quartet are likely to have key cabinet posts if Reform wins the next election. Dicky as chancellor? 30p Lee as foreign secretary? Prepare to leave the country. Last in were Yusuf and David Bull. Dave is the only man to have spent longer on the sunbed than Dicky. Perhaps they have a timeshare. He is also the next Reform party chair. Dave likes to think he is the great communicator: a TV presenter of note. The reality is much sadder than that. Having peaked as a presenter of Most Haunted, his career has steadily faded into obscurity. Last seen – allegedly – he was presenting his own show on TalkTV to an audience measured in single figures. But Dave's biggest asset is his loyalty. His head is so far up Nige's bum that it occasionally peeks out of his mouth. He will never say a word that hasn't been pre-authorised. He knows his place. Lights, cameras, actions. Nige appeared centre stage, basking in the attention. Cracking jokes. Laughing along with himself. The ship had been righted and he was still very much the captain. Principally, he was keen to establish the official version of events. What followed was pure passive-aggression. Lighthearted barbs intended to humiliate. The reality was that Zia had dared to consider himself Nige's equal. Had been the one tasked with professionalising the party. Had got sick and tired of the constant racism from members of his own party. Including from Nurse Ratched. Had been ground down and decided he had better things to do with his life than to feed Farage's solipsism. But this was no time for reality. So we got the Waltons treatment. Pure saccharine. It had all been a misunderstanding. Just one of those things, Zia had got a bit emotional. No big deal. Reform was one big happy family. To prove the point, Zia was dragged on stage. Exhibit A. To officially recant and swear his undying allegiance to Nige, the One True God. He had made the biggest mistake of his life, he said. Sad face. He didn't know what had come over him. Zia would never question Nige again. He would devote the rest of his life to reading the collected sayings of Nigel and to doing good works. All he could do was say sorry for the trouble he had caused. He looked forward to much more racist abuse. His new work would be the greatest challenge anyone had known since the second world war. Up bounced Diddy Dave to announce himself to the world again. He had been lying around in the store cupboard waiting to be of use to Nige again and when the summons had come he had answered the call. Thrilled to be a relevant irrelevance again. The rest of his speech was an outpouring of inconsequentiality. No one does inconsequentiality better. He is a man of no importance. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Back to Nige, ready and waiting to take questions from all comers. He is the only party leader to actively invite scrutiny. Primarily because he doesn't really give a shit. He is on a roll. The polls are going his way and it's not inconceivable Reform could win the next election. What he would do if he became prime minister is another matter. Panic probably. His method for dealing with his party is to treat them all as children. Listen to him speak and you'd imagine he was a bleeding-heart liberal. Certainly compared to his MPs. Take the death penalty. Personally he wasn't in favour – too many miscarriages of justice – but he wasn't going to stop his kids from having their say. If they wanted to kill innocent people, then who was he to disagree? Same with the racists in his party. He didn't have a problem with immigrants, but if some of his MPs wanted to drown them, then he could go along with that. Nige was rather more hazy on anything that resembled policy. He couldn't explain how he was going to reopen the mines and the steel furnaces. He couldn't say how he was going to deport 1.2 million immigrants and separate 200,000 children from their parents. But these were unimportant details. Reform isn't a party of action. It's a party of grievance. A vibes party for those who think the country is screwed. And for Nige, the vibes are looking good. Dicky rose to his feet to applaud. Zia did likewise. He's learning fast.
The Guardian
12 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trust no one when it comes to ID cards
Polly Toynbee posits a world in which everyone has a smartphone and all government agencies can be trusted (Digital ID cards would be good for Britain – and a secret weapon for Labour against Reform, 9 June). What colour is the sky in this world?Linda MockettWinnersh, Berkshire Am I the only one thinking about Sellafield and wondering by what stretch of the imagination nuclear power can be called 'clean' (Sizewell C power station to be built as part of UK's £14bn nuclear investment, 10 June)?Dr Nigel MellorNewcastle upon Tyne This year, I received my 50 years' service badge from Aslef – a couple of years late, but we are train drivers, after all. During my career, I always 'worked on the railway', never on the trains (Letters, 8 June). Malcolm SimpsonSalisbury, Wiltshire So is an airport a plane station or a runway station?Colin ProwerChipping Norton, Oxfordshire I am sick of hearing calls to raise the price of alcoholic beverages (Letters, 8 June). This would have little or no effect on the middle and upper classes, but would punish those on lower incomes. What next? A rise in food prices to deal with the obesity problem?Noel HannonLondon Damned bold of Dave Schilling to assume Elon Musk and Donald Trump ever had anything like friendship, as opposed to plans to exploit each other (Male friendship isn't easy. Just ask Trump and Musk, 7 June).Brandi WeedWoodland, California, US Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
