logo
Odd Lots: A US Clothing Brand On the Existential Threat From the Tariffs

Odd Lots: A US Clothing Brand On the Existential Threat From the Tariffs

Bloomberg09-05-2025

America's textile industry has famously declined over the years, with a bunch of production moving to lower-cost places like China, Vietnam, and Bangladesh. Now, with the Trump administration imposing heavy tariffs on exports from these countries, the US clothing industry is facing another big shock. In this episode we speak with Sarah LaFleur, founder and CEO of M.M.LaFleur, which makes high-quality work clothing for women (Tracy is a big fan). She walks us through what the past month has actually been like for a smaller clothing business trying to understand and deal with the tariffs. We talk about the conversations she's been having with mills and factories in China, how the tariffs are already impacting future seasons of clothing, the scramble to secure space on ships before the tariffs hit, and how businesses actually pay the new taxes.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New reconciliation text spares forest program from cuts
New reconciliation text spares forest program from cuts

E&E News

time24 minutes ago

  • E&E News

New reconciliation text spares forest program from cuts

A program that protects privately owned forests for timber and other uses has survived in a megabill being put together in the Senate, after falling victim to House budget cutters in May. The Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee saved the Forest Legacy Program in its piece of the big tax-cut and spending bill, refusing to cut off $100 million in Inflation Reduction Act funding. 'This is a victory not only for forests, but for the families, economies, and ecosystems that depend on them,' said Lesley Kane Szynal, chair of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Coalition, an advocacy group, in a news release Thursday. Advertisement The Forest Legacy Program pays for conservation easements and land purchases that prevent privately owned forests from being converted to other uses. In many cases, they've been used to keep timber operations in business while protecting forest watersheds and allowing for recreational access.

Washington state pollution prices rise amid struggle to cut emissions
Washington state pollution prices rise amid struggle to cut emissions

E&E News

time25 minutes ago

  • E&E News

Washington state pollution prices rise amid struggle to cut emissions

The price of pollution allowances in Washington state's carbon market hit its highest level in more than two years, signaling that polluters are increasingly paying for the excess emissions instead of reducing them. Regulated polluters paid $58.51 for each pollution allowance at a Washington auction in June, according to data released Wednesday. The price was $50 at the previous auction, in March. Washington, through its carbon market, sets yearly limits on total greenhouse gas emissions in the state and gives regulated polluters a choice between cutting their emissions under a certain level or purchasing pollution allowances for each ton of excessive emissions. Washington spends the revenue from pollution allowances on climate-focused projects, such as infrastructure for electric vehicles. Advertisement The program requires deep cuts in greenhouse emissions, and most regulated entities haven't been able to reduce their pollution that rapidly, said Mitul Kaushal, associate at cKinetics, a Delhi, India-based financial advisory firm.

House Republicans try again on water permitting bills
House Republicans try again on water permitting bills

E&E News

time25 minutes ago

  • E&E News

House Republicans try again on water permitting bills

Republicans on the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee introduced 15 water-related bills Thursday, targeting everything from the length of federal permitting to the types of water resources protected by the Clean Water Act. The bills would benefit oil and gas companies, farming interests, homebuilders, water utilities and others who say that environmental reviews and long permitting timelines are stifling development. They were introduced by Water Resources and Environment Subcommittee Chair Mike Collins (R-Ga.) and Reps. Rick Crawford (R-Ark.), David Rouzer (R-N.C.), Doug LaMalfa (R-Calif.), Pete Stauber (R-Minn.), Burgess Owens (R-Utah), Eric Burlison (R-Mo.), Jeff Hurd (R-Colo.), Jefferson Shreve (R-Ind.), Dave Taylor (R-Ohio) and Jimmy Patronis (R-Fla.). Advertisement 'The Clean Water Act was intended to protect water quality, support healthy communities, and balance the demands of economic growth across the United States,' Graves said in a statement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store