US dietary guidelines expected as soon as this month, sources say
New York: The U.S. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, which influence school lunches, medical advice and nutrition standards, are expected to be released as soon as June, two sources familiar with the matter said.
The Trump administration is accelerating the timeline to impact meals served in the upcoming school year, starting later this summer, one of the sources said. However, it is already late for many school districts to adjust items they purchase, said Diane Pratt-Heavner, the director of media relations for the School Nutrition Association.
The upcoming dietary guidelines are still being developed and nothing has been decided, a third source familiar with the matter said, adding they were expected to address
saturated fat
, found mainly in meat and certain oils, and
ultra-processed food
. Recommendations on drinking alcohol are not slated to dramatically change, the source said.
The guidelines will likely modify suggestions related to
dairy consumption
, according to an industry source. Currently, the dietary guidelines recommend low and non-fat dairy, but the new ones may include whole fat dairy, the source said.
The sources requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media.
Health and Human Services
and the U.S. Department of Agriculture publish the guidelines jointly every five years. Former President Joe Biden's administration began the process of drafting the guidelines.
The agencies did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The guidelines are the basis for
school nutrition standards
, which are set by the USDA.
Asked during a Tuesday press conference if the revised guidelines would include any changes to limits on saturated fats, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins declined to provide details.
"We're looking at everything right now. I don't want to make news today, but you'll be hearing a lot more on this in the coming weeks," she said, adding that her goal was to have the full guidelines out in the next month or two.
U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said last month that the guidelines would be four pages long, published by August and emphasize eating "whole food."
A report commissioned by Kennedy last month said the guidelines were compromised by corporate interests, such as the meat and sugar industries.
The report, named after the Make America Healthy Again social movement linked with Kennedy, also said that the current guidelines' recommendation to reduce saturated fat and sodium was problematic, and should instead focus on minimally processed food.
The current dietary guidelines recommend limiting saturated fat to less than 10% of total calories consumed daily, and do not address ultra-processed food. The definition of ultra-processed food is hotly debated by the food industry while the report describes it as industrially manufactured products.
The guidelines recommend limiting consumption of alcoholic beverages to one a day for women and two for men, or not drinking.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is required to set standards for school meals that align with the dietary guidelines. The guidelines also impact Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), an anti-hunger program. Doctors, nutritionists and dieticians also rely on them when advising patients.
School districts may struggle to meet the recommendations of the new dietary guidelines by the time school starts. Most school districts placed orders for fall 2025 menus at the beginning of the year, Pratt-Heavner said.
"Meeting mandatory changes to the nutrition standards or meal pattern would be extremely difficult given these procurement issues, but the administration could offer flexibility," such as allowing schools to offer whole milk, Pratt-Heavner said. Schools may now only offer fat-free and low-fat milk.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
13 hours ago
- NDTV
RFK Jr.s New Vaccine Panel Includes Self-Proclaimed Anti-Vaxxer
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced eight new members of an expert panel that advises the federal government on immunization policy, including several vocal vaccine critics and one who identifies as an "anti-vaxxer." The newly reconstituted panel includes numerous scientists with less conventional views. Several weren't aware of their appointments when contacted by Bloomberg. The moves come as Mr Kennedy makes major changes to how immunizations are studied and administered in the US and paves the way for a more skeptical approach to the use of shots that prevent deadly infections. In just the first few months of his tenure,Mr Kennedy's already taken steps to restrict vaccine approvals and access. On Monday, I took a major step towards restoring public trust in vaccines by reconstituting the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP). I retired the 17 current members of the committee. I'm now repopulating ACIP with the eight new members who will attend ACIP's… — Secretary Kennedy (@SecKennedy) June 11, 2025 Mr Kennedy removed all 17 former members of the panel on Monday, saying "a clean sweep is needed to reestablish public confidence in vaccine science." It was an unprecedented dismantling of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, which reviews the latest data and makes recommendations to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which typically implements them. The new members, including one who claimed Covid shots were causing AIDS and a nurse who became an advocate after saying her child suffered long-term health damage from immunizations, are in a position to revamp vaccine use in the US. The group's positions are used to help determine what shots are given and whether insurers pay for them, among other things. Vaccine Skeptics Robert Malone, a scientist who studied messenger RNA, has spent years espousing debunked theories about the safety of Covid vaccines, at one point claiming the shots were "causing a form of AIDS." While Mr Kennedy said Tuesday afternoon that he would not appoint "anti-vaxxers" to the panel, Malone said in a post on X that he embraced the title two days before his appointment was announced. "The term 'anti-vaxer' it is not a slur, but a compliment. Embrace it. Own it. and be proud to be a part of this fight," Mr Malone wrote. The post didn't indicate Malone is saying he is an anti-vaxxer, according to an HHS official. Instead, it says he opposes vaccine mandates, the official said. Vicky Pebsworth, the nurse who became involved in vaccine safety research because of her child, is listed as the head of research and patient safety for the National Vaccine Information Center, an advocacy group that questions the safety of vaccines. Retsef Levi, an operations professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology business school, has called into question the safety of mRNA Covid vaccines, including in a post on X. "The evidence is mounting and indisputable that MRNA vaccines cause serious harm including death, especially among young people. We have to stop giving them immediately!" Mr Levi posted in January 2023. Mr Levi also co-authored a study in April about people dying after getting mRNA Covid shots. He wrote that with Joseph Ladapo, the controversial surgeon general of Florida who gained prominence during the Covid pandemic for contradicting federal public health guidance. The study was a preprint, which means it has not been subject to rigorous, peer-reviewed vetting. Martin Kulldorff, a biostatistician and epidemiologist who formerly worked at Harvard Medical School, was a co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration alongside National Institutes of Health Director Jay Bhattacharya. The manifesto called for an alternative to Covid lockdowns focused on protecting the elderly and others at high risk of infection while opening up the rest of society to return to normal early in the outbreak. Another of the appointees, Dartmouth College professor of pediatrics Cody Meissner, signed the declaration. The health secretary, at a showing of Les Miserables at the Kennedy Center in DC on Wednesday, said he changed the makeup of the panel "because the American people deserve it" and because of financial entanglements among the members. "How America responds to outbreaks, pandemics, and preventable deaths are now in the hands of a small group of 'experts' who are loyal to" Mr Kennedy, said Shaughnessy Naughton, president of 314 Action, a nonprofit that works to get Democratic scientists elected. Ms Naughton called on Louisiana Senator Bill Cassidy to investigate why the original panel was dismissed. Mr Kennedy previously promised Cassidy he would not touch the vaccine committee to secure the Republican's vote for the top health job. Member List The list also includes: James Pagano, an emergency room doctor from California Joseph Hibbeln, a psychiatrist and visiting professor at University of Bristol Michael Ross, an obstetrician and gynecologist and the chief medical officer of the generics company Mantra Pharma "I am grateful for the honor to be selected, and will do my best to serve without bias and with rigor," Malone said in a brief phone interview with Bloomberg. "I am honored with this opportunity and humbled by the responsibility," Levi said Wednesday in a post on
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
18 hours ago
- Business Standard
US green card rule change: New medical form needed each time you apply
Now, you will have to re-submit your medical form each time you apply for green card. In a fresh move by the Donald Trump administration, the US has changed the rules for green card applicants. From now on, the medical form submitted with an application—Form I-693—will no longer remain valid if that application is denied or withdrawn. You'll need a new one each time you apply. The new rule came into effect immediately after a notification from the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) on June 11, 2025. 'Form I-693, Report of Immigration Medical Examination and Vaccination Record, signed by a civil surgeon on or after November 1, 2023, is only valid while the application the Form I-693 was submitted with is pending,' said USCIS. 'If the application a Form I-693 was submitted with is withdrawn or denied, that Form I-693 is no longer valid.' This update applies to all applications pending or filed on or after June 11, 2025. What changed and why? Until now, applicants were allowed to reuse their medical forms indefinitely, as long as they were completed after November 1, 2023. This policy was introduced in April 2024 to help applicants avoid delays or repeat visits to civil surgeons. But in its latest notification, USCIS said this approach was 'overly broad' and could 'potentially threaten public health.' 'By limiting the validity period to only the current immigration benefit application or request, we ensure that aliens get timely and proper medical examinations and treatment, which safeguards public health,' the agency added. Other green card changes under Trump USCIS has made several other changes to green card processing over the last year: 1. Social media disclosure proposal • Announced in March 2025 • Would require green card, asylum, refugee and naturalisation applicants to list social media handles • Open for public comment until May 5, 2025 2. Hold on asylum and refugee green cards • Started in late March 2025 • Processing paused for extra fraud and security reviews 3. Covid??'19 vaccine no longer required • USCIS stopped issuing RFEs or NOIDs related to Covid-19 vaccination from January 20, 2025 • The CDC removed COVID-19 from the required vaccine list on March 11, 2025 4. Extended green card validity for renewals • Since September 10, 2024, green cards are automatically extended for 36 months while Form I??'90 renewal is pending
Mint
18 hours ago
- Mint
Trump wants cheaper drugs like Europe has. How it works.
President Donald Trump doesn't just want to bring down prescription drug prices for Americans. He wants European countries to raise them to make up the revenue that drugmakers would lose from his policy. Trump is proposing a so-called most-favored-nation pricing model, which would set U.S. drug prices at the lowest level in other wealthy countries. But the pharmaceutical industry isn't buying into tying drug prices in the U.S. to prices in Europe—at least not knowing the details of the president's proposal. More details about the government's pricing model could come this week. On May 12, Trump directed government health officials to benchmark drug prices to international standards within 30 days. The lobbying group PhRMA, with members including U.S. pharma giants Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, and AbbVie, has argued there are two reasons why U.S. drug prices are high: foreign countries not paying 'their fair share" for medicines, and middlemen such as pharmacy-benefit managers. Today, U.S. drug pricing is largely market driven. It involves negotiations between drug manufacturers, pharmacy-benefit managers, healthcare insurers and providers. European countries do it much differently. Each has its own way of determining drug prices, but most follow one of two broad approaches. The first approach, which Germany and France use, considers the overall clinical effectiveness of a new medicine. How does the new treatment compare to existing ones? Does it have added therapeutic benefits? If the new drug is substantially better, its price would reflect that. A second approach, used by the U.K., the Netherlands, and Sweden, analyzes cost effectiveness. This model not only compares the new drug to existing ones but also assesses the incremental value that the medicine brings to the health system. After the assessments, negotiations between drugmakers and the countries begin. Because many European countries have national health systems, they are in a strong negotiation position. If government negotiators think a medicine is too expensive for its effectiveness, they won't recommend its use. How Trump's MFN policy would work in practice isn't clear. Drug prices would probably be based on list prices in Europe since the prices paid by national health systems, or net prices, are confidential. The president's open-ended directive, laid out in an executive order, has many wondering how the U.S. could raise prices in Europe. Trump has made clear he wants to close the gap between U.S. and international prices, and has suggested he would use tariffs and export controls to achieve his goal. In theory, drugmakers could set list prices higher in Europe as long as it doesn't affect net prices, health policy expert Dr. Huseyin Naci told Barron's. In the U.K., for example, a higher list price could still lower the prices in other European countries. 'So that would still not be an acceptable approach to many other European countries," said Naci, who is associate professor of health policy at the London School of Economics. Overhauling Europe's decades-old pricing approaches would require fundamental changes to their pricing regulations—and there will be 'little appetite or ability" to alter them, Naci added. Cost is another complicating factor. 'Pharmaceutical spending is already one of the top categories of spending in many countries in terms of healthcare expenditure, so there's little room to accommodate higher prices and spending for pharmaceuticals in Europe," according to Naci. How Trump is planning to make Europeans pay more for drugs is the big question. He could use tariffs and trade negotiations as leverage. In early April, the president said a 'major" tax on pharmaceutical imports is coming 'very shortly," however nothing has been announced yet. In a trade agreement with the U.K. a month later, there is a provision on pharmaceuticals that states the U.K. will 'endeavor to improve the overall environment for pharmaceutical companies." What that means in practice still isn't clear. Write to Elsa Ohlen at
