logo
Inside Iran's secret nuclear bunker that's 260ft deep underground

Inside Iran's secret nuclear bunker that's 260ft deep underground

Daily Mirror6 hours ago

The heavily guarded mysterious Fordow bunker is built into the side of a mountain near the city of Qom, around 60 miles of Tehran. It was first made public in 2009, according to officials
The world is nervously awaiting Donald Trump's decision whether to strike Iran's secretive nuclear bunker hidden in the mountains. The heavily guarded mysterious Fordow bunker is built into the side of a mountain near the city of Qom, around 60 miles of Tehran. It is believed to have started around 2006, but was first made public in 2009, according to officials.
It is a staggering 260ft under rock and soil, with the site said to be protected by Iranian and Russian surface-to-air missile systems. However, those air defences have likely already been struck by Israel during the conflict.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the goal of attacking Iran was to eliminate its missile and nuclear program, which he described as an existential threat to Israel, and officials have said Fordow was part of that plan.

'This entire operation ... really has to be completed with the elimination of Fordo,' Yechiel Leiter, Israel's ambassador to the US, said last Friday.
Why is the Fordow nuclear bunker being targeted?
Fordow is Iran's second nuclear enrichment facility after Natanz, its main facility, which has already been targeted by Israeli airstrikes. The International Atomic Energy Agency believes the strikes have had 'direct impacts' on the facility's underground centrifuge halls.
Fordo is smaller than Natanz, and is built into the side of a mountain near the city of Qom. Construction is believed to have started around 2006 and it became first operational in 2009 — the same year Tehran publicly acknowledged its existence.
In addition to being an estimated 260 feet under rock and soil, the site is reportedly protected by Iranian and Russian surface-to-air missile systems. Those air defences, however, likely have already been struck in the Israeli campaign.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the goal of attacking Iran was to eliminate its missile and nuclear program, which he described as an existential threat to Israel, and officials have said Fordo was part of that plan.
Why is Donald Trump waiting?
Reports claim Donald Trump has approved plans for a US attack on nuclear sites in Iran.
However, the president is holding off on plans for now in case Iran agrees to give up its nuclear programme, which it claims it is maintained for peaceful purposes.

Despite this, Iran also enriches uranium up to 60%, a short step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%. Iran is the only non-nuclear-weapon state to enrich at that level.
Israel is the only nuclear-armed state in the Middle East but does not acknowledge having such weapons.

US officials said this week that President Donald Trump had rejected an Israeli plan to kill Khamenei. Trump later said there were no plans to kill him 'at least not for now.'
The strikes came a day after Iran's supreme leader rejected US calls for surrender and warned that any military involvement by the Americans would cause 'irreparable damage to them.'
Does the US need to be involved?
At the moment, only the US has configured and programmed its B-2 Spirit stealth bomber to deliver the bomb, according to the Air Force. The B-2 is only flown by the Air Force, and is produced by Northrop Grumman.
According to the manufacturer, the B-2 can carry a payload of 40,000 pounds but the US Air Force has said it has successfully tested the B-2 loaded with two GBU-57 A/B bunker busters — a total weight of some 60,000 pounds.
The strategic long-range heavy bomber has a range of about 7,000 miles without refueling and 11,500 miles with one refueling, and can reach any point in the world within hours, according to Northrop Grumman.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thawing of relations between Pakistan and US raises eyebrows in India
Thawing of relations between Pakistan and US raises eyebrows in India

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Thawing of relations between Pakistan and US raises eyebrows in India

After years in the diplomatic deep freeze, US-Pakistan ties appear to be quickly thawing, with Donald Trump's effusive welcome for Pakistan's army chief, Gen Asim Munir, signalling a possible major reset. Once snubbed so badly that Imran Khan, a former prime minister, rode the New York subway to the UN general assembly in 2019 unescorted, Pakistan is now enjoying top-level access in Washington, including a White House lunch for Munir on Wednesday and meetings with top national security officials. Trump's perceived friendliness with Munir, coupled with what India considers to be a glossing over of Pakistan's record on terrorism, has raised Indian eyebrows, especially amid sensitive trade negotiations with the US. In a phone call with Trump on Tuesday, the Indian prime minister, Narendra Modi, strongly rejected the US president's repeated claims that he personally brokered peace in the four-day conflict between India and Pakistan in May. The next day, while calling Modi a 'fantastic man', Trump described Munir as 'extremely influential' in halting the brief but intense war. 'I love Pakistan,' Trump said, before repeating: 'I stopped the war between Pakistan and India.' In the phone call, Modi made it 'absolutely clear', India's foreign secretary, Vikram Misri, said, that hostilities ceased only after Pakistan requested a ceasefire, and that no third-party mediation had taken place. 'India has not accepted mediation in the past and never will,' Misri added. Adding to the confusion, a White House press officer said Munir had been invited after suggesting Trump be nominated for the Nobel peace prize for ending the conflict, which followed a terror attack that killed 26 mainly Hindu holidaymakers in Indian-administered Kashmir. Munir's red-carpet treatment in Washington and high praise from US Central Command hint at a strategic recalibration. Gen Michael E Kurilla, the head of Central Command, recently called Pakistan a 'phenomenal' counter-terrorism partner, citing Islamabad's role in helping capture the alleged ISKP planner behind the 2021 Abbey Gate bombing at Kabul airport, an attack that killed 13 US troops and more than 170 Afghan civilians. Munir's five-day US tour includes meetings at the Pentagon, State Department, and Central Command headquarters in Florida. Such access is extraordinary for a Pakistani general. 'Senior US officials often meet with Pakistani generals,' Michael Kugelman, a Washington-based South Asia analyst, noted. 'But they don't get entertained at the White House. Ayub Khan and Zia ul-Haq were exceptions but they came as heads of state.' The shift in tone is stark. India has long positioned itself as the more reliable partner for the US as the world's largest democracy, a bulwark against China, and a hub for expanding trade and intelligence-sharing. Pakistan, by contrast, has been dogged by accusations of sheltering terrorists and undermining civilian rule. Just a few years ago, Trump himself accused Pakistan of offering 'nothing but lies and deceit'. Joe Biden later called it 'one of the most dangerous nations in the world'. Indian officials continue to point to Pakistan's links to major terror attacks, including on its parliament in 2001 and in Mumbai in 2008 . Against that backdrop, Washington's embrace of Munir strikes a jarring note in Delhi, where critics say the US is engaging with the same military establishment long accused of enabling cross-border militancy. Analysts say the pivot may be driven by more than just strategic cooperation. For Trump, it could be personal. 'He has a thing for strongmen,' said one US analyst. 'He sees something in Munir – the mystique, the military credentials, the aura of control. Trump responds to dominance, and Munir projects it.' That may help to explain why Munir was granted access usually reserved for heads of state. 'He probably relished the opportunity to size Munir up,' said Kugelman. 'Trump knows that in Pakistan, it's the army chief who really runs the show.' But Munir's visit is taking place as the Middle East is in turmoil, with Israel striking Iranian targets and Iran firing missiles in retaliation. The US may be hoping that Pakistan, one of the few countries with diplomatic ties to Tehran, could play a role in de-escalation. There's also a more delicate calculation, with Israel pushing the US to join its military campaign against Iran, which shares a 900-km border with Pakistan. That geography puts Islamabad in a pivotal position. Some analysts believe the US may be probing whether Munir would allow surveillance flights or logistical cooperation. But Pakistan's room for manoeuvre is limited, with public opinion strongly pro-Iran. 'Even privately, Pakistan's military would likely balk at the risks,' said Kugelman. 'They can't afford to be dragged into this. The backlash would be enormous.' For Indian officials, Munir's reception has revived old memories of the U.S. tendency to tilt toward Pakistan at critical junctures, such as in the cold war moments or post-9/11. But this time, analysts also say, the reset may also involve commercial opportunity. Pakistan is actively courting US investment in two of the most volatile and potentially lucrative global commerce sectors: cryptocurrency and critical minerals. 'The Trump-Munir meeting shouldn't be seen only through the lens of the Israel-Iran war,' Kugelman said. 'There's been US-Pakistan engagement on crypto, minerals, and counter-terrorism, and Trump takes a deep personal interest in all of these.' He added: 'This is classic Trump: 'What can you do for me? What can I get out of this?''

Trump to decide on US action in Israel-Iran conflict within two weeks, White House says
Trump to decide on US action in Israel-Iran conflict within two weeks, White House says

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Trump to decide on US action in Israel-Iran conflict within two weeks, White House says

WASHINGTON, June 19 (Reuters) - The White House said on Thursday that President Donald Trump will make a decision on whether the U.S. will get involved in the Israel-Iran conflict in the next two weeks. Citing a message from Trump, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters: "Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store